Are valued-quiver species and combinatorial species related?
$begingroup$
In these slides, Joel Lemay defines a species as a generalization of a valued quiver $Q$, where to each node $i in Q_0$ we assign a division ring $mathbf{k}_i$, and to each arrow $(a colon i to j) in Q_1$ we assign a $(mathbf{k}_j, mathbf{k}_i)$-bimodule $M_a$ that satisfies a couple of conditions:
$operatorname{Hom}_{mathbf{k}_j}(M_a, mathbf{k}_j) simeq operatorname{Hom}_{mathbf{k}_i}(M_a, mathbf{k}_i)$ as $(mathbf{k}_i, mathbf{k}_j)$-bimodules.
$(dim_{mathbf{k}_j}M_a, dim_{mathbf{k}_i}M_a)$ is equal to the pair of values on the edge $a$.
Now a combinatorial species is an endofunctor of the category of finite sets, where the morphisms are set bijections. Is this first sort of species related at all to a combinatorial species? or do these two types
of objects just coincidentally (unfortunately?) have the same name? And if they're not the same, what is the origin of the valued-quiver species? The term for combinatorial species comes from Andre Joyal's "espèces de structure".
category-theory representation-theory quiver combinatorial-species
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In these slides, Joel Lemay defines a species as a generalization of a valued quiver $Q$, where to each node $i in Q_0$ we assign a division ring $mathbf{k}_i$, and to each arrow $(a colon i to j) in Q_1$ we assign a $(mathbf{k}_j, mathbf{k}_i)$-bimodule $M_a$ that satisfies a couple of conditions:
$operatorname{Hom}_{mathbf{k}_j}(M_a, mathbf{k}_j) simeq operatorname{Hom}_{mathbf{k}_i}(M_a, mathbf{k}_i)$ as $(mathbf{k}_i, mathbf{k}_j)$-bimodules.
$(dim_{mathbf{k}_j}M_a, dim_{mathbf{k}_i}M_a)$ is equal to the pair of values on the edge $a$.
Now a combinatorial species is an endofunctor of the category of finite sets, where the morphisms are set bijections. Is this first sort of species related at all to a combinatorial species? or do these two types
of objects just coincidentally (unfortunately?) have the same name? And if they're not the same, what is the origin of the valued-quiver species? The term for combinatorial species comes from Andre Joyal's "espèces de structure".
category-theory representation-theory quiver combinatorial-species
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
I have the very strong impression that it is just a coincidence, but I would love to be proven wrong!
$endgroup$
– Ivan Di Liberti
Dec 3 '18 at 23:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In these slides, Joel Lemay defines a species as a generalization of a valued quiver $Q$, where to each node $i in Q_0$ we assign a division ring $mathbf{k}_i$, and to each arrow $(a colon i to j) in Q_1$ we assign a $(mathbf{k}_j, mathbf{k}_i)$-bimodule $M_a$ that satisfies a couple of conditions:
$operatorname{Hom}_{mathbf{k}_j}(M_a, mathbf{k}_j) simeq operatorname{Hom}_{mathbf{k}_i}(M_a, mathbf{k}_i)$ as $(mathbf{k}_i, mathbf{k}_j)$-bimodules.
$(dim_{mathbf{k}_j}M_a, dim_{mathbf{k}_i}M_a)$ is equal to the pair of values on the edge $a$.
Now a combinatorial species is an endofunctor of the category of finite sets, where the morphisms are set bijections. Is this first sort of species related at all to a combinatorial species? or do these two types
of objects just coincidentally (unfortunately?) have the same name? And if they're not the same, what is the origin of the valued-quiver species? The term for combinatorial species comes from Andre Joyal's "espèces de structure".
category-theory representation-theory quiver combinatorial-species
$endgroup$
In these slides, Joel Lemay defines a species as a generalization of a valued quiver $Q$, where to each node $i in Q_0$ we assign a division ring $mathbf{k}_i$, and to each arrow $(a colon i to j) in Q_1$ we assign a $(mathbf{k}_j, mathbf{k}_i)$-bimodule $M_a$ that satisfies a couple of conditions:
$operatorname{Hom}_{mathbf{k}_j}(M_a, mathbf{k}_j) simeq operatorname{Hom}_{mathbf{k}_i}(M_a, mathbf{k}_i)$ as $(mathbf{k}_i, mathbf{k}_j)$-bimodules.
$(dim_{mathbf{k}_j}M_a, dim_{mathbf{k}_i}M_a)$ is equal to the pair of values on the edge $a$.
Now a combinatorial species is an endofunctor of the category of finite sets, where the morphisms are set bijections. Is this first sort of species related at all to a combinatorial species? or do these two types
of objects just coincidentally (unfortunately?) have the same name? And if they're not the same, what is the origin of the valued-quiver species? The term for combinatorial species comes from Andre Joyal's "espèces de structure".
category-theory representation-theory quiver combinatorial-species
category-theory representation-theory quiver combinatorial-species
edited Dec 11 '18 at 4:14
Mike Pierce
asked Dec 3 '18 at 23:23
Mike PierceMike Pierce
11.4k103584
11.4k103584
5
$begingroup$
I have the very strong impression that it is just a coincidence, but I would love to be proven wrong!
$endgroup$
– Ivan Di Liberti
Dec 3 '18 at 23:40
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
I have the very strong impression that it is just a coincidence, but I would love to be proven wrong!
$endgroup$
– Ivan Di Liberti
Dec 3 '18 at 23:40
5
5
$begingroup$
I have the very strong impression that it is just a coincidence, but I would love to be proven wrong!
$endgroup$
– Ivan Di Liberti
Dec 3 '18 at 23:40
$begingroup$
I have the very strong impression that it is just a coincidence, but I would love to be proven wrong!
$endgroup$
– Ivan Di Liberti
Dec 3 '18 at 23:40
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024865%2fare-valued-quiver-species-and-combinatorial-species-related%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3024865%2fare-valued-quiver-species-and-combinatorial-species-related%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
$begingroup$
I have the very strong impression that it is just a coincidence, but I would love to be proven wrong!
$endgroup$
– Ivan Di Liberti
Dec 3 '18 at 23:40