Sturm-Liouville eigenvalues have lower bound












0












$begingroup$


I am looking to find a proof that eigenvalues are bounded below for the the general Sturm Liouville equation on an open region $ Omega subset mathfrak R^d $ (perhaps with compact closure),



$Ly -lambda rho(mathbf x) y = -nabla cdot big( p(mathbf x) nabla y big) + q(mathbf x) y - lambda rho(mathbf x) y = 0, quad mathbf x in Omega $



where $y $ is twice differentiable, $ p, rho > 0 $ and boundary conditions on $ partialOmega $,



$alpha(mathbf s) y + beta(mathbf s) frac{partial y}{partial n} = 0 $



($alpha, beta$ not both zero).



Can anyone help me find a clear treatment handling of this question?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For any non-trivial solution $(λ,y)$ you get $$ newcommand{vol}{{rm vol}} newcommand{area}{{rm area}} λ=frac{ int_Ωp(x)|∇y(x)|^2,dvol(x) +int_Ωq(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) - int_{∂Ω}y(x)p(x)langle ∇y(x), n(x)rangle,darea(x) }{ int_Ωρ(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) } $$ so essentially you "only" have to treat the last term in the numerator.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Dec 17 '18 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks so much, and the last term simplified to zero if either of $ alpha $ or $ beta $ is zero and if neither is, it becomes $ int_{partial Omega} p frac{beta}{alpha} left| frac{partial y}{partial n}right|^2 ds = int_{partialOmega} p frac{alpha}{beta} left| y right|^2 ds $ which is where I get stuck. I am wondering if it is not true without restrictions on $alpha, beta$ - for instance both must have the same sign when non-zero.
    $endgroup$
    – WA Don
    Dec 18 '18 at 12:27


















0












$begingroup$


I am looking to find a proof that eigenvalues are bounded below for the the general Sturm Liouville equation on an open region $ Omega subset mathfrak R^d $ (perhaps with compact closure),



$Ly -lambda rho(mathbf x) y = -nabla cdot big( p(mathbf x) nabla y big) + q(mathbf x) y - lambda rho(mathbf x) y = 0, quad mathbf x in Omega $



where $y $ is twice differentiable, $ p, rho > 0 $ and boundary conditions on $ partialOmega $,



$alpha(mathbf s) y + beta(mathbf s) frac{partial y}{partial n} = 0 $



($alpha, beta$ not both zero).



Can anyone help me find a clear treatment handling of this question?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For any non-trivial solution $(λ,y)$ you get $$ newcommand{vol}{{rm vol}} newcommand{area}{{rm area}} λ=frac{ int_Ωp(x)|∇y(x)|^2,dvol(x) +int_Ωq(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) - int_{∂Ω}y(x)p(x)langle ∇y(x), n(x)rangle,darea(x) }{ int_Ωρ(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) } $$ so essentially you "only" have to treat the last term in the numerator.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Dec 17 '18 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks so much, and the last term simplified to zero if either of $ alpha $ or $ beta $ is zero and if neither is, it becomes $ int_{partial Omega} p frac{beta}{alpha} left| frac{partial y}{partial n}right|^2 ds = int_{partialOmega} p frac{alpha}{beta} left| y right|^2 ds $ which is where I get stuck. I am wondering if it is not true without restrictions on $alpha, beta$ - for instance both must have the same sign when non-zero.
    $endgroup$
    – WA Don
    Dec 18 '18 at 12:27
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am looking to find a proof that eigenvalues are bounded below for the the general Sturm Liouville equation on an open region $ Omega subset mathfrak R^d $ (perhaps with compact closure),



$Ly -lambda rho(mathbf x) y = -nabla cdot big( p(mathbf x) nabla y big) + q(mathbf x) y - lambda rho(mathbf x) y = 0, quad mathbf x in Omega $



where $y $ is twice differentiable, $ p, rho > 0 $ and boundary conditions on $ partialOmega $,



$alpha(mathbf s) y + beta(mathbf s) frac{partial y}{partial n} = 0 $



($alpha, beta$ not both zero).



Can anyone help me find a clear treatment handling of this question?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am looking to find a proof that eigenvalues are bounded below for the the general Sturm Liouville equation on an open region $ Omega subset mathfrak R^d $ (perhaps with compact closure),



$Ly -lambda rho(mathbf x) y = -nabla cdot big( p(mathbf x) nabla y big) + q(mathbf x) y - lambda rho(mathbf x) y = 0, quad mathbf x in Omega $



where $y $ is twice differentiable, $ p, rho > 0 $ and boundary conditions on $ partialOmega $,



$alpha(mathbf s) y + beta(mathbf s) frac{partial y}{partial n} = 0 $



($alpha, beta$ not both zero).



Can anyone help me find a clear treatment handling of this question?







functional-analysis ordinary-differential-equations eigenvalues-eigenvectors calculus-of-variations sturm-liouville






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 17 '18 at 10:00









WA DonWA Don

261




261












  • $begingroup$
    For any non-trivial solution $(λ,y)$ you get $$ newcommand{vol}{{rm vol}} newcommand{area}{{rm area}} λ=frac{ int_Ωp(x)|∇y(x)|^2,dvol(x) +int_Ωq(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) - int_{∂Ω}y(x)p(x)langle ∇y(x), n(x)rangle,darea(x) }{ int_Ωρ(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) } $$ so essentially you "only" have to treat the last term in the numerator.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Dec 17 '18 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks so much, and the last term simplified to zero if either of $ alpha $ or $ beta $ is zero and if neither is, it becomes $ int_{partial Omega} p frac{beta}{alpha} left| frac{partial y}{partial n}right|^2 ds = int_{partialOmega} p frac{alpha}{beta} left| y right|^2 ds $ which is where I get stuck. I am wondering if it is not true without restrictions on $alpha, beta$ - for instance both must have the same sign when non-zero.
    $endgroup$
    – WA Don
    Dec 18 '18 at 12:27




















  • $begingroup$
    For any non-trivial solution $(λ,y)$ you get $$ newcommand{vol}{{rm vol}} newcommand{area}{{rm area}} λ=frac{ int_Ωp(x)|∇y(x)|^2,dvol(x) +int_Ωq(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) - int_{∂Ω}y(x)p(x)langle ∇y(x), n(x)rangle,darea(x) }{ int_Ωρ(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) } $$ so essentially you "only" have to treat the last term in the numerator.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Dec 17 '18 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks so much, and the last term simplified to zero if either of $ alpha $ or $ beta $ is zero and if neither is, it becomes $ int_{partial Omega} p frac{beta}{alpha} left| frac{partial y}{partial n}right|^2 ds = int_{partialOmega} p frac{alpha}{beta} left| y right|^2 ds $ which is where I get stuck. I am wondering if it is not true without restrictions on $alpha, beta$ - for instance both must have the same sign when non-zero.
    $endgroup$
    – WA Don
    Dec 18 '18 at 12:27


















$begingroup$
For any non-trivial solution $(λ,y)$ you get $$ newcommand{vol}{{rm vol}} newcommand{area}{{rm area}} λ=frac{ int_Ωp(x)|∇y(x)|^2,dvol(x) +int_Ωq(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) - int_{∂Ω}y(x)p(x)langle ∇y(x), n(x)rangle,darea(x) }{ int_Ωρ(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) } $$ so essentially you "only" have to treat the last term in the numerator.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 17 '18 at 11:45




$begingroup$
For any non-trivial solution $(λ,y)$ you get $$ newcommand{vol}{{rm vol}} newcommand{area}{{rm area}} λ=frac{ int_Ωp(x)|∇y(x)|^2,dvol(x) +int_Ωq(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) - int_{∂Ω}y(x)p(x)langle ∇y(x), n(x)rangle,darea(x) }{ int_Ωρ(x)|y(x)|^2,dvol(x) } $$ so essentially you "only" have to treat the last term in the numerator.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 17 '18 at 11:45












$begingroup$
Thanks so much, and the last term simplified to zero if either of $ alpha $ or $ beta $ is zero and if neither is, it becomes $ int_{partial Omega} p frac{beta}{alpha} left| frac{partial y}{partial n}right|^2 ds = int_{partialOmega} p frac{alpha}{beta} left| y right|^2 ds $ which is where I get stuck. I am wondering if it is not true without restrictions on $alpha, beta$ - for instance both must have the same sign when non-zero.
$endgroup$
– WA Don
Dec 18 '18 at 12:27






$begingroup$
Thanks so much, and the last term simplified to zero if either of $ alpha $ or $ beta $ is zero and if neither is, it becomes $ int_{partial Omega} p frac{beta}{alpha} left| frac{partial y}{partial n}right|^2 ds = int_{partialOmega} p frac{alpha}{beta} left| y right|^2 ds $ which is where I get stuck. I am wondering if it is not true without restrictions on $alpha, beta$ - for instance both must have the same sign when non-zero.
$endgroup$
– WA Don
Dec 18 '18 at 12:27












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043755%2fsturm-liouville-eigenvalues-have-lower-bound%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043755%2fsturm-liouville-eigenvalues-have-lower-bound%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Willebadessen

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Residenzschloss Arolsen