Changing open and compact sets in regular measure definition
$begingroup$
The definition of outer regular and inner regular measures:
$begin{equation}
mu(E) = inf_{U textrm{ open}} {mu(U): U supseteq E}
end{equation}
$
$begin{equation}
mu(E) = sup_{U textrm{ compact}} {mu(U): U subseteq E}.
end{equation}$
What happened if I change open and compact sets in these definitions?
Example: Let $mu1$ be a Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R^1}$.
Only open subset of $E1 = [0,1] cap mathbb{Q}$ is {$emptyset$}, maximal closed set is $[0,1]$. The set $E2 = [0,1]setminus mathbb{Q}$.
Both have the same properties - Only open is {$emptyset$} and max. closed set is $[0,1]$. But $mu1 = 0$ and $mu2 = 1$.
How can I interpret this result? Is there a theorem?
measure-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The definition of outer regular and inner regular measures:
$begin{equation}
mu(E) = inf_{U textrm{ open}} {mu(U): U supseteq E}
end{equation}
$
$begin{equation}
mu(E) = sup_{U textrm{ compact}} {mu(U): U subseteq E}.
end{equation}$
What happened if I change open and compact sets in these definitions?
Example: Let $mu1$ be a Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R^1}$.
Only open subset of $E1 = [0,1] cap mathbb{Q}$ is {$emptyset$}, maximal closed set is $[0,1]$. The set $E2 = [0,1]setminus mathbb{Q}$.
Both have the same properties - Only open is {$emptyset$} and max. closed set is $[0,1]$. But $mu1 = 0$ and $mu2 = 1$.
How can I interpret this result? Is there a theorem?
measure-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $E$ is unbounded and $mathbb R$ has the standard topology, your new definition won't make sense
$endgroup$
– Matematleta
Dec 17 '18 at 16:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The definition of outer regular and inner regular measures:
$begin{equation}
mu(E) = inf_{U textrm{ open}} {mu(U): U supseteq E}
end{equation}
$
$begin{equation}
mu(E) = sup_{U textrm{ compact}} {mu(U): U subseteq E}.
end{equation}$
What happened if I change open and compact sets in these definitions?
Example: Let $mu1$ be a Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R^1}$.
Only open subset of $E1 = [0,1] cap mathbb{Q}$ is {$emptyset$}, maximal closed set is $[0,1]$. The set $E2 = [0,1]setminus mathbb{Q}$.
Both have the same properties - Only open is {$emptyset$} and max. closed set is $[0,1]$. But $mu1 = 0$ and $mu2 = 1$.
How can I interpret this result? Is there a theorem?
measure-theory
$endgroup$
The definition of outer regular and inner regular measures:
$begin{equation}
mu(E) = inf_{U textrm{ open}} {mu(U): U supseteq E}
end{equation}
$
$begin{equation}
mu(E) = sup_{U textrm{ compact}} {mu(U): U subseteq E}.
end{equation}$
What happened if I change open and compact sets in these definitions?
Example: Let $mu1$ be a Lebesgue measure on $mathbb{R^1}$.
Only open subset of $E1 = [0,1] cap mathbb{Q}$ is {$emptyset$}, maximal closed set is $[0,1]$. The set $E2 = [0,1]setminus mathbb{Q}$.
Both have the same properties - Only open is {$emptyset$} and max. closed set is $[0,1]$. But $mu1 = 0$ and $mu2 = 1$.
How can I interpret this result? Is there a theorem?
measure-theory
measure-theory
asked Dec 17 '18 at 14:46
MetsoMetso
1549
1549
$begingroup$
If $E$ is unbounded and $mathbb R$ has the standard topology, your new definition won't make sense
$endgroup$
– Matematleta
Dec 17 '18 at 16:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $E$ is unbounded and $mathbb R$ has the standard topology, your new definition won't make sense
$endgroup$
– Matematleta
Dec 17 '18 at 16:09
$begingroup$
If $E$ is unbounded and $mathbb R$ has the standard topology, your new definition won't make sense
$endgroup$
– Matematleta
Dec 17 '18 at 16:09
$begingroup$
If $E$ is unbounded and $mathbb R$ has the standard topology, your new definition won't make sense
$endgroup$
– Matematleta
Dec 17 '18 at 16:09
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044037%2fchanging-open-and-compact-sets-in-regular-measure-definition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044037%2fchanging-open-and-compact-sets-in-regular-measure-definition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If $E$ is unbounded and $mathbb R$ has the standard topology, your new definition won't make sense
$endgroup$
– Matematleta
Dec 17 '18 at 16:09