Proof Stirling equality












0














Proof that



$k^n = sum_{j=1}^{k}binom{k}{j}j!S(n,j)$



To justify this last equality you have to consider, firstly, that if $X$ and $Y$ are two sets with $n$ and $k$ elements, respectively, then there are $k^{n}$ applications of $X$ and $Y$. To reach the equality it have to use that these applications can be constructed in the following way: the images of the elements of X are a series of elements of Y, say j of them, where $1leq jleq k$ (the rest will not have preimage). Then, first, we decided that elements of Y have preimagenes and, once decided that the elements "arrives" the application, it only remains to build a suprayective application that has only these elements as an image. This is the process that should lead to the desired formula.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • "applications"? Do you means maps? There is a typo in the header. And you can add the tag proof-verification :)
    – Stockfish
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:09










  • Welcome to MSE. Please read this text about how to ask a good question.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:11










  • Your proof is correct modulo small language issues.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Nov 29 '18 at 11:06


















0














Proof that



$k^n = sum_{j=1}^{k}binom{k}{j}j!S(n,j)$



To justify this last equality you have to consider, firstly, that if $X$ and $Y$ are two sets with $n$ and $k$ elements, respectively, then there are $k^{n}$ applications of $X$ and $Y$. To reach the equality it have to use that these applications can be constructed in the following way: the images of the elements of X are a series of elements of Y, say j of them, where $1leq jleq k$ (the rest will not have preimage). Then, first, we decided that elements of Y have preimagenes and, once decided that the elements "arrives" the application, it only remains to build a suprayective application that has only these elements as an image. This is the process that should lead to the desired formula.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • "applications"? Do you means maps? There is a typo in the header. And you can add the tag proof-verification :)
    – Stockfish
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:09










  • Welcome to MSE. Please read this text about how to ask a good question.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:11










  • Your proof is correct modulo small language issues.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Nov 29 '18 at 11:06
















0












0








0







Proof that



$k^n = sum_{j=1}^{k}binom{k}{j}j!S(n,j)$



To justify this last equality you have to consider, firstly, that if $X$ and $Y$ are two sets with $n$ and $k$ elements, respectively, then there are $k^{n}$ applications of $X$ and $Y$. To reach the equality it have to use that these applications can be constructed in the following way: the images of the elements of X are a series of elements of Y, say j of them, where $1leq jleq k$ (the rest will not have preimage). Then, first, we decided that elements of Y have preimagenes and, once decided that the elements "arrives" the application, it only remains to build a suprayective application that has only these elements as an image. This is the process that should lead to the desired formula.










share|cite|improve this question















Proof that



$k^n = sum_{j=1}^{k}binom{k}{j}j!S(n,j)$



To justify this last equality you have to consider, firstly, that if $X$ and $Y$ are two sets with $n$ and $k$ elements, respectively, then there are $k^{n}$ applications of $X$ and $Y$. To reach the equality it have to use that these applications can be constructed in the following way: the images of the elements of X are a series of elements of Y, say j of them, where $1leq jleq k$ (the rest will not have preimage). Then, first, we decided that elements of Y have preimagenes and, once decided that the elements "arrives" the application, it only remains to build a suprayective application that has only these elements as an image. This is the process that should lead to the desired formula.







discrete-mathematics proof-verification stirling-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 29 '18 at 9:12







Str0nger

















asked Nov 29 '18 at 9:07









Str0ngerStr0nger

12




12












  • "applications"? Do you means maps? There is a typo in the header. And you can add the tag proof-verification :)
    – Stockfish
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:09










  • Welcome to MSE. Please read this text about how to ask a good question.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:11










  • Your proof is correct modulo small language issues.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Nov 29 '18 at 11:06




















  • "applications"? Do you means maps? There is a typo in the header. And you can add the tag proof-verification :)
    – Stockfish
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:09










  • Welcome to MSE. Please read this text about how to ask a good question.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Nov 29 '18 at 9:11










  • Your proof is correct modulo small language issues.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Nov 29 '18 at 11:06


















"applications"? Do you means maps? There is a typo in the header. And you can add the tag proof-verification :)
– Stockfish
Nov 29 '18 at 9:09




"applications"? Do you means maps? There is a typo in the header. And you can add the tag proof-verification :)
– Stockfish
Nov 29 '18 at 9:09












Welcome to MSE. Please read this text about how to ask a good question.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 29 '18 at 9:11




Welcome to MSE. Please read this text about how to ask a good question.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 29 '18 at 9:11












Your proof is correct modulo small language issues.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 29 '18 at 11:06






Your proof is correct modulo small language issues.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 29 '18 at 11:06












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018376%2fproof-stirling-equality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018376%2fproof-stirling-equality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Willebadessen

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Residenzschloss Arolsen