Are There Any Special Properties for Different Number of “Terms” in Equal Summations
$begingroup$
I found that solving for $e^{ix}$ gave a formula that produces two n "terms" of the starting summation
and defining terms as two n products like 1+ix being two terms of the summation
$e^{ix} $ =$sum_{n=0}^infty$ $frac{(ix)^n}{n!}$
$=1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}-frac{ix^3}{3!}+...$
So solving for this using Euler's Identity $e^{i x}=cos(x)+isin(x)$,
$e^{ix}=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!} + sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}i $
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!}+frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)(2n)!}i$
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(2n+1)(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!(2n+1)}+frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)(2n)!}i$, so
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}(2n+ix+1)}{(2n+1)!}=e^{ix}$ ,
but unlike the first $e^{ix}$ series this one produces 2 parts of the first series with n=0 on the solved summation =1+ix, which were n=0 and n=1 for the original
from this I decided to make a summation that produced 3 terms per each n by grouping the original $e^{ix}$ summation by threes and got
$sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^{n+1}x^{3n}i^{n}(x^2-(3n+2)ix-(3n+1)(3n+2))}{(3n+2)!}$ ,
so n=0 produces $1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}$, and n=1 producing $frac{-ix^3}{3!}+frac{x^4}{4!}+frac{ix^5}{5!}$, a continuation of the original infinite series. At the same time I haven't been able to prove this is equal to $e^{ix}$ through any other means
I also did this for 4 terms which created,
$sum_{n=0}^infty frac{-ix^{4n} (x^3-(4n+3)ix^2-(4n+2)(4n+3)x+(4n+1)(4n+2)(4n+3)i}{(4n+3)!}$
Which again n=0 produces $1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}-frac{ix^3}{3!}$
and from these I tried to create a general formula to produce the infinite sum that produces a certain number of the original terms per n, as there seems to be a definite pattern, but I haven't quite found one yet.
So do all these have the same properties? Like would there be any theoretical way to produce a formula that has infinite terms, or truncate to the negatives, or zero? Or anything special that one summation is capable of over another?
sequences-and-series summation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found that solving for $e^{ix}$ gave a formula that produces two n "terms" of the starting summation
and defining terms as two n products like 1+ix being two terms of the summation
$e^{ix} $ =$sum_{n=0}^infty$ $frac{(ix)^n}{n!}$
$=1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}-frac{ix^3}{3!}+...$
So solving for this using Euler's Identity $e^{i x}=cos(x)+isin(x)$,
$e^{ix}=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!} + sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}i $
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!}+frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)(2n)!}i$
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(2n+1)(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!(2n+1)}+frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)(2n)!}i$, so
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}(2n+ix+1)}{(2n+1)!}=e^{ix}$ ,
but unlike the first $e^{ix}$ series this one produces 2 parts of the first series with n=0 on the solved summation =1+ix, which were n=0 and n=1 for the original
from this I decided to make a summation that produced 3 terms per each n by grouping the original $e^{ix}$ summation by threes and got
$sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^{n+1}x^{3n}i^{n}(x^2-(3n+2)ix-(3n+1)(3n+2))}{(3n+2)!}$ ,
so n=0 produces $1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}$, and n=1 producing $frac{-ix^3}{3!}+frac{x^4}{4!}+frac{ix^5}{5!}$, a continuation of the original infinite series. At the same time I haven't been able to prove this is equal to $e^{ix}$ through any other means
I also did this for 4 terms which created,
$sum_{n=0}^infty frac{-ix^{4n} (x^3-(4n+3)ix^2-(4n+2)(4n+3)x+(4n+1)(4n+2)(4n+3)i}{(4n+3)!}$
Which again n=0 produces $1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}-frac{ix^3}{3!}$
and from these I tried to create a general formula to produce the infinite sum that produces a certain number of the original terms per n, as there seems to be a definite pattern, but I haven't quite found one yet.
So do all these have the same properties? Like would there be any theoretical way to produce a formula that has infinite terms, or truncate to the negatives, or zero? Or anything special that one summation is capable of over another?
sequences-and-series summation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found that solving for $e^{ix}$ gave a formula that produces two n "terms" of the starting summation
and defining terms as two n products like 1+ix being two terms of the summation
$e^{ix} $ =$sum_{n=0}^infty$ $frac{(ix)^n}{n!}$
$=1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}-frac{ix^3}{3!}+...$
So solving for this using Euler's Identity $e^{i x}=cos(x)+isin(x)$,
$e^{ix}=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!} + sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}i $
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!}+frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)(2n)!}i$
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(2n+1)(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!(2n+1)}+frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)(2n)!}i$, so
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}(2n+ix+1)}{(2n+1)!}=e^{ix}$ ,
but unlike the first $e^{ix}$ series this one produces 2 parts of the first series with n=0 on the solved summation =1+ix, which were n=0 and n=1 for the original
from this I decided to make a summation that produced 3 terms per each n by grouping the original $e^{ix}$ summation by threes and got
$sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^{n+1}x^{3n}i^{n}(x^2-(3n+2)ix-(3n+1)(3n+2))}{(3n+2)!}$ ,
so n=0 produces $1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}$, and n=1 producing $frac{-ix^3}{3!}+frac{x^4}{4!}+frac{ix^5}{5!}$, a continuation of the original infinite series. At the same time I haven't been able to prove this is equal to $e^{ix}$ through any other means
I also did this for 4 terms which created,
$sum_{n=0}^infty frac{-ix^{4n} (x^3-(4n+3)ix^2-(4n+2)(4n+3)x+(4n+1)(4n+2)(4n+3)i}{(4n+3)!}$
Which again n=0 produces $1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}-frac{ix^3}{3!}$
and from these I tried to create a general formula to produce the infinite sum that produces a certain number of the original terms per n, as there seems to be a definite pattern, but I haven't quite found one yet.
So do all these have the same properties? Like would there be any theoretical way to produce a formula that has infinite terms, or truncate to the negatives, or zero? Or anything special that one summation is capable of over another?
sequences-and-series summation
$endgroup$
I found that solving for $e^{ix}$ gave a formula that produces two n "terms" of the starting summation
and defining terms as two n products like 1+ix being two terms of the summation
$e^{ix} $ =$sum_{n=0}^infty$ $frac{(ix)^n}{n!}$
$=1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}-frac{ix^3}{3!}+...$
So solving for this using Euler's Identity $e^{i x}=cos(x)+isin(x)$,
$e^{ix}=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!} + sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)!}i $
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!}+frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)(2n)!}i$
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(2n+1)(-1)^nx^{2n}}{(2n)!(2n+1)}+frac{(-1)^nx^{2n+1}}{(2n+1)(2n)!}i$, so
$=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^nx^{2n}(2n+ix+1)}{(2n+1)!}=e^{ix}$ ,
but unlike the first $e^{ix}$ series this one produces 2 parts of the first series with n=0 on the solved summation =1+ix, which were n=0 and n=1 for the original
from this I decided to make a summation that produced 3 terms per each n by grouping the original $e^{ix}$ summation by threes and got
$sum_{n=0}^infty frac{(-1)^{n+1}x^{3n}i^{n}(x^2-(3n+2)ix-(3n+1)(3n+2))}{(3n+2)!}$ ,
so n=0 produces $1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}$, and n=1 producing $frac{-ix^3}{3!}+frac{x^4}{4!}+frac{ix^5}{5!}$, a continuation of the original infinite series. At the same time I haven't been able to prove this is equal to $e^{ix}$ through any other means
I also did this for 4 terms which created,
$sum_{n=0}^infty frac{-ix^{4n} (x^3-(4n+3)ix^2-(4n+2)(4n+3)x+(4n+1)(4n+2)(4n+3)i}{(4n+3)!}$
Which again n=0 produces $1+ix-frac{x^2}{2!}-frac{ix^3}{3!}$
and from these I tried to create a general formula to produce the infinite sum that produces a certain number of the original terms per n, as there seems to be a definite pattern, but I haven't quite found one yet.
So do all these have the same properties? Like would there be any theoretical way to produce a formula that has infinite terms, or truncate to the negatives, or zero? Or anything special that one summation is capable of over another?
sequences-and-series summation
sequences-and-series summation
asked Dec 4 '18 at 6:49
2AM Aesthetic2AM Aesthetic
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025216%2fare-there-any-special-properties-for-different-number-of-terms-in-equal-summat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025216%2fare-there-any-special-properties-for-different-number-of-terms-in-equal-summat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown