Each Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb C$ is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space?
$begingroup$
I would like to know is the following result true ?
"Each Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb C$ is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space".
Where a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb C$ is a Hilbert space
$H subseteq O(mathbb C)$ such that the inclusion mapping $H hookrightarrow O(mathbb C)$ is continuous.
i.e., If $H subseteq O(mathbb C)$ is a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions, then the point evaluation map, $f mapsto f(z)$, is continuous for all $zin mathbb C$ .
If so, where can I find its proof?
Thank you in advance
complex-analysis functional-analysis hilbert-spaces reproducing-kernel-hilbert-spaces
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I would like to know is the following result true ?
"Each Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb C$ is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space".
Where a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb C$ is a Hilbert space
$H subseteq O(mathbb C)$ such that the inclusion mapping $H hookrightarrow O(mathbb C)$ is continuous.
i.e., If $H subseteq O(mathbb C)$ is a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions, then the point evaluation map, $f mapsto f(z)$, is continuous for all $zin mathbb C$ .
If so, where can I find its proof?
Thank you in advance
complex-analysis functional-analysis hilbert-spaces reproducing-kernel-hilbert-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Yaddle: The boundedness of the functions is not assumed. E.g. you could take the space of polynomials of degree at most $n$.
$endgroup$
– gerw
Dec 5 '18 at 10:48
1
$begingroup$
Is the topology on $O(mathbb{C})$ the one of uniform convergence on compacta? If it is, your claim follows immediately from the continuity of the point evaluation maps on $O(mathbb{C})$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 5 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
I don't know anything about "reproducing kernels", but judging from the name, a reproducing kernel should be a representation of the identity operator as an integral. For holomorphic functions, this is Cauchy's formula; $$f(z)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_C frac{f(zeta), dzeta}{zeta - z}.$$
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
I think the non-trivial idea is that $f_n$ analytic on $U$ converges to an analytic function on $U$ iff for every compact $Ksubset U$ it converges uniformly on $K$ iff (Cauchy integral formula) for some sequence of curves (enclosing every compacts) its converges uniformly on those curves. So that your normed space of analytic functions is closed means the norm must be stronger than the previous ones.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 14:55
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro Cauchy's formula does not show that any such $H$ is a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, because the kernel is not an element of $H$.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Dec 5 '18 at 15:51
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I would like to know is the following result true ?
"Each Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb C$ is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space".
Where a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb C$ is a Hilbert space
$H subseteq O(mathbb C)$ such that the inclusion mapping $H hookrightarrow O(mathbb C)$ is continuous.
i.e., If $H subseteq O(mathbb C)$ is a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions, then the point evaluation map, $f mapsto f(z)$, is continuous for all $zin mathbb C$ .
If so, where can I find its proof?
Thank you in advance
complex-analysis functional-analysis hilbert-spaces reproducing-kernel-hilbert-spaces
$endgroup$
I would like to know is the following result true ?
"Each Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb C$ is a reproducing kernel Hilbert space".
Where a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb C$ is a Hilbert space
$H subseteq O(mathbb C)$ such that the inclusion mapping $H hookrightarrow O(mathbb C)$ is continuous.
i.e., If $H subseteq O(mathbb C)$ is a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions, then the point evaluation map, $f mapsto f(z)$, is continuous for all $zin mathbb C$ .
If so, where can I find its proof?
Thank you in advance
complex-analysis functional-analysis hilbert-spaces reproducing-kernel-hilbert-spaces
complex-analysis functional-analysis hilbert-spaces reproducing-kernel-hilbert-spaces
edited Dec 5 '18 at 10:49
Z. Alfata
asked Dec 5 '18 at 8:53
Z. AlfataZ. Alfata
895514
895514
$begingroup$
@Yaddle: The boundedness of the functions is not assumed. E.g. you could take the space of polynomials of degree at most $n$.
$endgroup$
– gerw
Dec 5 '18 at 10:48
1
$begingroup$
Is the topology on $O(mathbb{C})$ the one of uniform convergence on compacta? If it is, your claim follows immediately from the continuity of the point evaluation maps on $O(mathbb{C})$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 5 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
I don't know anything about "reproducing kernels", but judging from the name, a reproducing kernel should be a representation of the identity operator as an integral. For holomorphic functions, this is Cauchy's formula; $$f(z)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_C frac{f(zeta), dzeta}{zeta - z}.$$
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
I think the non-trivial idea is that $f_n$ analytic on $U$ converges to an analytic function on $U$ iff for every compact $Ksubset U$ it converges uniformly on $K$ iff (Cauchy integral formula) for some sequence of curves (enclosing every compacts) its converges uniformly on those curves. So that your normed space of analytic functions is closed means the norm must be stronger than the previous ones.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 14:55
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro Cauchy's formula does not show that any such $H$ is a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, because the kernel is not an element of $H$.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Dec 5 '18 at 15:51
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
@Yaddle: The boundedness of the functions is not assumed. E.g. you could take the space of polynomials of degree at most $n$.
$endgroup$
– gerw
Dec 5 '18 at 10:48
1
$begingroup$
Is the topology on $O(mathbb{C})$ the one of uniform convergence on compacta? If it is, your claim follows immediately from the continuity of the point evaluation maps on $O(mathbb{C})$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 5 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
I don't know anything about "reproducing kernels", but judging from the name, a reproducing kernel should be a representation of the identity operator as an integral. For holomorphic functions, this is Cauchy's formula; $$f(z)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_C frac{f(zeta), dzeta}{zeta - z}.$$
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
I think the non-trivial idea is that $f_n$ analytic on $U$ converges to an analytic function on $U$ iff for every compact $Ksubset U$ it converges uniformly on $K$ iff (Cauchy integral formula) for some sequence of curves (enclosing every compacts) its converges uniformly on those curves. So that your normed space of analytic functions is closed means the norm must be stronger than the previous ones.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 14:55
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro Cauchy's formula does not show that any such $H$ is a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, because the kernel is not an element of $H$.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Dec 5 '18 at 15:51
$begingroup$
@Yaddle: The boundedness of the functions is not assumed. E.g. you could take the space of polynomials of degree at most $n$.
$endgroup$
– gerw
Dec 5 '18 at 10:48
$begingroup$
@Yaddle: The boundedness of the functions is not assumed. E.g. you could take the space of polynomials of degree at most $n$.
$endgroup$
– gerw
Dec 5 '18 at 10:48
1
1
$begingroup$
Is the topology on $O(mathbb{C})$ the one of uniform convergence on compacta? If it is, your claim follows immediately from the continuity of the point evaluation maps on $O(mathbb{C})$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 5 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
Is the topology on $O(mathbb{C})$ the one of uniform convergence on compacta? If it is, your claim follows immediately from the continuity of the point evaluation maps on $O(mathbb{C})$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 5 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
I don't know anything about "reproducing kernels", but judging from the name, a reproducing kernel should be a representation of the identity operator as an integral. For holomorphic functions, this is Cauchy's formula; $$f(z)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_C frac{f(zeta), dzeta}{zeta - z}.$$
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
I don't know anything about "reproducing kernels", but judging from the name, a reproducing kernel should be a representation of the identity operator as an integral. For holomorphic functions, this is Cauchy's formula; $$f(z)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_C frac{f(zeta), dzeta}{zeta - z}.$$
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
I think the non-trivial idea is that $f_n$ analytic on $U$ converges to an analytic function on $U$ iff for every compact $Ksubset U$ it converges uniformly on $K$ iff (Cauchy integral formula) for some sequence of curves (enclosing every compacts) its converges uniformly on those curves. So that your normed space of analytic functions is closed means the norm must be stronger than the previous ones.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 14:55
$begingroup$
I think the non-trivial idea is that $f_n$ analytic on $U$ converges to an analytic function on $U$ iff for every compact $Ksubset U$ it converges uniformly on $K$ iff (Cauchy integral formula) for some sequence of curves (enclosing every compacts) its converges uniformly on those curves. So that your normed space of analytic functions is closed means the norm must be stronger than the previous ones.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 14:55
1
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro Cauchy's formula does not show that any such $H$ is a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, because the kernel is not an element of $H$.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Dec 5 '18 at 15:51
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro Cauchy's formula does not show that any such $H$ is a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, because the kernel is not an element of $H$.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Dec 5 '18 at 15:51
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If the inclusion $i: H to O(mathbb{C})$ is continuous, then of course the evaluations are continuous, since they are continuous on $O(mathbb{C})$ so that $f(z) = (if)(z)$ is a composition of two continuous maps. I'm assuming here that $O(mathbb{C})$ is supplied with the usual topology of uniform convergence on compacta.
A perhaps more interesting case happens if the continuity of this inclusion is dropped. Without this assumption, the continuity of evaluations certainly should not be true, although an explicit counterexample might be difficult to construct. If you allow the use of the axiom of choice, then the following construction I think will work.
Let $E$ be the vector space of all entire functions. It should not be difficult to show by example that a linearly independent sequence of functions $f_n in E$ exists such that $|f_n(0)| to infty$ as $n to infty$. By the axiom of choice, we can complete this sequence to a vector space basis ${f_alpha}_{alpha in A}$ for $E$.
There certainly exists a Hilbert space $H$ with a a vector space basis of the same cardinality as $A$, say this basis is ${h_alpha}_{alpha in A}$. By scaling, we can assume that $|h_alpha|_{H} = 1$. Now, define the norm on $E$ in the following way: $$|sum_{i=1}^n c_if_{alpha_i}|_{E} = |sum_{i=1}^n c_ih_{alpha_i}|_{H}.$$ This makes $E$ into a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb{C}$. Certainly $|f_n|_E = 1$, yet $|f_n(0)| to infty$ by construction, so the evaluation at $z = 0$ is discontinuous.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026823%2feach-hilbert-space-of-holomorphic-functions-on-mathbb-c-is-a-reproducing-kern%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If the inclusion $i: H to O(mathbb{C})$ is continuous, then of course the evaluations are continuous, since they are continuous on $O(mathbb{C})$ so that $f(z) = (if)(z)$ is a composition of two continuous maps. I'm assuming here that $O(mathbb{C})$ is supplied with the usual topology of uniform convergence on compacta.
A perhaps more interesting case happens if the continuity of this inclusion is dropped. Without this assumption, the continuity of evaluations certainly should not be true, although an explicit counterexample might be difficult to construct. If you allow the use of the axiom of choice, then the following construction I think will work.
Let $E$ be the vector space of all entire functions. It should not be difficult to show by example that a linearly independent sequence of functions $f_n in E$ exists such that $|f_n(0)| to infty$ as $n to infty$. By the axiom of choice, we can complete this sequence to a vector space basis ${f_alpha}_{alpha in A}$ for $E$.
There certainly exists a Hilbert space $H$ with a a vector space basis of the same cardinality as $A$, say this basis is ${h_alpha}_{alpha in A}$. By scaling, we can assume that $|h_alpha|_{H} = 1$. Now, define the norm on $E$ in the following way: $$|sum_{i=1}^n c_if_{alpha_i}|_{E} = |sum_{i=1}^n c_ih_{alpha_i}|_{H}.$$ This makes $E$ into a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb{C}$. Certainly $|f_n|_E = 1$, yet $|f_n(0)| to infty$ by construction, so the evaluation at $z = 0$ is discontinuous.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the inclusion $i: H to O(mathbb{C})$ is continuous, then of course the evaluations are continuous, since they are continuous on $O(mathbb{C})$ so that $f(z) = (if)(z)$ is a composition of two continuous maps. I'm assuming here that $O(mathbb{C})$ is supplied with the usual topology of uniform convergence on compacta.
A perhaps more interesting case happens if the continuity of this inclusion is dropped. Without this assumption, the continuity of evaluations certainly should not be true, although an explicit counterexample might be difficult to construct. If you allow the use of the axiom of choice, then the following construction I think will work.
Let $E$ be the vector space of all entire functions. It should not be difficult to show by example that a linearly independent sequence of functions $f_n in E$ exists such that $|f_n(0)| to infty$ as $n to infty$. By the axiom of choice, we can complete this sequence to a vector space basis ${f_alpha}_{alpha in A}$ for $E$.
There certainly exists a Hilbert space $H$ with a a vector space basis of the same cardinality as $A$, say this basis is ${h_alpha}_{alpha in A}$. By scaling, we can assume that $|h_alpha|_{H} = 1$. Now, define the norm on $E$ in the following way: $$|sum_{i=1}^n c_if_{alpha_i}|_{E} = |sum_{i=1}^n c_ih_{alpha_i}|_{H}.$$ This makes $E$ into a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb{C}$. Certainly $|f_n|_E = 1$, yet $|f_n(0)| to infty$ by construction, so the evaluation at $z = 0$ is discontinuous.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the inclusion $i: H to O(mathbb{C})$ is continuous, then of course the evaluations are continuous, since they are continuous on $O(mathbb{C})$ so that $f(z) = (if)(z)$ is a composition of two continuous maps. I'm assuming here that $O(mathbb{C})$ is supplied with the usual topology of uniform convergence on compacta.
A perhaps more interesting case happens if the continuity of this inclusion is dropped. Without this assumption, the continuity of evaluations certainly should not be true, although an explicit counterexample might be difficult to construct. If you allow the use of the axiom of choice, then the following construction I think will work.
Let $E$ be the vector space of all entire functions. It should not be difficult to show by example that a linearly independent sequence of functions $f_n in E$ exists such that $|f_n(0)| to infty$ as $n to infty$. By the axiom of choice, we can complete this sequence to a vector space basis ${f_alpha}_{alpha in A}$ for $E$.
There certainly exists a Hilbert space $H$ with a a vector space basis of the same cardinality as $A$, say this basis is ${h_alpha}_{alpha in A}$. By scaling, we can assume that $|h_alpha|_{H} = 1$. Now, define the norm on $E$ in the following way: $$|sum_{i=1}^n c_if_{alpha_i}|_{E} = |sum_{i=1}^n c_ih_{alpha_i}|_{H}.$$ This makes $E$ into a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb{C}$. Certainly $|f_n|_E = 1$, yet $|f_n(0)| to infty$ by construction, so the evaluation at $z = 0$ is discontinuous.
$endgroup$
If the inclusion $i: H to O(mathbb{C})$ is continuous, then of course the evaluations are continuous, since they are continuous on $O(mathbb{C})$ so that $f(z) = (if)(z)$ is a composition of two continuous maps. I'm assuming here that $O(mathbb{C})$ is supplied with the usual topology of uniform convergence on compacta.
A perhaps more interesting case happens if the continuity of this inclusion is dropped. Without this assumption, the continuity of evaluations certainly should not be true, although an explicit counterexample might be difficult to construct. If you allow the use of the axiom of choice, then the following construction I think will work.
Let $E$ be the vector space of all entire functions. It should not be difficult to show by example that a linearly independent sequence of functions $f_n in E$ exists such that $|f_n(0)| to infty$ as $n to infty$. By the axiom of choice, we can complete this sequence to a vector space basis ${f_alpha}_{alpha in A}$ for $E$.
There certainly exists a Hilbert space $H$ with a a vector space basis of the same cardinality as $A$, say this basis is ${h_alpha}_{alpha in A}$. By scaling, we can assume that $|h_alpha|_{H} = 1$. Now, define the norm on $E$ in the following way: $$|sum_{i=1}^n c_if_{alpha_i}|_{E} = |sum_{i=1}^n c_ih_{alpha_i}|_{H}.$$ This makes $E$ into a Hilbert space of holomorphic functions on $mathbb{C}$. Certainly $|f_n|_E = 1$, yet $|f_n(0)| to infty$ by construction, so the evaluation at $z = 0$ is discontinuous.
edited Dec 5 '18 at 17:27
answered Dec 5 '18 at 13:45
Bartosz MalmanBartosz Malman
8161620
8161620
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3026823%2feach-hilbert-space-of-holomorphic-functions-on-mathbb-c-is-a-reproducing-kern%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@Yaddle: The boundedness of the functions is not assumed. E.g. you could take the space of polynomials of degree at most $n$.
$endgroup$
– gerw
Dec 5 '18 at 10:48
1
$begingroup$
Is the topology on $O(mathbb{C})$ the one of uniform convergence on compacta? If it is, your claim follows immediately from the continuity of the point evaluation maps on $O(mathbb{C})$.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 5 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
I don't know anything about "reproducing kernels", but judging from the name, a reproducing kernel should be a representation of the identity operator as an integral. For holomorphic functions, this is Cauchy's formula; $$f(z)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_C frac{f(zeta), dzeta}{zeta - z}.$$
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 5 '18 at 13:52
$begingroup$
I think the non-trivial idea is that $f_n$ analytic on $U$ converges to an analytic function on $U$ iff for every compact $Ksubset U$ it converges uniformly on $K$ iff (Cauchy integral formula) for some sequence of curves (enclosing every compacts) its converges uniformly on those curves. So that your normed space of analytic functions is closed means the norm must be stronger than the previous ones.
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 5 '18 at 14:55
1
$begingroup$
@GiuseppeNegro Cauchy's formula does not show that any such $H$ is a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, because the kernel is not an element of $H$.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Dec 5 '18 at 15:51