Why would a creature be immune to heavy metals?











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I need a creature that can survive in environments with elements like lead and mercury in many nutrition sources, and in some places making up part of the atmosphere.



I was thinking maybe it could have an organ with other elements that readily bind with the heavy metals, making them not toxic or detrimental. However, I'm not well versed enough in chemistry or biology to know if that makes sense.










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite












    I need a creature that can survive in environments with elements like lead and mercury in many nutrition sources, and in some places making up part of the atmosphere.



    I was thinking maybe it could have an organ with other elements that readily bind with the heavy metals, making them not toxic or detrimental. However, I'm not well versed enough in chemistry or biology to know if that makes sense.










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite











      I need a creature that can survive in environments with elements like lead and mercury in many nutrition sources, and in some places making up part of the atmosphere.



      I was thinking maybe it could have an organ with other elements that readily bind with the heavy metals, making them not toxic or detrimental. However, I'm not well versed enough in chemistry or biology to know if that makes sense.










      share|improve this question















      I need a creature that can survive in environments with elements like lead and mercury in many nutrition sources, and in some places making up part of the atmosphere.



      I was thinking maybe it could have an organ with other elements that readily bind with the heavy metals, making them not toxic or detrimental. However, I'm not well versed enough in chemistry or biology to know if that makes sense.







      reality-check creature-design






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      kingledion

      70.7k24236412




      70.7k24236412










      asked yesterday









      Aethenosity

      14811




      14811






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          8
          down vote













          Creatures that evolved in metal-rich environments would be immune



          Evolution could take care of the toxicity problems. Metal toxicity is a characteristic of many different metals, and the root cause for why a metal is poisonous varies widely between metals. For example with arsenic:




          Arsenic interferes with cellular longevity by allosteric inhibition of
          an essential metabolic enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex,
          which catalyzes the oxidation of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA by NAD+. With
          the enzyme inhibited, the energy system of the cell is disrupted
          resulting in cellular apoptosis. Biochemically, arsenic prevents use
          of thiamine resulting in a clinical picture resembling thiamine
          deficiency.




          Arsenic interacts with specific enzymes in a specific way to disrupt them from doing their biological job. The solution is for organisms to evolve specific methods for resolving whatever biochemical problem the metal causes. For arsenic, an animal which evolved so that that allosteric sites on the PDH complex enzyme are not receptive to arsenic. The biochemical reaction chain is broken, and now arsenic is not any more problematic to us than eating iron (well...there may be other problems arsenic causes, this is just the one that kills you fastest).



          Humans are immune to the metals common in the environment



          In the Earth's biosystems, certain metals are present in certain quantities. These metals are needed for nutrition, iron, magnesium, potassium, etc. The amount of iron or aluminum, two common metals, found in organic matter will not poison an organism on Earth, since all organisms on Earth have had to deal with these common metals for billions of years.



          If you planet has a different geo-chemistry, or different elemental abundances in the crust, the creatures of your planet, since the inception of life, will evolve a resistance to the metals commonly encountered. Therefore, you can assume that any creature on a heavy-metal-heavy planet would be immune to the commonly encountered heavy metals.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            I broadly like this answer, although I'd suggest that immunity is not required. Life tends to work fine as long as it has enough time to reproduce (and in more complex lifeforms to raise the "kiddies" :-) ). That doesn't require immunity just reasonable tolerance for some period of time.
            – StephenG
            yesterday






          • 1




            Some metal may actually get incorporated, there are bacteria that evolved in arsenic rich areas that actually use it in enzymes.
            – John
            yesterday






          • 2




            For an example, here's a microorganism that's adapted to high concentrations of arsenic: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFAJ-1 More generally, if you search for "bioremediation heavy metal" you'll find lots of links to microorganisms that tolerate various metals.
            – jamesqf
            yesterday






          • 2




            @StephanG - not really. life tends to work fine as long as it isn't poisoned. poisoning usually takes place precisely along these lines - knocking out enzymes, or attacking structure. the only thing reproduction provides is trials for a suitable mutation to do precisely that - alter the enzyme, protect the structure.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            @Aethenosity I don't know if it is reasonable to have all heavy metals abundant on a planets surface. There are a lot of heavy metals, and some are much more common than others. My first instinct would be to say that any process that makes iridium or rhodium a common metal would also mean the planet would be made almost entirely of tungsten, barium, and lead. Perhaps that is the basis for another question?
            – kingledion
            23 hours ago


















          up vote
          -1
          down vote













          I would start with the igaunas of Galapagos as a reasonable visual of what some creature plaqued by pesky heavy metals could look like. Constantly excreting the poison through the nose and skin.



          Of course some metals in microscopic doses are necessary and tolerable. So yes the organ might work which picks up and filters the blood. But really the metal would mostly enter through skin and lungs. So those organs must feature some coating or ingenious enzyme that eats the metal, sends it to another special organ which turns it into energy or poison the animal could use as a defense. Also you could use a magnetic aura against the non-ferrous metal or an acid which dissolves it. And maybe that special organ could have a separate chamber which pools the ferrous metals and excretes them to be harvested by humans or other symbiotic creatures.



          This feature of metal eating creatures might give them some supernatural abilities. Might even allow them to talk to each other telekinetically, or Have metal skin, poisonous concentrations of saliva, or a lot of other scientific uses.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            note: metals can't be eaten/digested. they are elements. they can be 'handled' by chelation & excretion, though, as you allude to.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelation
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            just be be clear, metals are used as cofactors in enzymes, the alkali metal ions have a variety of uses, but no metal is consumed or digested. the cofactors' capacity for orbital geometry changes associated w/ oxidation state changes are used to modulate protein activity. but the metals are not, in any way, deconstructed. that's all i'm trying to get across.
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            you can't digest an element. i'm sorry. digestion implies decomposition.digest 1. break down (food) in the alimentary canal into substances that can be absorbed and used by the body. its the breaking down part that doesn't apply, not the absorb & use part. carry on!
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            all metals are elements. i'm not trying to be difficult. this is a fact-based place, and all i'm trying to get across is that metals aren't digested. if this point is coming across that way, I apologize.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            we're done, i think. thanks.
            – theRiley
            23 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130932%2fwhy-would-a-creature-be-immune-to-heavy-metals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          8
          down vote













          Creatures that evolved in metal-rich environments would be immune



          Evolution could take care of the toxicity problems. Metal toxicity is a characteristic of many different metals, and the root cause for why a metal is poisonous varies widely between metals. For example with arsenic:




          Arsenic interferes with cellular longevity by allosteric inhibition of
          an essential metabolic enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex,
          which catalyzes the oxidation of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA by NAD+. With
          the enzyme inhibited, the energy system of the cell is disrupted
          resulting in cellular apoptosis. Biochemically, arsenic prevents use
          of thiamine resulting in a clinical picture resembling thiamine
          deficiency.




          Arsenic interacts with specific enzymes in a specific way to disrupt them from doing their biological job. The solution is for organisms to evolve specific methods for resolving whatever biochemical problem the metal causes. For arsenic, an animal which evolved so that that allosteric sites on the PDH complex enzyme are not receptive to arsenic. The biochemical reaction chain is broken, and now arsenic is not any more problematic to us than eating iron (well...there may be other problems arsenic causes, this is just the one that kills you fastest).



          Humans are immune to the metals common in the environment



          In the Earth's biosystems, certain metals are present in certain quantities. These metals are needed for nutrition, iron, magnesium, potassium, etc. The amount of iron or aluminum, two common metals, found in organic matter will not poison an organism on Earth, since all organisms on Earth have had to deal with these common metals for billions of years.



          If you planet has a different geo-chemistry, or different elemental abundances in the crust, the creatures of your planet, since the inception of life, will evolve a resistance to the metals commonly encountered. Therefore, you can assume that any creature on a heavy-metal-heavy planet would be immune to the commonly encountered heavy metals.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            I broadly like this answer, although I'd suggest that immunity is not required. Life tends to work fine as long as it has enough time to reproduce (and in more complex lifeforms to raise the "kiddies" :-) ). That doesn't require immunity just reasonable tolerance for some period of time.
            – StephenG
            yesterday






          • 1




            Some metal may actually get incorporated, there are bacteria that evolved in arsenic rich areas that actually use it in enzymes.
            – John
            yesterday






          • 2




            For an example, here's a microorganism that's adapted to high concentrations of arsenic: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFAJ-1 More generally, if you search for "bioremediation heavy metal" you'll find lots of links to microorganisms that tolerate various metals.
            – jamesqf
            yesterday






          • 2




            @StephanG - not really. life tends to work fine as long as it isn't poisoned. poisoning usually takes place precisely along these lines - knocking out enzymes, or attacking structure. the only thing reproduction provides is trials for a suitable mutation to do precisely that - alter the enzyme, protect the structure.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            @Aethenosity I don't know if it is reasonable to have all heavy metals abundant on a planets surface. There are a lot of heavy metals, and some are much more common than others. My first instinct would be to say that any process that makes iridium or rhodium a common metal would also mean the planet would be made almost entirely of tungsten, barium, and lead. Perhaps that is the basis for another question?
            – kingledion
            23 hours ago















          up vote
          8
          down vote













          Creatures that evolved in metal-rich environments would be immune



          Evolution could take care of the toxicity problems. Metal toxicity is a characteristic of many different metals, and the root cause for why a metal is poisonous varies widely between metals. For example with arsenic:




          Arsenic interferes with cellular longevity by allosteric inhibition of
          an essential metabolic enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex,
          which catalyzes the oxidation of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA by NAD+. With
          the enzyme inhibited, the energy system of the cell is disrupted
          resulting in cellular apoptosis. Biochemically, arsenic prevents use
          of thiamine resulting in a clinical picture resembling thiamine
          deficiency.




          Arsenic interacts with specific enzymes in a specific way to disrupt them from doing their biological job. The solution is for organisms to evolve specific methods for resolving whatever biochemical problem the metal causes. For arsenic, an animal which evolved so that that allosteric sites on the PDH complex enzyme are not receptive to arsenic. The biochemical reaction chain is broken, and now arsenic is not any more problematic to us than eating iron (well...there may be other problems arsenic causes, this is just the one that kills you fastest).



          Humans are immune to the metals common in the environment



          In the Earth's biosystems, certain metals are present in certain quantities. These metals are needed for nutrition, iron, magnesium, potassium, etc. The amount of iron or aluminum, two common metals, found in organic matter will not poison an organism on Earth, since all organisms on Earth have had to deal with these common metals for billions of years.



          If you planet has a different geo-chemistry, or different elemental abundances in the crust, the creatures of your planet, since the inception of life, will evolve a resistance to the metals commonly encountered. Therefore, you can assume that any creature on a heavy-metal-heavy planet would be immune to the commonly encountered heavy metals.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            I broadly like this answer, although I'd suggest that immunity is not required. Life tends to work fine as long as it has enough time to reproduce (and in more complex lifeforms to raise the "kiddies" :-) ). That doesn't require immunity just reasonable tolerance for some period of time.
            – StephenG
            yesterday






          • 1




            Some metal may actually get incorporated, there are bacteria that evolved in arsenic rich areas that actually use it in enzymes.
            – John
            yesterday






          • 2




            For an example, here's a microorganism that's adapted to high concentrations of arsenic: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFAJ-1 More generally, if you search for "bioremediation heavy metal" you'll find lots of links to microorganisms that tolerate various metals.
            – jamesqf
            yesterday






          • 2




            @StephanG - not really. life tends to work fine as long as it isn't poisoned. poisoning usually takes place precisely along these lines - knocking out enzymes, or attacking structure. the only thing reproduction provides is trials for a suitable mutation to do precisely that - alter the enzyme, protect the structure.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            @Aethenosity I don't know if it is reasonable to have all heavy metals abundant on a planets surface. There are a lot of heavy metals, and some are much more common than others. My first instinct would be to say that any process that makes iridium or rhodium a common metal would also mean the planet would be made almost entirely of tungsten, barium, and lead. Perhaps that is the basis for another question?
            – kingledion
            23 hours ago













          up vote
          8
          down vote










          up vote
          8
          down vote









          Creatures that evolved in metal-rich environments would be immune



          Evolution could take care of the toxicity problems. Metal toxicity is a characteristic of many different metals, and the root cause for why a metal is poisonous varies widely between metals. For example with arsenic:




          Arsenic interferes with cellular longevity by allosteric inhibition of
          an essential metabolic enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex,
          which catalyzes the oxidation of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA by NAD+. With
          the enzyme inhibited, the energy system of the cell is disrupted
          resulting in cellular apoptosis. Biochemically, arsenic prevents use
          of thiamine resulting in a clinical picture resembling thiamine
          deficiency.




          Arsenic interacts with specific enzymes in a specific way to disrupt them from doing their biological job. The solution is for organisms to evolve specific methods for resolving whatever biochemical problem the metal causes. For arsenic, an animal which evolved so that that allosteric sites on the PDH complex enzyme are not receptive to arsenic. The biochemical reaction chain is broken, and now arsenic is not any more problematic to us than eating iron (well...there may be other problems arsenic causes, this is just the one that kills you fastest).



          Humans are immune to the metals common in the environment



          In the Earth's biosystems, certain metals are present in certain quantities. These metals are needed for nutrition, iron, magnesium, potassium, etc. The amount of iron or aluminum, two common metals, found in organic matter will not poison an organism on Earth, since all organisms on Earth have had to deal with these common metals for billions of years.



          If you planet has a different geo-chemistry, or different elemental abundances in the crust, the creatures of your planet, since the inception of life, will evolve a resistance to the metals commonly encountered. Therefore, you can assume that any creature on a heavy-metal-heavy planet would be immune to the commonly encountered heavy metals.






          share|improve this answer












          Creatures that evolved in metal-rich environments would be immune



          Evolution could take care of the toxicity problems. Metal toxicity is a characteristic of many different metals, and the root cause for why a metal is poisonous varies widely between metals. For example with arsenic:




          Arsenic interferes with cellular longevity by allosteric inhibition of
          an essential metabolic enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex,
          which catalyzes the oxidation of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA by NAD+. With
          the enzyme inhibited, the energy system of the cell is disrupted
          resulting in cellular apoptosis. Biochemically, arsenic prevents use
          of thiamine resulting in a clinical picture resembling thiamine
          deficiency.




          Arsenic interacts with specific enzymes in a specific way to disrupt them from doing their biological job. The solution is for organisms to evolve specific methods for resolving whatever biochemical problem the metal causes. For arsenic, an animal which evolved so that that allosteric sites on the PDH complex enzyme are not receptive to arsenic. The biochemical reaction chain is broken, and now arsenic is not any more problematic to us than eating iron (well...there may be other problems arsenic causes, this is just the one that kills you fastest).



          Humans are immune to the metals common in the environment



          In the Earth's biosystems, certain metals are present in certain quantities. These metals are needed for nutrition, iron, magnesium, potassium, etc. The amount of iron or aluminum, two common metals, found in organic matter will not poison an organism on Earth, since all organisms on Earth have had to deal with these common metals for billions of years.



          If you planet has a different geo-chemistry, or different elemental abundances in the crust, the creatures of your planet, since the inception of life, will evolve a resistance to the metals commonly encountered. Therefore, you can assume that any creature on a heavy-metal-heavy planet would be immune to the commonly encountered heavy metals.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          kingledion

          70.7k24236412




          70.7k24236412








          • 1




            I broadly like this answer, although I'd suggest that immunity is not required. Life tends to work fine as long as it has enough time to reproduce (and in more complex lifeforms to raise the "kiddies" :-) ). That doesn't require immunity just reasonable tolerance for some period of time.
            – StephenG
            yesterday






          • 1




            Some metal may actually get incorporated, there are bacteria that evolved in arsenic rich areas that actually use it in enzymes.
            – John
            yesterday






          • 2




            For an example, here's a microorganism that's adapted to high concentrations of arsenic: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFAJ-1 More generally, if you search for "bioremediation heavy metal" you'll find lots of links to microorganisms that tolerate various metals.
            – jamesqf
            yesterday






          • 2




            @StephanG - not really. life tends to work fine as long as it isn't poisoned. poisoning usually takes place precisely along these lines - knocking out enzymes, or attacking structure. the only thing reproduction provides is trials for a suitable mutation to do precisely that - alter the enzyme, protect the structure.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            @Aethenosity I don't know if it is reasonable to have all heavy metals abundant on a planets surface. There are a lot of heavy metals, and some are much more common than others. My first instinct would be to say that any process that makes iridium or rhodium a common metal would also mean the planet would be made almost entirely of tungsten, barium, and lead. Perhaps that is the basis for another question?
            – kingledion
            23 hours ago














          • 1




            I broadly like this answer, although I'd suggest that immunity is not required. Life tends to work fine as long as it has enough time to reproduce (and in more complex lifeforms to raise the "kiddies" :-) ). That doesn't require immunity just reasonable tolerance for some period of time.
            – StephenG
            yesterday






          • 1




            Some metal may actually get incorporated, there are bacteria that evolved in arsenic rich areas that actually use it in enzymes.
            – John
            yesterday






          • 2




            For an example, here's a microorganism that's adapted to high concentrations of arsenic: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFAJ-1 More generally, if you search for "bioremediation heavy metal" you'll find lots of links to microorganisms that tolerate various metals.
            – jamesqf
            yesterday






          • 2




            @StephanG - not really. life tends to work fine as long as it isn't poisoned. poisoning usually takes place precisely along these lines - knocking out enzymes, or attacking structure. the only thing reproduction provides is trials for a suitable mutation to do precisely that - alter the enzyme, protect the structure.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            @Aethenosity I don't know if it is reasonable to have all heavy metals abundant on a planets surface. There are a lot of heavy metals, and some are much more common than others. My first instinct would be to say that any process that makes iridium or rhodium a common metal would also mean the planet would be made almost entirely of tungsten, barium, and lead. Perhaps that is the basis for another question?
            – kingledion
            23 hours ago








          1




          1




          I broadly like this answer, although I'd suggest that immunity is not required. Life tends to work fine as long as it has enough time to reproduce (and in more complex lifeforms to raise the "kiddies" :-) ). That doesn't require immunity just reasonable tolerance for some period of time.
          – StephenG
          yesterday




          I broadly like this answer, although I'd suggest that immunity is not required. Life tends to work fine as long as it has enough time to reproduce (and in more complex lifeforms to raise the "kiddies" :-) ). That doesn't require immunity just reasonable tolerance for some period of time.
          – StephenG
          yesterday




          1




          1




          Some metal may actually get incorporated, there are bacteria that evolved in arsenic rich areas that actually use it in enzymes.
          – John
          yesterday




          Some metal may actually get incorporated, there are bacteria that evolved in arsenic rich areas that actually use it in enzymes.
          – John
          yesterday




          2




          2




          For an example, here's a microorganism that's adapted to high concentrations of arsenic: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFAJ-1 More generally, if you search for "bioremediation heavy metal" you'll find lots of links to microorganisms that tolerate various metals.
          – jamesqf
          yesterday




          For an example, here's a microorganism that's adapted to high concentrations of arsenic: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GFAJ-1 More generally, if you search for "bioremediation heavy metal" you'll find lots of links to microorganisms that tolerate various metals.
          – jamesqf
          yesterday




          2




          2




          @StephanG - not really. life tends to work fine as long as it isn't poisoned. poisoning usually takes place precisely along these lines - knocking out enzymes, or attacking structure. the only thing reproduction provides is trials for a suitable mutation to do precisely that - alter the enzyme, protect the structure.
          – theRiley
          yesterday




          @StephanG - not really. life tends to work fine as long as it isn't poisoned. poisoning usually takes place precisely along these lines - knocking out enzymes, or attacking structure. the only thing reproduction provides is trials for a suitable mutation to do precisely that - alter the enzyme, protect the structure.
          – theRiley
          yesterday




          1




          1




          @Aethenosity I don't know if it is reasonable to have all heavy metals abundant on a planets surface. There are a lot of heavy metals, and some are much more common than others. My first instinct would be to say that any process that makes iridium or rhodium a common metal would also mean the planet would be made almost entirely of tungsten, barium, and lead. Perhaps that is the basis for another question?
          – kingledion
          23 hours ago




          @Aethenosity I don't know if it is reasonable to have all heavy metals abundant on a planets surface. There are a lot of heavy metals, and some are much more common than others. My first instinct would be to say that any process that makes iridium or rhodium a common metal would also mean the planet would be made almost entirely of tungsten, barium, and lead. Perhaps that is the basis for another question?
          – kingledion
          23 hours ago










          up vote
          -1
          down vote













          I would start with the igaunas of Galapagos as a reasonable visual of what some creature plaqued by pesky heavy metals could look like. Constantly excreting the poison through the nose and skin.



          Of course some metals in microscopic doses are necessary and tolerable. So yes the organ might work which picks up and filters the blood. But really the metal would mostly enter through skin and lungs. So those organs must feature some coating or ingenious enzyme that eats the metal, sends it to another special organ which turns it into energy or poison the animal could use as a defense. Also you could use a magnetic aura against the non-ferrous metal or an acid which dissolves it. And maybe that special organ could have a separate chamber which pools the ferrous metals and excretes them to be harvested by humans or other symbiotic creatures.



          This feature of metal eating creatures might give them some supernatural abilities. Might even allow them to talk to each other telekinetically, or Have metal skin, poisonous concentrations of saliva, or a lot of other scientific uses.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            note: metals can't be eaten/digested. they are elements. they can be 'handled' by chelation & excretion, though, as you allude to.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelation
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            just be be clear, metals are used as cofactors in enzymes, the alkali metal ions have a variety of uses, but no metal is consumed or digested. the cofactors' capacity for orbital geometry changes associated w/ oxidation state changes are used to modulate protein activity. but the metals are not, in any way, deconstructed. that's all i'm trying to get across.
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            you can't digest an element. i'm sorry. digestion implies decomposition.digest 1. break down (food) in the alimentary canal into substances that can be absorbed and used by the body. its the breaking down part that doesn't apply, not the absorb & use part. carry on!
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            all metals are elements. i'm not trying to be difficult. this is a fact-based place, and all i'm trying to get across is that metals aren't digested. if this point is coming across that way, I apologize.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            we're done, i think. thanks.
            – theRiley
            23 hours ago















          up vote
          -1
          down vote













          I would start with the igaunas of Galapagos as a reasonable visual of what some creature plaqued by pesky heavy metals could look like. Constantly excreting the poison through the nose and skin.



          Of course some metals in microscopic doses are necessary and tolerable. So yes the organ might work which picks up and filters the blood. But really the metal would mostly enter through skin and lungs. So those organs must feature some coating or ingenious enzyme that eats the metal, sends it to another special organ which turns it into energy or poison the animal could use as a defense. Also you could use a magnetic aura against the non-ferrous metal or an acid which dissolves it. And maybe that special organ could have a separate chamber which pools the ferrous metals and excretes them to be harvested by humans or other symbiotic creatures.



          This feature of metal eating creatures might give them some supernatural abilities. Might even allow them to talk to each other telekinetically, or Have metal skin, poisonous concentrations of saliva, or a lot of other scientific uses.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            note: metals can't be eaten/digested. they are elements. they can be 'handled' by chelation & excretion, though, as you allude to.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelation
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            just be be clear, metals are used as cofactors in enzymes, the alkali metal ions have a variety of uses, but no metal is consumed or digested. the cofactors' capacity for orbital geometry changes associated w/ oxidation state changes are used to modulate protein activity. but the metals are not, in any way, deconstructed. that's all i'm trying to get across.
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            you can't digest an element. i'm sorry. digestion implies decomposition.digest 1. break down (food) in the alimentary canal into substances that can be absorbed and used by the body. its the breaking down part that doesn't apply, not the absorb & use part. carry on!
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            all metals are elements. i'm not trying to be difficult. this is a fact-based place, and all i'm trying to get across is that metals aren't digested. if this point is coming across that way, I apologize.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            we're done, i think. thanks.
            – theRiley
            23 hours ago













          up vote
          -1
          down vote










          up vote
          -1
          down vote









          I would start with the igaunas of Galapagos as a reasonable visual of what some creature plaqued by pesky heavy metals could look like. Constantly excreting the poison through the nose and skin.



          Of course some metals in microscopic doses are necessary and tolerable. So yes the organ might work which picks up and filters the blood. But really the metal would mostly enter through skin and lungs. So those organs must feature some coating or ingenious enzyme that eats the metal, sends it to another special organ which turns it into energy or poison the animal could use as a defense. Also you could use a magnetic aura against the non-ferrous metal or an acid which dissolves it. And maybe that special organ could have a separate chamber which pools the ferrous metals and excretes them to be harvested by humans or other symbiotic creatures.



          This feature of metal eating creatures might give them some supernatural abilities. Might even allow them to talk to each other telekinetically, or Have metal skin, poisonous concentrations of saliva, or a lot of other scientific uses.






          share|improve this answer












          I would start with the igaunas of Galapagos as a reasonable visual of what some creature plaqued by pesky heavy metals could look like. Constantly excreting the poison through the nose and skin.



          Of course some metals in microscopic doses are necessary and tolerable. So yes the organ might work which picks up and filters the blood. But really the metal would mostly enter through skin and lungs. So those organs must feature some coating or ingenious enzyme that eats the metal, sends it to another special organ which turns it into energy or poison the animal could use as a defense. Also you could use a magnetic aura against the non-ferrous metal or an acid which dissolves it. And maybe that special organ could have a separate chamber which pools the ferrous metals and excretes them to be harvested by humans or other symbiotic creatures.



          This feature of metal eating creatures might give them some supernatural abilities. Might even allow them to talk to each other telekinetically, or Have metal skin, poisonous concentrations of saliva, or a lot of other scientific uses.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Robus

          1085




          1085








          • 1




            note: metals can't be eaten/digested. they are elements. they can be 'handled' by chelation & excretion, though, as you allude to.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelation
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            just be be clear, metals are used as cofactors in enzymes, the alkali metal ions have a variety of uses, but no metal is consumed or digested. the cofactors' capacity for orbital geometry changes associated w/ oxidation state changes are used to modulate protein activity. but the metals are not, in any way, deconstructed. that's all i'm trying to get across.
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            you can't digest an element. i'm sorry. digestion implies decomposition.digest 1. break down (food) in the alimentary canal into substances that can be absorbed and used by the body. its the breaking down part that doesn't apply, not the absorb & use part. carry on!
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            all metals are elements. i'm not trying to be difficult. this is a fact-based place, and all i'm trying to get across is that metals aren't digested. if this point is coming across that way, I apologize.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            we're done, i think. thanks.
            – theRiley
            23 hours ago














          • 1




            note: metals can't be eaten/digested. they are elements. they can be 'handled' by chelation & excretion, though, as you allude to.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelation
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            just be be clear, metals are used as cofactors in enzymes, the alkali metal ions have a variety of uses, but no metal is consumed or digested. the cofactors' capacity for orbital geometry changes associated w/ oxidation state changes are used to modulate protein activity. but the metals are not, in any way, deconstructed. that's all i'm trying to get across.
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            you can't digest an element. i'm sorry. digestion implies decomposition.digest 1. break down (food) in the alimentary canal into substances that can be absorbed and used by the body. its the breaking down part that doesn't apply, not the absorb & use part. carry on!
            – theRiley
            yesterday








          • 1




            all metals are elements. i'm not trying to be difficult. this is a fact-based place, and all i'm trying to get across is that metals aren't digested. if this point is coming across that way, I apologize.
            – theRiley
            yesterday






          • 1




            we're done, i think. thanks.
            – theRiley
            23 hours ago








          1




          1




          note: metals can't be eaten/digested. they are elements. they can be 'handled' by chelation & excretion, though, as you allude to.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelation
          – theRiley
          yesterday




          note: metals can't be eaten/digested. they are elements. they can be 'handled' by chelation & excretion, though, as you allude to.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelation
          – theRiley
          yesterday




          1




          1




          just be be clear, metals are used as cofactors in enzymes, the alkali metal ions have a variety of uses, but no metal is consumed or digested. the cofactors' capacity for orbital geometry changes associated w/ oxidation state changes are used to modulate protein activity. but the metals are not, in any way, deconstructed. that's all i'm trying to get across.
          – theRiley
          yesterday






          just be be clear, metals are used as cofactors in enzymes, the alkali metal ions have a variety of uses, but no metal is consumed or digested. the cofactors' capacity for orbital geometry changes associated w/ oxidation state changes are used to modulate protein activity. but the metals are not, in any way, deconstructed. that's all i'm trying to get across.
          – theRiley
          yesterday






          1




          1




          you can't digest an element. i'm sorry. digestion implies decomposition.digest 1. break down (food) in the alimentary canal into substances that can be absorbed and used by the body. its the breaking down part that doesn't apply, not the absorb & use part. carry on!
          – theRiley
          yesterday






          you can't digest an element. i'm sorry. digestion implies decomposition.digest 1. break down (food) in the alimentary canal into substances that can be absorbed and used by the body. its the breaking down part that doesn't apply, not the absorb & use part. carry on!
          – theRiley
          yesterday






          1




          1




          all metals are elements. i'm not trying to be difficult. this is a fact-based place, and all i'm trying to get across is that metals aren't digested. if this point is coming across that way, I apologize.
          – theRiley
          yesterday




          all metals are elements. i'm not trying to be difficult. this is a fact-based place, and all i'm trying to get across is that metals aren't digested. if this point is coming across that way, I apologize.
          – theRiley
          yesterday




          1




          1




          we're done, i think. thanks.
          – theRiley
          23 hours ago




          we're done, i think. thanks.
          – theRiley
          23 hours ago


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130932%2fwhy-would-a-creature-be-immune-to-heavy-metals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Willebadessen

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

          Residenzschloss Arolsen