Proving Equality of the Induced Matrix Norm
I need to prove that the induced matrix norm satisfies $$|A| = max_{|x| = 1} |Ax|$$
Here's what I've done so far, and I'm not sure how to make the connection.
By definition, $$|A| = max_{xneq 0}{|Ax| over |x|}.$$ Because $xneq0$, $|x| neq 0 implies |x| = alpha > 0$ for any nonzero $xin mathbb{R}^n$ by definition of a vector norm. So, $$begin{align}|x| = alpha &iff {1 over alpha}|x| = 1 \ &iffleft|{1 over alpha}xright| = 1 \ &iff |hat{x}| = 1. tag{Let ${1 over alpha}x = hat{x}$}end{align}$$ I need to show that $$max_{|x| = 1}|Ax| = max_{xneq0}{|Ax| over |x|}.$$ Well I've shown that $$x neq 0 implies |hat x| = 1.$$ So does it suffice to say that since $|hat x| = 1$, $$|A| = max_{x neq 0}{|Ax| over |x|} = max_{|hat x| = 1}{|Ahat x | over |hat x|} = max_{|hat x| = 1} {|Ahat x| over 1} = max_{|hat x| = 1} |Ahat x|?$$
Thanks so much!
linear-algebra proof-verification proof-writing vectors numerical-linear-algebra
add a comment |
I need to prove that the induced matrix norm satisfies $$|A| = max_{|x| = 1} |Ax|$$
Here's what I've done so far, and I'm not sure how to make the connection.
By definition, $$|A| = max_{xneq 0}{|Ax| over |x|}.$$ Because $xneq0$, $|x| neq 0 implies |x| = alpha > 0$ for any nonzero $xin mathbb{R}^n$ by definition of a vector norm. So, $$begin{align}|x| = alpha &iff {1 over alpha}|x| = 1 \ &iffleft|{1 over alpha}xright| = 1 \ &iff |hat{x}| = 1. tag{Let ${1 over alpha}x = hat{x}$}end{align}$$ I need to show that $$max_{|x| = 1}|Ax| = max_{xneq0}{|Ax| over |x|}.$$ Well I've shown that $$x neq 0 implies |hat x| = 1.$$ So does it suffice to say that since $|hat x| = 1$, $$|A| = max_{x neq 0}{|Ax| over |x|} = max_{|hat x| = 1}{|Ahat x | over |hat x|} = max_{|hat x| = 1} {|Ahat x| over 1} = max_{|hat x| = 1} |Ahat x|?$$
Thanks so much!
linear-algebra proof-verification proof-writing vectors numerical-linear-algebra
Looks good for me. Neglecting the typo $||x||=a$ which should be $||x||=alpha$.
– robert.marik.cz
Apr 3 '16 at 8:16
Whoops! Fixed that. Thanks!
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:17
Hint.${x:|x|=1}={y/|y|:yne 0}$ and ${y:yne 0}={r x:|x|=1land 0ne rin R}.$..... Remark:We usually write $sup$ rather than $ max$ in the def'n of $|A|$ because in infinite-dimensional spaces the $max$ is not always attained.
– DanielWainfleet
Apr 3 '16 at 8:22
Ah, I'd forgotten that a magnitude of 1 meant that it was a unit vector. And I've used the $sup$ in norms before in my previous numerical analysis class with the $infty$ norm. It's just our textbook uses the $max$ definition.
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:30
add a comment |
I need to prove that the induced matrix norm satisfies $$|A| = max_{|x| = 1} |Ax|$$
Here's what I've done so far, and I'm not sure how to make the connection.
By definition, $$|A| = max_{xneq 0}{|Ax| over |x|}.$$ Because $xneq0$, $|x| neq 0 implies |x| = alpha > 0$ for any nonzero $xin mathbb{R}^n$ by definition of a vector norm. So, $$begin{align}|x| = alpha &iff {1 over alpha}|x| = 1 \ &iffleft|{1 over alpha}xright| = 1 \ &iff |hat{x}| = 1. tag{Let ${1 over alpha}x = hat{x}$}end{align}$$ I need to show that $$max_{|x| = 1}|Ax| = max_{xneq0}{|Ax| over |x|}.$$ Well I've shown that $$x neq 0 implies |hat x| = 1.$$ So does it suffice to say that since $|hat x| = 1$, $$|A| = max_{x neq 0}{|Ax| over |x|} = max_{|hat x| = 1}{|Ahat x | over |hat x|} = max_{|hat x| = 1} {|Ahat x| over 1} = max_{|hat x| = 1} |Ahat x|?$$
Thanks so much!
linear-algebra proof-verification proof-writing vectors numerical-linear-algebra
I need to prove that the induced matrix norm satisfies $$|A| = max_{|x| = 1} |Ax|$$
Here's what I've done so far, and I'm not sure how to make the connection.
By definition, $$|A| = max_{xneq 0}{|Ax| over |x|}.$$ Because $xneq0$, $|x| neq 0 implies |x| = alpha > 0$ for any nonzero $xin mathbb{R}^n$ by definition of a vector norm. So, $$begin{align}|x| = alpha &iff {1 over alpha}|x| = 1 \ &iffleft|{1 over alpha}xright| = 1 \ &iff |hat{x}| = 1. tag{Let ${1 over alpha}x = hat{x}$}end{align}$$ I need to show that $$max_{|x| = 1}|Ax| = max_{xneq0}{|Ax| over |x|}.$$ Well I've shown that $$x neq 0 implies |hat x| = 1.$$ So does it suffice to say that since $|hat x| = 1$, $$|A| = max_{x neq 0}{|Ax| over |x|} = max_{|hat x| = 1}{|Ahat x | over |hat x|} = max_{|hat x| = 1} {|Ahat x| over 1} = max_{|hat x| = 1} |Ahat x|?$$
Thanks so much!
linear-algebra proof-verification proof-writing vectors numerical-linear-algebra
linear-algebra proof-verification proof-writing vectors numerical-linear-algebra
edited Apr 3 '16 at 8:17
asked Apr 3 '16 at 8:09
Decaf-Math
3,179825
3,179825
Looks good for me. Neglecting the typo $||x||=a$ which should be $||x||=alpha$.
– robert.marik.cz
Apr 3 '16 at 8:16
Whoops! Fixed that. Thanks!
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:17
Hint.${x:|x|=1}={y/|y|:yne 0}$ and ${y:yne 0}={r x:|x|=1land 0ne rin R}.$..... Remark:We usually write $sup$ rather than $ max$ in the def'n of $|A|$ because in infinite-dimensional spaces the $max$ is not always attained.
– DanielWainfleet
Apr 3 '16 at 8:22
Ah, I'd forgotten that a magnitude of 1 meant that it was a unit vector. And I've used the $sup$ in norms before in my previous numerical analysis class with the $infty$ norm. It's just our textbook uses the $max$ definition.
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:30
add a comment |
Looks good for me. Neglecting the typo $||x||=a$ which should be $||x||=alpha$.
– robert.marik.cz
Apr 3 '16 at 8:16
Whoops! Fixed that. Thanks!
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:17
Hint.${x:|x|=1}={y/|y|:yne 0}$ and ${y:yne 0}={r x:|x|=1land 0ne rin R}.$..... Remark:We usually write $sup$ rather than $ max$ in the def'n of $|A|$ because in infinite-dimensional spaces the $max$ is not always attained.
– DanielWainfleet
Apr 3 '16 at 8:22
Ah, I'd forgotten that a magnitude of 1 meant that it was a unit vector. And I've used the $sup$ in norms before in my previous numerical analysis class with the $infty$ norm. It's just our textbook uses the $max$ definition.
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:30
Looks good for me. Neglecting the typo $||x||=a$ which should be $||x||=alpha$.
– robert.marik.cz
Apr 3 '16 at 8:16
Looks good for me. Neglecting the typo $||x||=a$ which should be $||x||=alpha$.
– robert.marik.cz
Apr 3 '16 at 8:16
Whoops! Fixed that. Thanks!
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:17
Whoops! Fixed that. Thanks!
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:17
Hint.${x:|x|=1}={y/|y|:yne 0}$ and ${y:yne 0}={r x:|x|=1land 0ne rin R}.$..... Remark:We usually write $sup$ rather than $ max$ in the def'n of $|A|$ because in infinite-dimensional spaces the $max$ is not always attained.
– DanielWainfleet
Apr 3 '16 at 8:22
Hint.${x:|x|=1}={y/|y|:yne 0}$ and ${y:yne 0}={r x:|x|=1land 0ne rin R}.$..... Remark:We usually write $sup$ rather than $ max$ in the def'n of $|A|$ because in infinite-dimensional spaces the $max$ is not always attained.
– DanielWainfleet
Apr 3 '16 at 8:22
Ah, I'd forgotten that a magnitude of 1 meant that it was a unit vector. And I've used the $sup$ in norms before in my previous numerical analysis class with the $infty$ norm. It's just our textbook uses the $max$ definition.
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:30
Ah, I'd forgotten that a magnitude of 1 meant that it was a unit vector. And I've used the $sup$ in norms before in my previous numerical analysis class with the $infty$ norm. It's just our textbook uses the $max$ definition.
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:30
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Just to add to the previous answer: a clearer argument (I think) is to proceed in two steps. You certainly have
$$
max_{|x| = 1} |Ax| = max_{|x| = 1} frac{|Ax|}{|x|} le max_{x not= 0} frac{|Ax|}{|x|}.
$$
For the reverse inequality, fix $x not= 0$. Then
$$
frac{|Ax|}{|x|} = left|Afrac{x}{|x|}right| le max_{|y| = 1} |Ay|,
$$
and so taking the maximum over nonzero $x$ gives the result.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1725705%2fproving-equality-of-the-induced-matrix-norm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Just to add to the previous answer: a clearer argument (I think) is to proceed in two steps. You certainly have
$$
max_{|x| = 1} |Ax| = max_{|x| = 1} frac{|Ax|}{|x|} le max_{x not= 0} frac{|Ax|}{|x|}.
$$
For the reverse inequality, fix $x not= 0$. Then
$$
frac{|Ax|}{|x|} = left|Afrac{x}{|x|}right| le max_{|y| = 1} |Ay|,
$$
and so taking the maximum over nonzero $x$ gives the result.
add a comment |
Just to add to the previous answer: a clearer argument (I think) is to proceed in two steps. You certainly have
$$
max_{|x| = 1} |Ax| = max_{|x| = 1} frac{|Ax|}{|x|} le max_{x not= 0} frac{|Ax|}{|x|}.
$$
For the reverse inequality, fix $x not= 0$. Then
$$
frac{|Ax|}{|x|} = left|Afrac{x}{|x|}right| le max_{|y| = 1} |Ay|,
$$
and so taking the maximum over nonzero $x$ gives the result.
add a comment |
Just to add to the previous answer: a clearer argument (I think) is to proceed in two steps. You certainly have
$$
max_{|x| = 1} |Ax| = max_{|x| = 1} frac{|Ax|}{|x|} le max_{x not= 0} frac{|Ax|}{|x|}.
$$
For the reverse inequality, fix $x not= 0$. Then
$$
frac{|Ax|}{|x|} = left|Afrac{x}{|x|}right| le max_{|y| = 1} |Ay|,
$$
and so taking the maximum over nonzero $x$ gives the result.
Just to add to the previous answer: a clearer argument (I think) is to proceed in two steps. You certainly have
$$
max_{|x| = 1} |Ax| = max_{|x| = 1} frac{|Ax|}{|x|} le max_{x not= 0} frac{|Ax|}{|x|}.
$$
For the reverse inequality, fix $x not= 0$. Then
$$
frac{|Ax|}{|x|} = left|Afrac{x}{|x|}right| le max_{|y| = 1} |Ay|,
$$
and so taking the maximum over nonzero $x$ gives the result.
answered Apr 3 '16 at 8:37
Aidan Sims
84959
84959
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1725705%2fproving-equality-of-the-induced-matrix-norm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Looks good for me. Neglecting the typo $||x||=a$ which should be $||x||=alpha$.
– robert.marik.cz
Apr 3 '16 at 8:16
Whoops! Fixed that. Thanks!
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:17
Hint.${x:|x|=1}={y/|y|:yne 0}$ and ${y:yne 0}={r x:|x|=1land 0ne rin R}.$..... Remark:We usually write $sup$ rather than $ max$ in the def'n of $|A|$ because in infinite-dimensional spaces the $max$ is not always attained.
– DanielWainfleet
Apr 3 '16 at 8:22
Ah, I'd forgotten that a magnitude of 1 meant that it was a unit vector. And I've used the $sup$ in norms before in my previous numerical analysis class with the $infty$ norm. It's just our textbook uses the $max$ definition.
– Decaf-Math
Apr 3 '16 at 8:30