classification of prime ideals $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$












0












$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{Z}[1/2] = {a/(2^{k}) : text{$a$ is odd}, k in mathbb{Z} }$ be a ring,
I would like to classify the prime ideals.



I am having a hard time thinking about this problem, I have no ideal how to start thinking about it.



Any insight to the problem will be highly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:33


















0












$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{Z}[1/2] = {a/(2^{k}) : text{$a$ is odd}, k in mathbb{Z} }$ be a ring,
I would like to classify the prime ideals.



I am having a hard time thinking about this problem, I have no ideal how to start thinking about it.



Any insight to the problem will be highly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:33
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{Z}[1/2] = {a/(2^{k}) : text{$a$ is odd}, k in mathbb{Z} }$ be a ring,
I would like to classify the prime ideals.



I am having a hard time thinking about this problem, I have no ideal how to start thinking about it.



Any insight to the problem will be highly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $mathbb{Z}[1/2] = {a/(2^{k}) : text{$a$ is odd}, k in mathbb{Z} }$ be a ring,
I would like to classify the prime ideals.



I am having a hard time thinking about this problem, I have no ideal how to start thinking about it.



Any insight to the problem will be highly appreciated.







ring-theory maximal-and-prime-ideals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 12:55









Andreas Caranti

56.5k34395




56.5k34395










asked Dec 6 '18 at 12:30









evgniy tayarovevgniy tayarov

132




132








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:33
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:33










1




1




$begingroup$
Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 6 '18 at 12:33






$begingroup$
Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 6 '18 at 12:33












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.



We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you, i think i got it
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 14:37



















0












$begingroup$

Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.



Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.



Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$

implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.



Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$

is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.



Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.





More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:




  1. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;

  2. if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;

  3. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.


Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.



Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.



Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.



Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.



In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you for such a detailed proof
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 18:06











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028442%2fclassification-of-prime-ideals-mathbbz1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.



We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you, i think i got it
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 14:37
















0












$begingroup$

Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.



We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you, i think i got it
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 14:37














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.



We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.



We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 6 '18 at 13:59









Rafay AsharyRafay Ashary

83618




83618












  • $begingroup$
    thank you, i think i got it
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 14:37


















  • $begingroup$
    thank you, i think i got it
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 14:37
















$begingroup$
thank you, i think i got it
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 14:37




$begingroup$
thank you, i think i got it
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 14:37











0












$begingroup$

Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.



Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.



Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$

implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.



Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$

is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.



Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.





More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:




  1. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;

  2. if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;

  3. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.


Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.



Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.



Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.



Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.



In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you for such a detailed proof
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 18:06
















0












$begingroup$

Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.



Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.



Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$

implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.



Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$

is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.



Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.





More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:




  1. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;

  2. if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;

  3. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.


Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.



Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.



Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.



Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.



In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you for such a detailed proof
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 18:06














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.



Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.



Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$

implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.



Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$

is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.



Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.





More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:




  1. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;

  2. if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;

  3. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.


Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.



Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.



Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.



Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.



In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.



Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.



Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$

implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.



Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$

is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.



Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.





More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:




  1. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;

  2. if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;

  3. if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.


Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.



Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.



Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.



Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.



In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 6 '18 at 14:50









egregegreg

181k1485203




181k1485203












  • $begingroup$
    thank you for such a detailed proof
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 18:06


















  • $begingroup$
    thank you for such a detailed proof
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Dec 6 '18 at 18:06
















$begingroup$
thank you for such a detailed proof
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 18:06




$begingroup$
thank you for such a detailed proof
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 18:06


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028442%2fclassification-of-prime-ideals-mathbbz1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Willebadessen

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Residenzschloss Arolsen