Finding an exception for a seemingly universal form of functionals [closed]












0














How to prove that not every $fin l_infty^*$ functional is in the form of $f=f_y$, where $ y=(y_n)in l_1 $ and $$ f_y(x)=sum_n x_ny_n, , x=(x_n)in l_infty$$?










share|cite|improve this question













closed as off-topic by The Phenotype, Saad, Leucippus, Chinnapparaj R, user10354138 Nov 26 at 8:14


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – The Phenotype, Saad, Leucippus, Chinnapparaj R, user10354138

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















    0














    How to prove that not every $fin l_infty^*$ functional is in the form of $f=f_y$, where $ y=(y_n)in l_1 $ and $$ f_y(x)=sum_n x_ny_n, , x=(x_n)in l_infty$$?










    share|cite|improve this question













    closed as off-topic by The Phenotype, Saad, Leucippus, Chinnapparaj R, user10354138 Nov 26 at 8:14


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – The Phenotype, Saad, Leucippus, Chinnapparaj R, user10354138

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















      0












      0








      0







      How to prove that not every $fin l_infty^*$ functional is in the form of $f=f_y$, where $ y=(y_n)in l_1 $ and $$ f_y(x)=sum_n x_ny_n, , x=(x_n)in l_infty$$?










      share|cite|improve this question













      How to prove that not every $fin l_infty^*$ functional is in the form of $f=f_y$, where $ y=(y_n)in l_1 $ and $$ f_y(x)=sum_n x_ny_n, , x=(x_n)in l_infty$$?







      functional-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 25 at 19:03









      kohiheku

      1




      1




      closed as off-topic by The Phenotype, Saad, Leucippus, Chinnapparaj R, user10354138 Nov 26 at 8:14


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – The Phenotype, Saad, Leucippus, Chinnapparaj R, user10354138

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




      closed as off-topic by The Phenotype, Saad, Leucippus, Chinnapparaj R, user10354138 Nov 26 at 8:14


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – The Phenotype, Saad, Leucippus, Chinnapparaj R, user10354138

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          You can use the Hahn-Banach extension theorem on the subspace of sequences $f in l_infty$ for which $lim_{n to infty} f_n$ exists.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            You can use the Hahn-Banach extension theorem on the subspace of sequences $f in l_infty$ for which $lim_{n to infty} f_n$ exists.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              2














              You can use the Hahn-Banach extension theorem on the subspace of sequences $f in l_infty$ for which $lim_{n to infty} f_n$ exists.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                2












                2








                2






                You can use the Hahn-Banach extension theorem on the subspace of sequences $f in l_infty$ for which $lim_{n to infty} f_n$ exists.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                You can use the Hahn-Banach extension theorem on the subspace of sequences $f in l_infty$ for which $lim_{n to infty} f_n$ exists.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 25 at 19:08









                Bartosz Malman

                8011620




                8011620















                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Willebadessen

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                    Residenzschloss Arolsen