Surjectivity of momentum mapping












1












$begingroup$


I have to show that the following mapping of momenta is surjective. The mapping ${p_i^{mu},p_j^{mu},p_k^{mu}}rightarrow{tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu},tilde{p}_k^{mu}}$ is given by



$$
tilde{p}_k^{mu}=frac{1}{1-y_{ij,k}}p_k^{mu}
$$



$$
tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu}=p_i^{mu}+p_j^{mu}-frac{y_{ij,k}}{1-y_{ij,k}}p_k^{mu}.
$$



with $y_{ij,k}=frac{p_ip_j}{p_ip_j+p_ip_k+p_jp_k}$.



In other words: Do we cover the whole phase space for the tilde quantities under the mapping from ordinary momenta to tilde momenta?



Furthermore momentum conservation and on-shellness is guaranteed.



$$
tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu}+tilde{p}_k^{mu}=p_i^{mu}+p_j^{mu}+p_k^{mu}
$$



$$
p_i^2=p_j^2=p_k^2=tilde{p}_{ij}^2=tilde{p}_k^2=0
$$



To me it seems to be a bit strange, since we have 3 momenta (9 degerees of freedom) that we map to 2 momenta (with 6 degrees of freedom).



In addition to that it was mentioned that the mapping is also injective. How is this possible?



I can provide more physical background if required.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have to show that the following mapping of momenta is surjective. The mapping ${p_i^{mu},p_j^{mu},p_k^{mu}}rightarrow{tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu},tilde{p}_k^{mu}}$ is given by



    $$
    tilde{p}_k^{mu}=frac{1}{1-y_{ij,k}}p_k^{mu}
    $$



    $$
    tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu}=p_i^{mu}+p_j^{mu}-frac{y_{ij,k}}{1-y_{ij,k}}p_k^{mu}.
    $$



    with $y_{ij,k}=frac{p_ip_j}{p_ip_j+p_ip_k+p_jp_k}$.



    In other words: Do we cover the whole phase space for the tilde quantities under the mapping from ordinary momenta to tilde momenta?



    Furthermore momentum conservation and on-shellness is guaranteed.



    $$
    tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu}+tilde{p}_k^{mu}=p_i^{mu}+p_j^{mu}+p_k^{mu}
    $$



    $$
    p_i^2=p_j^2=p_k^2=tilde{p}_{ij}^2=tilde{p}_k^2=0
    $$



    To me it seems to be a bit strange, since we have 3 momenta (9 degerees of freedom) that we map to 2 momenta (with 6 degrees of freedom).



    In addition to that it was mentioned that the mapping is also injective. How is this possible?



    I can provide more physical background if required.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      I have to show that the following mapping of momenta is surjective. The mapping ${p_i^{mu},p_j^{mu},p_k^{mu}}rightarrow{tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu},tilde{p}_k^{mu}}$ is given by



      $$
      tilde{p}_k^{mu}=frac{1}{1-y_{ij,k}}p_k^{mu}
      $$



      $$
      tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu}=p_i^{mu}+p_j^{mu}-frac{y_{ij,k}}{1-y_{ij,k}}p_k^{mu}.
      $$



      with $y_{ij,k}=frac{p_ip_j}{p_ip_j+p_ip_k+p_jp_k}$.



      In other words: Do we cover the whole phase space for the tilde quantities under the mapping from ordinary momenta to tilde momenta?



      Furthermore momentum conservation and on-shellness is guaranteed.



      $$
      tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu}+tilde{p}_k^{mu}=p_i^{mu}+p_j^{mu}+p_k^{mu}
      $$



      $$
      p_i^2=p_j^2=p_k^2=tilde{p}_{ij}^2=tilde{p}_k^2=0
      $$



      To me it seems to be a bit strange, since we have 3 momenta (9 degerees of freedom) that we map to 2 momenta (with 6 degrees of freedom).



      In addition to that it was mentioned that the mapping is also injective. How is this possible?



      I can provide more physical background if required.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have to show that the following mapping of momenta is surjective. The mapping ${p_i^{mu},p_j^{mu},p_k^{mu}}rightarrow{tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu},tilde{p}_k^{mu}}$ is given by



      $$
      tilde{p}_k^{mu}=frac{1}{1-y_{ij,k}}p_k^{mu}
      $$



      $$
      tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu}=p_i^{mu}+p_j^{mu}-frac{y_{ij,k}}{1-y_{ij,k}}p_k^{mu}.
      $$



      with $y_{ij,k}=frac{p_ip_j}{p_ip_j+p_ip_k+p_jp_k}$.



      In other words: Do we cover the whole phase space for the tilde quantities under the mapping from ordinary momenta to tilde momenta?



      Furthermore momentum conservation and on-shellness is guaranteed.



      $$
      tilde{p}_{ij}^{mu}+tilde{p}_k^{mu}=p_i^{mu}+p_j^{mu}+p_k^{mu}
      $$



      $$
      p_i^2=p_j^2=p_k^2=tilde{p}_{ij}^2=tilde{p}_k^2=0
      $$



      To me it seems to be a bit strange, since we have 3 momenta (9 degerees of freedom) that we map to 2 momenta (with 6 degrees of freedom).



      In addition to that it was mentioned that the mapping is also injective. How is this possible?



      I can provide more physical background if required.







      calculus linear-algebra kinematics special-relativity






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 6 '18 at 18:38









      SchnarcoSchnarco

      1648




      1648






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Ok, I am dumping a few illustrative notes to flesh out that the number of parameters (d.o.f.) is 6 before and after the map.



          Given the arbitrariness of your basis choice and orientation, we may as well pick our axes to simplify them, the triangular pyramid found by the spacelike pieces of $p_k,p_i,p_j$,
          $$p_k=s(1,1,0,0); qquad p_i= r(1,cos theta, sin theta, 0); qquad p_j=u (1,cosphi coschi, sin phi coschi, sinchi).
          $$

          To put all 3 space vectors on a plane, pick $chi=0$, so the volume of the space pyramid collapses to zero.



          Your total momentum is then
          $$
          (s+r+u, s+rcostheta + u cosphicoschi, rsintheta + u coschi sin phi,usin chi ),
          $$

          so when all 3 spatial vectors are on a plane, the sum is on a plane.



          The scale factors for $p_k$ are
          $$
          frac{y}{1-y} = frac {ru(1-costheta cosphicoschi -coschi sinphi sintheta )}{s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) },
          $$

          and
          $$
          frac{1}{1-y}= \ ({sr (1-cos theta)+su(1-cos phicoschi)+ru(1-costheta cosphi coschi -coschisinphi sintheta )}) \
          /~({s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) }).
          $$

          For $chi=0$ the "sum vector" tilts away from the "original" one , $tilde p_k$. I think we need not do any spherical trigonometry, but I am unfamiliar with the hyperbolic geometry involved.



          In any case, we may directly verify the before and after sufficiency of the 6 parameters. Given a null tilded vector, we might, in principle solve for these parameters, and plug them into 3 null untilded vectors... I am not seriously suggesting doing this... just a notional fantasy on our bijection. The extra 3 d.o.f. we might think they'd have, are the three 0 entries, above, and they are just a peculiarity of the coordinate axes' choices.



          To handle the strangeness, we might look at $theta=chi=pi/2$, $s=r=u=1$,
          so the original triplet momenta space parts become the orthogonal axes $hat x, hat y, hat z$, and the equivalent doublet of tilded output light-like vectors $tilde p _k=frac{3}{2}(1,hat x)$, and $tilde p _{ij}= (frac {3}{2}, hat y+hat z-hat x /2) $. Aren't they doing the same job?





          In any case, if we wanted to hack around with hyperbolic geometry, given your total momentum $P=tilde P$, distinctly non-null, we have
          $$
          y=1-frac{2Pcdot p_k}{P^2} =frac{p_icdot p_j}{tilde p_kcdot tilde p_{ij}} ~,qquad 2Pcdot tilde p_k = P^2 ,\
          frac{1}{1-y}= frac{P^2}{2Pcdot p_k}, qquad frac{y}{1-y}=frac{P^2-2Pcdot p_k}{2Pcdot p_k} ~~.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028877%2fsurjectivity-of-momentum-mapping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Ok, I am dumping a few illustrative notes to flesh out that the number of parameters (d.o.f.) is 6 before and after the map.



            Given the arbitrariness of your basis choice and orientation, we may as well pick our axes to simplify them, the triangular pyramid found by the spacelike pieces of $p_k,p_i,p_j$,
            $$p_k=s(1,1,0,0); qquad p_i= r(1,cos theta, sin theta, 0); qquad p_j=u (1,cosphi coschi, sin phi coschi, sinchi).
            $$

            To put all 3 space vectors on a plane, pick $chi=0$, so the volume of the space pyramid collapses to zero.



            Your total momentum is then
            $$
            (s+r+u, s+rcostheta + u cosphicoschi, rsintheta + u coschi sin phi,usin chi ),
            $$

            so when all 3 spatial vectors are on a plane, the sum is on a plane.



            The scale factors for $p_k$ are
            $$
            frac{y}{1-y} = frac {ru(1-costheta cosphicoschi -coschi sinphi sintheta )}{s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) },
            $$

            and
            $$
            frac{1}{1-y}= \ ({sr (1-cos theta)+su(1-cos phicoschi)+ru(1-costheta cosphi coschi -coschisinphi sintheta )}) \
            /~({s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) }).
            $$

            For $chi=0$ the "sum vector" tilts away from the "original" one , $tilde p_k$. I think we need not do any spherical trigonometry, but I am unfamiliar with the hyperbolic geometry involved.



            In any case, we may directly verify the before and after sufficiency of the 6 parameters. Given a null tilded vector, we might, in principle solve for these parameters, and plug them into 3 null untilded vectors... I am not seriously suggesting doing this... just a notional fantasy on our bijection. The extra 3 d.o.f. we might think they'd have, are the three 0 entries, above, and they are just a peculiarity of the coordinate axes' choices.



            To handle the strangeness, we might look at $theta=chi=pi/2$, $s=r=u=1$,
            so the original triplet momenta space parts become the orthogonal axes $hat x, hat y, hat z$, and the equivalent doublet of tilded output light-like vectors $tilde p _k=frac{3}{2}(1,hat x)$, and $tilde p _{ij}= (frac {3}{2}, hat y+hat z-hat x /2) $. Aren't they doing the same job?





            In any case, if we wanted to hack around with hyperbolic geometry, given your total momentum $P=tilde P$, distinctly non-null, we have
            $$
            y=1-frac{2Pcdot p_k}{P^2} =frac{p_icdot p_j}{tilde p_kcdot tilde p_{ij}} ~,qquad 2Pcdot tilde p_k = P^2 ,\
            frac{1}{1-y}= frac{P^2}{2Pcdot p_k}, qquad frac{y}{1-y}=frac{P^2-2Pcdot p_k}{2Pcdot p_k} ~~.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Ok, I am dumping a few illustrative notes to flesh out that the number of parameters (d.o.f.) is 6 before and after the map.



              Given the arbitrariness of your basis choice and orientation, we may as well pick our axes to simplify them, the triangular pyramid found by the spacelike pieces of $p_k,p_i,p_j$,
              $$p_k=s(1,1,0,0); qquad p_i= r(1,cos theta, sin theta, 0); qquad p_j=u (1,cosphi coschi, sin phi coschi, sinchi).
              $$

              To put all 3 space vectors on a plane, pick $chi=0$, so the volume of the space pyramid collapses to zero.



              Your total momentum is then
              $$
              (s+r+u, s+rcostheta + u cosphicoschi, rsintheta + u coschi sin phi,usin chi ),
              $$

              so when all 3 spatial vectors are on a plane, the sum is on a plane.



              The scale factors for $p_k$ are
              $$
              frac{y}{1-y} = frac {ru(1-costheta cosphicoschi -coschi sinphi sintheta )}{s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) },
              $$

              and
              $$
              frac{1}{1-y}= \ ({sr (1-cos theta)+su(1-cos phicoschi)+ru(1-costheta cosphi coschi -coschisinphi sintheta )}) \
              /~({s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) }).
              $$

              For $chi=0$ the "sum vector" tilts away from the "original" one , $tilde p_k$. I think we need not do any spherical trigonometry, but I am unfamiliar with the hyperbolic geometry involved.



              In any case, we may directly verify the before and after sufficiency of the 6 parameters. Given a null tilded vector, we might, in principle solve for these parameters, and plug them into 3 null untilded vectors... I am not seriously suggesting doing this... just a notional fantasy on our bijection. The extra 3 d.o.f. we might think they'd have, are the three 0 entries, above, and they are just a peculiarity of the coordinate axes' choices.



              To handle the strangeness, we might look at $theta=chi=pi/2$, $s=r=u=1$,
              so the original triplet momenta space parts become the orthogonal axes $hat x, hat y, hat z$, and the equivalent doublet of tilded output light-like vectors $tilde p _k=frac{3}{2}(1,hat x)$, and $tilde p _{ij}= (frac {3}{2}, hat y+hat z-hat x /2) $. Aren't they doing the same job?





              In any case, if we wanted to hack around with hyperbolic geometry, given your total momentum $P=tilde P$, distinctly non-null, we have
              $$
              y=1-frac{2Pcdot p_k}{P^2} =frac{p_icdot p_j}{tilde p_kcdot tilde p_{ij}} ~,qquad 2Pcdot tilde p_k = P^2 ,\
              frac{1}{1-y}= frac{P^2}{2Pcdot p_k}, qquad frac{y}{1-y}=frac{P^2-2Pcdot p_k}{2Pcdot p_k} ~~.
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Ok, I am dumping a few illustrative notes to flesh out that the number of parameters (d.o.f.) is 6 before and after the map.



                Given the arbitrariness of your basis choice and orientation, we may as well pick our axes to simplify them, the triangular pyramid found by the spacelike pieces of $p_k,p_i,p_j$,
                $$p_k=s(1,1,0,0); qquad p_i= r(1,cos theta, sin theta, 0); qquad p_j=u (1,cosphi coschi, sin phi coschi, sinchi).
                $$

                To put all 3 space vectors on a plane, pick $chi=0$, so the volume of the space pyramid collapses to zero.



                Your total momentum is then
                $$
                (s+r+u, s+rcostheta + u cosphicoschi, rsintheta + u coschi sin phi,usin chi ),
                $$

                so when all 3 spatial vectors are on a plane, the sum is on a plane.



                The scale factors for $p_k$ are
                $$
                frac{y}{1-y} = frac {ru(1-costheta cosphicoschi -coschi sinphi sintheta )}{s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) },
                $$

                and
                $$
                frac{1}{1-y}= \ ({sr (1-cos theta)+su(1-cos phicoschi)+ru(1-costheta cosphi coschi -coschisinphi sintheta )}) \
                /~({s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) }).
                $$

                For $chi=0$ the "sum vector" tilts away from the "original" one , $tilde p_k$. I think we need not do any spherical trigonometry, but I am unfamiliar with the hyperbolic geometry involved.



                In any case, we may directly verify the before and after sufficiency of the 6 parameters. Given a null tilded vector, we might, in principle solve for these parameters, and plug them into 3 null untilded vectors... I am not seriously suggesting doing this... just a notional fantasy on our bijection. The extra 3 d.o.f. we might think they'd have, are the three 0 entries, above, and they are just a peculiarity of the coordinate axes' choices.



                To handle the strangeness, we might look at $theta=chi=pi/2$, $s=r=u=1$,
                so the original triplet momenta space parts become the orthogonal axes $hat x, hat y, hat z$, and the equivalent doublet of tilded output light-like vectors $tilde p _k=frac{3}{2}(1,hat x)$, and $tilde p _{ij}= (frac {3}{2}, hat y+hat z-hat x /2) $. Aren't they doing the same job?





                In any case, if we wanted to hack around with hyperbolic geometry, given your total momentum $P=tilde P$, distinctly non-null, we have
                $$
                y=1-frac{2Pcdot p_k}{P^2} =frac{p_icdot p_j}{tilde p_kcdot tilde p_{ij}} ~,qquad 2Pcdot tilde p_k = P^2 ,\
                frac{1}{1-y}= frac{P^2}{2Pcdot p_k}, qquad frac{y}{1-y}=frac{P^2-2Pcdot p_k}{2Pcdot p_k} ~~.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Ok, I am dumping a few illustrative notes to flesh out that the number of parameters (d.o.f.) is 6 before and after the map.



                Given the arbitrariness of your basis choice and orientation, we may as well pick our axes to simplify them, the triangular pyramid found by the spacelike pieces of $p_k,p_i,p_j$,
                $$p_k=s(1,1,0,0); qquad p_i= r(1,cos theta, sin theta, 0); qquad p_j=u (1,cosphi coschi, sin phi coschi, sinchi).
                $$

                To put all 3 space vectors on a plane, pick $chi=0$, so the volume of the space pyramid collapses to zero.



                Your total momentum is then
                $$
                (s+r+u, s+rcostheta + u cosphicoschi, rsintheta + u coschi sin phi,usin chi ),
                $$

                so when all 3 spatial vectors are on a plane, the sum is on a plane.



                The scale factors for $p_k$ are
                $$
                frac{y}{1-y} = frac {ru(1-costheta cosphicoschi -coschi sinphi sintheta )}{s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) },
                $$

                and
                $$
                frac{1}{1-y}= \ ({sr (1-cos theta)+su(1-cos phicoschi)+ru(1-costheta cosphi coschi -coschisinphi sintheta )}) \
                /~({s(r+u-rcostheta -ucosphi coschi ) }).
                $$

                For $chi=0$ the "sum vector" tilts away from the "original" one , $tilde p_k$. I think we need not do any spherical trigonometry, but I am unfamiliar with the hyperbolic geometry involved.



                In any case, we may directly verify the before and after sufficiency of the 6 parameters. Given a null tilded vector, we might, in principle solve for these parameters, and plug them into 3 null untilded vectors... I am not seriously suggesting doing this... just a notional fantasy on our bijection. The extra 3 d.o.f. we might think they'd have, are the three 0 entries, above, and they are just a peculiarity of the coordinate axes' choices.



                To handle the strangeness, we might look at $theta=chi=pi/2$, $s=r=u=1$,
                so the original triplet momenta space parts become the orthogonal axes $hat x, hat y, hat z$, and the equivalent doublet of tilded output light-like vectors $tilde p _k=frac{3}{2}(1,hat x)$, and $tilde p _{ij}= (frac {3}{2}, hat y+hat z-hat x /2) $. Aren't they doing the same job?





                In any case, if we wanted to hack around with hyperbolic geometry, given your total momentum $P=tilde P$, distinctly non-null, we have
                $$
                y=1-frac{2Pcdot p_k}{P^2} =frac{p_icdot p_j}{tilde p_kcdot tilde p_{ij}} ~,qquad 2Pcdot tilde p_k = P^2 ,\
                frac{1}{1-y}= frac{P^2}{2Pcdot p_k}, qquad frac{y}{1-y}=frac{P^2-2Pcdot p_k}{2Pcdot p_k} ~~.
                $$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 12 '18 at 8:59









                SchnarcoSchnarco

                1648




                1648






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028877%2fsurjectivity-of-momentum-mapping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Le Mesnil-Réaume

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten