Prove this integral is zero
$begingroup$
I'm trying to prove that $lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{C_R} dz expleft(iaz^2right) = 0$, where $a$ has a positive imaginary part and $C_R$ is an arc from $R$ to $frac{1+i}{sqrt{2}}R$ along the circle centered around the origin with radius $R$.
This is what I have so far:

But this proof does not go through unfortunately.
integration complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to prove that $lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{C_R} dz expleft(iaz^2right) = 0$, where $a$ has a positive imaginary part and $C_R$ is an arc from $R$ to $frac{1+i}{sqrt{2}}R$ along the circle centered around the origin with radius $R$.
This is what I have so far:

But this proof does not go through unfortunately.
integration complex-analysis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same question as math.stackexchange.com/questions/753676/…
$endgroup$
– Etienne
Apr 15 '14 at 18:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to prove that $lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{C_R} dz expleft(iaz^2right) = 0$, where $a$ has a positive imaginary part and $C_R$ is an arc from $R$ to $frac{1+i}{sqrt{2}}R$ along the circle centered around the origin with radius $R$.
This is what I have so far:

But this proof does not go through unfortunately.
integration complex-analysis
$endgroup$
I'm trying to prove that $lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{C_R} dz expleft(iaz^2right) = 0$, where $a$ has a positive imaginary part and $C_R$ is an arc from $R$ to $frac{1+i}{sqrt{2}}R$ along the circle centered around the origin with radius $R$.
This is what I have so far:

But this proof does not go through unfortunately.
integration complex-analysis
integration complex-analysis
edited Dec 24 '18 at 7:27
Glorfindel
3,41381830
3,41381830
asked Feb 21 '14 at 16:23
PPRPPR
661519
661519
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same question as math.stackexchange.com/questions/753676/…
$endgroup$
– Etienne
Apr 15 '14 at 18:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same question as math.stackexchange.com/questions/753676/…
$endgroup$
– Etienne
Apr 15 '14 at 18:07
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same question as math.stackexchange.com/questions/753676/…
$endgroup$
– Etienne
Apr 15 '14 at 18:07
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same question as math.stackexchange.com/questions/753676/…
$endgroup$
– Etienne
Apr 15 '14 at 18:07
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the complex function
$$
f(z)=e^{ialpha z^2}, z=re^{itheta}, f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}.
$$
Thus we can analyze the term
$$
f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}
$$
and notice for $theta=pi/4$, this is just a real Gaussian integral $alpha >0$. If $theta=0$ we have $f(re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2}$. Thus we split our contour into three pieces making an angle between the imaginary and real axis of $45^o$. The contour is shown here http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Fresnel_Integral_Contour.svg . We know there are no poles inside the contour and $f(z)$ is holomorphic , thus by the Cauchy Goursat theorem we know we know
begin{equation}
0=oint f(z) dz=int_{0}^{infty} e^{ialpha x^2} dx +int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))}+int_{infty}^{0}e^{-alpha r^2}e^{ipi/4}dr
end{equation}
where the integral is broken up into three contours shown in the illustration and I used $z=re^{itheta}, dz= e^{itheta }dr$. The difficult integral to evaluate is
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))},
$$
however it vanishes as $r to infty$. We need to show that it vanishes, it is similar to Jordan's inequality, but that just places an upper bound on the integral,
$$
int_{0}^{pi} e^{-rsintheta}dtheta < frac{pi}{r} (r >0).
$$
We will prove this now by showing that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
We know that
$$
bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg| leq int_{0}^{pi/4} big|e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}}big| big|ir e^{itheta}dthetabig|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta big| e^{ialpha r^2cos(2theta)-alpha r^2sin(2theta)} big|=int_{0}^{pi/4}rdtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2 sin(2theta)}big|
$$
where I used $e^{2itheta}=cos 2theta +isin 2theta$. We can simplify this to obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} r dtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}big|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}.
$$
Thus we need to show that this vanishes as $r to infty.$ If we make the substitution $xi=2theta , dtheta=dxi/2$ and changing the bounds of integration we obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi}.
$$
We can see that for $xi in [0,pi/2]$, $sinxi geq 2xi/pi$. Since $e^{-alpha r^2cdot 2xi/pi} geq e^{-alpha r^2 sin xi} $ (since exponential is bigger for a smaller exponent), we can write
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi} leq int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2 cdot 2/pi}=frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2}).
$$
Thus it is clear that
$$
lim_{rto infty}frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2})=0,
$$
thus we have shown that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f685015%2fprove-this-integral-is-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the complex function
$$
f(z)=e^{ialpha z^2}, z=re^{itheta}, f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}.
$$
Thus we can analyze the term
$$
f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}
$$
and notice for $theta=pi/4$, this is just a real Gaussian integral $alpha >0$. If $theta=0$ we have $f(re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2}$. Thus we split our contour into three pieces making an angle between the imaginary and real axis of $45^o$. The contour is shown here http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Fresnel_Integral_Contour.svg . We know there are no poles inside the contour and $f(z)$ is holomorphic , thus by the Cauchy Goursat theorem we know we know
begin{equation}
0=oint f(z) dz=int_{0}^{infty} e^{ialpha x^2} dx +int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))}+int_{infty}^{0}e^{-alpha r^2}e^{ipi/4}dr
end{equation}
where the integral is broken up into three contours shown in the illustration and I used $z=re^{itheta}, dz= e^{itheta }dr$. The difficult integral to evaluate is
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))},
$$
however it vanishes as $r to infty$. We need to show that it vanishes, it is similar to Jordan's inequality, but that just places an upper bound on the integral,
$$
int_{0}^{pi} e^{-rsintheta}dtheta < frac{pi}{r} (r >0).
$$
We will prove this now by showing that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
We know that
$$
bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg| leq int_{0}^{pi/4} big|e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}}big| big|ir e^{itheta}dthetabig|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta big| e^{ialpha r^2cos(2theta)-alpha r^2sin(2theta)} big|=int_{0}^{pi/4}rdtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2 sin(2theta)}big|
$$
where I used $e^{2itheta}=cos 2theta +isin 2theta$. We can simplify this to obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} r dtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}big|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}.
$$
Thus we need to show that this vanishes as $r to infty.$ If we make the substitution $xi=2theta , dtheta=dxi/2$ and changing the bounds of integration we obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi}.
$$
We can see that for $xi in [0,pi/2]$, $sinxi geq 2xi/pi$. Since $e^{-alpha r^2cdot 2xi/pi} geq e^{-alpha r^2 sin xi} $ (since exponential is bigger for a smaller exponent), we can write
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi} leq int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2 cdot 2/pi}=frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2}).
$$
Thus it is clear that
$$
lim_{rto infty}frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2})=0,
$$
thus we have shown that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the complex function
$$
f(z)=e^{ialpha z^2}, z=re^{itheta}, f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}.
$$
Thus we can analyze the term
$$
f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}
$$
and notice for $theta=pi/4$, this is just a real Gaussian integral $alpha >0$. If $theta=0$ we have $f(re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2}$. Thus we split our contour into three pieces making an angle between the imaginary and real axis of $45^o$. The contour is shown here http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Fresnel_Integral_Contour.svg . We know there are no poles inside the contour and $f(z)$ is holomorphic , thus by the Cauchy Goursat theorem we know we know
begin{equation}
0=oint f(z) dz=int_{0}^{infty} e^{ialpha x^2} dx +int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))}+int_{infty}^{0}e^{-alpha r^2}e^{ipi/4}dr
end{equation}
where the integral is broken up into three contours shown in the illustration and I used $z=re^{itheta}, dz= e^{itheta }dr$. The difficult integral to evaluate is
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))},
$$
however it vanishes as $r to infty$. We need to show that it vanishes, it is similar to Jordan's inequality, but that just places an upper bound on the integral,
$$
int_{0}^{pi} e^{-rsintheta}dtheta < frac{pi}{r} (r >0).
$$
We will prove this now by showing that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
We know that
$$
bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg| leq int_{0}^{pi/4} big|e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}}big| big|ir e^{itheta}dthetabig|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta big| e^{ialpha r^2cos(2theta)-alpha r^2sin(2theta)} big|=int_{0}^{pi/4}rdtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2 sin(2theta)}big|
$$
where I used $e^{2itheta}=cos 2theta +isin 2theta$. We can simplify this to obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} r dtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}big|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}.
$$
Thus we need to show that this vanishes as $r to infty.$ If we make the substitution $xi=2theta , dtheta=dxi/2$ and changing the bounds of integration we obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi}.
$$
We can see that for $xi in [0,pi/2]$, $sinxi geq 2xi/pi$. Since $e^{-alpha r^2cdot 2xi/pi} geq e^{-alpha r^2 sin xi} $ (since exponential is bigger for a smaller exponent), we can write
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi} leq int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2 cdot 2/pi}=frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2}).
$$
Thus it is clear that
$$
lim_{rto infty}frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2})=0,
$$
thus we have shown that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the complex function
$$
f(z)=e^{ialpha z^2}, z=re^{itheta}, f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}.
$$
Thus we can analyze the term
$$
f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}
$$
and notice for $theta=pi/4$, this is just a real Gaussian integral $alpha >0$. If $theta=0$ we have $f(re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2}$. Thus we split our contour into three pieces making an angle between the imaginary and real axis of $45^o$. The contour is shown here http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Fresnel_Integral_Contour.svg . We know there are no poles inside the contour and $f(z)$ is holomorphic , thus by the Cauchy Goursat theorem we know we know
begin{equation}
0=oint f(z) dz=int_{0}^{infty} e^{ialpha x^2} dx +int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))}+int_{infty}^{0}e^{-alpha r^2}e^{ipi/4}dr
end{equation}
where the integral is broken up into three contours shown in the illustration and I used $z=re^{itheta}, dz= e^{itheta }dr$. The difficult integral to evaluate is
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))},
$$
however it vanishes as $r to infty$. We need to show that it vanishes, it is similar to Jordan's inequality, but that just places an upper bound on the integral,
$$
int_{0}^{pi} e^{-rsintheta}dtheta < frac{pi}{r} (r >0).
$$
We will prove this now by showing that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
We know that
$$
bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg| leq int_{0}^{pi/4} big|e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}}big| big|ir e^{itheta}dthetabig|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta big| e^{ialpha r^2cos(2theta)-alpha r^2sin(2theta)} big|=int_{0}^{pi/4}rdtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2 sin(2theta)}big|
$$
where I used $e^{2itheta}=cos 2theta +isin 2theta$. We can simplify this to obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} r dtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}big|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}.
$$
Thus we need to show that this vanishes as $r to infty.$ If we make the substitution $xi=2theta , dtheta=dxi/2$ and changing the bounds of integration we obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi}.
$$
We can see that for $xi in [0,pi/2]$, $sinxi geq 2xi/pi$. Since $e^{-alpha r^2cdot 2xi/pi} geq e^{-alpha r^2 sin xi} $ (since exponential is bigger for a smaller exponent), we can write
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi} leq int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2 cdot 2/pi}=frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2}).
$$
Thus it is clear that
$$
lim_{rto infty}frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2})=0,
$$
thus we have shown that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
$endgroup$
Consider the complex function
$$
f(z)=e^{ialpha z^2}, z=re^{itheta}, f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}.
$$
Thus we can analyze the term
$$
f(z=re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2 itheta}}
$$
and notice for $theta=pi/4$, this is just a real Gaussian integral $alpha >0$. If $theta=0$ we have $f(re^{itheta})=e^{ialpha r^2}$. Thus we split our contour into three pieces making an angle between the imaginary and real axis of $45^o$. The contour is shown here http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Fresnel_Integral_Contour.svg . We know there are no poles inside the contour and $f(z)$ is holomorphic , thus by the Cauchy Goursat theorem we know we know
begin{equation}
0=oint f(z) dz=int_{0}^{infty} e^{ialpha x^2} dx +int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))}+int_{infty}^{0}e^{-alpha r^2}e^{ipi/4}dr
end{equation}
where the integral is broken up into three contours shown in the illustration and I used $z=re^{itheta}, dz= e^{itheta }dr$. The difficult integral to evaluate is
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} ire^{itheta} dtheta e^{ialpha r^2(cos(2theta)+isin(2theta))},
$$
however it vanishes as $r to infty$. We need to show that it vanishes, it is similar to Jordan's inequality, but that just places an upper bound on the integral,
$$
int_{0}^{pi} e^{-rsintheta}dtheta < frac{pi}{r} (r >0).
$$
We will prove this now by showing that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
We know that
$$
bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg| leq int_{0}^{pi/4} big|e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}}big| big|ir e^{itheta}dthetabig|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta big| e^{ialpha r^2cos(2theta)-alpha r^2sin(2theta)} big|=int_{0}^{pi/4}rdtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2 sin(2theta)}big|
$$
where I used $e^{2itheta}=cos 2theta +isin 2theta$. We can simplify this to obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/4} r dtheta big|e^{i alpha r^2cos(2theta)}big|big|e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}big|=int_{0}^{pi/4} rdtheta e^{-alpha r^2sin(2theta)}.
$$
Thus we need to show that this vanishes as $r to infty.$ If we make the substitution $xi=2theta , dtheta=dxi/2$ and changing the bounds of integration we obtain
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi}.
$$
We can see that for $xi in [0,pi/2]$, $sinxi geq 2xi/pi$. Since $e^{-alpha r^2cdot 2xi/pi} geq e^{-alpha r^2 sin xi} $ (since exponential is bigger for a smaller exponent), we can write
$$
int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2sin xi} leq int_{0}^{pi/2} frac{r}{2}dxi e^{-alpha r^2 cdot 2/pi}=frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2}).
$$
Thus it is clear that
$$
lim_{rto infty}frac{pi}{4 alpha r}(1-e^{-alpha r^2})=0,
$$
thus we have shown that
$$
lim_{rto infty} bigg| int_{0}^{pi/4} e^{ialpha r^2 e^{2itheta}} ir e^{itheta }dtheta bigg|=0.
$$
answered Apr 10 '14 at 22:57
Jeff FaraciJeff Faraci
3,18311985
3,18311985
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f685015%2fprove-this-integral-is-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same question as math.stackexchange.com/questions/753676/…
$endgroup$
– Etienne
Apr 15 '14 at 18:07