Smooth curves on a path connected smooth manifold
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $M$ is a path connected smooth manifold, so any two points $p,qin M$ can be joined with a continuous curve on $M$. Is it true that any two points can be joined with a smooth (I mean $C^{infty}$) curve on $M$?
differential-geometry manifolds differential-topology smooth-manifolds path-connected
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $M$ is a path connected smooth manifold, so any two points $p,qin M$ can be joined with a continuous curve on $M$. Is it true that any two points can be joined with a smooth (I mean $C^{infty}$) curve on $M$?
differential-geometry manifolds differential-topology smooth-manifolds path-connected
3
Use finitely many local charts and approximate the given curve with a smooth one locally.
– Hans Engler
Nov 23 '12 at 17:36
Do I need partition of unity?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 17:44
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
up vote
10
down vote
favorite
Suppose that $M$ is a path connected smooth manifold, so any two points $p,qin M$ can be joined with a continuous curve on $M$. Is it true that any two points can be joined with a smooth (I mean $C^{infty}$) curve on $M$?
differential-geometry manifolds differential-topology smooth-manifolds path-connected
Suppose that $M$ is a path connected smooth manifold, so any two points $p,qin M$ can be joined with a continuous curve on $M$. Is it true that any two points can be joined with a smooth (I mean $C^{infty}$) curve on $M$?
differential-geometry manifolds differential-topology smooth-manifolds path-connected
differential-geometry manifolds differential-topology smooth-manifolds path-connected
edited Nov 23 at 5:45
Kelvin Lois
3,0872823
3,0872823
asked Nov 23 '12 at 17:30
Dubious
3,23452574
3,23452574
3
Use finitely many local charts and approximate the given curve with a smooth one locally.
– Hans Engler
Nov 23 '12 at 17:36
Do I need partition of unity?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 17:44
add a comment |
3
Use finitely many local charts and approximate the given curve with a smooth one locally.
– Hans Engler
Nov 23 '12 at 17:36
Do I need partition of unity?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 17:44
3
3
Use finitely many local charts and approximate the given curve with a smooth one locally.
– Hans Engler
Nov 23 '12 at 17:36
Use finitely many local charts and approximate the given curve with a smooth one locally.
– Hans Engler
Nov 23 '12 at 17:36
Do I need partition of unity?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 17:44
Do I need partition of unity?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 17:44
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
No need for a partition of unity. Let $gamma$ be a path from $p$ to $q$, not necessarily smooth. Take finitely many local charts that cover the compact image of $gamma([0,1])$. Call these local charts $U_1, cdots, U_n$. Let us have ordered these charts so that the overlap between $U_{i}$ and $U_{i+1}$ is nonempty, but rather some point $r_i$. Pragmatically, you can do this by pulling back the $U_i$ to a cover of $[0,1]$ by the $gamma^{-1}(U_i)$, and then ordering them by left-endpoints. Now, in each of these local charts the manifold looks like $mathbb{R}^n$, so we can find a smooth path from $p$ to $r_1$ in $U_1$, then a smooth path from $r_1$ to $r_2$ in $U_2$, etc. Connecting all these smooth paths gives us a smooth path from $p$ to $q$.
if the domain of the curve is $(0,1)$ then the image is not compact, but the proof works. Is it right?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 20:59
You generally need endpoints so that one goes to $p$ and the other goes to $q$. That's the definition of a continuous path, no?
– Elchanan Solomon
Nov 23 '12 at 21:01
yes, you're right! I'm sorry.
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 21:04
2
How do we know that when we patch these paths together the result will remain smooth at the $r_i$?
– Eric Auld
Aug 29 '15 at 6:54
3
I believe that you have only constructed a piecewise-smooth curve.
– Matthew Kvalheim
Oct 27 '16 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
Since the accepted answer is rather incomplete, i'll post an answer here. As @Elchanan Solomon did, for any two points $p$ and $q$ on a connected manifold $M$, we can obtain a piecewise smooth curve $gamma : [0,1] to M$ such that $gamma(0)=p$ and $gamma(1)=q$. That is there are finite partition $0=t_0<t_1<dots<t_{n-1}<t_n=1$ such that $gamma|_{[t_i,t_{i+1}]} : [t_i,t_{i+1}] to M$ are smooth. To smoothing the curve $gamma$ we can use smooth bump function (as the answer here) or we can use Whitney Approximation Theorem for Function.
For any point of corner $gamma(t_i)$ where $gamma$ not smooth, we choose a smooth chart $(U_i,varphi)$ containing it. Now we pick a portion of $gamma$ that still contain in $U_i$. That is, consider the restriction of $gamma$ to a closed interval $[a,b]$ where $a<t_i<b$ and $gamma([a,b]) subset U_i$. By composing with chart map $varphi : U to mathbb{R}^n$, we obtain a piecewise smooth curve in $mathbb{R}^n$,
$$
alpha := varphi circ gamma|_{[a,b]} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n.
$$
For a small number $epsilon>0$, the subset $A=[a,t_i-epsilon] cup [t_i+epsilon,b]$ is closed in $[a,b]$ and $alpha$ is smooth on $A$. By Whitney Approximation theorem, there are smooth map $tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $tilde{alpha}$ is agree with $alpha$ on $A$. Mapping back to $M$ and replacing the map $varphi^{-1} circ tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to M$ with $gamma|_{[a,b]}$ before. Doing this for all corners, we obtain the desired smooth map joining $p$ and $q$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Consider the following equivalence relation on the points of $M$. Two points $x,yin M$ are equivalent if they are connected by a smooth path.
Let us prove the equivalence classes of this relation are open. This means every point $x$ has a neighborhood of points smoothly connected to it. Any chart about $x$ provides such a neighborhood, since any two points in Euclidean space may be smoothly connected (as Euclidean space is locally convex).
Consequently $M$ is partitioned into open subsets given by the equivalence classes. By connectedness this partition has a single equivalence class, proving every two points are connected by a smooth curve as desired.
1
You need to prove that this relation is transitive, which amounts to smoothing the corners of a piecewise-smooth curve; so your answer has the same gap as Elchanan's.
– Anthony Carapetis
Mar 29 at 15:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f243295%2fsmooth-curves-on-a-path-connected-smooth-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
No need for a partition of unity. Let $gamma$ be a path from $p$ to $q$, not necessarily smooth. Take finitely many local charts that cover the compact image of $gamma([0,1])$. Call these local charts $U_1, cdots, U_n$. Let us have ordered these charts so that the overlap between $U_{i}$ and $U_{i+1}$ is nonempty, but rather some point $r_i$. Pragmatically, you can do this by pulling back the $U_i$ to a cover of $[0,1]$ by the $gamma^{-1}(U_i)$, and then ordering them by left-endpoints. Now, in each of these local charts the manifold looks like $mathbb{R}^n$, so we can find a smooth path from $p$ to $r_1$ in $U_1$, then a smooth path from $r_1$ to $r_2$ in $U_2$, etc. Connecting all these smooth paths gives us a smooth path from $p$ to $q$.
if the domain of the curve is $(0,1)$ then the image is not compact, but the proof works. Is it right?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 20:59
You generally need endpoints so that one goes to $p$ and the other goes to $q$. That's the definition of a continuous path, no?
– Elchanan Solomon
Nov 23 '12 at 21:01
yes, you're right! I'm sorry.
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 21:04
2
How do we know that when we patch these paths together the result will remain smooth at the $r_i$?
– Eric Auld
Aug 29 '15 at 6:54
3
I believe that you have only constructed a piecewise-smooth curve.
– Matthew Kvalheim
Oct 27 '16 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
No need for a partition of unity. Let $gamma$ be a path from $p$ to $q$, not necessarily smooth. Take finitely many local charts that cover the compact image of $gamma([0,1])$. Call these local charts $U_1, cdots, U_n$. Let us have ordered these charts so that the overlap between $U_{i}$ and $U_{i+1}$ is nonempty, but rather some point $r_i$. Pragmatically, you can do this by pulling back the $U_i$ to a cover of $[0,1]$ by the $gamma^{-1}(U_i)$, and then ordering them by left-endpoints. Now, in each of these local charts the manifold looks like $mathbb{R}^n$, so we can find a smooth path from $p$ to $r_1$ in $U_1$, then a smooth path from $r_1$ to $r_2$ in $U_2$, etc. Connecting all these smooth paths gives us a smooth path from $p$ to $q$.
if the domain of the curve is $(0,1)$ then the image is not compact, but the proof works. Is it right?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 20:59
You generally need endpoints so that one goes to $p$ and the other goes to $q$. That's the definition of a continuous path, no?
– Elchanan Solomon
Nov 23 '12 at 21:01
yes, you're right! I'm sorry.
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 21:04
2
How do we know that when we patch these paths together the result will remain smooth at the $r_i$?
– Eric Auld
Aug 29 '15 at 6:54
3
I believe that you have only constructed a piecewise-smooth curve.
– Matthew Kvalheim
Oct 27 '16 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
No need for a partition of unity. Let $gamma$ be a path from $p$ to $q$, not necessarily smooth. Take finitely many local charts that cover the compact image of $gamma([0,1])$. Call these local charts $U_1, cdots, U_n$. Let us have ordered these charts so that the overlap between $U_{i}$ and $U_{i+1}$ is nonempty, but rather some point $r_i$. Pragmatically, you can do this by pulling back the $U_i$ to a cover of $[0,1]$ by the $gamma^{-1}(U_i)$, and then ordering them by left-endpoints. Now, in each of these local charts the manifold looks like $mathbb{R}^n$, so we can find a smooth path from $p$ to $r_1$ in $U_1$, then a smooth path from $r_1$ to $r_2$ in $U_2$, etc. Connecting all these smooth paths gives us a smooth path from $p$ to $q$.
No need for a partition of unity. Let $gamma$ be a path from $p$ to $q$, not necessarily smooth. Take finitely many local charts that cover the compact image of $gamma([0,1])$. Call these local charts $U_1, cdots, U_n$. Let us have ordered these charts so that the overlap between $U_{i}$ and $U_{i+1}$ is nonempty, but rather some point $r_i$. Pragmatically, you can do this by pulling back the $U_i$ to a cover of $[0,1]$ by the $gamma^{-1}(U_i)$, and then ordering them by left-endpoints. Now, in each of these local charts the manifold looks like $mathbb{R}^n$, so we can find a smooth path from $p$ to $r_1$ in $U_1$, then a smooth path from $r_1$ to $r_2$ in $U_2$, etc. Connecting all these smooth paths gives us a smooth path from $p$ to $q$.
answered Nov 23 '12 at 19:01
Elchanan Solomon
21.7k54277
21.7k54277
if the domain of the curve is $(0,1)$ then the image is not compact, but the proof works. Is it right?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 20:59
You generally need endpoints so that one goes to $p$ and the other goes to $q$. That's the definition of a continuous path, no?
– Elchanan Solomon
Nov 23 '12 at 21:01
yes, you're right! I'm sorry.
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 21:04
2
How do we know that when we patch these paths together the result will remain smooth at the $r_i$?
– Eric Auld
Aug 29 '15 at 6:54
3
I believe that you have only constructed a piecewise-smooth curve.
– Matthew Kvalheim
Oct 27 '16 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
if the domain of the curve is $(0,1)$ then the image is not compact, but the proof works. Is it right?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 20:59
You generally need endpoints so that one goes to $p$ and the other goes to $q$. That's the definition of a continuous path, no?
– Elchanan Solomon
Nov 23 '12 at 21:01
yes, you're right! I'm sorry.
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 21:04
2
How do we know that when we patch these paths together the result will remain smooth at the $r_i$?
– Eric Auld
Aug 29 '15 at 6:54
3
I believe that you have only constructed a piecewise-smooth curve.
– Matthew Kvalheim
Oct 27 '16 at 21:16
if the domain of the curve is $(0,1)$ then the image is not compact, but the proof works. Is it right?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 20:59
if the domain of the curve is $(0,1)$ then the image is not compact, but the proof works. Is it right?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 20:59
You generally need endpoints so that one goes to $p$ and the other goes to $q$. That's the definition of a continuous path, no?
– Elchanan Solomon
Nov 23 '12 at 21:01
You generally need endpoints so that one goes to $p$ and the other goes to $q$. That's the definition of a continuous path, no?
– Elchanan Solomon
Nov 23 '12 at 21:01
yes, you're right! I'm sorry.
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 21:04
yes, you're right! I'm sorry.
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 21:04
2
2
How do we know that when we patch these paths together the result will remain smooth at the $r_i$?
– Eric Auld
Aug 29 '15 at 6:54
How do we know that when we patch these paths together the result will remain smooth at the $r_i$?
– Eric Auld
Aug 29 '15 at 6:54
3
3
I believe that you have only constructed a piecewise-smooth curve.
– Matthew Kvalheim
Oct 27 '16 at 21:16
I believe that you have only constructed a piecewise-smooth curve.
– Matthew Kvalheim
Oct 27 '16 at 21:16
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
Since the accepted answer is rather incomplete, i'll post an answer here. As @Elchanan Solomon did, for any two points $p$ and $q$ on a connected manifold $M$, we can obtain a piecewise smooth curve $gamma : [0,1] to M$ such that $gamma(0)=p$ and $gamma(1)=q$. That is there are finite partition $0=t_0<t_1<dots<t_{n-1}<t_n=1$ such that $gamma|_{[t_i,t_{i+1}]} : [t_i,t_{i+1}] to M$ are smooth. To smoothing the curve $gamma$ we can use smooth bump function (as the answer here) or we can use Whitney Approximation Theorem for Function.
For any point of corner $gamma(t_i)$ where $gamma$ not smooth, we choose a smooth chart $(U_i,varphi)$ containing it. Now we pick a portion of $gamma$ that still contain in $U_i$. That is, consider the restriction of $gamma$ to a closed interval $[a,b]$ where $a<t_i<b$ and $gamma([a,b]) subset U_i$. By composing with chart map $varphi : U to mathbb{R}^n$, we obtain a piecewise smooth curve in $mathbb{R}^n$,
$$
alpha := varphi circ gamma|_{[a,b]} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n.
$$
For a small number $epsilon>0$, the subset $A=[a,t_i-epsilon] cup [t_i+epsilon,b]$ is closed in $[a,b]$ and $alpha$ is smooth on $A$. By Whitney Approximation theorem, there are smooth map $tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $tilde{alpha}$ is agree with $alpha$ on $A$. Mapping back to $M$ and replacing the map $varphi^{-1} circ tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to M$ with $gamma|_{[a,b]}$ before. Doing this for all corners, we obtain the desired smooth map joining $p$ and $q$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Since the accepted answer is rather incomplete, i'll post an answer here. As @Elchanan Solomon did, for any two points $p$ and $q$ on a connected manifold $M$, we can obtain a piecewise smooth curve $gamma : [0,1] to M$ such that $gamma(0)=p$ and $gamma(1)=q$. That is there are finite partition $0=t_0<t_1<dots<t_{n-1}<t_n=1$ such that $gamma|_{[t_i,t_{i+1}]} : [t_i,t_{i+1}] to M$ are smooth. To smoothing the curve $gamma$ we can use smooth bump function (as the answer here) or we can use Whitney Approximation Theorem for Function.
For any point of corner $gamma(t_i)$ where $gamma$ not smooth, we choose a smooth chart $(U_i,varphi)$ containing it. Now we pick a portion of $gamma$ that still contain in $U_i$. That is, consider the restriction of $gamma$ to a closed interval $[a,b]$ where $a<t_i<b$ and $gamma([a,b]) subset U_i$. By composing with chart map $varphi : U to mathbb{R}^n$, we obtain a piecewise smooth curve in $mathbb{R}^n$,
$$
alpha := varphi circ gamma|_{[a,b]} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n.
$$
For a small number $epsilon>0$, the subset $A=[a,t_i-epsilon] cup [t_i+epsilon,b]$ is closed in $[a,b]$ and $alpha$ is smooth on $A$. By Whitney Approximation theorem, there are smooth map $tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $tilde{alpha}$ is agree with $alpha$ on $A$. Mapping back to $M$ and replacing the map $varphi^{-1} circ tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to M$ with $gamma|_{[a,b]}$ before. Doing this for all corners, we obtain the desired smooth map joining $p$ and $q$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Since the accepted answer is rather incomplete, i'll post an answer here. As @Elchanan Solomon did, for any two points $p$ and $q$ on a connected manifold $M$, we can obtain a piecewise smooth curve $gamma : [0,1] to M$ such that $gamma(0)=p$ and $gamma(1)=q$. That is there are finite partition $0=t_0<t_1<dots<t_{n-1}<t_n=1$ such that $gamma|_{[t_i,t_{i+1}]} : [t_i,t_{i+1}] to M$ are smooth. To smoothing the curve $gamma$ we can use smooth bump function (as the answer here) or we can use Whitney Approximation Theorem for Function.
For any point of corner $gamma(t_i)$ where $gamma$ not smooth, we choose a smooth chart $(U_i,varphi)$ containing it. Now we pick a portion of $gamma$ that still contain in $U_i$. That is, consider the restriction of $gamma$ to a closed interval $[a,b]$ where $a<t_i<b$ and $gamma([a,b]) subset U_i$. By composing with chart map $varphi : U to mathbb{R}^n$, we obtain a piecewise smooth curve in $mathbb{R}^n$,
$$
alpha := varphi circ gamma|_{[a,b]} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n.
$$
For a small number $epsilon>0$, the subset $A=[a,t_i-epsilon] cup [t_i+epsilon,b]$ is closed in $[a,b]$ and $alpha$ is smooth on $A$. By Whitney Approximation theorem, there are smooth map $tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $tilde{alpha}$ is agree with $alpha$ on $A$. Mapping back to $M$ and replacing the map $varphi^{-1} circ tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to M$ with $gamma|_{[a,b]}$ before. Doing this for all corners, we obtain the desired smooth map joining $p$ and $q$.
Since the accepted answer is rather incomplete, i'll post an answer here. As @Elchanan Solomon did, for any two points $p$ and $q$ on a connected manifold $M$, we can obtain a piecewise smooth curve $gamma : [0,1] to M$ such that $gamma(0)=p$ and $gamma(1)=q$. That is there are finite partition $0=t_0<t_1<dots<t_{n-1}<t_n=1$ such that $gamma|_{[t_i,t_{i+1}]} : [t_i,t_{i+1}] to M$ are smooth. To smoothing the curve $gamma$ we can use smooth bump function (as the answer here) or we can use Whitney Approximation Theorem for Function.
For any point of corner $gamma(t_i)$ where $gamma$ not smooth, we choose a smooth chart $(U_i,varphi)$ containing it. Now we pick a portion of $gamma$ that still contain in $U_i$. That is, consider the restriction of $gamma$ to a closed interval $[a,b]$ where $a<t_i<b$ and $gamma([a,b]) subset U_i$. By composing with chart map $varphi : U to mathbb{R}^n$, we obtain a piecewise smooth curve in $mathbb{R}^n$,
$$
alpha := varphi circ gamma|_{[a,b]} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n.
$$
For a small number $epsilon>0$, the subset $A=[a,t_i-epsilon] cup [t_i+epsilon,b]$ is closed in $[a,b]$ and $alpha$ is smooth on $A$. By Whitney Approximation theorem, there are smooth map $tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to mathbb{R}^n$ such that $tilde{alpha}$ is agree with $alpha$ on $A$. Mapping back to $M$ and replacing the map $varphi^{-1} circ tilde{alpha} : [a,b] to M$ with $gamma|_{[a,b]}$ before. Doing this for all corners, we obtain the desired smooth map joining $p$ and $q$.
edited Mar 30 at 19:09
answered Mar 29 at 13:47
Kelvin Lois
3,0872823
3,0872823
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Consider the following equivalence relation on the points of $M$. Two points $x,yin M$ are equivalent if they are connected by a smooth path.
Let us prove the equivalence classes of this relation are open. This means every point $x$ has a neighborhood of points smoothly connected to it. Any chart about $x$ provides such a neighborhood, since any two points in Euclidean space may be smoothly connected (as Euclidean space is locally convex).
Consequently $M$ is partitioned into open subsets given by the equivalence classes. By connectedness this partition has a single equivalence class, proving every two points are connected by a smooth curve as desired.
1
You need to prove that this relation is transitive, which amounts to smoothing the corners of a piecewise-smooth curve; so your answer has the same gap as Elchanan's.
– Anthony Carapetis
Mar 29 at 15:18
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Consider the following equivalence relation on the points of $M$. Two points $x,yin M$ are equivalent if they are connected by a smooth path.
Let us prove the equivalence classes of this relation are open. This means every point $x$ has a neighborhood of points smoothly connected to it. Any chart about $x$ provides such a neighborhood, since any two points in Euclidean space may be smoothly connected (as Euclidean space is locally convex).
Consequently $M$ is partitioned into open subsets given by the equivalence classes. By connectedness this partition has a single equivalence class, proving every two points are connected by a smooth curve as desired.
1
You need to prove that this relation is transitive, which amounts to smoothing the corners of a piecewise-smooth curve; so your answer has the same gap as Elchanan's.
– Anthony Carapetis
Mar 29 at 15:18
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Consider the following equivalence relation on the points of $M$. Two points $x,yin M$ are equivalent if they are connected by a smooth path.
Let us prove the equivalence classes of this relation are open. This means every point $x$ has a neighborhood of points smoothly connected to it. Any chart about $x$ provides such a neighborhood, since any two points in Euclidean space may be smoothly connected (as Euclidean space is locally convex).
Consequently $M$ is partitioned into open subsets given by the equivalence classes. By connectedness this partition has a single equivalence class, proving every two points are connected by a smooth curve as desired.
Consider the following equivalence relation on the points of $M$. Two points $x,yin M$ are equivalent if they are connected by a smooth path.
Let us prove the equivalence classes of this relation are open. This means every point $x$ has a neighborhood of points smoothly connected to it. Any chart about $x$ provides such a neighborhood, since any two points in Euclidean space may be smoothly connected (as Euclidean space is locally convex).
Consequently $M$ is partitioned into open subsets given by the equivalence classes. By connectedness this partition has a single equivalence class, proving every two points are connected by a smooth curve as desired.
answered Jan 11 at 17:03
Arrow
5,11211445
5,11211445
1
You need to prove that this relation is transitive, which amounts to smoothing the corners of a piecewise-smooth curve; so your answer has the same gap as Elchanan's.
– Anthony Carapetis
Mar 29 at 15:18
add a comment |
1
You need to prove that this relation is transitive, which amounts to smoothing the corners of a piecewise-smooth curve; so your answer has the same gap as Elchanan's.
– Anthony Carapetis
Mar 29 at 15:18
1
1
You need to prove that this relation is transitive, which amounts to smoothing the corners of a piecewise-smooth curve; so your answer has the same gap as Elchanan's.
– Anthony Carapetis
Mar 29 at 15:18
You need to prove that this relation is transitive, which amounts to smoothing the corners of a piecewise-smooth curve; so your answer has the same gap as Elchanan's.
– Anthony Carapetis
Mar 29 at 15:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f243295%2fsmooth-curves-on-a-path-connected-smooth-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Use finitely many local charts and approximate the given curve with a smooth one locally.
– Hans Engler
Nov 23 '12 at 17:36
Do I need partition of unity?
– Dubious
Nov 23 '12 at 17:44