Proving a sequence of functions is an approximation to the identity












0












$begingroup$


Define the sequence $phi_n$ on the interval $[-pi,pi]$ (the torus if you will) by:
$$
phi_n = c_n (1 + cos x)^n
$$

Where $c_n$ is a normalizing constant to ensure that $int_T phi_n = 1$ for any choice of $n$. I.e $c_n = int_T (1 + cos x)^n$. Now, I want to prove this sequence is an approximation to the identity. The main property I must prove is that for any $delta$ greater than $0$, we have that:
$$
int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} phi_n(x) mathrm{d}x to 0
$$

I.e, if we shift a little off from $1$ and take a limit of integrals, all the mass becomes concentrated around $0$, as we would think happens in an approximation to the identity. My main strategy for the proof was to do the following. First, write:
$$
(1 + cos x)^n = 2^{n} cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)
$$

using trigonometric identities. Then we see that $cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right) to 0$ pointwise for any $x neq 0$. Moreover, if we have for fixed $x_0$ that:



$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x_0}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

Then we see that $x > x_0$ implies:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

Hence, given any $delta > 0$, we can take $N$ such that $n > N$ implies:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{delta}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

So that for any $x$ with $|x| > delta$ (exploiting symmetry of cosine) we have that:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

And hence:
$$
int_{{delta} < |x|<pi} cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right) < 2(pi - delta)epsilon to 0
$$

So that the LHS becomes arbitrarily small and converges to $0$. However, I am having issues dealing with the normalizing factor. Namely, we have:
$$
int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} phi_n(x) mathrm{d}x = frac{1}{int_{[-pi,pi]} 2^{n} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right) mathrm{d}x} int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} 2^{n} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right)mathrm{d}x
$$

The $2^n$ powers cancel, so we have:
$$
frac{int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right)mathrm{d}x}{int_{[-pi,pi]} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right) mathrm{d}x}
$$

And the numerator of this expression tends to $0$, by my previous argument. However, how can I deal with the normalizing integrals? How do I make sure they do not go to $0$, and if they do (I am fairly sure they do), how can I rigorize the fact that the numerator converges to $0$ faster?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    you mean $cos^{2n}frac{x}2to 0$ pointwise for any $xneq 0$, not $xneq 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:09












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, I've edited that.
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Surely it's becoming more like a Dirac delta function az n→∞ ?
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:35










  • $begingroup$
    @ambretteorrisey yes that's what I mean by an approximation to an identity
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:06










  • $begingroup$
    Good good! It's absolutely clear now. And there's an infinitude of similar ways of constructing the Dirac delta function; and you can get |x| by lim{a→∞}(1/a)ln(cosh(ax)): & all kinds of other lovely things!
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:17
















0












$begingroup$


Define the sequence $phi_n$ on the interval $[-pi,pi]$ (the torus if you will) by:
$$
phi_n = c_n (1 + cos x)^n
$$

Where $c_n$ is a normalizing constant to ensure that $int_T phi_n = 1$ for any choice of $n$. I.e $c_n = int_T (1 + cos x)^n$. Now, I want to prove this sequence is an approximation to the identity. The main property I must prove is that for any $delta$ greater than $0$, we have that:
$$
int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} phi_n(x) mathrm{d}x to 0
$$

I.e, if we shift a little off from $1$ and take a limit of integrals, all the mass becomes concentrated around $0$, as we would think happens in an approximation to the identity. My main strategy for the proof was to do the following. First, write:
$$
(1 + cos x)^n = 2^{n} cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)
$$

using trigonometric identities. Then we see that $cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right) to 0$ pointwise for any $x neq 0$. Moreover, if we have for fixed $x_0$ that:



$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x_0}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

Then we see that $x > x_0$ implies:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

Hence, given any $delta > 0$, we can take $N$ such that $n > N$ implies:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{delta}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

So that for any $x$ with $|x| > delta$ (exploiting symmetry of cosine) we have that:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

And hence:
$$
int_{{delta} < |x|<pi} cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right) < 2(pi - delta)epsilon to 0
$$

So that the LHS becomes arbitrarily small and converges to $0$. However, I am having issues dealing with the normalizing factor. Namely, we have:
$$
int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} phi_n(x) mathrm{d}x = frac{1}{int_{[-pi,pi]} 2^{n} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right) mathrm{d}x} int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} 2^{n} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right)mathrm{d}x
$$

The $2^n$ powers cancel, so we have:
$$
frac{int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right)mathrm{d}x}{int_{[-pi,pi]} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right) mathrm{d}x}
$$

And the numerator of this expression tends to $0$, by my previous argument. However, how can I deal with the normalizing integrals? How do I make sure they do not go to $0$, and if they do (I am fairly sure they do), how can I rigorize the fact that the numerator converges to $0$ faster?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    you mean $cos^{2n}frac{x}2to 0$ pointwise for any $xneq 0$, not $xneq 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:09












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, I've edited that.
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Surely it's becoming more like a Dirac delta function az n→∞ ?
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:35










  • $begingroup$
    @ambretteorrisey yes that's what I mean by an approximation to an identity
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:06










  • $begingroup$
    Good good! It's absolutely clear now. And there's an infinitude of similar ways of constructing the Dirac delta function; and you can get |x| by lim{a→∞}(1/a)ln(cosh(ax)): & all kinds of other lovely things!
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:17














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Define the sequence $phi_n$ on the interval $[-pi,pi]$ (the torus if you will) by:
$$
phi_n = c_n (1 + cos x)^n
$$

Where $c_n$ is a normalizing constant to ensure that $int_T phi_n = 1$ for any choice of $n$. I.e $c_n = int_T (1 + cos x)^n$. Now, I want to prove this sequence is an approximation to the identity. The main property I must prove is that for any $delta$ greater than $0$, we have that:
$$
int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} phi_n(x) mathrm{d}x to 0
$$

I.e, if we shift a little off from $1$ and take a limit of integrals, all the mass becomes concentrated around $0$, as we would think happens in an approximation to the identity. My main strategy for the proof was to do the following. First, write:
$$
(1 + cos x)^n = 2^{n} cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)
$$

using trigonometric identities. Then we see that $cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right) to 0$ pointwise for any $x neq 0$. Moreover, if we have for fixed $x_0$ that:



$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x_0}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

Then we see that $x > x_0$ implies:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

Hence, given any $delta > 0$, we can take $N$ such that $n > N$ implies:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{delta}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

So that for any $x$ with $|x| > delta$ (exploiting symmetry of cosine) we have that:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

And hence:
$$
int_{{delta} < |x|<pi} cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right) < 2(pi - delta)epsilon to 0
$$

So that the LHS becomes arbitrarily small and converges to $0$. However, I am having issues dealing with the normalizing factor. Namely, we have:
$$
int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} phi_n(x) mathrm{d}x = frac{1}{int_{[-pi,pi]} 2^{n} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right) mathrm{d}x} int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} 2^{n} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right)mathrm{d}x
$$

The $2^n$ powers cancel, so we have:
$$
frac{int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right)mathrm{d}x}{int_{[-pi,pi]} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right) mathrm{d}x}
$$

And the numerator of this expression tends to $0$, by my previous argument. However, how can I deal with the normalizing integrals? How do I make sure they do not go to $0$, and if they do (I am fairly sure they do), how can I rigorize the fact that the numerator converges to $0$ faster?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Define the sequence $phi_n$ on the interval $[-pi,pi]$ (the torus if you will) by:
$$
phi_n = c_n (1 + cos x)^n
$$

Where $c_n$ is a normalizing constant to ensure that $int_T phi_n = 1$ for any choice of $n$. I.e $c_n = int_T (1 + cos x)^n$. Now, I want to prove this sequence is an approximation to the identity. The main property I must prove is that for any $delta$ greater than $0$, we have that:
$$
int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} phi_n(x) mathrm{d}x to 0
$$

I.e, if we shift a little off from $1$ and take a limit of integrals, all the mass becomes concentrated around $0$, as we would think happens in an approximation to the identity. My main strategy for the proof was to do the following. First, write:
$$
(1 + cos x)^n = 2^{n} cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)
$$

using trigonometric identities. Then we see that $cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right) to 0$ pointwise for any $x neq 0$. Moreover, if we have for fixed $x_0$ that:



$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x_0}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

Then we see that $x > x_0$ implies:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

Hence, given any $delta > 0$, we can take $N$ such that $n > N$ implies:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{delta}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

So that for any $x$ with $|x| > delta$ (exploiting symmetry of cosine) we have that:
$$
left|cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right)right|<epsilon
$$

And hence:
$$
int_{{delta} < |x|<pi} cos^{2n} left(frac{x}{2}right) < 2(pi - delta)epsilon to 0
$$

So that the LHS becomes arbitrarily small and converges to $0$. However, I am having issues dealing with the normalizing factor. Namely, we have:
$$
int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} phi_n(x) mathrm{d}x = frac{1}{int_{[-pi,pi]} 2^{n} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right) mathrm{d}x} int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} 2^{n} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right)mathrm{d}x
$$

The $2^n$ powers cancel, so we have:
$$
frac{int_{{delta < |x| < pi}} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right)mathrm{d}x}{int_{[-pi,pi]} cos^{2n} left( frac{x}{2}right) mathrm{d}x}
$$

And the numerator of this expression tends to $0$, by my previous argument. However, how can I deal with the normalizing integrals? How do I make sure they do not go to $0$, and if they do (I am fairly sure they do), how can I rigorize the fact that the numerator converges to $0$ faster?







real-analysis functional-analysis fourier-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '18 at 5:11







rubikscube09

















asked Dec 2 '18 at 3:02









rubikscube09rubikscube09

1,189718




1,189718












  • $begingroup$
    you mean $cos^{2n}frac{x}2to 0$ pointwise for any $xneq 0$, not $xneq 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:09












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, I've edited that.
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Surely it's becoming more like a Dirac delta function az n→∞ ?
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:35










  • $begingroup$
    @ambretteorrisey yes that's what I mean by an approximation to an identity
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:06










  • $begingroup$
    Good good! It's absolutely clear now. And there's an infinitude of similar ways of constructing the Dirac delta function; and you can get |x| by lim{a→∞}(1/a)ln(cosh(ax)): & all kinds of other lovely things!
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:17


















  • $begingroup$
    you mean $cos^{2n}frac{x}2to 0$ pointwise for any $xneq 0$, not $xneq 1$.
    $endgroup$
    – user10354138
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:09












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, I've edited that.
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Surely it's becoming more like a Dirac delta function az n→∞ ?
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 2 '18 at 5:35










  • $begingroup$
    @ambretteorrisey yes that's what I mean by an approximation to an identity
    $endgroup$
    – rubikscube09
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:06










  • $begingroup$
    Good good! It's absolutely clear now. And there's an infinitude of similar ways of constructing the Dirac delta function; and you can get |x| by lim{a→∞}(1/a)ln(cosh(ax)): & all kinds of other lovely things!
    $endgroup$
    – AmbretteOrrisey
    Dec 2 '18 at 6:17
















$begingroup$
you mean $cos^{2n}frac{x}2to 0$ pointwise for any $xneq 0$, not $xneq 1$.
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 2 '18 at 5:09






$begingroup$
you mean $cos^{2n}frac{x}2to 0$ pointwise for any $xneq 0$, not $xneq 1$.
$endgroup$
– user10354138
Dec 2 '18 at 5:09














$begingroup$
Thank you, I've edited that.
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Dec 2 '18 at 5:10




$begingroup$
Thank you, I've edited that.
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Dec 2 '18 at 5:10




1




1




$begingroup$
Surely it's becoming more like a Dirac delta function az n→∞ ?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 2 '18 at 5:35




$begingroup$
Surely it's becoming more like a Dirac delta function az n→∞ ?
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 2 '18 at 5:35












$begingroup$
@ambretteorrisey yes that's what I mean by an approximation to an identity
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Dec 2 '18 at 6:06




$begingroup$
@ambretteorrisey yes that's what I mean by an approximation to an identity
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Dec 2 '18 at 6:06












$begingroup$
Good good! It's absolutely clear now. And there's an infinitude of similar ways of constructing the Dirac delta function; and you can get |x| by lim{a→∞}(1/a)ln(cosh(ax)): & all kinds of other lovely things!
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 2 '18 at 6:17




$begingroup$
Good good! It's absolutely clear now. And there's an infinitude of similar ways of constructing the Dirac delta function; and you can get |x| by lim{a→∞}(1/a)ln(cosh(ax)): & all kinds of other lovely things!
$endgroup$
– AmbretteOrrisey
Dec 2 '18 at 6:17










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

If you look at the graph of $f(x) = 1+cos x$ you can intuitively guess that with the powers $f^n$ the mass of the integral will "bunch up" around $x=0$. Points closer to 0 will shoot up faster than points further away (basically because if a>b then $a^n >>b^n$ as n grows large). Here's a way to make that precise:



Let $f(x)$ be positive and strictly decreasing on $[0,pi]$. We can compare $int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx$ to $int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x), dx$ by taking their ratio and showing
$$
frac{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow +infty
$$



By choosing a fixed $0<epsilon<delta$ we have that the numerator is at least $int_{[0,epsilon]} f^n(x) ,dx$ and this is at least $epsilon f(epsilon)^n$ (both of these fact follow since $fgeq 0$ and $f$ is decreasing.
Similarly the denominator is less than $(pi-delta)f(delta)^n$. Since
$$
frac{epsilon f(epsilon)^n}{(pi-delta)f(delta)^n} rightarrow infty
$$

we have our result.



Now to apply this result to your problem, you can choose $f(x) = cos^2(frac{x}{2})$ as in your last line. You can invert the limit above going to $infty$ and do one more comparison:



$$
frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} leq frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow 0
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    You can compute the normalising factor explicitly: $$int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x = 2^{-n}binom{2n}{n+1}cdot 2pisim 2^ncdotfrac{2pi}{sqrt{npi}}$$
    where the last asymptotic is by Stirling's formula. On the other hand, for $delta<lvert xrvert<pi$, we have $cos^{2n}frac{x}{2}<cos^{2n}fracdelta2leqexp(-cndelta^2)$, some $c>0$. So
    $$
    frac{int_{delta<lvert xrvert<pi}(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}{int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}lesssimfrac{2^nexp(-cndelta^2)cdot 2pi}{2^ncdot{2pi}/{sqrt{npi}}}simexp(-cndelta^2)sqrt{npi}to 0
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022167%2fproving-a-sequence-of-functions-is-an-approximation-to-the-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      If you look at the graph of $f(x) = 1+cos x$ you can intuitively guess that with the powers $f^n$ the mass of the integral will "bunch up" around $x=0$. Points closer to 0 will shoot up faster than points further away (basically because if a>b then $a^n >>b^n$ as n grows large). Here's a way to make that precise:



      Let $f(x)$ be positive and strictly decreasing on $[0,pi]$. We can compare $int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx$ to $int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x), dx$ by taking their ratio and showing
      $$
      frac{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow +infty
      $$



      By choosing a fixed $0<epsilon<delta$ we have that the numerator is at least $int_{[0,epsilon]} f^n(x) ,dx$ and this is at least $epsilon f(epsilon)^n$ (both of these fact follow since $fgeq 0$ and $f$ is decreasing.
      Similarly the denominator is less than $(pi-delta)f(delta)^n$. Since
      $$
      frac{epsilon f(epsilon)^n}{(pi-delta)f(delta)^n} rightarrow infty
      $$

      we have our result.



      Now to apply this result to your problem, you can choose $f(x) = cos^2(frac{x}{2})$ as in your last line. You can invert the limit above going to $infty$ and do one more comparison:



      $$
      frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} leq frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow 0
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        If you look at the graph of $f(x) = 1+cos x$ you can intuitively guess that with the powers $f^n$ the mass of the integral will "bunch up" around $x=0$. Points closer to 0 will shoot up faster than points further away (basically because if a>b then $a^n >>b^n$ as n grows large). Here's a way to make that precise:



        Let $f(x)$ be positive and strictly decreasing on $[0,pi]$. We can compare $int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx$ to $int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x), dx$ by taking their ratio and showing
        $$
        frac{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow +infty
        $$



        By choosing a fixed $0<epsilon<delta$ we have that the numerator is at least $int_{[0,epsilon]} f^n(x) ,dx$ and this is at least $epsilon f(epsilon)^n$ (both of these fact follow since $fgeq 0$ and $f$ is decreasing.
        Similarly the denominator is less than $(pi-delta)f(delta)^n$. Since
        $$
        frac{epsilon f(epsilon)^n}{(pi-delta)f(delta)^n} rightarrow infty
        $$

        we have our result.



        Now to apply this result to your problem, you can choose $f(x) = cos^2(frac{x}{2})$ as in your last line. You can invert the limit above going to $infty$ and do one more comparison:



        $$
        frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} leq frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow 0
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          If you look at the graph of $f(x) = 1+cos x$ you can intuitively guess that with the powers $f^n$ the mass of the integral will "bunch up" around $x=0$. Points closer to 0 will shoot up faster than points further away (basically because if a>b then $a^n >>b^n$ as n grows large). Here's a way to make that precise:



          Let $f(x)$ be positive and strictly decreasing on $[0,pi]$. We can compare $int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx$ to $int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x), dx$ by taking their ratio and showing
          $$
          frac{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow +infty
          $$



          By choosing a fixed $0<epsilon<delta$ we have that the numerator is at least $int_{[0,epsilon]} f^n(x) ,dx$ and this is at least $epsilon f(epsilon)^n$ (both of these fact follow since $fgeq 0$ and $f$ is decreasing.
          Similarly the denominator is less than $(pi-delta)f(delta)^n$. Since
          $$
          frac{epsilon f(epsilon)^n}{(pi-delta)f(delta)^n} rightarrow infty
          $$

          we have our result.



          Now to apply this result to your problem, you can choose $f(x) = cos^2(frac{x}{2})$ as in your last line. You can invert the limit above going to $infty$ and do one more comparison:



          $$
          frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} leq frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow 0
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If you look at the graph of $f(x) = 1+cos x$ you can intuitively guess that with the powers $f^n$ the mass of the integral will "bunch up" around $x=0$. Points closer to 0 will shoot up faster than points further away (basically because if a>b then $a^n >>b^n$ as n grows large). Here's a way to make that precise:



          Let $f(x)$ be positive and strictly decreasing on $[0,pi]$. We can compare $int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx$ to $int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x), dx$ by taking their ratio and showing
          $$
          frac{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow +infty
          $$



          By choosing a fixed $0<epsilon<delta$ we have that the numerator is at least $int_{[0,epsilon]} f^n(x) ,dx$ and this is at least $epsilon f(epsilon)^n$ (both of these fact follow since $fgeq 0$ and $f$ is decreasing.
          Similarly the denominator is less than $(pi-delta)f(delta)^n$. Since
          $$
          frac{epsilon f(epsilon)^n}{(pi-delta)f(delta)^n} rightarrow infty
          $$

          we have our result.



          Now to apply this result to your problem, you can choose $f(x) = cos^2(frac{x}{2})$ as in your last line. You can invert the limit above going to $infty$ and do one more comparison:



          $$
          frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx} leq frac{int_{[delta,pi]} f^n(x) ,dx}{int_{[0,delta]} f^n(x) ,dx} rightarrow 0
          $$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 2 '18 at 5:38









          user25959user25959

          1,573816




          1,573816























              0












              $begingroup$

              You can compute the normalising factor explicitly: $$int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x = 2^{-n}binom{2n}{n+1}cdot 2pisim 2^ncdotfrac{2pi}{sqrt{npi}}$$
              where the last asymptotic is by Stirling's formula. On the other hand, for $delta<lvert xrvert<pi$, we have $cos^{2n}frac{x}{2}<cos^{2n}fracdelta2leqexp(-cndelta^2)$, some $c>0$. So
              $$
              frac{int_{delta<lvert xrvert<pi}(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}{int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}lesssimfrac{2^nexp(-cndelta^2)cdot 2pi}{2^ncdot{2pi}/{sqrt{npi}}}simexp(-cndelta^2)sqrt{npi}to 0
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                You can compute the normalising factor explicitly: $$int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x = 2^{-n}binom{2n}{n+1}cdot 2pisim 2^ncdotfrac{2pi}{sqrt{npi}}$$
                where the last asymptotic is by Stirling's formula. On the other hand, for $delta<lvert xrvert<pi$, we have $cos^{2n}frac{x}{2}<cos^{2n}fracdelta2leqexp(-cndelta^2)$, some $c>0$. So
                $$
                frac{int_{delta<lvert xrvert<pi}(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}{int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}lesssimfrac{2^nexp(-cndelta^2)cdot 2pi}{2^ncdot{2pi}/{sqrt{npi}}}simexp(-cndelta^2)sqrt{npi}to 0
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  You can compute the normalising factor explicitly: $$int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x = 2^{-n}binom{2n}{n+1}cdot 2pisim 2^ncdotfrac{2pi}{sqrt{npi}}$$
                  where the last asymptotic is by Stirling's formula. On the other hand, for $delta<lvert xrvert<pi$, we have $cos^{2n}frac{x}{2}<cos^{2n}fracdelta2leqexp(-cndelta^2)$, some $c>0$. So
                  $$
                  frac{int_{delta<lvert xrvert<pi}(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}{int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}lesssimfrac{2^nexp(-cndelta^2)cdot 2pi}{2^ncdot{2pi}/{sqrt{npi}}}simexp(-cndelta^2)sqrt{npi}to 0
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  You can compute the normalising factor explicitly: $$int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x = 2^{-n}binom{2n}{n+1}cdot 2pisim 2^ncdotfrac{2pi}{sqrt{npi}}$$
                  where the last asymptotic is by Stirling's formula. On the other hand, for $delta<lvert xrvert<pi$, we have $cos^{2n}frac{x}{2}<cos^{2n}fracdelta2leqexp(-cndelta^2)$, some $c>0$. So
                  $$
                  frac{int_{delta<lvert xrvert<pi}(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}{int_{-pi}^pi(1+cos x)^n,mathrm{d}x}lesssimfrac{2^nexp(-cndelta^2)cdot 2pi}{2^ncdot{2pi}/{sqrt{npi}}}simexp(-cndelta^2)sqrt{npi}to 0
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 2 '18 at 5:37









                  user10354138user10354138

                  7,3772925




                  7,3772925






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022167%2fproving-a-sequence-of-functions-is-an-approximation-to-the-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Willebadessen

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                      Residenzschloss Arolsen