Does the canonical map of the universal coefficient theorem induce an isomorphism?
$begingroup$
Suppose $C$ is a free chain complex over a PID $R$, and $H(C)$ is finitely generated. From the universal coefficient theorem, there is a short exact sequence:
$$
0 rightarrow text{Ext}^1_R(H(C), R) rightarrow H(C^*) overset{h}{rightarrow} text{Hom}_R(H(C), R) rightarrow 0.
$$
My question is, is the following homomorphism
$$ bar{h}: H(C^*)/text{(tor)} rightarrow text{Hom}_R(H(C), R)$$
an isomorphism?
A torsion $[f] in H(C^*)$ is annihilated by $h$, since if there is an $a in R$ such that $a[f] = 0$, then $$ah([f])([z]) = aleft< [f], [z]right> = left< a[f], [z]right> = 0,$$ so $h([f]) = 0$ and the map is well-defined. On the other hand, from the structure theorem, we may write $$H(C) cong R^r oplus_i R/(a_i)$$ and we have $$text{Hom}_R(H(C), R) cong text{Hom}_R(R^r, R) oplus_i text{Hom}_R(R/(a_i), R) cong R^r$$ and $$text{Ext}_R(H(C), R) cong text{Ext}_R(R^r, R) oplus_i text{Ext}_R(R/(a_i), R) cong bigoplus_i R/(a_i)$$ so we have $$H(C^*) cong R^r oplus_i R/(a_i).$$
So we can say that $text{Ext}_R(H(C), R)$ is (abstractly) isomorphic to the torsion submodule of $H(C^*)$, but not canonically as discussed in this question.
Thanks in advance.
homological-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $C$ is a free chain complex over a PID $R$, and $H(C)$ is finitely generated. From the universal coefficient theorem, there is a short exact sequence:
$$
0 rightarrow text{Ext}^1_R(H(C), R) rightarrow H(C^*) overset{h}{rightarrow} text{Hom}_R(H(C), R) rightarrow 0.
$$
My question is, is the following homomorphism
$$ bar{h}: H(C^*)/text{(tor)} rightarrow text{Hom}_R(H(C), R)$$
an isomorphism?
A torsion $[f] in H(C^*)$ is annihilated by $h$, since if there is an $a in R$ such that $a[f] = 0$, then $$ah([f])([z]) = aleft< [f], [z]right> = left< a[f], [z]right> = 0,$$ so $h([f]) = 0$ and the map is well-defined. On the other hand, from the structure theorem, we may write $$H(C) cong R^r oplus_i R/(a_i)$$ and we have $$text{Hom}_R(H(C), R) cong text{Hom}_R(R^r, R) oplus_i text{Hom}_R(R/(a_i), R) cong R^r$$ and $$text{Ext}_R(H(C), R) cong text{Ext}_R(R^r, R) oplus_i text{Ext}_R(R/(a_i), R) cong bigoplus_i R/(a_i)$$ so we have $$H(C^*) cong R^r oplus_i R/(a_i).$$
So we can say that $text{Ext}_R(H(C), R)$ is (abstractly) isomorphic to the torsion submodule of $H(C^*)$, but not canonically as discussed in this question.
Thanks in advance.
homological-algebra
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Maybe it is helpful to know that the short exact sequence splits?
$endgroup$
– Johannes Huisman
Dec 19 '18 at 14:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $C$ is a free chain complex over a PID $R$, and $H(C)$ is finitely generated. From the universal coefficient theorem, there is a short exact sequence:
$$
0 rightarrow text{Ext}^1_R(H(C), R) rightarrow H(C^*) overset{h}{rightarrow} text{Hom}_R(H(C), R) rightarrow 0.
$$
My question is, is the following homomorphism
$$ bar{h}: H(C^*)/text{(tor)} rightarrow text{Hom}_R(H(C), R)$$
an isomorphism?
A torsion $[f] in H(C^*)$ is annihilated by $h$, since if there is an $a in R$ such that $a[f] = 0$, then $$ah([f])([z]) = aleft< [f], [z]right> = left< a[f], [z]right> = 0,$$ so $h([f]) = 0$ and the map is well-defined. On the other hand, from the structure theorem, we may write $$H(C) cong R^r oplus_i R/(a_i)$$ and we have $$text{Hom}_R(H(C), R) cong text{Hom}_R(R^r, R) oplus_i text{Hom}_R(R/(a_i), R) cong R^r$$ and $$text{Ext}_R(H(C), R) cong text{Ext}_R(R^r, R) oplus_i text{Ext}_R(R/(a_i), R) cong bigoplus_i R/(a_i)$$ so we have $$H(C^*) cong R^r oplus_i R/(a_i).$$
So we can say that $text{Ext}_R(H(C), R)$ is (abstractly) isomorphic to the torsion submodule of $H(C^*)$, but not canonically as discussed in this question.
Thanks in advance.
homological-algebra
$endgroup$
Suppose $C$ is a free chain complex over a PID $R$, and $H(C)$ is finitely generated. From the universal coefficient theorem, there is a short exact sequence:
$$
0 rightarrow text{Ext}^1_R(H(C), R) rightarrow H(C^*) overset{h}{rightarrow} text{Hom}_R(H(C), R) rightarrow 0.
$$
My question is, is the following homomorphism
$$ bar{h}: H(C^*)/text{(tor)} rightarrow text{Hom}_R(H(C), R)$$
an isomorphism?
A torsion $[f] in H(C^*)$ is annihilated by $h$, since if there is an $a in R$ such that $a[f] = 0$, then $$ah([f])([z]) = aleft< [f], [z]right> = left< a[f], [z]right> = 0,$$ so $h([f]) = 0$ and the map is well-defined. On the other hand, from the structure theorem, we may write $$H(C) cong R^r oplus_i R/(a_i)$$ and we have $$text{Hom}_R(H(C), R) cong text{Hom}_R(R^r, R) oplus_i text{Hom}_R(R/(a_i), R) cong R^r$$ and $$text{Ext}_R(H(C), R) cong text{Ext}_R(R^r, R) oplus_i text{Ext}_R(R/(a_i), R) cong bigoplus_i R/(a_i)$$ so we have $$H(C^*) cong R^r oplus_i R/(a_i).$$
So we can say that $text{Ext}_R(H(C), R)$ is (abstractly) isomorphic to the torsion submodule of $H(C^*)$, but not canonically as discussed in this question.
Thanks in advance.
homological-algebra
homological-algebra
edited Dec 19 '18 at 6:47
Taketo Sano
asked Dec 19 '18 at 5:33
Taketo SanoTaketo Sano
1134
1134
$begingroup$
Maybe it is helpful to know that the short exact sequence splits?
$endgroup$
– Johannes Huisman
Dec 19 '18 at 14:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Maybe it is helpful to know that the short exact sequence splits?
$endgroup$
– Johannes Huisman
Dec 19 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Maybe it is helpful to know that the short exact sequence splits?
$endgroup$
– Johannes Huisman
Dec 19 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Maybe it is helpful to know that the short exact sequence splits?
$endgroup$
– Johannes Huisman
Dec 19 '18 at 14:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It appears to me that the image of $newcommandExt{operatorname{Ext}}Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ is necessarily the torsion subgroup of $H(C^*)$. You've already argued that all torsion elements are in the kernel, and every element of $Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ has torsion, so its image in $H(C^*)$ will have torsion. Thus by exactness of the sequence, all torsion elements lie in the kernel, hence lie in the image of $Ext$, and yet also every element of the image of $Ext$ lies in the torsion subgroup. Thus the image of $Ext$ is precisely the torsion subgroup. Thus by exactness, $h$ induces the desired isomorphism.
There appears to be no issue of canonicality here, unless the original short exact sequence wasn't canonical (which I'm pretty sure it is), since the scenario here doesn't really match exactly with what you've got in that linked question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046037%2fdoes-the-canonical-map-of-the-universal-coefficient-theorem-induce-an-isomorphis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It appears to me that the image of $newcommandExt{operatorname{Ext}}Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ is necessarily the torsion subgroup of $H(C^*)$. You've already argued that all torsion elements are in the kernel, and every element of $Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ has torsion, so its image in $H(C^*)$ will have torsion. Thus by exactness of the sequence, all torsion elements lie in the kernel, hence lie in the image of $Ext$, and yet also every element of the image of $Ext$ lies in the torsion subgroup. Thus the image of $Ext$ is precisely the torsion subgroup. Thus by exactness, $h$ induces the desired isomorphism.
There appears to be no issue of canonicality here, unless the original short exact sequence wasn't canonical (which I'm pretty sure it is), since the scenario here doesn't really match exactly with what you've got in that linked question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It appears to me that the image of $newcommandExt{operatorname{Ext}}Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ is necessarily the torsion subgroup of $H(C^*)$. You've already argued that all torsion elements are in the kernel, and every element of $Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ has torsion, so its image in $H(C^*)$ will have torsion. Thus by exactness of the sequence, all torsion elements lie in the kernel, hence lie in the image of $Ext$, and yet also every element of the image of $Ext$ lies in the torsion subgroup. Thus the image of $Ext$ is precisely the torsion subgroup. Thus by exactness, $h$ induces the desired isomorphism.
There appears to be no issue of canonicality here, unless the original short exact sequence wasn't canonical (which I'm pretty sure it is), since the scenario here doesn't really match exactly with what you've got in that linked question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It appears to me that the image of $newcommandExt{operatorname{Ext}}Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ is necessarily the torsion subgroup of $H(C^*)$. You've already argued that all torsion elements are in the kernel, and every element of $Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ has torsion, so its image in $H(C^*)$ will have torsion. Thus by exactness of the sequence, all torsion elements lie in the kernel, hence lie in the image of $Ext$, and yet also every element of the image of $Ext$ lies in the torsion subgroup. Thus the image of $Ext$ is precisely the torsion subgroup. Thus by exactness, $h$ induces the desired isomorphism.
There appears to be no issue of canonicality here, unless the original short exact sequence wasn't canonical (which I'm pretty sure it is), since the scenario here doesn't really match exactly with what you've got in that linked question.
$endgroup$
It appears to me that the image of $newcommandExt{operatorname{Ext}}Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ is necessarily the torsion subgroup of $H(C^*)$. You've already argued that all torsion elements are in the kernel, and every element of $Ext_R^1(H(C),R)$ has torsion, so its image in $H(C^*)$ will have torsion. Thus by exactness of the sequence, all torsion elements lie in the kernel, hence lie in the image of $Ext$, and yet also every element of the image of $Ext$ lies in the torsion subgroup. Thus the image of $Ext$ is precisely the torsion subgroup. Thus by exactness, $h$ induces the desired isomorphism.
There appears to be no issue of canonicality here, unless the original short exact sequence wasn't canonical (which I'm pretty sure it is), since the scenario here doesn't really match exactly with what you've got in that linked question.
answered Dec 19 '18 at 21:37
jgonjgon
15.6k32143
15.6k32143
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046037%2fdoes-the-canonical-map-of-the-universal-coefficient-theorem-induce-an-isomorphis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Maybe it is helpful to know that the short exact sequence splits?
$endgroup$
– Johannes Huisman
Dec 19 '18 at 14:48