Is $operatorname{Frac}(bigcap_{i in I}R_i)=K$ when each $R_i$ is integrally closed and...












1












$begingroup$


Let $K$ be a field. Let $left { R_iright }_{i in I} $ be a set of integrally closed domains
in $K$ whose field of fractions equals $K$.



It is easy to show that $R:=bigcap_{i in I}R_i$ is an integrally closed ring in its field of fractions. I was wondering if the field of fractions of $R$ is always $K$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $K$ be a field. Let $left { R_iright }_{i in I} $ be a set of integrally closed domains
    in $K$ whose field of fractions equals $K$.



    It is easy to show that $R:=bigcap_{i in I}R_i$ is an integrally closed ring in its field of fractions. I was wondering if the field of fractions of $R$ is always $K$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $K$ be a field. Let $left { R_iright }_{i in I} $ be a set of integrally closed domains
      in $K$ whose field of fractions equals $K$.



      It is easy to show that $R:=bigcap_{i in I}R_i$ is an integrally closed ring in its field of fractions. I was wondering if the field of fractions of $R$ is always $K$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $K$ be a field. Let $left { R_iright }_{i in I} $ be a set of integrally closed domains
      in $K$ whose field of fractions equals $K$.



      It is easy to show that $R:=bigcap_{i in I}R_i$ is an integrally closed ring in its field of fractions. I was wondering if the field of fractions of $R$ is always $K$.







      abstract-algebra algebraic-number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 2 '18 at 23:28









      Bernard

      119k740113




      119k740113










      asked Dec 2 '18 at 23:25









      CorneliusCornelius

      1957




      1957






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          It is not true in general. Here is a counter-example.



          Consider the domains $R_p:=mathbb Z[px]$, where $p$ is a prime number. Observe that the field of fractions of each $R_p$ is equal to $mathbb Q(x)$. Since each $R_p$ is isomorphic to $mathbb Z[x]$ then it is a UFD and hence integrally closed in its field of fractions. Then, observe that



          begin{equation}
          R:=bigcap_{p: prime} R_p=mathbb Z
          end{equation}



          where the field of fractions of $mathbb Z$ is $mathbb Q$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023369%2fis-operatornamefrac-bigcap-i-in-ir-i-k-when-each-r-i-is-integrally-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            It is not true in general. Here is a counter-example.



            Consider the domains $R_p:=mathbb Z[px]$, where $p$ is a prime number. Observe that the field of fractions of each $R_p$ is equal to $mathbb Q(x)$. Since each $R_p$ is isomorphic to $mathbb Z[x]$ then it is a UFD and hence integrally closed in its field of fractions. Then, observe that



            begin{equation}
            R:=bigcap_{p: prime} R_p=mathbb Z
            end{equation}



            where the field of fractions of $mathbb Z$ is $mathbb Q$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              5












              $begingroup$

              It is not true in general. Here is a counter-example.



              Consider the domains $R_p:=mathbb Z[px]$, where $p$ is a prime number. Observe that the field of fractions of each $R_p$ is equal to $mathbb Q(x)$. Since each $R_p$ is isomorphic to $mathbb Z[x]$ then it is a UFD and hence integrally closed in its field of fractions. Then, observe that



              begin{equation}
              R:=bigcap_{p: prime} R_p=mathbb Z
              end{equation}



              where the field of fractions of $mathbb Z$ is $mathbb Q$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                It is not true in general. Here is a counter-example.



                Consider the domains $R_p:=mathbb Z[px]$, where $p$ is a prime number. Observe that the field of fractions of each $R_p$ is equal to $mathbb Q(x)$. Since each $R_p$ is isomorphic to $mathbb Z[x]$ then it is a UFD and hence integrally closed in its field of fractions. Then, observe that



                begin{equation}
                R:=bigcap_{p: prime} R_p=mathbb Z
                end{equation}



                where the field of fractions of $mathbb Z$ is $mathbb Q$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                It is not true in general. Here is a counter-example.



                Consider the domains $R_p:=mathbb Z[px]$, where $p$ is a prime number. Observe that the field of fractions of each $R_p$ is equal to $mathbb Q(x)$. Since each $R_p$ is isomorphic to $mathbb Z[x]$ then it is a UFD and hence integrally closed in its field of fractions. Then, observe that



                begin{equation}
                R:=bigcap_{p: prime} R_p=mathbb Z
                end{equation}



                where the field of fractions of $mathbb Z$ is $mathbb Q$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 2 '18 at 23:37









                richarddedekindricharddedekind

                711316




                711316






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023369%2fis-operatornamefrac-bigcap-i-in-ir-i-k-when-each-r-i-is-integrally-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Willebadessen

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                    Residenzschloss Arolsen