Irreducible projective varieties and morphisms












0












$begingroup$


Let $C$ be a smooth and irreducible projective curve, and let $f: X rightarrow mathbb{P}^1(mathbb{C})$ a morphism of varieties: then $f$ is either constant or surjective. I am trying to prove this in an elementary way (I don't know about schemes, and I cannot use the notion of completeness).



I think it should be possible to cover $mathbb{P}^1$ with two affine open sets $U,V$ both isomorphic to $mathbb{A}^1$ and then exploit the fact that the functions from $X$ to $mathbb{A}^1$ have to be constant but I cannot seem how to patch this up and how it relates to surjectivity.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. Assume it's not surjective and choose your cover appropriately.
    $endgroup$
    – user113102
    Dec 6 '18 at 19:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that is not that easy. Can you use Riemann-Roch theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – José Alejandro Aburto Araneda
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:55






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $f$ misses a point, WLOG take that point to be the point at infinity, so that $im(f) subset U$. But then $f$ is a map to $mathbb{A}^1$, so must be constant. I'm worried I'm saying something wrong though...been out of the game too long.
    $endgroup$
    – user113102
    Dec 7 '18 at 1:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Karl : there is nothing wrong with this argument I think. We started with a map $C to Bbb P^1$. By hypothesis $infty$ is not in the image, so it factors by a map $C to Bbb A^1$. By what you already know this map is constant, so the original map was constant as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicolas Hemelsoet
    Dec 7 '18 at 8:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Karl That doesn't even make sense. The morphism can't take values on $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$, since $Bbb{P}^1$ is the codomain, not the domain. And by assumption $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$ is not in the image of the morphism, so the morphism doesn't take on that value either.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 8 '18 at 5:57
















0












$begingroup$


Let $C$ be a smooth and irreducible projective curve, and let $f: X rightarrow mathbb{P}^1(mathbb{C})$ a morphism of varieties: then $f$ is either constant or surjective. I am trying to prove this in an elementary way (I don't know about schemes, and I cannot use the notion of completeness).



I think it should be possible to cover $mathbb{P}^1$ with two affine open sets $U,V$ both isomorphic to $mathbb{A}^1$ and then exploit the fact that the functions from $X$ to $mathbb{A}^1$ have to be constant but I cannot seem how to patch this up and how it relates to surjectivity.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. Assume it's not surjective and choose your cover appropriately.
    $endgroup$
    – user113102
    Dec 6 '18 at 19:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that is not that easy. Can you use Riemann-Roch theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – José Alejandro Aburto Araneda
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:55






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $f$ misses a point, WLOG take that point to be the point at infinity, so that $im(f) subset U$. But then $f$ is a map to $mathbb{A}^1$, so must be constant. I'm worried I'm saying something wrong though...been out of the game too long.
    $endgroup$
    – user113102
    Dec 7 '18 at 1:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Karl : there is nothing wrong with this argument I think. We started with a map $C to Bbb P^1$. By hypothesis $infty$ is not in the image, so it factors by a map $C to Bbb A^1$. By what you already know this map is constant, so the original map was constant as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicolas Hemelsoet
    Dec 7 '18 at 8:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Karl That doesn't even make sense. The morphism can't take values on $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$, since $Bbb{P}^1$ is the codomain, not the domain. And by assumption $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$ is not in the image of the morphism, so the morphism doesn't take on that value either.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 8 '18 at 5:57














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $C$ be a smooth and irreducible projective curve, and let $f: X rightarrow mathbb{P}^1(mathbb{C})$ a morphism of varieties: then $f$ is either constant or surjective. I am trying to prove this in an elementary way (I don't know about schemes, and I cannot use the notion of completeness).



I think it should be possible to cover $mathbb{P}^1$ with two affine open sets $U,V$ both isomorphic to $mathbb{A}^1$ and then exploit the fact that the functions from $X$ to $mathbb{A}^1$ have to be constant but I cannot seem how to patch this up and how it relates to surjectivity.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $C$ be a smooth and irreducible projective curve, and let $f: X rightarrow mathbb{P}^1(mathbb{C})$ a morphism of varieties: then $f$ is either constant or surjective. I am trying to prove this in an elementary way (I don't know about schemes, and I cannot use the notion of completeness).



I think it should be possible to cover $mathbb{P}^1$ with two affine open sets $U,V$ both isomorphic to $mathbb{A}^1$ and then exploit the fact that the functions from $X$ to $mathbb{A}^1$ have to be constant but I cannot seem how to patch this up and how it relates to surjectivity.







algebraic-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 7 '18 at 1:54







Karl

















asked Dec 6 '18 at 19:17









KarlKarl

366




366








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. Assume it's not surjective and choose your cover appropriately.
    $endgroup$
    – user113102
    Dec 6 '18 at 19:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that is not that easy. Can you use Riemann-Roch theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – José Alejandro Aburto Araneda
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:55






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $f$ misses a point, WLOG take that point to be the point at infinity, so that $im(f) subset U$. But then $f$ is a map to $mathbb{A}^1$, so must be constant. I'm worried I'm saying something wrong though...been out of the game too long.
    $endgroup$
    – user113102
    Dec 7 '18 at 1:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Karl : there is nothing wrong with this argument I think. We started with a map $C to Bbb P^1$. By hypothesis $infty$ is not in the image, so it factors by a map $C to Bbb A^1$. By what you already know this map is constant, so the original map was constant as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicolas Hemelsoet
    Dec 7 '18 at 8:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Karl That doesn't even make sense. The morphism can't take values on $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$, since $Bbb{P}^1$ is the codomain, not the domain. And by assumption $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$ is not in the image of the morphism, so the morphism doesn't take on that value either.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 8 '18 at 5:57














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You're on the right track. Assume it's not surjective and choose your cover appropriately.
    $endgroup$
    – user113102
    Dec 6 '18 at 19:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that is not that easy. Can you use Riemann-Roch theorem?
    $endgroup$
    – José Alejandro Aburto Araneda
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:55






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $f$ misses a point, WLOG take that point to be the point at infinity, so that $im(f) subset U$. But then $f$ is a map to $mathbb{A}^1$, so must be constant. I'm worried I'm saying something wrong though...been out of the game too long.
    $endgroup$
    – user113102
    Dec 7 '18 at 1:05








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Karl : there is nothing wrong with this argument I think. We started with a map $C to Bbb P^1$. By hypothesis $infty$ is not in the image, so it factors by a map $C to Bbb A^1$. By what you already know this map is constant, so the original map was constant as well.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicolas Hemelsoet
    Dec 7 '18 at 8:12






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Karl That doesn't even make sense. The morphism can't take values on $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$, since $Bbb{P}^1$ is the codomain, not the domain. And by assumption $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$ is not in the image of the morphism, so the morphism doesn't take on that value either.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 8 '18 at 5:57








2




2




$begingroup$
You're on the right track. Assume it's not surjective and choose your cover appropriately.
$endgroup$
– user113102
Dec 6 '18 at 19:29




$begingroup$
You're on the right track. Assume it's not surjective and choose your cover appropriately.
$endgroup$
– user113102
Dec 6 '18 at 19:29




1




1




$begingroup$
I think that is not that easy. Can you use Riemann-Roch theorem?
$endgroup$
– José Alejandro Aburto Araneda
Dec 6 '18 at 20:55




$begingroup$
I think that is not that easy. Can you use Riemann-Roch theorem?
$endgroup$
– José Alejandro Aburto Araneda
Dec 6 '18 at 20:55




2




2




$begingroup$
If $f$ misses a point, WLOG take that point to be the point at infinity, so that $im(f) subset U$. But then $f$ is a map to $mathbb{A}^1$, so must be constant. I'm worried I'm saying something wrong though...been out of the game too long.
$endgroup$
– user113102
Dec 7 '18 at 1:05






$begingroup$
If $f$ misses a point, WLOG take that point to be the point at infinity, so that $im(f) subset U$. But then $f$ is a map to $mathbb{A}^1$, so must be constant. I'm worried I'm saying something wrong though...been out of the game too long.
$endgroup$
– user113102
Dec 7 '18 at 1:05






2




2




$begingroup$
@Karl : there is nothing wrong with this argument I think. We started with a map $C to Bbb P^1$. By hypothesis $infty$ is not in the image, so it factors by a map $C to Bbb A^1$. By what you already know this map is constant, so the original map was constant as well.
$endgroup$
– Nicolas Hemelsoet
Dec 7 '18 at 8:12




$begingroup$
@Karl : there is nothing wrong with this argument I think. We started with a map $C to Bbb P^1$. By hypothesis $infty$ is not in the image, so it factors by a map $C to Bbb A^1$. By what you already know this map is constant, so the original map was constant as well.
$endgroup$
– Nicolas Hemelsoet
Dec 7 '18 at 8:12




1




1




$begingroup$
@Karl That doesn't even make sense. The morphism can't take values on $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$, since $Bbb{P}^1$ is the codomain, not the domain. And by assumption $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$ is not in the image of the morphism, so the morphism doesn't take on that value either.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 8 '18 at 5:57




$begingroup$
@Karl That doesn't even make sense. The morphism can't take values on $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$, since $Bbb{P}^1$ is the codomain, not the domain. And by assumption $Bbb{P}^1setminus U$ is not in the image of the morphism, so the morphism doesn't take on that value either.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 8 '18 at 5:57










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028918%2firreducible-projective-varieties-and-morphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028918%2firreducible-projective-varieties-and-morphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Le Mesnil-Réaume

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten