classification of prime ideals $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$
$begingroup$
Let $mathbb{Z}[1/2] = {a/(2^{k}) : text{$a$ is odd}, k in mathbb{Z} }$ be a ring,
I would like to classify the prime ideals.
I am having a hard time thinking about this problem, I have no ideal how to start thinking about it.
Any insight to the problem will be highly appreciated.
ring-theory maximal-and-prime-ideals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathbb{Z}[1/2] = {a/(2^{k}) : text{$a$ is odd}, k in mathbb{Z} }$ be a ring,
I would like to classify the prime ideals.
I am having a hard time thinking about this problem, I have no ideal how to start thinking about it.
Any insight to the problem will be highly appreciated.
ring-theory maximal-and-prime-ideals
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 6 '18 at 12:33
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $mathbb{Z}[1/2] = {a/(2^{k}) : text{$a$ is odd}, k in mathbb{Z} }$ be a ring,
I would like to classify the prime ideals.
I am having a hard time thinking about this problem, I have no ideal how to start thinking about it.
Any insight to the problem will be highly appreciated.
ring-theory maximal-and-prime-ideals
$endgroup$
Let $mathbb{Z}[1/2] = {a/(2^{k}) : text{$a$ is odd}, k in mathbb{Z} }$ be a ring,
I would like to classify the prime ideals.
I am having a hard time thinking about this problem, I have no ideal how to start thinking about it.
Any insight to the problem will be highly appreciated.
ring-theory maximal-and-prime-ideals
ring-theory maximal-and-prime-ideals
edited Dec 6 '18 at 12:55
Andreas Caranti
56.5k34395
56.5k34395
asked Dec 6 '18 at 12:30
evgniy tayarovevgniy tayarov
132
132
1
$begingroup$
Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 6 '18 at 12:33
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 6 '18 at 12:33
1
1
$begingroup$
Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 6 '18 at 12:33
$begingroup$
Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 6 '18 at 12:33
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.
We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you, i think i got it
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 14:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.
Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.
Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$
implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.
Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$
is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.
Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.
More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;
- if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.
Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.
Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.
Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.
Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.
In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you for such a detailed proof
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028442%2fclassification-of-prime-ideals-mathbbz1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.
We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you, i think i got it
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 14:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.
We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you, i think i got it
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 14:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.
We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$
$endgroup$
Sketch: Observe that $mathbb Z[1/2]cong mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$. Let $eta:mathbb Z[x]to mathbb Z/(2x-1)$ be the usual quotient map. Each prime ideal $Isubseteq mathbb Z[x]/(2x-1)$ is taken to a prime ideal in $mathbb Z[x]$ via its preimage under $eta$. So it suffices to classify the proper prime ideals of $mathbb Z[x]$ properly containing $(2x-1)$. One can show that these are exactly those $Jsubseteqmathbb Z[x]$ of the form $(p,2x-1)$ for prime $pneq 2$ and furthermore that $eta(p,2x-1)=eta(p',2x-1)iff p=p'$.
We conclude that the prime ideals of $mathbb Z[1/2]$ are exactly those of the form $(text{loc}(p))subseteq mathbb Z[1/2]$ where $pneq 2$ is prime and $text{loc}:mathbb Ztomathbb Z[1/2]$ is the localization map $Box$
answered Dec 6 '18 at 13:59
Rafay AsharyRafay Ashary
83618
83618
$begingroup$
thank you, i think i got it
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 14:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
thank you, i think i got it
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 14:37
$begingroup$
thank you, i think i got it
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 14:37
$begingroup$
thank you, i think i got it
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 14:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.
Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.
Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$
implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.
Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$
is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.
Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.
More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;
- if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.
Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.
Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.
Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.
Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.
In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you for such a detailed proof
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.
Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.
Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$
implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.
Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$
is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.
Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.
More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;
- if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.
Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.
Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.
Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.
Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.
In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you for such a detailed proof
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.
Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.
Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$
implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.
Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$
is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.
Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.
More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;
- if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.
Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.
Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.
Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.
Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.
In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.
$endgroup$
Let $p$ be a prime different from $2$; we want to show that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is a prime ideal.
Note that every element of $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $px/2^k$, for some $xinmathbb{Z}$ and $kinmathbb{N}$. Similarly, elements in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ can be written as $y/2^k$.
Suppose $a,binmathbb{Z}$ and $m,ninmathbb{N}$; then
$$
frac{a}{2^m}frac{b}{2^n}=frac{px}{2^k}
$$
implies that $pmid ab$, because we have $2^{m+n}px=2^kab$, so $pmid 2^kab$. Since $pne2$, we have $pmid ab$ and the conclusion easily follows.
Suppose $I$ is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}[1/2]$. Then
$$
I^c={xinmathbb{Z}:xin I}=Icapmathbb{Z}
$$
is a prime ideal in $mathbb{Z}$, so it is of the form $pmathbb{Z}$. Note that $pmathbb{Z}[1/2]subseteq I$. On the other hand, if $y/2^kin I$, then $yin I$ and so $y=px$ for some $x$. This proves the reverse inclusion.
Note that $pne2$, because $2mathbb{Z}[1/2]=mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ is not a prime ideal.
More generally, given a multiplicative set $S$ in $R$:
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ such that $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $S^{-1}P$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$;
- if $Q$ is a prime ideal of $S^{-1}R$, then $Q^c={xin R:x/1in Q}$ is a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q^ccap S=emptyset$;
- if $P$ is a prime ideal of $R$ and $Pcap S=emptyset$, then $P=(S^{-1}P)^c$.
Proof of 1. Suppose $(a/s)(b/t)=x/u$, with $a,bin R$, $xin P$ and $s,t,uin S$. Then $abuv=xstuv$, for some $vin S$. Therefore $abuvin P$; since $uvnotin P$, we conclude $abin P$ and therefore $a/sin S^{-1}P$ or $b/tin S^{-1}P$.
Proof of 2. The fact that $Q^c$ is a prime ideal is obvious. If $sin Q^ccap S$, then $s/sin Q$: contradiction.
Proof of 3. Let $xin P$; then $x/1in S^{-1}P$, so $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$. Let $xin(S^{-1}P)^c$; this means $x/1=y/s$ for some $yin P$ and $sin S$; therefore, for some $tin S$, $xst=yt$; but $ytin P$ and $stnotin P$; therefore $xin P$.
Conclusion: the map $Pmapsto S^{-1}P$ defines a bijection between the prime ideals of $R$ not intersecting $S$ and the prime ideals of $S^{-1}R$.
In your case $R=mathbb{Z}$ and $S={2^n:ninmathbb{N}}$. You can see the steps in the proof of the general fact as mirrored in the special case above.
answered Dec 6 '18 at 14:50
egregegreg
181k1485203
181k1485203
$begingroup$
thank you for such a detailed proof
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
thank you for such a detailed proof
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 18:06
$begingroup$
thank you for such a detailed proof
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 18:06
$begingroup$
thank you for such a detailed proof
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Dec 6 '18 at 18:06
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028442%2fclassification-of-prime-ideals-mathbbz1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Apart from $(2)$, which is now the entire ring, the prime ideals haven't changed that much from $Bbb Z$, really.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Dec 6 '18 at 12:33