Another way to write equation of the line passing through two points?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am trying to write equation of the line passing through two points pA={1, -3} and pB={-33, -1} in the form x+17 y+50=0. I tried



{pA, pB} = {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}};
u = pB - pA;
m = {x, y};
v = m - pA;
d = Det[{u, v}];
w = {Coefficient[d, x], Coefficient[d, y]};
k = GCD[Coefficient[d, x], Coefficient[d, y]];
If[w[[1]] != 0, n = Sign[w[[1]]] w/k,
If[w[[2]] != 0, n = Sign[w[[2]]] w/k]];
TraditionalForm[Expand[n.v]] == 0


I got




x+17 y+50==0




Is there another way to write it?










share|improve this question
























  • Write or solve?
    – Kuba
    yesterday










  • @Kuba Write the equation of the line passing through two points.
    – minhthien_2016
    yesterday






  • 1




    Isn't 17 x-y-20==0 already in that form?
    – Kuba
    yesterday










  • Yes. My question is "is there another way to write the equation in that form?"
    – minhthien_2016
    yesterday






  • 1




    You can multiply sides by a constant but I fail to see how it is a Mathematica question.
    – Kuba
    yesterday















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am trying to write equation of the line passing through two points pA={1, -3} and pB={-33, -1} in the form x+17 y+50=0. I tried



{pA, pB} = {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}};
u = pB - pA;
m = {x, y};
v = m - pA;
d = Det[{u, v}];
w = {Coefficient[d, x], Coefficient[d, y]};
k = GCD[Coefficient[d, x], Coefficient[d, y]];
If[w[[1]] != 0, n = Sign[w[[1]]] w/k,
If[w[[2]] != 0, n = Sign[w[[2]]] w/k]];
TraditionalForm[Expand[n.v]] == 0


I got




x+17 y+50==0




Is there another way to write it?










share|improve this question
























  • Write or solve?
    – Kuba
    yesterday










  • @Kuba Write the equation of the line passing through two points.
    – minhthien_2016
    yesterday






  • 1




    Isn't 17 x-y-20==0 already in that form?
    – Kuba
    yesterday










  • Yes. My question is "is there another way to write the equation in that form?"
    – minhthien_2016
    yesterday






  • 1




    You can multiply sides by a constant but I fail to see how it is a Mathematica question.
    – Kuba
    yesterday













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I am trying to write equation of the line passing through two points pA={1, -3} and pB={-33, -1} in the form x+17 y+50=0. I tried



{pA, pB} = {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}};
u = pB - pA;
m = {x, y};
v = m - pA;
d = Det[{u, v}];
w = {Coefficient[d, x], Coefficient[d, y]};
k = GCD[Coefficient[d, x], Coefficient[d, y]];
If[w[[1]] != 0, n = Sign[w[[1]]] w/k,
If[w[[2]] != 0, n = Sign[w[[2]]] w/k]];
TraditionalForm[Expand[n.v]] == 0


I got




x+17 y+50==0




Is there another way to write it?










share|improve this question















I am trying to write equation of the line passing through two points pA={1, -3} and pB={-33, -1} in the form x+17 y+50=0. I tried



{pA, pB} = {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}};
u = pB - pA;
m = {x, y};
v = m - pA;
d = Det[{u, v}];
w = {Coefficient[d, x], Coefficient[d, y]};
k = GCD[Coefficient[d, x], Coefficient[d, y]];
If[w[[1]] != 0, n = Sign[w[[1]]] w/k,
If[w[[2]] != 0, n = Sign[w[[2]]] w/k]];
TraditionalForm[Expand[n.v]] == 0


I got




x+17 y+50==0




Is there another way to write it?







output-formatting geometry






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday

























asked yesterday









minhthien_2016

544310




544310












  • Write or solve?
    – Kuba
    yesterday










  • @Kuba Write the equation of the line passing through two points.
    – minhthien_2016
    yesterday






  • 1




    Isn't 17 x-y-20==0 already in that form?
    – Kuba
    yesterday










  • Yes. My question is "is there another way to write the equation in that form?"
    – minhthien_2016
    yesterday






  • 1




    You can multiply sides by a constant but I fail to see how it is a Mathematica question.
    – Kuba
    yesterday


















  • Write or solve?
    – Kuba
    yesterday










  • @Kuba Write the equation of the line passing through two points.
    – minhthien_2016
    yesterday






  • 1




    Isn't 17 x-y-20==0 already in that form?
    – Kuba
    yesterday










  • Yes. My question is "is there another way to write the equation in that form?"
    – minhthien_2016
    yesterday






  • 1




    You can multiply sides by a constant but I fail to see how it is a Mathematica question.
    – Kuba
    yesterday
















Write or solve?
– Kuba
yesterday




Write or solve?
– Kuba
yesterday












@Kuba Write the equation of the line passing through two points.
– minhthien_2016
yesterday




@Kuba Write the equation of the line passing through two points.
– minhthien_2016
yesterday




1




1




Isn't 17 x-y-20==0 already in that form?
– Kuba
yesterday




Isn't 17 x-y-20==0 already in that form?
– Kuba
yesterday












Yes. My question is "is there another way to write the equation in that form?"
– minhthien_2016
yesterday




Yes. My question is "is there another way to write the equation in that form?"
– minhthien_2016
yesterday




1




1




You can multiply sides by a constant but I fail to see how it is a Mathematica question.
– Kuba
yesterday




You can multiply sides by a constant but I fail to see how it is a Mathematica question.
– Kuba
yesterday










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote



accepted










Simplify[y - InterpolatingPolynomial[{pA, pB}, x] == 0]



50 + x + 17 y == 0




Also



Simplify[y - a x - b == 0 /. First@Solve[a # + b == #2 & @@@ {pA, pB}, {a, b}]]



50 + x + 17 y == 0




And



Simplify @ Rationalize[y - Fit[{pA, pB}, {x, 1}, x] == 0]



50 + x + 17 y == 0







share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    You may do as follows. Let us look for the equation in the form ax+by==1, where the parameters a and b are to be found.This will substitute the coordinates of the points pA and pB into this equations, thus, forming two equations with respect to a and b and solves the system:



    eq = a*#[[1]] + b*#[[2]] == 1 &;
    eq1=eq /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}

    (* {a - 3 b == 1, -33 a - b == 1} *)


    This will substitute the solution into the linear equation already in coordinates x and y:



    eq[{x, y}] /. sol

    (* -(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1 *)


    This will plot the solution:



    Show[{
    ContourPlot[-(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1, {x, -34, 2}, {y, -4, 0}],
    Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.015], Point[#] & /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}}]
    }]


    yielding the following plot:



    enter image description here



    The original points are shown in red.



    This is one of several possible ways.



    Have fun!






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      The equation of a planar line going through two points $ P_1(x_1,y_1) $ and $ P_2(x_2,y_2) $ (e.g. cf this for reference) is



      $$
      begin{vmatrix}
      x & y\
      x_2-x_1 & y_2-y_1
      end{vmatrix}
      =
      begin{vmatrix}
      x_1 & y_1\
      x_2 & y_2
      end{vmatrix}.
      $$



      So there is the piece of codes below:



      Clear[eq, pts]
      eq = Simplify[Det[{{x, y}, -Subtract @@ #}] == Det[#]] &;
      pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}};
      eq[pts]



      50 + x + 17 y == 0





      Or



      eq2 = Simplify[Det[{-1, 1} Differences[Prepend[#, {x, y}]]] == 0] &;





      share|improve this answer























      • If pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, 150}} How can I get the form 9 x+2 y-3=0 . Your code ouput 9 x+2 y==3 Allways in the form a x + b y + c==0, a>0, if a=0, then b >0`.
        – minhthien_2016
        yesterday












      • @minhthien_2016 Sort of eq[pts] /. a_ == b_ :> a - b == 0, though I think it just a minor issue.
        – Αλέξανδρος Ζεγγ
        yesterday










      • Thank you very much.
        – minhthien_2016
        yesterday










      • Another way : Det[{{x - #1[[1]], y - #1[[2]]}, {x - #2[[1]], y - #2[[2]]}}] == 0 & @@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}} // Simplify
        – Sigis K
        1 hour ago




















      up vote
      4
      down vote













      With RegionMember:



      Simplify[RegionMember[InfiniteLine[{{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}], {x, y}], 
      Element[x | y, Reals]]



      50 + x + 17 y == 0







      share|improve this answer




























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        Knowing that the coefficients are components of a vector perpendicular to the difference of the two points, I think the most convenient command to obtain the equation is



        perp = Cross[pB - pA];
        perp.{x, y} == perp.pA // Simplify



        50 + x + 17 y == 0




        The last step before Simplify is



        -2 x - 34 y == 100


        so you can see that the simplification brought all terms to one side, factored out the greatest common divisor and fixed the signs.



        To Mathematica the sums "50 + x + 17y" and "x + 17y + 50" are exactly the same expression, but if you want to order linear terms before constants in the displayed form, you may consider using TraditionalForm (with the added benefit of using a "normal" equality sign while remaining copy-and-pastable):



        % // TraditionalForm



        $x+17 y+50=0$







        share|improve this answer





















        • Ad sign of the x coefficient: I don't know of any trick simpler than multiply the result by –1 if you don't like it.
          – The Vee
          yesterday


















        up vote
        0
        down vote













        Although this might be more a math question, the ingenious answers have taught me a lot about MMA. Thanks to all contributors. I can add an answer based on my high school Analytical Geometry classes. The mnemonic two-point form of the equation of a straight line through A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2) is



        enter image description here



        Using the coordinates for pA and pB given in the question:



        Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
        y2 - y1) == (x - x1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


        gives



        enter image description here



        However the more 'symmetrical form' of the equation leads to an answer that is mathematically identical, but is not in the required form. Does anybody know how to force MMA to yield the required form?



        Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
        x - x1) == (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


        gives



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer





















          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "387"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186285%2fanother-way-to-write-equation-of-the-line-passing-through-two-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          Simplify[y - InterpolatingPolynomial[{pA, pB}, x] == 0]



          50 + x + 17 y == 0




          Also



          Simplify[y - a x - b == 0 /. First@Solve[a # + b == #2 & @@@ {pA, pB}, {a, b}]]



          50 + x + 17 y == 0




          And



          Simplify @ Rationalize[y - Fit[{pA, pB}, {x, 1}, x] == 0]



          50 + x + 17 y == 0







          share|improve this answer



























            up vote
            6
            down vote



            accepted










            Simplify[y - InterpolatingPolynomial[{pA, pB}, x] == 0]



            50 + x + 17 y == 0




            Also



            Simplify[y - a x - b == 0 /. First@Solve[a # + b == #2 & @@@ {pA, pB}, {a, b}]]



            50 + x + 17 y == 0




            And



            Simplify @ Rationalize[y - Fit[{pA, pB}, {x, 1}, x] == 0]



            50 + x + 17 y == 0







            share|improve this answer

























              up vote
              6
              down vote



              accepted







              up vote
              6
              down vote



              accepted






              Simplify[y - InterpolatingPolynomial[{pA, pB}, x] == 0]



              50 + x + 17 y == 0




              Also



              Simplify[y - a x - b == 0 /. First@Solve[a # + b == #2 & @@@ {pA, pB}, {a, b}]]



              50 + x + 17 y == 0




              And



              Simplify @ Rationalize[y - Fit[{pA, pB}, {x, 1}, x] == 0]



              50 + x + 17 y == 0







              share|improve this answer














              Simplify[y - InterpolatingPolynomial[{pA, pB}, x] == 0]



              50 + x + 17 y == 0




              Also



              Simplify[y - a x - b == 0 /. First@Solve[a # + b == #2 & @@@ {pA, pB}, {a, b}]]



              50 + x + 17 y == 0




              And



              Simplify @ Rationalize[y - Fit[{pA, pB}, {x, 1}, x] == 0]



              50 + x + 17 y == 0








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited yesterday

























              answered yesterday









              kglr

              171k8194399




              171k8194399






















                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote













                  You may do as follows. Let us look for the equation in the form ax+by==1, where the parameters a and b are to be found.This will substitute the coordinates of the points pA and pB into this equations, thus, forming two equations with respect to a and b and solves the system:



                  eq = a*#[[1]] + b*#[[2]] == 1 &;
                  eq1=eq /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}

                  (* {a - 3 b == 1, -33 a - b == 1} *)


                  This will substitute the solution into the linear equation already in coordinates x and y:



                  eq[{x, y}] /. sol

                  (* -(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1 *)


                  This will plot the solution:



                  Show[{
                  ContourPlot[-(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1, {x, -34, 2}, {y, -4, 0}],
                  Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.015], Point[#] & /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}}]
                  }]


                  yielding the following plot:



                  enter image description here



                  The original points are shown in red.



                  This is one of several possible ways.



                  Have fun!






                  share|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote













                    You may do as follows. Let us look for the equation in the form ax+by==1, where the parameters a and b are to be found.This will substitute the coordinates of the points pA and pB into this equations, thus, forming two equations with respect to a and b and solves the system:



                    eq = a*#[[1]] + b*#[[2]] == 1 &;
                    eq1=eq /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}

                    (* {a - 3 b == 1, -33 a - b == 1} *)


                    This will substitute the solution into the linear equation already in coordinates x and y:



                    eq[{x, y}] /. sol

                    (* -(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1 *)


                    This will plot the solution:



                    Show[{
                    ContourPlot[-(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1, {x, -34, 2}, {y, -4, 0}],
                    Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.015], Point[#] & /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}}]
                    }]


                    yielding the following plot:



                    enter image description here



                    The original points are shown in red.



                    This is one of several possible ways.



                    Have fun!






                    share|improve this answer























                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote









                      You may do as follows. Let us look for the equation in the form ax+by==1, where the parameters a and b are to be found.This will substitute the coordinates of the points pA and pB into this equations, thus, forming two equations with respect to a and b and solves the system:



                      eq = a*#[[1]] + b*#[[2]] == 1 &;
                      eq1=eq /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}

                      (* {a - 3 b == 1, -33 a - b == 1} *)


                      This will substitute the solution into the linear equation already in coordinates x and y:



                      eq[{x, y}] /. sol

                      (* -(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1 *)


                      This will plot the solution:



                      Show[{
                      ContourPlot[-(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1, {x, -34, 2}, {y, -4, 0}],
                      Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.015], Point[#] & /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}}]
                      }]


                      yielding the following plot:



                      enter image description here



                      The original points are shown in red.



                      This is one of several possible ways.



                      Have fun!






                      share|improve this answer












                      You may do as follows. Let us look for the equation in the form ax+by==1, where the parameters a and b are to be found.This will substitute the coordinates of the points pA and pB into this equations, thus, forming two equations with respect to a and b and solves the system:



                      eq = a*#[[1]] + b*#[[2]] == 1 &;
                      eq1=eq /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}

                      (* {a - 3 b == 1, -33 a - b == 1} *)


                      This will substitute the solution into the linear equation already in coordinates x and y:



                      eq[{x, y}] /. sol

                      (* -(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1 *)


                      This will plot the solution:



                      Show[{
                      ContourPlot[-(x/50) - (17 y)/50 == 1, {x, -34, 2}, {y, -4, 0}],
                      Graphics[{Red, PointSize[0.015], Point[#] & /@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}}]
                      }]


                      yielding the following plot:



                      enter image description here



                      The original points are shown in red.



                      This is one of several possible ways.



                      Have fun!







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered yesterday









                      Alexei Boulbitch

                      21.1k2369




                      21.1k2369






















                          up vote
                          4
                          down vote













                          The equation of a planar line going through two points $ P_1(x_1,y_1) $ and $ P_2(x_2,y_2) $ (e.g. cf this for reference) is



                          $$
                          begin{vmatrix}
                          x & y\
                          x_2-x_1 & y_2-y_1
                          end{vmatrix}
                          =
                          begin{vmatrix}
                          x_1 & y_1\
                          x_2 & y_2
                          end{vmatrix}.
                          $$



                          So there is the piece of codes below:



                          Clear[eq, pts]
                          eq = Simplify[Det[{{x, y}, -Subtract @@ #}] == Det[#]] &;
                          pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}};
                          eq[pts]



                          50 + x + 17 y == 0





                          Or



                          eq2 = Simplify[Det[{-1, 1} Differences[Prepend[#, {x, y}]]] == 0] &;





                          share|improve this answer























                          • If pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, 150}} How can I get the form 9 x+2 y-3=0 . Your code ouput 9 x+2 y==3 Allways in the form a x + b y + c==0, a>0, if a=0, then b >0`.
                            – minhthien_2016
                            yesterday












                          • @minhthien_2016 Sort of eq[pts] /. a_ == b_ :> a - b == 0, though I think it just a minor issue.
                            – Αλέξανδρος Ζεγγ
                            yesterday










                          • Thank you very much.
                            – minhthien_2016
                            yesterday










                          • Another way : Det[{{x - #1[[1]], y - #1[[2]]}, {x - #2[[1]], y - #2[[2]]}}] == 0 & @@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}} // Simplify
                            – Sigis K
                            1 hour ago

















                          up vote
                          4
                          down vote













                          The equation of a planar line going through two points $ P_1(x_1,y_1) $ and $ P_2(x_2,y_2) $ (e.g. cf this for reference) is



                          $$
                          begin{vmatrix}
                          x & y\
                          x_2-x_1 & y_2-y_1
                          end{vmatrix}
                          =
                          begin{vmatrix}
                          x_1 & y_1\
                          x_2 & y_2
                          end{vmatrix}.
                          $$



                          So there is the piece of codes below:



                          Clear[eq, pts]
                          eq = Simplify[Det[{{x, y}, -Subtract @@ #}] == Det[#]] &;
                          pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}};
                          eq[pts]



                          50 + x + 17 y == 0





                          Or



                          eq2 = Simplify[Det[{-1, 1} Differences[Prepend[#, {x, y}]]] == 0] &;





                          share|improve this answer























                          • If pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, 150}} How can I get the form 9 x+2 y-3=0 . Your code ouput 9 x+2 y==3 Allways in the form a x + b y + c==0, a>0, if a=0, then b >0`.
                            – minhthien_2016
                            yesterday












                          • @minhthien_2016 Sort of eq[pts] /. a_ == b_ :> a - b == 0, though I think it just a minor issue.
                            – Αλέξανδρος Ζεγγ
                            yesterday










                          • Thank you very much.
                            – minhthien_2016
                            yesterday










                          • Another way : Det[{{x - #1[[1]], y - #1[[2]]}, {x - #2[[1]], y - #2[[2]]}}] == 0 & @@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}} // Simplify
                            – Sigis K
                            1 hour ago















                          up vote
                          4
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          4
                          down vote









                          The equation of a planar line going through two points $ P_1(x_1,y_1) $ and $ P_2(x_2,y_2) $ (e.g. cf this for reference) is



                          $$
                          begin{vmatrix}
                          x & y\
                          x_2-x_1 & y_2-y_1
                          end{vmatrix}
                          =
                          begin{vmatrix}
                          x_1 & y_1\
                          x_2 & y_2
                          end{vmatrix}.
                          $$



                          So there is the piece of codes below:



                          Clear[eq, pts]
                          eq = Simplify[Det[{{x, y}, -Subtract @@ #}] == Det[#]] &;
                          pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}};
                          eq[pts]



                          50 + x + 17 y == 0





                          Or



                          eq2 = Simplify[Det[{-1, 1} Differences[Prepend[#, {x, y}]]] == 0] &;





                          share|improve this answer














                          The equation of a planar line going through two points $ P_1(x_1,y_1) $ and $ P_2(x_2,y_2) $ (e.g. cf this for reference) is



                          $$
                          begin{vmatrix}
                          x & y\
                          x_2-x_1 & y_2-y_1
                          end{vmatrix}
                          =
                          begin{vmatrix}
                          x_1 & y_1\
                          x_2 & y_2
                          end{vmatrix}.
                          $$



                          So there is the piece of codes below:



                          Clear[eq, pts]
                          eq = Simplify[Det[{{x, y}, -Subtract @@ #}] == Det[#]] &;
                          pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}};
                          eq[pts]



                          50 + x + 17 y == 0





                          Or



                          eq2 = Simplify[Det[{-1, 1} Differences[Prepend[#, {x, y}]]] == 0] &;






                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited yesterday

























                          answered yesterday









                          Αλέξανδρος Ζεγγ

                          3,4631927




                          3,4631927












                          • If pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, 150}} How can I get the form 9 x+2 y-3=0 . Your code ouput 9 x+2 y==3 Allways in the form a x + b y + c==0, a>0, if a=0, then b >0`.
                            – minhthien_2016
                            yesterday












                          • @minhthien_2016 Sort of eq[pts] /. a_ == b_ :> a - b == 0, though I think it just a minor issue.
                            – Αλέξανδρος Ζεγγ
                            yesterday










                          • Thank you very much.
                            – minhthien_2016
                            yesterday










                          • Another way : Det[{{x - #1[[1]], y - #1[[2]]}, {x - #2[[1]], y - #2[[2]]}}] == 0 & @@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}} // Simplify
                            – Sigis K
                            1 hour ago




















                          • If pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, 150}} How can I get the form 9 x+2 y-3=0 . Your code ouput 9 x+2 y==3 Allways in the form a x + b y + c==0, a>0, if a=0, then b >0`.
                            – minhthien_2016
                            yesterday












                          • @minhthien_2016 Sort of eq[pts] /. a_ == b_ :> a - b == 0, though I think it just a minor issue.
                            – Αλέξανδρος Ζεγγ
                            yesterday










                          • Thank you very much.
                            – minhthien_2016
                            yesterday










                          • Another way : Det[{{x - #1[[1]], y - #1[[2]]}, {x - #2[[1]], y - #2[[2]]}}] == 0 & @@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}} // Simplify
                            – Sigis K
                            1 hour ago


















                          If pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, 150}} How can I get the form 9 x+2 y-3=0 . Your code ouput 9 x+2 y==3 Allways in the form a x + b y + c==0, a>0, if a=0, then b >0`.
                          – minhthien_2016
                          yesterday






                          If pts = {{1, -3}, {-33, 150}} How can I get the form 9 x+2 y-3=0 . Your code ouput 9 x+2 y==3 Allways in the form a x + b y + c==0, a>0, if a=0, then b >0`.
                          – minhthien_2016
                          yesterday














                          @minhthien_2016 Sort of eq[pts] /. a_ == b_ :> a - b == 0, though I think it just a minor issue.
                          – Αλέξανδρος Ζεγγ
                          yesterday




                          @minhthien_2016 Sort of eq[pts] /. a_ == b_ :> a - b == 0, though I think it just a minor issue.
                          – Αλέξανδρος Ζεγγ
                          yesterday












                          Thank you very much.
                          – minhthien_2016
                          yesterday




                          Thank you very much.
                          – minhthien_2016
                          yesterday












                          Another way : Det[{{x - #1[[1]], y - #1[[2]]}, {x - #2[[1]], y - #2[[2]]}}] == 0 & @@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}} // Simplify
                          – Sigis K
                          1 hour ago






                          Another way : Det[{{x - #1[[1]], y - #1[[2]]}, {x - #2[[1]], y - #2[[2]]}}] == 0 & @@ {{1, -3}, {-33, -1}} // Simplify
                          – Sigis K
                          1 hour ago












                          up vote
                          4
                          down vote













                          With RegionMember:



                          Simplify[RegionMember[InfiniteLine[{{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}], {x, y}], 
                          Element[x | y, Reals]]



                          50 + x + 17 y == 0







                          share|improve this answer

























                            up vote
                            4
                            down vote













                            With RegionMember:



                            Simplify[RegionMember[InfiniteLine[{{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}], {x, y}], 
                            Element[x | y, Reals]]



                            50 + x + 17 y == 0







                            share|improve this answer























                              up vote
                              4
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              4
                              down vote









                              With RegionMember:



                              Simplify[RegionMember[InfiniteLine[{{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}], {x, y}], 
                              Element[x | y, Reals]]



                              50 + x + 17 y == 0







                              share|improve this answer












                              With RegionMember:



                              Simplify[RegionMember[InfiniteLine[{{1, -3}, {-33, -1}}], {x, y}], 
                              Element[x | y, Reals]]



                              50 + x + 17 y == 0








                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered yesterday









                              halmir

                              10.1k2443




                              10.1k2443






















                                  up vote
                                  2
                                  down vote













                                  Knowing that the coefficients are components of a vector perpendicular to the difference of the two points, I think the most convenient command to obtain the equation is



                                  perp = Cross[pB - pA];
                                  perp.{x, y} == perp.pA // Simplify



                                  50 + x + 17 y == 0




                                  The last step before Simplify is



                                  -2 x - 34 y == 100


                                  so you can see that the simplification brought all terms to one side, factored out the greatest common divisor and fixed the signs.



                                  To Mathematica the sums "50 + x + 17y" and "x + 17y + 50" are exactly the same expression, but if you want to order linear terms before constants in the displayed form, you may consider using TraditionalForm (with the added benefit of using a "normal" equality sign while remaining copy-and-pastable):



                                  % // TraditionalForm



                                  $x+17 y+50=0$







                                  share|improve this answer





















                                  • Ad sign of the x coefficient: I don't know of any trick simpler than multiply the result by –1 if you don't like it.
                                    – The Vee
                                    yesterday















                                  up vote
                                  2
                                  down vote













                                  Knowing that the coefficients are components of a vector perpendicular to the difference of the two points, I think the most convenient command to obtain the equation is



                                  perp = Cross[pB - pA];
                                  perp.{x, y} == perp.pA // Simplify



                                  50 + x + 17 y == 0




                                  The last step before Simplify is



                                  -2 x - 34 y == 100


                                  so you can see that the simplification brought all terms to one side, factored out the greatest common divisor and fixed the signs.



                                  To Mathematica the sums "50 + x + 17y" and "x + 17y + 50" are exactly the same expression, but if you want to order linear terms before constants in the displayed form, you may consider using TraditionalForm (with the added benefit of using a "normal" equality sign while remaining copy-and-pastable):



                                  % // TraditionalForm



                                  $x+17 y+50=0$







                                  share|improve this answer





















                                  • Ad sign of the x coefficient: I don't know of any trick simpler than multiply the result by –1 if you don't like it.
                                    – The Vee
                                    yesterday













                                  up vote
                                  2
                                  down vote










                                  up vote
                                  2
                                  down vote









                                  Knowing that the coefficients are components of a vector perpendicular to the difference of the two points, I think the most convenient command to obtain the equation is



                                  perp = Cross[pB - pA];
                                  perp.{x, y} == perp.pA // Simplify



                                  50 + x + 17 y == 0




                                  The last step before Simplify is



                                  -2 x - 34 y == 100


                                  so you can see that the simplification brought all terms to one side, factored out the greatest common divisor and fixed the signs.



                                  To Mathematica the sums "50 + x + 17y" and "x + 17y + 50" are exactly the same expression, but if you want to order linear terms before constants in the displayed form, you may consider using TraditionalForm (with the added benefit of using a "normal" equality sign while remaining copy-and-pastable):



                                  % // TraditionalForm



                                  $x+17 y+50=0$







                                  share|improve this answer












                                  Knowing that the coefficients are components of a vector perpendicular to the difference of the two points, I think the most convenient command to obtain the equation is



                                  perp = Cross[pB - pA];
                                  perp.{x, y} == perp.pA // Simplify



                                  50 + x + 17 y == 0




                                  The last step before Simplify is



                                  -2 x - 34 y == 100


                                  so you can see that the simplification brought all terms to one side, factored out the greatest common divisor and fixed the signs.



                                  To Mathematica the sums "50 + x + 17y" and "x + 17y + 50" are exactly the same expression, but if you want to order linear terms before constants in the displayed form, you may consider using TraditionalForm (with the added benefit of using a "normal" equality sign while remaining copy-and-pastable):



                                  % // TraditionalForm



                                  $x+17 y+50=0$








                                  share|improve this answer












                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer










                                  answered yesterday









                                  The Vee

                                  1,393916




                                  1,393916












                                  • Ad sign of the x coefficient: I don't know of any trick simpler than multiply the result by –1 if you don't like it.
                                    – The Vee
                                    yesterday


















                                  • Ad sign of the x coefficient: I don't know of any trick simpler than multiply the result by –1 if you don't like it.
                                    – The Vee
                                    yesterday
















                                  Ad sign of the x coefficient: I don't know of any trick simpler than multiply the result by –1 if you don't like it.
                                  – The Vee
                                  yesterday




                                  Ad sign of the x coefficient: I don't know of any trick simpler than multiply the result by –1 if you don't like it.
                                  – The Vee
                                  yesterday










                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  Although this might be more a math question, the ingenious answers have taught me a lot about MMA. Thanks to all contributors. I can add an answer based on my high school Analytical Geometry classes. The mnemonic two-point form of the equation of a straight line through A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2) is



                                  enter image description here



                                  Using the coordinates for pA and pB given in the question:



                                  Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
                                  y2 - y1) == (x - x1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


                                  gives



                                  enter image description here



                                  However the more 'symmetrical form' of the equation leads to an answer that is mathematically identical, but is not in the required form. Does anybody know how to force MMA to yield the required form?



                                  Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
                                  x - x1) == (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


                                  gives



                                  enter image description here






                                  share|improve this answer

























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    Although this might be more a math question, the ingenious answers have taught me a lot about MMA. Thanks to all contributors. I can add an answer based on my high school Analytical Geometry classes. The mnemonic two-point form of the equation of a straight line through A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2) is



                                    enter image description here



                                    Using the coordinates for pA and pB given in the question:



                                    Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
                                    y2 - y1) == (x - x1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


                                    gives



                                    enter image description here



                                    However the more 'symmetrical form' of the equation leads to an answer that is mathematically identical, but is not in the required form. Does anybody know how to force MMA to yield the required form?



                                    Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
                                    x - x1) == (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


                                    gives



                                    enter image description here






                                    share|improve this answer























                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      Although this might be more a math question, the ingenious answers have taught me a lot about MMA. Thanks to all contributors. I can add an answer based on my high school Analytical Geometry classes. The mnemonic two-point form of the equation of a straight line through A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2) is



                                      enter image description here



                                      Using the coordinates for pA and pB given in the question:



                                      Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
                                      y2 - y1) == (x - x1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


                                      gives



                                      enter image description here



                                      However the more 'symmetrical form' of the equation leads to an answer that is mathematically identical, but is not in the required form. Does anybody know how to force MMA to yield the required form?



                                      Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
                                      x - x1) == (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


                                      gives



                                      enter image description here






                                      share|improve this answer












                                      Although this might be more a math question, the ingenious answers have taught me a lot about MMA. Thanks to all contributors. I can add an answer based on my high school Analytical Geometry classes. The mnemonic two-point form of the equation of a straight line through A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2) is



                                      enter image description here



                                      Using the coordinates for pA and pB given in the question:



                                      Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
                                      y2 - y1) == (x - x1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


                                      gives



                                      enter image description here



                                      However the more 'symmetrical form' of the equation leads to an answer that is mathematically identical, but is not in the required form. Does anybody know how to force MMA to yield the required form?



                                      Simplify@With[{x1 = 1, y1 = -3, x2 = -33, y2 = -1}, (y - y1)/(
                                      x - x1) == (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)] // TraditionalForm


                                      gives



                                      enter image description here







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 12 hours ago









                                      Gommaire

                                      1564




                                      1564






























                                           

                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded



















































                                           


                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186285%2fanother-way-to-write-equation-of-the-line-passing-through-two-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Willebadessen

                                          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                                          Residenzschloss Arolsen