What is the next step in the prove? (Mathematical Induction) $left(x^{n}+1right)<left(x+1right)^{n}$












4












$begingroup$


I have to prove this preposition by mathematical induction:



$$left(x^n+1right)<left(x+1right)^n quad forall ngeq 2 quad text{and}quad x>0,,, n in mathbb{N}$$



I started the prove with $n=2$:



$left(x^{2}+1right)<left(x+1right)^{2}$



$x^{2}+1<x^{2}+2x+1$



We see that;



$x^{2}+1-x^{2}-1<2x$



$0<2x$



Then



$x>0$



And this one carries out for $n=2$



Now for $quad n=k quad$ (Hypothesis)



$left(x^{k}+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k}$



We have



$displaystyle x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1ldots quad (1)$



Then, we must prove for $quad n= k+1 quad$ (Thesis):



$x^{k+1}+1<left(x+1right)^{k+1}$



We develop before expression as:



$x^{k+1}<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-1ldots quad (2)$



According to the steps of mathematical induction, the next stpe would be use the hypothesis $(1)$ to prove thesis $(2)$. It's in here when I hesitate if the next one that I am going to write is correct:



First way:



We multiply hypothesis $(1)$ by $left(x+1right)$ and we have:



$x^{k}left(x+1right)<left[left(x+1right)^{k}-1right]left(x+1right)$



$x^{k}left(x+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-left(x+1right)$



Last expression divided by $left(x+1right)$ we have again the expression $(1)$:



$displaystyle frac{x^{k}left(x+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-left(x+1right)}{left(x+1right)}$



$x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1$



Second way:



If we multiply $(2)$ by $x$ we have:



$xx^{k}<xleft[left(x+1right)^{k}-1right]$



$x^{k+1}<xleft(x+1right)^{k}-x$



And if we again divided last expression by $x$, we arrive at the same result



$displaystyle frac{x^{k+1}<xleft(x+1right)^{k}-x}{x}$



$x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1$



I do not find another way to prove this demonstration, another way to solve the problem is using Newton's theorem binomial coeficients, but the prove lies in the technical using of mathematical induction. If someone can help me, I will be very grateful with him/her!
Thanks
-Víctor Hugo-






algebra-precalculus induction







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Note that both $x^n$ and $1$ are coefficients in the binomial expansion of $(x+1)^n$, and any other terms are positive since $x>0$. The inequality thus follows.
    $endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Dec 20 '18 at 23:41










  • $begingroup$
    You have to prove that if $k$ holds, then $k+1$ also holds. You haven't actually done that in either case, you've just arrived at the original statement where $n=k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex S
    Dec 20 '18 at 23:56










  • $begingroup$
    Just a general recommendation: you'll never get anywhere in proofs with the "one step forward, one step back" method.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Buie
    Dec 21 '18 at 1:07
















4












$begingroup$


I have to prove this preposition by mathematical induction:



$$left(x^n+1right)<left(x+1right)^n quad forall ngeq 2 quad text{and}quad x>0,,, n in mathbb{N}$$



I started the prove with $n=2$:



$left(x^{2}+1right)<left(x+1right)^{2}$



$x^{2}+1<x^{2}+2x+1$



We see that;



$x^{2}+1-x^{2}-1<2x$



$0<2x$



Then



$x>0$



And this one carries out for $n=2$



Now for $quad n=k quad$ (Hypothesis)



$left(x^{k}+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k}$



We have



$displaystyle x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1ldots quad (1)$



Then, we must prove for $quad n= k+1 quad$ (Thesis):



$x^{k+1}+1<left(x+1right)^{k+1}$



We develop before expression as:



$x^{k+1}<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-1ldots quad (2)$



According to the steps of mathematical induction, the next stpe would be use the hypothesis $(1)$ to prove thesis $(2)$. It's in here when I hesitate if the next one that I am going to write is correct:



First way:



We multiply hypothesis $(1)$ by $left(x+1right)$ and we have:



$x^{k}left(x+1right)<left[left(x+1right)^{k}-1right]left(x+1right)$



$x^{k}left(x+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-left(x+1right)$



Last expression divided by $left(x+1right)$ we have again the expression $(1)$:



$displaystyle frac{x^{k}left(x+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-left(x+1right)}{left(x+1right)}$



$x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1$



Second way:



If we multiply $(2)$ by $x$ we have:



$xx^{k}<xleft[left(x+1right)^{k}-1right]$



$x^{k+1}<xleft(x+1right)^{k}-x$



And if we again divided last expression by $x$, we arrive at the same result



$displaystyle frac{x^{k+1}<xleft(x+1right)^{k}-x}{x}$



$x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1$



I do not find another way to prove this demonstration, another way to solve the problem is using Newton's theorem binomial coeficients, but the prove lies in the technical using of mathematical induction. If someone can help me, I will be very grateful with him/her!
Thanks
-Víctor Hugo-






algebra-precalculus induction







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Note that both $x^n$ and $1$ are coefficients in the binomial expansion of $(x+1)^n$, and any other terms are positive since $x>0$. The inequality thus follows.
    $endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Dec 20 '18 at 23:41










  • $begingroup$
    You have to prove that if $k$ holds, then $k+1$ also holds. You haven't actually done that in either case, you've just arrived at the original statement where $n=k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex S
    Dec 20 '18 at 23:56










  • $begingroup$
    Just a general recommendation: you'll never get anywhere in proofs with the "one step forward, one step back" method.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Buie
    Dec 21 '18 at 1:07














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


I have to prove this preposition by mathematical induction:



$$left(x^n+1right)<left(x+1right)^n quad forall ngeq 2 quad text{and}quad x>0,,, n in mathbb{N}$$



I started the prove with $n=2$:



$left(x^{2}+1right)<left(x+1right)^{2}$



$x^{2}+1<x^{2}+2x+1$



We see that;



$x^{2}+1-x^{2}-1<2x$



$0<2x$



Then



$x>0$



And this one carries out for $n=2$



Now for $quad n=k quad$ (Hypothesis)



$left(x^{k}+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k}$



We have



$displaystyle x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1ldots quad (1)$



Then, we must prove for $quad n= k+1 quad$ (Thesis):



$x^{k+1}+1<left(x+1right)^{k+1}$



We develop before expression as:



$x^{k+1}<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-1ldots quad (2)$



According to the steps of mathematical induction, the next stpe would be use the hypothesis $(1)$ to prove thesis $(2)$. It's in here when I hesitate if the next one that I am going to write is correct:



First way:



We multiply hypothesis $(1)$ by $left(x+1right)$ and we have:



$x^{k}left(x+1right)<left[left(x+1right)^{k}-1right]left(x+1right)$



$x^{k}left(x+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-left(x+1right)$



Last expression divided by $left(x+1right)$ we have again the expression $(1)$:



$displaystyle frac{x^{k}left(x+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-left(x+1right)}{left(x+1right)}$



$x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1$



Second way:



If we multiply $(2)$ by $x$ we have:



$xx^{k}<xleft[left(x+1right)^{k}-1right]$



$x^{k+1}<xleft(x+1right)^{k}-x$



And if we again divided last expression by $x$, we arrive at the same result



$displaystyle frac{x^{k+1}<xleft(x+1right)^{k}-x}{x}$



$x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1$



I do not find another way to prove this demonstration, another way to solve the problem is using Newton's theorem binomial coeficients, but the prove lies in the technical using of mathematical induction. If someone can help me, I will be very grateful with him/her!
Thanks
-Víctor Hugo-






algebra-precalculus induction







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have to prove this preposition by mathematical induction:



$$left(x^n+1right)<left(x+1right)^n quad forall ngeq 2 quad text{and}quad x>0,,, n in mathbb{N}$$



I started the prove with $n=2$:



$left(x^{2}+1right)<left(x+1right)^{2}$



$x^{2}+1<x^{2}+2x+1$



We see that;



$x^{2}+1-x^{2}-1<2x$



$0<2x$



Then



$x>0$



And this one carries out for $n=2$



Now for $quad n=k quad$ (Hypothesis)



$left(x^{k}+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k}$



We have



$displaystyle x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1ldots quad (1)$



Then, we must prove for $quad n= k+1 quad$ (Thesis):



$x^{k+1}+1<left(x+1right)^{k+1}$



We develop before expression as:



$x^{k+1}<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-1ldots quad (2)$



According to the steps of mathematical induction, the next stpe would be use the hypothesis $(1)$ to prove thesis $(2)$. It's in here when I hesitate if the next one that I am going to write is correct:



First way:



We multiply hypothesis $(1)$ by $left(x+1right)$ and we have:



$x^{k}left(x+1right)<left[left(x+1right)^{k}-1right]left(x+1right)$



$x^{k}left(x+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-left(x+1right)$



Last expression divided by $left(x+1right)$ we have again the expression $(1)$:



$displaystyle frac{x^{k}left(x+1right)<left(x+1right)^{k+1}-left(x+1right)}{left(x+1right)}$



$x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1$



Second way:



If we multiply $(2)$ by $x$ we have:



$xx^{k}<xleft[left(x+1right)^{k}-1right]$



$x^{k+1}<xleft(x+1right)^{k}-x$



And if we again divided last expression by $x$, we arrive at the same result



$displaystyle frac{x^{k+1}<xleft(x+1right)^{k}-x}{x}$



$x^{k}<left(x+1right)^{k}-1$



I do not find another way to prove this demonstration, another way to solve the problem is using Newton's theorem binomial coeficients, but the prove lies in the technical using of mathematical induction. If someone can help me, I will be very grateful with him/her!
Thanks
-Víctor Hugo-






algebra-precalculus induction




algebra-precalculus induction






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 20 '18 at 23:46









Cameron Williams

22.5k43680




22.5k43680










asked Dec 20 '18 at 23:34









Víctor VázquezVíctor Vázquez

232




232












  • $begingroup$
    Note that both $x^n$ and $1$ are coefficients in the binomial expansion of $(x+1)^n$, and any other terms are positive since $x>0$. The inequality thus follows.
    $endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Dec 20 '18 at 23:41










  • $begingroup$
    You have to prove that if $k$ holds, then $k+1$ also holds. You haven't actually done that in either case, you've just arrived at the original statement where $n=k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex S
    Dec 20 '18 at 23:56










  • $begingroup$
    Just a general recommendation: you'll never get anywhere in proofs with the "one step forward, one step back" method.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Buie
    Dec 21 '18 at 1:07


















  • $begingroup$
    Note that both $x^n$ and $1$ are coefficients in the binomial expansion of $(x+1)^n$, and any other terms are positive since $x>0$. The inequality thus follows.
    $endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Dec 20 '18 at 23:41










  • $begingroup$
    You have to prove that if $k$ holds, then $k+1$ also holds. You haven't actually done that in either case, you've just arrived at the original statement where $n=k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex S
    Dec 20 '18 at 23:56










  • $begingroup$
    Just a general recommendation: you'll never get anywhere in proofs with the "one step forward, one step back" method.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Buie
    Dec 21 '18 at 1:07
















$begingroup$
Note that both $x^n$ and $1$ are coefficients in the binomial expansion of $(x+1)^n$, and any other terms are positive since $x>0$. The inequality thus follows.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Dec 20 '18 at 23:41




$begingroup$
Note that both $x^n$ and $1$ are coefficients in the binomial expansion of $(x+1)^n$, and any other terms are positive since $x>0$. The inequality thus follows.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Dec 20 '18 at 23:41












$begingroup$
You have to prove that if $k$ holds, then $k+1$ also holds. You haven't actually done that in either case, you've just arrived at the original statement where $n=k$.
$endgroup$
– Alex S
Dec 20 '18 at 23:56




$begingroup$
You have to prove that if $k$ holds, then $k+1$ also holds. You haven't actually done that in either case, you've just arrived at the original statement where $n=k$.
$endgroup$
– Alex S
Dec 20 '18 at 23:56












$begingroup$
Just a general recommendation: you'll never get anywhere in proofs with the "one step forward, one step back" method.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Dec 21 '18 at 1:07




$begingroup$
Just a general recommendation: you'll never get anywhere in proofs with the "one step forward, one step back" method.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Buie
Dec 21 '18 at 1:07










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Suppose that $(1+x)^n>1+x^n$ for some $nge 2$. Then
$$
(1+x)^{n+1}=(1+x)^n(1+x)>(1+x^n)(1+x)=1+x+x^n+x^{n+1}>1+x^{n+1}
$$
since $x>0$ where in the first inequality we used the induction hypothesis.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    We will prove it is true with $n=k$. Indeed we need to prove it is true with $n=k+1$.



    Or we need to prove $x^{k+1}+1<left(x+1right)^{k+1}$



    We have: $RHS=(x+1)cdot (x+1)^k>(x+1)cdot (x^k+1)$ (Hypothesis)



    $=x(x^k+1)+(x^k+1)=x^{k+1}+x^k+x+1$



    $>x^{k+1}+1=RHS$ $(x>0)$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048063%2fwhat-is-the-next-step-in-the-prove-mathematical-induction-leftxn1-righ%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      Suppose that $(1+x)^n>1+x^n$ for some $nge 2$. Then
      $$
      (1+x)^{n+1}=(1+x)^n(1+x)>(1+x^n)(1+x)=1+x+x^n+x^{n+1}>1+x^{n+1}
      $$
      since $x>0$ where in the first inequality we used the induction hypothesis.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        Suppose that $(1+x)^n>1+x^n$ for some $nge 2$. Then
        $$
        (1+x)^{n+1}=(1+x)^n(1+x)>(1+x^n)(1+x)=1+x+x^n+x^{n+1}>1+x^{n+1}
        $$
        since $x>0$ where in the first inequality we used the induction hypothesis.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Suppose that $(1+x)^n>1+x^n$ for some $nge 2$. Then
          $$
          (1+x)^{n+1}=(1+x)^n(1+x)>(1+x^n)(1+x)=1+x+x^n+x^{n+1}>1+x^{n+1}
          $$
          since $x>0$ where in the first inequality we used the induction hypothesis.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Suppose that $(1+x)^n>1+x^n$ for some $nge 2$. Then
          $$
          (1+x)^{n+1}=(1+x)^n(1+x)>(1+x^n)(1+x)=1+x+x^n+x^{n+1}>1+x^{n+1}
          $$
          since $x>0$ where in the first inequality we used the induction hypothesis.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 20 '18 at 23:40









          Foobaz JohnFoobaz John

          22.8k41452




          22.8k41452























              2












              $begingroup$

              We will prove it is true with $n=k$. Indeed we need to prove it is true with $n=k+1$.



              Or we need to prove $x^{k+1}+1<left(x+1right)^{k+1}$



              We have: $RHS=(x+1)cdot (x+1)^k>(x+1)cdot (x^k+1)$ (Hypothesis)



              $=x(x^k+1)+(x^k+1)=x^{k+1}+x^k+x+1$



              $>x^{k+1}+1=RHS$ $(x>0)$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                We will prove it is true with $n=k$. Indeed we need to prove it is true with $n=k+1$.



                Or we need to prove $x^{k+1}+1<left(x+1right)^{k+1}$



                We have: $RHS=(x+1)cdot (x+1)^k>(x+1)cdot (x^k+1)$ (Hypothesis)



                $=x(x^k+1)+(x^k+1)=x^{k+1}+x^k+x+1$



                $>x^{k+1}+1=RHS$ $(x>0)$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  We will prove it is true with $n=k$. Indeed we need to prove it is true with $n=k+1$.



                  Or we need to prove $x^{k+1}+1<left(x+1right)^{k+1}$



                  We have: $RHS=(x+1)cdot (x+1)^k>(x+1)cdot (x^k+1)$ (Hypothesis)



                  $=x(x^k+1)+(x^k+1)=x^{k+1}+x^k+x+1$



                  $>x^{k+1}+1=RHS$ $(x>0)$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  We will prove it is true with $n=k$. Indeed we need to prove it is true with $n=k+1$.



                  Or we need to prove $x^{k+1}+1<left(x+1right)^{k+1}$



                  We have: $RHS=(x+1)cdot (x+1)^k>(x+1)cdot (x^k+1)$ (Hypothesis)



                  $=x(x^k+1)+(x^k+1)=x^{k+1}+x^k+x+1$



                  $>x^{k+1}+1=RHS$ $(x>0)$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 20 '18 at 23:44









                  Word ShallowWord Shallow

                  1,0472621




                  1,0472621






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048063%2fwhat-is-the-next-step-in-the-prove-mathematical-induction-leftxn1-righ%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Willebadessen

                      Image
                      Wappen Deutschlandkarte 51.633055555556 9.0330555555556 295 Koordinaten: 51° 38′  N , 9° 2′  O Basisdaten Bundesland: Nordrhein-Westfalen Regierungsbezirk: Detmold Kreis: Höxter Höhe: 295 m ü. NHN Fläche: 128,41 km 2 Einwohner: 8227 (31. Dez. 2017) [1] Bevölkerungsdichte: 64 Einwohner je km 2 Postleitzahlen: 34435, 34437, 34439 Vorwahlen: 05644, 05646, 05642 Kfz-Kennzeichen: HX Gemeindeschlüssel: 05 7 62 040 Stadtgliederung: 13 Stadtteile Adresse der Stadtverwaltung: Abdinghofweg 1 34439 Willebadessen Website: www.willebadessen.de Bürgermeister: Hans Hermann Bluhm (CDU) Lage der Stadt Willebadessen im Kreis Höxter Willebadessen ist eine Kleinstadt in Nordrhein-Westfalen und gehört zum Kreis Höxter im Regierungsbezirk Detmold. Die Stadt liegt im Osten des Regierungsbezirkes mitten im Naturpark Teutoburger Wald/Eggegebirge. Für den heu...
                      Read more

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                      Image
                      Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich ...
                      Read more

                      Residenzschloss Arolsen

                      Image
                      Residenzschloss Arolsen Residenzschloss Arolsen Entstehungszeit: 1710–1728 Erhaltungszustand: Vollständig Ständische Stellung: Grafen Ort: Bad Arolsen Geographische Lage 51° 22′ 51″  N , 9° 1′ 19″  O 51.380833333333 9.0219444444444 293 Koordinaten: 51° 22′ 51″  N , 9° 1′ 19″  O Höhe: 293  m ü. NHN Das Residenzschloss Arolsen ist ein barockes Schloss in Bad Arolsen im Kreis Waldeck-Frankenberg in Nordhessen (Deutschland). Das Schloss wurde als dreiflügelige Anlage gebaut, an die sich ein englischer Garten anschließt. Zentrales landschaftsarchitektonisches Gestaltungselement ist ein ausgedehntes Rondell. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Geschichte 1.1 Vorgängerbau 1.2 Bau und Geschichte des neuen Schlosses 1.3 Bibliothek 1.4 Finanzielle und staatsrechtliche Konsequenzen 1.5 Heutige Nutzung 2 Innenausstattung 3 Umgebung 3.1 Park 3.2 Wirtschaftsgebäude 4 Literatur 5 Weblinks 6...
                      Read more