Every finite $sigma$-algebra is of the form…?












1












$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{F}$ be a finite $sigma$-algebra.



The problem asks to show there exists a partition $G = { G_1,dots,G_n }$ of $Omega$ such that for all $A in mathcal{F}$, $A$ is the union of all or some $G_i$:



$$A = bigcup_{i in I} G_i$$



The existence of a partition is immediate from the definition of a $sigma$-algebra, but I'm not sure how to use the fact $mathcal{F}$ is finite to construct the generating set $G$. Specifically, to show that every member of $mathcal{F}$ can be generated from a single partition using only union.



Can someone give me a hint?



Not a homework problem, I am working through a textbook for self-study.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $mathcal{F}$ be a finite $sigma$-algebra.



    The problem asks to show there exists a partition $G = { G_1,dots,G_n }$ of $Omega$ such that for all $A in mathcal{F}$, $A$ is the union of all or some $G_i$:



    $$A = bigcup_{i in I} G_i$$



    The existence of a partition is immediate from the definition of a $sigma$-algebra, but I'm not sure how to use the fact $mathcal{F}$ is finite to construct the generating set $G$. Specifically, to show that every member of $mathcal{F}$ can be generated from a single partition using only union.



    Can someone give me a hint?



    Not a homework problem, I am working through a textbook for self-study.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $mathcal{F}$ be a finite $sigma$-algebra.



      The problem asks to show there exists a partition $G = { G_1,dots,G_n }$ of $Omega$ such that for all $A in mathcal{F}$, $A$ is the union of all or some $G_i$:



      $$A = bigcup_{i in I} G_i$$



      The existence of a partition is immediate from the definition of a $sigma$-algebra, but I'm not sure how to use the fact $mathcal{F}$ is finite to construct the generating set $G$. Specifically, to show that every member of $mathcal{F}$ can be generated from a single partition using only union.



      Can someone give me a hint?



      Not a homework problem, I am working through a textbook for self-study.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $mathcal{F}$ be a finite $sigma$-algebra.



      The problem asks to show there exists a partition $G = { G_1,dots,G_n }$ of $Omega$ such that for all $A in mathcal{F}$, $A$ is the union of all or some $G_i$:



      $$A = bigcup_{i in I} G_i$$



      The existence of a partition is immediate from the definition of a $sigma$-algebra, but I'm not sure how to use the fact $mathcal{F}$ is finite to construct the generating set $G$. Specifically, to show that every member of $mathcal{F}$ can be generated from a single partition using only union.



      Can someone give me a hint?



      Not a homework problem, I am working through a textbook for self-study.







      probability self-learning






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 7 '18 at 15:37









      zhoraster

      15.7k21752




      15.7k21752










      asked Dec 7 '18 at 9:49









      XiaomiXiaomi

      1,057115




      1,057115






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $mathcal F ={B_1,B_2,cdots ,B_n}$. Consider all sets of the type $A_1cap A_2cap cdots cap A_n$ where $A_i$ is either $B_i$ or $B_i^{c}$ for each $i$. You get $2^{n}$ such intersection but many of them be just empty. It is now routine to check that the nonempty sets in this collection form a partition of $Omega$ and that each $B_i$ is a union of some sets in this partition. For example, you can write $B_1$ as a union of such sets by fixing $A_1$ to be $B_1$ and varying $A_2,A_3,cdots,A_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! That is a lot more intuitive
            $endgroup$
            – Xiaomi
            Dec 7 '18 at 9:55











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029712%2fevery-finite-sigma-algebra-is-of-the-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $mathcal F ={B_1,B_2,cdots ,B_n}$. Consider all sets of the type $A_1cap A_2cap cdots cap A_n$ where $A_i$ is either $B_i$ or $B_i^{c}$ for each $i$. You get $2^{n}$ such intersection but many of them be just empty. It is now routine to check that the nonempty sets in this collection form a partition of $Omega$ and that each $B_i$ is a union of some sets in this partition. For example, you can write $B_1$ as a union of such sets by fixing $A_1$ to be $B_1$ and varying $A_2,A_3,cdots,A_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! That is a lot more intuitive
            $endgroup$
            – Xiaomi
            Dec 7 '18 at 9:55
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $mathcal F ={B_1,B_2,cdots ,B_n}$. Consider all sets of the type $A_1cap A_2cap cdots cap A_n$ where $A_i$ is either $B_i$ or $B_i^{c}$ for each $i$. You get $2^{n}$ such intersection but many of them be just empty. It is now routine to check that the nonempty sets in this collection form a partition of $Omega$ and that each $B_i$ is a union of some sets in this partition. For example, you can write $B_1$ as a union of such sets by fixing $A_1$ to be $B_1$ and varying $A_2,A_3,cdots,A_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! That is a lot more intuitive
            $endgroup$
            – Xiaomi
            Dec 7 '18 at 9:55














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Let $mathcal F ={B_1,B_2,cdots ,B_n}$. Consider all sets of the type $A_1cap A_2cap cdots cap A_n$ where $A_i$ is either $B_i$ or $B_i^{c}$ for each $i$. You get $2^{n}$ such intersection but many of them be just empty. It is now routine to check that the nonempty sets in this collection form a partition of $Omega$ and that each $B_i$ is a union of some sets in this partition. For example, you can write $B_1$ as a union of such sets by fixing $A_1$ to be $B_1$ and varying $A_2,A_3,cdots,A_n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Let $mathcal F ={B_1,B_2,cdots ,B_n}$. Consider all sets of the type $A_1cap A_2cap cdots cap A_n$ where $A_i$ is either $B_i$ or $B_i^{c}$ for each $i$. You get $2^{n}$ such intersection but many of them be just empty. It is now routine to check that the nonempty sets in this collection form a partition of $Omega$ and that each $B_i$ is a union of some sets in this partition. For example, you can write $B_1$ as a union of such sets by fixing $A_1$ to be $B_1$ and varying $A_2,A_3,cdots,A_n$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 7 '18 at 15:38









          zhoraster

          15.7k21752




          15.7k21752










          answered Dec 7 '18 at 9:54









          Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

          58.2k42161




          58.2k42161












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! That is a lot more intuitive
            $endgroup$
            – Xiaomi
            Dec 7 '18 at 9:55


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! That is a lot more intuitive
            $endgroup$
            – Xiaomi
            Dec 7 '18 at 9:55
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks! That is a lot more intuitive
          $endgroup$
          – Xiaomi
          Dec 7 '18 at 9:55




          $begingroup$
          Thanks! That is a lot more intuitive
          $endgroup$
          – Xiaomi
          Dec 7 '18 at 9:55


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029712%2fevery-finite-sigma-algebra-is-of-the-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Le Mesnil-Réaume

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten