Please check the proof of Imbedding theorem.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
It is instructed in Munkre's topology that proof of imbedding theorem is almost the copy of step 1 of this post.It is instructed to just replace $n$ by $alpha$ and $mathbb R^{omega}$ by $mathbb R^J$.
Imbedding theorem:Let X be a space in which one point sets are closed.Suppose that {$f_{alpha}$}_{$alphain J$}} is an indexed
family of continuous functions $f_{alpha}:Xin mathbb R$ satisfying
the requirement that for each point $x_0$ of X and each nbhd U of
$x_0,$ there is an index $alpha$ such that $f_{alpha}$ is positive
at $x_0$ and vanish outside U.then the funcion $F:Xrightarrow mathbb
R^J$ defined by $F(x)=(f_{alpha})_{alphain J}$ is an imbedding of X
in $mathbb R^J.$if $f_{alpha}$ maps X into $[0,1]$ for each
$alpha,$ then $F$ imbeds $X$ in $[0,1]^J$We shall prove that X is
metrizable by imbedding X into a metrizable space Y;that is by showing
that X is homeomorphic to some subspace of Y.
Step 1: We prove the following:-
There exists an indexed collection of continuous functions $f_{alpha}:Xrightarrow [0,1]$ having the property that given any point $x_0$ of $X$ and any neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$,there exists an index $alpha$ such that $f_{alpha}(x_0)>0$ and $f_alpha$ vanishes outside $U$.
Proof:
Let {$B_{alpha}$} be the countable basis for $X$.For each pair $alpha,beta$ of indices for which $overline{B_{alpha}} subset B_{beta},$apply Urysohn's lemma to choose a continuous function $g_{alpha,beta}:Xrightarrow[0,1] $ such that $g_{alpha,beta}[overline{B_{alpha}}]={1}$ and $g_{alpha,beta}[X-B_{beta}]={1}$. Then the collection {$g_{alpha,beta}$} satisfies our requirement:
Given $x_0$ and given a neighbourhood $U$ of $x_0,$ one can choose a basis element $B_m$ containing $x_0$ that is contained in $U$.
Using Regularity,one can then choose $B_{alpha}$ so that $x_0 in B_{alpha}$ and $overline{B_{alpha}} subset B_{beta}$.Then $alpha,beta$ is a pair of indices for which function $g_{alpha,beta}$ is defined; and it is positive at $x_0$ and vanishes outside of $U$. Because the collection {$g_{alpha,beta}$} is indexed with a subset of indexing set $J$, gives us the desired collection {$f_{alpha}$}.
Given a function $f_{alpha}$ of step 1,take $mathbb{R}^{J} $ in the product topology and define a map $F: Xrightarrow mathbb{R}^{J}$ by the rule-
$F(x)=(f_{alpha})_{alphain J}$
We assert that $F$ is an embedding-
$F$ is continuous
Because $mathbb{R}^{omega}$ has a product topology and each $f_{alpha}$ is continuous.
$F$ is injective
Let $x,yin X$ such that $xneq yimplies$ there is some basic element $B_{alpha}$ that contains $x$ and misses y.By applying Urysohn's lemma there exists a function $f_{delta}:Xrightarrow [0,1]$ such that $f_{delta}(x)=1,f_{delta}(y)=0$.So,$F(X)neq F(y)$(because the image differs atleast in one coordinate)
$F$ is a homeomorphism of $X$ onto its image, the subspace $Z=F[X]$ of $mathbb{R}^{J} $.
Because each component of $F$ is continuous,so $F$ is continuous.**
$F:Xrightarrow F[X]$ is a bijection.
So,we need only show that for each open set $U$ in $X,$ the set $F[U]$ is open in $Z=F[X]$.
Let $z_0in F(U).$
We shall find an open set $W$ of Z such that $z_0in Wsubset F(U)$.
Let $x_0in U$ such that $F(x_0)=z_0.$Choose an index $theta$ for which $f_{theta}(x_0)>0$
anf $f_{theta}(X-U)=${$0$.}
Take the open ray $(0,infty) $ in $mathbb R$ and let $V$ be the open set $V=pi_{theta}^{-1}((0,infty))$ of $mathbb R^{J}$.
Let $W=Vcap Z;$ then $W$ is open in $Z$ by definition of subspace topology.We assert that $z_0in Wsubset F(U).$
First $z_0in W$ because $pi_{theta}(z_0)=pi_{theta}F(z_0)=f_{theta}(x_0)>0.$
Second,$Wsubset F(U).$For if $zin W$ then $z=F(x)$ for some $xin X$ and $pi_N(z)in (0,infty)$.
Since,$pi_{theta}(z)=pi_{theta}(F(x))=f_{theta}(x),$ and $f_{theta}$ vanish outside $U,$the point $x$ must be in $U.$
Then,$z=F(x)$ is in $F(U)$,as desired.
Thus,$F$ is an imbedding of $X$ in $mathbb R^J.$
Also,examine this proof critically,and if there is some scope of improvement please let me know...
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification proof-explanation open-map
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
It is instructed in Munkre's topology that proof of imbedding theorem is almost the copy of step 1 of this post.It is instructed to just replace $n$ by $alpha$ and $mathbb R^{omega}$ by $mathbb R^J$.
Imbedding theorem:Let X be a space in which one point sets are closed.Suppose that {$f_{alpha}$}_{$alphain J$}} is an indexed
family of continuous functions $f_{alpha}:Xin mathbb R$ satisfying
the requirement that for each point $x_0$ of X and each nbhd U of
$x_0,$ there is an index $alpha$ such that $f_{alpha}$ is positive
at $x_0$ and vanish outside U.then the funcion $F:Xrightarrow mathbb
R^J$ defined by $F(x)=(f_{alpha})_{alphain J}$ is an imbedding of X
in $mathbb R^J.$if $f_{alpha}$ maps X into $[0,1]$ for each
$alpha,$ then $F$ imbeds $X$ in $[0,1]^J$We shall prove that X is
metrizable by imbedding X into a metrizable space Y;that is by showing
that X is homeomorphic to some subspace of Y.
Step 1: We prove the following:-
There exists an indexed collection of continuous functions $f_{alpha}:Xrightarrow [0,1]$ having the property that given any point $x_0$ of $X$ and any neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$,there exists an index $alpha$ such that $f_{alpha}(x_0)>0$ and $f_alpha$ vanishes outside $U$.
Proof:
Let {$B_{alpha}$} be the countable basis for $X$.For each pair $alpha,beta$ of indices for which $overline{B_{alpha}} subset B_{beta},$apply Urysohn's lemma to choose a continuous function $g_{alpha,beta}:Xrightarrow[0,1] $ such that $g_{alpha,beta}[overline{B_{alpha}}]={1}$ and $g_{alpha,beta}[X-B_{beta}]={1}$. Then the collection {$g_{alpha,beta}$} satisfies our requirement:
Given $x_0$ and given a neighbourhood $U$ of $x_0,$ one can choose a basis element $B_m$ containing $x_0$ that is contained in $U$.
Using Regularity,one can then choose $B_{alpha}$ so that $x_0 in B_{alpha}$ and $overline{B_{alpha}} subset B_{beta}$.Then $alpha,beta$ is a pair of indices for which function $g_{alpha,beta}$ is defined; and it is positive at $x_0$ and vanishes outside of $U$. Because the collection {$g_{alpha,beta}$} is indexed with a subset of indexing set $J$, gives us the desired collection {$f_{alpha}$}.
Given a function $f_{alpha}$ of step 1,take $mathbb{R}^{J} $ in the product topology and define a map $F: Xrightarrow mathbb{R}^{J}$ by the rule-
$F(x)=(f_{alpha})_{alphain J}$
We assert that $F$ is an embedding-
$F$ is continuous
Because $mathbb{R}^{omega}$ has a product topology and each $f_{alpha}$ is continuous.
$F$ is injective
Let $x,yin X$ such that $xneq yimplies$ there is some basic element $B_{alpha}$ that contains $x$ and misses y.By applying Urysohn's lemma there exists a function $f_{delta}:Xrightarrow [0,1]$ such that $f_{delta}(x)=1,f_{delta}(y)=0$.So,$F(X)neq F(y)$(because the image differs atleast in one coordinate)
$F$ is a homeomorphism of $X$ onto its image, the subspace $Z=F[X]$ of $mathbb{R}^{J} $.
Because each component of $F$ is continuous,so $F$ is continuous.**
$F:Xrightarrow F[X]$ is a bijection.
So,we need only show that for each open set $U$ in $X,$ the set $F[U]$ is open in $Z=F[X]$.
Let $z_0in F(U).$
We shall find an open set $W$ of Z such that $z_0in Wsubset F(U)$.
Let $x_0in U$ such that $F(x_0)=z_0.$Choose an index $theta$ for which $f_{theta}(x_0)>0$
anf $f_{theta}(X-U)=${$0$.}
Take the open ray $(0,infty) $ in $mathbb R$ and let $V$ be the open set $V=pi_{theta}^{-1}((0,infty))$ of $mathbb R^{J}$.
Let $W=Vcap Z;$ then $W$ is open in $Z$ by definition of subspace topology.We assert that $z_0in Wsubset F(U).$
First $z_0in W$ because $pi_{theta}(z_0)=pi_{theta}F(z_0)=f_{theta}(x_0)>0.$
Second,$Wsubset F(U).$For if $zin W$ then $z=F(x)$ for some $xin X$ and $pi_N(z)in (0,infty)$.
Since,$pi_{theta}(z)=pi_{theta}(F(x))=f_{theta}(x),$ and $f_{theta}$ vanish outside $U,$the point $x$ must be in $U.$
Then,$z=F(x)$ is in $F(U)$,as desired.
Thus,$F$ is an imbedding of $X$ in $mathbb R^J.$
Also,examine this proof critically,and if there is some scope of improvement please let me know...
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification proof-explanation open-map
We don't need Urysohn's lemma but just the property for the functions and the fact one point set aree closed. See my proof below. Bases are irrelevant.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 24 at 9:41
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
It is instructed in Munkre's topology that proof of imbedding theorem is almost the copy of step 1 of this post.It is instructed to just replace $n$ by $alpha$ and $mathbb R^{omega}$ by $mathbb R^J$.
Imbedding theorem:Let X be a space in which one point sets are closed.Suppose that {$f_{alpha}$}_{$alphain J$}} is an indexed
family of continuous functions $f_{alpha}:Xin mathbb R$ satisfying
the requirement that for each point $x_0$ of X and each nbhd U of
$x_0,$ there is an index $alpha$ such that $f_{alpha}$ is positive
at $x_0$ and vanish outside U.then the funcion $F:Xrightarrow mathbb
R^J$ defined by $F(x)=(f_{alpha})_{alphain J}$ is an imbedding of X
in $mathbb R^J.$if $f_{alpha}$ maps X into $[0,1]$ for each
$alpha,$ then $F$ imbeds $X$ in $[0,1]^J$We shall prove that X is
metrizable by imbedding X into a metrizable space Y;that is by showing
that X is homeomorphic to some subspace of Y.
Step 1: We prove the following:-
There exists an indexed collection of continuous functions $f_{alpha}:Xrightarrow [0,1]$ having the property that given any point $x_0$ of $X$ and any neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$,there exists an index $alpha$ such that $f_{alpha}(x_0)>0$ and $f_alpha$ vanishes outside $U$.
Proof:
Let {$B_{alpha}$} be the countable basis for $X$.For each pair $alpha,beta$ of indices for which $overline{B_{alpha}} subset B_{beta},$apply Urysohn's lemma to choose a continuous function $g_{alpha,beta}:Xrightarrow[0,1] $ such that $g_{alpha,beta}[overline{B_{alpha}}]={1}$ and $g_{alpha,beta}[X-B_{beta}]={1}$. Then the collection {$g_{alpha,beta}$} satisfies our requirement:
Given $x_0$ and given a neighbourhood $U$ of $x_0,$ one can choose a basis element $B_m$ containing $x_0$ that is contained in $U$.
Using Regularity,one can then choose $B_{alpha}$ so that $x_0 in B_{alpha}$ and $overline{B_{alpha}} subset B_{beta}$.Then $alpha,beta$ is a pair of indices for which function $g_{alpha,beta}$ is defined; and it is positive at $x_0$ and vanishes outside of $U$. Because the collection {$g_{alpha,beta}$} is indexed with a subset of indexing set $J$, gives us the desired collection {$f_{alpha}$}.
Given a function $f_{alpha}$ of step 1,take $mathbb{R}^{J} $ in the product topology and define a map $F: Xrightarrow mathbb{R}^{J}$ by the rule-
$F(x)=(f_{alpha})_{alphain J}$
We assert that $F$ is an embedding-
$F$ is continuous
Because $mathbb{R}^{omega}$ has a product topology and each $f_{alpha}$ is continuous.
$F$ is injective
Let $x,yin X$ such that $xneq yimplies$ there is some basic element $B_{alpha}$ that contains $x$ and misses y.By applying Urysohn's lemma there exists a function $f_{delta}:Xrightarrow [0,1]$ such that $f_{delta}(x)=1,f_{delta}(y)=0$.So,$F(X)neq F(y)$(because the image differs atleast in one coordinate)
$F$ is a homeomorphism of $X$ onto its image, the subspace $Z=F[X]$ of $mathbb{R}^{J} $.
Because each component of $F$ is continuous,so $F$ is continuous.**
$F:Xrightarrow F[X]$ is a bijection.
So,we need only show that for each open set $U$ in $X,$ the set $F[U]$ is open in $Z=F[X]$.
Let $z_0in F(U).$
We shall find an open set $W$ of Z such that $z_0in Wsubset F(U)$.
Let $x_0in U$ such that $F(x_0)=z_0.$Choose an index $theta$ for which $f_{theta}(x_0)>0$
anf $f_{theta}(X-U)=${$0$.}
Take the open ray $(0,infty) $ in $mathbb R$ and let $V$ be the open set $V=pi_{theta}^{-1}((0,infty))$ of $mathbb R^{J}$.
Let $W=Vcap Z;$ then $W$ is open in $Z$ by definition of subspace topology.We assert that $z_0in Wsubset F(U).$
First $z_0in W$ because $pi_{theta}(z_0)=pi_{theta}F(z_0)=f_{theta}(x_0)>0.$
Second,$Wsubset F(U).$For if $zin W$ then $z=F(x)$ for some $xin X$ and $pi_N(z)in (0,infty)$.
Since,$pi_{theta}(z)=pi_{theta}(F(x))=f_{theta}(x),$ and $f_{theta}$ vanish outside $U,$the point $x$ must be in $U.$
Then,$z=F(x)$ is in $F(U)$,as desired.
Thus,$F$ is an imbedding of $X$ in $mathbb R^J.$
Also,examine this proof critically,and if there is some scope of improvement please let me know...
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification proof-explanation open-map
It is instructed in Munkre's topology that proof of imbedding theorem is almost the copy of step 1 of this post.It is instructed to just replace $n$ by $alpha$ and $mathbb R^{omega}$ by $mathbb R^J$.
Imbedding theorem:Let X be a space in which one point sets are closed.Suppose that {$f_{alpha}$}_{$alphain J$}} is an indexed
family of continuous functions $f_{alpha}:Xin mathbb R$ satisfying
the requirement that for each point $x_0$ of X and each nbhd U of
$x_0,$ there is an index $alpha$ such that $f_{alpha}$ is positive
at $x_0$ and vanish outside U.then the funcion $F:Xrightarrow mathbb
R^J$ defined by $F(x)=(f_{alpha})_{alphain J}$ is an imbedding of X
in $mathbb R^J.$if $f_{alpha}$ maps X into $[0,1]$ for each
$alpha,$ then $F$ imbeds $X$ in $[0,1]^J$We shall prove that X is
metrizable by imbedding X into a metrizable space Y;that is by showing
that X is homeomorphic to some subspace of Y.
Step 1: We prove the following:-
There exists an indexed collection of continuous functions $f_{alpha}:Xrightarrow [0,1]$ having the property that given any point $x_0$ of $X$ and any neighborhood $U$ of $x_0$,there exists an index $alpha$ such that $f_{alpha}(x_0)>0$ and $f_alpha$ vanishes outside $U$.
Proof:
Let {$B_{alpha}$} be the countable basis for $X$.For each pair $alpha,beta$ of indices for which $overline{B_{alpha}} subset B_{beta},$apply Urysohn's lemma to choose a continuous function $g_{alpha,beta}:Xrightarrow[0,1] $ such that $g_{alpha,beta}[overline{B_{alpha}}]={1}$ and $g_{alpha,beta}[X-B_{beta}]={1}$. Then the collection {$g_{alpha,beta}$} satisfies our requirement:
Given $x_0$ and given a neighbourhood $U$ of $x_0,$ one can choose a basis element $B_m$ containing $x_0$ that is contained in $U$.
Using Regularity,one can then choose $B_{alpha}$ so that $x_0 in B_{alpha}$ and $overline{B_{alpha}} subset B_{beta}$.Then $alpha,beta$ is a pair of indices for which function $g_{alpha,beta}$ is defined; and it is positive at $x_0$ and vanishes outside of $U$. Because the collection {$g_{alpha,beta}$} is indexed with a subset of indexing set $J$, gives us the desired collection {$f_{alpha}$}.
Given a function $f_{alpha}$ of step 1,take $mathbb{R}^{J} $ in the product topology and define a map $F: Xrightarrow mathbb{R}^{J}$ by the rule-
$F(x)=(f_{alpha})_{alphain J}$
We assert that $F$ is an embedding-
$F$ is continuous
Because $mathbb{R}^{omega}$ has a product topology and each $f_{alpha}$ is continuous.
$F$ is injective
Let $x,yin X$ such that $xneq yimplies$ there is some basic element $B_{alpha}$ that contains $x$ and misses y.By applying Urysohn's lemma there exists a function $f_{delta}:Xrightarrow [0,1]$ such that $f_{delta}(x)=1,f_{delta}(y)=0$.So,$F(X)neq F(y)$(because the image differs atleast in one coordinate)
$F$ is a homeomorphism of $X$ onto its image, the subspace $Z=F[X]$ of $mathbb{R}^{J} $.
Because each component of $F$ is continuous,so $F$ is continuous.**
$F:Xrightarrow F[X]$ is a bijection.
So,we need only show that for each open set $U$ in $X,$ the set $F[U]$ is open in $Z=F[X]$.
Let $z_0in F(U).$
We shall find an open set $W$ of Z such that $z_0in Wsubset F(U)$.
Let $x_0in U$ such that $F(x_0)=z_0.$Choose an index $theta$ for which $f_{theta}(x_0)>0$
anf $f_{theta}(X-U)=${$0$.}
Take the open ray $(0,infty) $ in $mathbb R$ and let $V$ be the open set $V=pi_{theta}^{-1}((0,infty))$ of $mathbb R^{J}$.
Let $W=Vcap Z;$ then $W$ is open in $Z$ by definition of subspace topology.We assert that $z_0in Wsubset F(U).$
First $z_0in W$ because $pi_{theta}(z_0)=pi_{theta}F(z_0)=f_{theta}(x_0)>0.$
Second,$Wsubset F(U).$For if $zin W$ then $z=F(x)$ for some $xin X$ and $pi_N(z)in (0,infty)$.
Since,$pi_{theta}(z)=pi_{theta}(F(x))=f_{theta}(x),$ and $f_{theta}$ vanish outside $U,$the point $x$ must be in $U.$
Then,$z=F(x)$ is in $F(U)$,as desired.
Thus,$F$ is an imbedding of $X$ in $mathbb R^J.$
Also,examine this proof critically,and if there is some scope of improvement please let me know...
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification proof-explanation open-map
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification proof-explanation open-map
edited Nov 24 at 8:58
asked Nov 24 at 8:52
P.Styles
1,420726
1,420726
We don't need Urysohn's lemma but just the property for the functions and the fact one point set aree closed. See my proof below. Bases are irrelevant.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 24 at 9:41
add a comment |
We don't need Urysohn's lemma but just the property for the functions and the fact one point set aree closed. See my proof below. Bases are irrelevant.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 24 at 9:41
We don't need Urysohn's lemma but just the property for the functions and the fact one point set aree closed. See my proof below. Bases are irrelevant.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 24 at 9:41
We don't need Urysohn's lemma but just the property for the functions and the fact one point set aree closed. See my proof below. Bases are irrelevant.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 24 at 9:41
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You don't have a countable base for $X$. So any part of the proof that refers to those base elements must be scratched.
You just know 2 things about $X$:
One-point sets in $X$ are closed. ($X$ is $T_1$)
There is a family of continuous functions ${f_alpha: X to mathbb{R}: alpha in J }$ that obeys:
$(ast)$ For every $x_0 in X$ and every open neighbourhood $U$ of $x_0$, there exists some $alpha_0 in J$ such that $f_{alpha_0}(x_0) > 0 $ and $f_{alpha_0}(x)=0$ for all $x notin U$.
We then define $F:X to mathbb{R}^J$ by $F(x)= (f_alpha(x))_{alpha in J}$, or equivalently $pi_alpha circ F = f_alpha$ for all $alpha in J$. It is immediate that $F$ is continuous as the its compositions with all projections are continuous (universal property of maps into products, that Munkres has in its text).
So $F:X to Z=f[X]$ is also continuous, and onto by definition.
That leaves to check that $F$ is 1-1 and $F$ is open as a map onto $Z$.
If $x neq y$ we use the first property and take $U = Xsetminus {y}$ which is
an open neighbourhood of $x$. We apply $(ast)$ to get the promised $f_{alpha_0} : X to mathbb{R}$ with $f_{alpha_0}(x)> 0$ and $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
So $F(x)$ and $F(y)$ differ at the $alpha_0$-th coordinate and so $F(x) neq F(y)$ and $F$ is 1-1.
With $x_0in U$, $U$ open in $X$, such that $F(x_0) = z_0 in F[U]$ a you chose,
we find by $(ast)$ (Applied to $x_0$ and $U$) again some $beta in J$ (you have $theta$ but I prefer to use $beta$ after $alpha$) such that
$$f_beta(x_0) >0 text{ and } f_beta(x) =0 text{ for } x notin Utag{1}$$
Then of course $$pi_beta(F(x_0)) = f_beta(x_0) in (0,infty)$$ so that $$z_0= F(x_0) in pi_{beta}^{-1}[(0,infty)] cap Z = W$$
The fact that $W subseteq F[U]$ is clear: $y in W$ implies $y in Z =f[X]$, so there is some $x in X$ such that $f(x) =y$.
If $x notin U$ we know that $f_beta(x) = 0$, by how we chose $beta$ in $(1)$, and so $F(x) notin pi_beta^{-1}[(0,infty)] =V$, but this cannot be as $F(x) in W= V cap Z$. So $x in U$ must hold and so $y=F(x) in F[U]$ showing the inclusion $W subseteq F[U]$.
:While showing injectivity I think ,by mistake you wrote $f_{alpha_0}(y)=1$ instead of $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
– P.Styles
Dec 2 at 13:12
@P.Styles already edited.
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 2 at 13:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011335%2fplease-check-the-proof-of-imbedding-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You don't have a countable base for $X$. So any part of the proof that refers to those base elements must be scratched.
You just know 2 things about $X$:
One-point sets in $X$ are closed. ($X$ is $T_1$)
There is a family of continuous functions ${f_alpha: X to mathbb{R}: alpha in J }$ that obeys:
$(ast)$ For every $x_0 in X$ and every open neighbourhood $U$ of $x_0$, there exists some $alpha_0 in J$ such that $f_{alpha_0}(x_0) > 0 $ and $f_{alpha_0}(x)=0$ for all $x notin U$.
We then define $F:X to mathbb{R}^J$ by $F(x)= (f_alpha(x))_{alpha in J}$, or equivalently $pi_alpha circ F = f_alpha$ for all $alpha in J$. It is immediate that $F$ is continuous as the its compositions with all projections are continuous (universal property of maps into products, that Munkres has in its text).
So $F:X to Z=f[X]$ is also continuous, and onto by definition.
That leaves to check that $F$ is 1-1 and $F$ is open as a map onto $Z$.
If $x neq y$ we use the first property and take $U = Xsetminus {y}$ which is
an open neighbourhood of $x$. We apply $(ast)$ to get the promised $f_{alpha_0} : X to mathbb{R}$ with $f_{alpha_0}(x)> 0$ and $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
So $F(x)$ and $F(y)$ differ at the $alpha_0$-th coordinate and so $F(x) neq F(y)$ and $F$ is 1-1.
With $x_0in U$, $U$ open in $X$, such that $F(x_0) = z_0 in F[U]$ a you chose,
we find by $(ast)$ (Applied to $x_0$ and $U$) again some $beta in J$ (you have $theta$ but I prefer to use $beta$ after $alpha$) such that
$$f_beta(x_0) >0 text{ and } f_beta(x) =0 text{ for } x notin Utag{1}$$
Then of course $$pi_beta(F(x_0)) = f_beta(x_0) in (0,infty)$$ so that $$z_0= F(x_0) in pi_{beta}^{-1}[(0,infty)] cap Z = W$$
The fact that $W subseteq F[U]$ is clear: $y in W$ implies $y in Z =f[X]$, so there is some $x in X$ such that $f(x) =y$.
If $x notin U$ we know that $f_beta(x) = 0$, by how we chose $beta$ in $(1)$, and so $F(x) notin pi_beta^{-1}[(0,infty)] =V$, but this cannot be as $F(x) in W= V cap Z$. So $x in U$ must hold and so $y=F(x) in F[U]$ showing the inclusion $W subseteq F[U]$.
:While showing injectivity I think ,by mistake you wrote $f_{alpha_0}(y)=1$ instead of $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
– P.Styles
Dec 2 at 13:12
@P.Styles already edited.
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 2 at 13:13
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You don't have a countable base for $X$. So any part of the proof that refers to those base elements must be scratched.
You just know 2 things about $X$:
One-point sets in $X$ are closed. ($X$ is $T_1$)
There is a family of continuous functions ${f_alpha: X to mathbb{R}: alpha in J }$ that obeys:
$(ast)$ For every $x_0 in X$ and every open neighbourhood $U$ of $x_0$, there exists some $alpha_0 in J$ such that $f_{alpha_0}(x_0) > 0 $ and $f_{alpha_0}(x)=0$ for all $x notin U$.
We then define $F:X to mathbb{R}^J$ by $F(x)= (f_alpha(x))_{alpha in J}$, or equivalently $pi_alpha circ F = f_alpha$ for all $alpha in J$. It is immediate that $F$ is continuous as the its compositions with all projections are continuous (universal property of maps into products, that Munkres has in its text).
So $F:X to Z=f[X]$ is also continuous, and onto by definition.
That leaves to check that $F$ is 1-1 and $F$ is open as a map onto $Z$.
If $x neq y$ we use the first property and take $U = Xsetminus {y}$ which is
an open neighbourhood of $x$. We apply $(ast)$ to get the promised $f_{alpha_0} : X to mathbb{R}$ with $f_{alpha_0}(x)> 0$ and $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
So $F(x)$ and $F(y)$ differ at the $alpha_0$-th coordinate and so $F(x) neq F(y)$ and $F$ is 1-1.
With $x_0in U$, $U$ open in $X$, such that $F(x_0) = z_0 in F[U]$ a you chose,
we find by $(ast)$ (Applied to $x_0$ and $U$) again some $beta in J$ (you have $theta$ but I prefer to use $beta$ after $alpha$) such that
$$f_beta(x_0) >0 text{ and } f_beta(x) =0 text{ for } x notin Utag{1}$$
Then of course $$pi_beta(F(x_0)) = f_beta(x_0) in (0,infty)$$ so that $$z_0= F(x_0) in pi_{beta}^{-1}[(0,infty)] cap Z = W$$
The fact that $W subseteq F[U]$ is clear: $y in W$ implies $y in Z =f[X]$, so there is some $x in X$ such that $f(x) =y$.
If $x notin U$ we know that $f_beta(x) = 0$, by how we chose $beta$ in $(1)$, and so $F(x) notin pi_beta^{-1}[(0,infty)] =V$, but this cannot be as $F(x) in W= V cap Z$. So $x in U$ must hold and so $y=F(x) in F[U]$ showing the inclusion $W subseteq F[U]$.
:While showing injectivity I think ,by mistake you wrote $f_{alpha_0}(y)=1$ instead of $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
– P.Styles
Dec 2 at 13:12
@P.Styles already edited.
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 2 at 13:13
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You don't have a countable base for $X$. So any part of the proof that refers to those base elements must be scratched.
You just know 2 things about $X$:
One-point sets in $X$ are closed. ($X$ is $T_1$)
There is a family of continuous functions ${f_alpha: X to mathbb{R}: alpha in J }$ that obeys:
$(ast)$ For every $x_0 in X$ and every open neighbourhood $U$ of $x_0$, there exists some $alpha_0 in J$ such that $f_{alpha_0}(x_0) > 0 $ and $f_{alpha_0}(x)=0$ for all $x notin U$.
We then define $F:X to mathbb{R}^J$ by $F(x)= (f_alpha(x))_{alpha in J}$, or equivalently $pi_alpha circ F = f_alpha$ for all $alpha in J$. It is immediate that $F$ is continuous as the its compositions with all projections are continuous (universal property of maps into products, that Munkres has in its text).
So $F:X to Z=f[X]$ is also continuous, and onto by definition.
That leaves to check that $F$ is 1-1 and $F$ is open as a map onto $Z$.
If $x neq y$ we use the first property and take $U = Xsetminus {y}$ which is
an open neighbourhood of $x$. We apply $(ast)$ to get the promised $f_{alpha_0} : X to mathbb{R}$ with $f_{alpha_0}(x)> 0$ and $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
So $F(x)$ and $F(y)$ differ at the $alpha_0$-th coordinate and so $F(x) neq F(y)$ and $F$ is 1-1.
With $x_0in U$, $U$ open in $X$, such that $F(x_0) = z_0 in F[U]$ a you chose,
we find by $(ast)$ (Applied to $x_0$ and $U$) again some $beta in J$ (you have $theta$ but I prefer to use $beta$ after $alpha$) such that
$$f_beta(x_0) >0 text{ and } f_beta(x) =0 text{ for } x notin Utag{1}$$
Then of course $$pi_beta(F(x_0)) = f_beta(x_0) in (0,infty)$$ so that $$z_0= F(x_0) in pi_{beta}^{-1}[(0,infty)] cap Z = W$$
The fact that $W subseteq F[U]$ is clear: $y in W$ implies $y in Z =f[X]$, so there is some $x in X$ such that $f(x) =y$.
If $x notin U$ we know that $f_beta(x) = 0$, by how we chose $beta$ in $(1)$, and so $F(x) notin pi_beta^{-1}[(0,infty)] =V$, but this cannot be as $F(x) in W= V cap Z$. So $x in U$ must hold and so $y=F(x) in F[U]$ showing the inclusion $W subseteq F[U]$.
You don't have a countable base for $X$. So any part of the proof that refers to those base elements must be scratched.
You just know 2 things about $X$:
One-point sets in $X$ are closed. ($X$ is $T_1$)
There is a family of continuous functions ${f_alpha: X to mathbb{R}: alpha in J }$ that obeys:
$(ast)$ For every $x_0 in X$ and every open neighbourhood $U$ of $x_0$, there exists some $alpha_0 in J$ such that $f_{alpha_0}(x_0) > 0 $ and $f_{alpha_0}(x)=0$ for all $x notin U$.
We then define $F:X to mathbb{R}^J$ by $F(x)= (f_alpha(x))_{alpha in J}$, or equivalently $pi_alpha circ F = f_alpha$ for all $alpha in J$. It is immediate that $F$ is continuous as the its compositions with all projections are continuous (universal property of maps into products, that Munkres has in its text).
So $F:X to Z=f[X]$ is also continuous, and onto by definition.
That leaves to check that $F$ is 1-1 and $F$ is open as a map onto $Z$.
If $x neq y$ we use the first property and take $U = Xsetminus {y}$ which is
an open neighbourhood of $x$. We apply $(ast)$ to get the promised $f_{alpha_0} : X to mathbb{R}$ with $f_{alpha_0}(x)> 0$ and $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
So $F(x)$ and $F(y)$ differ at the $alpha_0$-th coordinate and so $F(x) neq F(y)$ and $F$ is 1-1.
With $x_0in U$, $U$ open in $X$, such that $F(x_0) = z_0 in F[U]$ a you chose,
we find by $(ast)$ (Applied to $x_0$ and $U$) again some $beta in J$ (you have $theta$ but I prefer to use $beta$ after $alpha$) such that
$$f_beta(x_0) >0 text{ and } f_beta(x) =0 text{ for } x notin Utag{1}$$
Then of course $$pi_beta(F(x_0)) = f_beta(x_0) in (0,infty)$$ so that $$z_0= F(x_0) in pi_{beta}^{-1}[(0,infty)] cap Z = W$$
The fact that $W subseteq F[U]$ is clear: $y in W$ implies $y in Z =f[X]$, so there is some $x in X$ such that $f(x) =y$.
If $x notin U$ we know that $f_beta(x) = 0$, by how we chose $beta$ in $(1)$, and so $F(x) notin pi_beta^{-1}[(0,infty)] =V$, but this cannot be as $F(x) in W= V cap Z$. So $x in U$ must hold and so $y=F(x) in F[U]$ showing the inclusion $W subseteq F[U]$.
edited Dec 2 at 13:13
answered Nov 24 at 9:40
Henno Brandsma
104k346113
104k346113
:While showing injectivity I think ,by mistake you wrote $f_{alpha_0}(y)=1$ instead of $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
– P.Styles
Dec 2 at 13:12
@P.Styles already edited.
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 2 at 13:13
add a comment |
:While showing injectivity I think ,by mistake you wrote $f_{alpha_0}(y)=1$ instead of $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
– P.Styles
Dec 2 at 13:12
@P.Styles already edited.
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 2 at 13:13
:While showing injectivity I think ,by mistake you wrote $f_{alpha_0}(y)=1$ instead of $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
– P.Styles
Dec 2 at 13:12
:While showing injectivity I think ,by mistake you wrote $f_{alpha_0}(y)=1$ instead of $f_{alpha_0}(y)=0$.
– P.Styles
Dec 2 at 13:12
@P.Styles already edited.
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 2 at 13:13
@P.Styles already edited.
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 2 at 13:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011335%2fplease-check-the-proof-of-imbedding-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
We don't need Urysohn's lemma but just the property for the functions and the fact one point set aree closed. See my proof below. Bases are irrelevant.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 24 at 9:41