Showing $phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z_{12}$ is a homomorphism and determining it's $Ker(phi)$ and $Im(phi)$












2












$begingroup$


Question: Group Theory: Let $phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z_{12}$ be defined by $$phi(x) = x;(text{mod}; 12)$$



a). Show that $phi$ is a homomorphism.



My work: Let $phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z_{12}$ be defined by $phi(x)$ = $x$ $mod$ $12$



$phi(x+y)$ $=$ $[x+y]_{12}$ $=$ $[x]_{12}$ $+$ $[y]_{12}$ $=$ $phi(x)$ $+$ $phi(y)$



$therefore$ $phi$ is a homomorphism.





b). Find $Ker(phi)$ and $Im(phi)$



My work: $Ker(phi)$ $=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $| phi(x) = [0]_{12}$}
$=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $|$$[x]_{12} = [0]_{12}$}
$=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $|$ $12$ divides $x$}
$=$ $12mathbb Z$



$Im(phi)$ $=$ {$phi(x) in mathbb Z_{12} / x in mathbb Z$} $=$ $mathbb Z_{12}$



Is my reasoning correct? I am unsure if my intuition is correct. Any help, comments, concerns, appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    For part $(a)$ I would say that you did not really show anything. Why is $[x+y]_{12}=[x]+[y]$? As for finding the kernel, I think that you are all good. Maybe a word: $[x]=[0]$ if there exists an integer $n$ so that $12 cdot n=x$. For finding the image, I think that's fine.
    $endgroup$
    – Andres Mejia
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to mention this is in the context of group theory in the question, not just the tags. It took me a little while to spot that, and the same question would have different answers for, say, a ring homomorphism.
    $endgroup$
    – aschepler
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:20










  • $begingroup$
    I hate to be that guy but, you haven't proved that $phi$ is well-defined.
    $endgroup$
    – Yunus Syed
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:36
















2












$begingroup$


Question: Group Theory: Let $phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z_{12}$ be defined by $$phi(x) = x;(text{mod}; 12)$$



a). Show that $phi$ is a homomorphism.



My work: Let $phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z_{12}$ be defined by $phi(x)$ = $x$ $mod$ $12$



$phi(x+y)$ $=$ $[x+y]_{12}$ $=$ $[x]_{12}$ $+$ $[y]_{12}$ $=$ $phi(x)$ $+$ $phi(y)$



$therefore$ $phi$ is a homomorphism.





b). Find $Ker(phi)$ and $Im(phi)$



My work: $Ker(phi)$ $=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $| phi(x) = [0]_{12}$}
$=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $|$$[x]_{12} = [0]_{12}$}
$=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $|$ $12$ divides $x$}
$=$ $12mathbb Z$



$Im(phi)$ $=$ {$phi(x) in mathbb Z_{12} / x in mathbb Z$} $=$ $mathbb Z_{12}$



Is my reasoning correct? I am unsure if my intuition is correct. Any help, comments, concerns, appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    For part $(a)$ I would say that you did not really show anything. Why is $[x+y]_{12}=[x]+[y]$? As for finding the kernel, I think that you are all good. Maybe a word: $[x]=[0]$ if there exists an integer $n$ so that $12 cdot n=x$. For finding the image, I think that's fine.
    $endgroup$
    – Andres Mejia
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to mention this is in the context of group theory in the question, not just the tags. It took me a little while to spot that, and the same question would have different answers for, say, a ring homomorphism.
    $endgroup$
    – aschepler
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:20










  • $begingroup$
    I hate to be that guy but, you haven't proved that $phi$ is well-defined.
    $endgroup$
    – Yunus Syed
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:36














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Question: Group Theory: Let $phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z_{12}$ be defined by $$phi(x) = x;(text{mod}; 12)$$



a). Show that $phi$ is a homomorphism.



My work: Let $phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z_{12}$ be defined by $phi(x)$ = $x$ $mod$ $12$



$phi(x+y)$ $=$ $[x+y]_{12}$ $=$ $[x]_{12}$ $+$ $[y]_{12}$ $=$ $phi(x)$ $+$ $phi(y)$



$therefore$ $phi$ is a homomorphism.





b). Find $Ker(phi)$ and $Im(phi)$



My work: $Ker(phi)$ $=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $| phi(x) = [0]_{12}$}
$=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $|$$[x]_{12} = [0]_{12}$}
$=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $|$ $12$ divides $x$}
$=$ $12mathbb Z$



$Im(phi)$ $=$ {$phi(x) in mathbb Z_{12} / x in mathbb Z$} $=$ $mathbb Z_{12}$



Is my reasoning correct? I am unsure if my intuition is correct. Any help, comments, concerns, appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Question: Group Theory: Let $phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z_{12}$ be defined by $$phi(x) = x;(text{mod}; 12)$$



a). Show that $phi$ is a homomorphism.



My work: Let $phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z_{12}$ be defined by $phi(x)$ = $x$ $mod$ $12$



$phi(x+y)$ $=$ $[x+y]_{12}$ $=$ $[x]_{12}$ $+$ $[y]_{12}$ $=$ $phi(x)$ $+$ $phi(y)$



$therefore$ $phi$ is a homomorphism.





b). Find $Ker(phi)$ and $Im(phi)$



My work: $Ker(phi)$ $=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $| phi(x) = [0]_{12}$}
$=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $|$$[x]_{12} = [0]_{12}$}
$=$ {$x in mathbb Z$ $|$ $12$ divides $x$}
$=$ $12mathbb Z$



$Im(phi)$ $=$ {$phi(x) in mathbb Z_{12} / x in mathbb Z$} $=$ $mathbb Z_{12}$



Is my reasoning correct? I am unsure if my intuition is correct. Any help, comments, concerns, appreciated!







abstract-algebra group-theory group-homomorphism






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 3:25







Trever

















asked Dec 6 '18 at 3:11









TreverTrever

566




566








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    For part $(a)$ I would say that you did not really show anything. Why is $[x+y]_{12}=[x]+[y]$? As for finding the kernel, I think that you are all good. Maybe a word: $[x]=[0]$ if there exists an integer $n$ so that $12 cdot n=x$. For finding the image, I think that's fine.
    $endgroup$
    – Andres Mejia
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to mention this is in the context of group theory in the question, not just the tags. It took me a little while to spot that, and the same question would have different answers for, say, a ring homomorphism.
    $endgroup$
    – aschepler
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:20










  • $begingroup$
    I hate to be that guy but, you haven't proved that $phi$ is well-defined.
    $endgroup$
    – Yunus Syed
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:36














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    For part $(a)$ I would say that you did not really show anything. Why is $[x+y]_{12}=[x]+[y]$? As for finding the kernel, I think that you are all good. Maybe a word: $[x]=[0]$ if there exists an integer $n$ so that $12 cdot n=x$. For finding the image, I think that's fine.
    $endgroup$
    – Andres Mejia
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to mention this is in the context of group theory in the question, not just the tags. It took me a little while to spot that, and the same question would have different answers for, say, a ring homomorphism.
    $endgroup$
    – aschepler
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:20










  • $begingroup$
    I hate to be that guy but, you haven't proved that $phi$ is well-defined.
    $endgroup$
    – Yunus Syed
    Dec 6 '18 at 3:36








2




2




$begingroup$
For part $(a)$ I would say that you did not really show anything. Why is $[x+y]_{12}=[x]+[y]$? As for finding the kernel, I think that you are all good. Maybe a word: $[x]=[0]$ if there exists an integer $n$ so that $12 cdot n=x$. For finding the image, I think that's fine.
$endgroup$
– Andres Mejia
Dec 6 '18 at 3:15




$begingroup$
For part $(a)$ I would say that you did not really show anything. Why is $[x+y]_{12}=[x]+[y]$? As for finding the kernel, I think that you are all good. Maybe a word: $[x]=[0]$ if there exists an integer $n$ so that $12 cdot n=x$. For finding the image, I think that's fine.
$endgroup$
– Andres Mejia
Dec 6 '18 at 3:15












$begingroup$
You might want to mention this is in the context of group theory in the question, not just the tags. It took me a little while to spot that, and the same question would have different answers for, say, a ring homomorphism.
$endgroup$
– aschepler
Dec 6 '18 at 3:20




$begingroup$
You might want to mention this is in the context of group theory in the question, not just the tags. It took me a little while to spot that, and the same question would have different answers for, say, a ring homomorphism.
$endgroup$
– aschepler
Dec 6 '18 at 3:20












$begingroup$
I hate to be that guy but, you haven't proved that $phi$ is well-defined.
$endgroup$
– Yunus Syed
Dec 6 '18 at 3:36




$begingroup$
I hate to be that guy but, you haven't proved that $phi$ is well-defined.
$endgroup$
– Yunus Syed
Dec 6 '18 at 3:36










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

It is unclear what you asking since you've not explained 'where we are at'.
So the answer here will be general, forgetting all group theory and only assuming an understanding of equivalence relations.



Fact 1: The relation $x equiv y text{ (mod 12) }$ is an equivalence relation, which by definition means that $x - y$ is divisible by $12$.



The block containing $0$ is equal to the set ${dots,-36,-24,-12,0,12,24,36,dots }$; we denote this set by $12mathbb Z$ and the quotient set by



$tag 1 mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



General theory tells us that we have a projection (or quotient) mapping



$tag 2 phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



The projection is by definition a surjective mapping.



Notice that $0$ gets mapped to $12mathbb Z in mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$, and of course $phi(x) = 12mathbb Z$ just means that $x in 12mathbb Z $.



So this takes care of the questions on the image and the kernel without having to know any group theory.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027985%2fshowing-phi-mathbb-z-to-mathbb-z-12-is-a-homomorphism-and-determining-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    It is unclear what you asking since you've not explained 'where we are at'.
    So the answer here will be general, forgetting all group theory and only assuming an understanding of equivalence relations.



    Fact 1: The relation $x equiv y text{ (mod 12) }$ is an equivalence relation, which by definition means that $x - y$ is divisible by $12$.



    The block containing $0$ is equal to the set ${dots,-36,-24,-12,0,12,24,36,dots }$; we denote this set by $12mathbb Z$ and the quotient set by



    $tag 1 mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



    General theory tells us that we have a projection (or quotient) mapping



    $tag 2 phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



    The projection is by definition a surjective mapping.



    Notice that $0$ gets mapped to $12mathbb Z in mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$, and of course $phi(x) = 12mathbb Z$ just means that $x in 12mathbb Z $.



    So this takes care of the questions on the image and the kernel without having to know any group theory.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      It is unclear what you asking since you've not explained 'where we are at'.
      So the answer here will be general, forgetting all group theory and only assuming an understanding of equivalence relations.



      Fact 1: The relation $x equiv y text{ (mod 12) }$ is an equivalence relation, which by definition means that $x - y$ is divisible by $12$.



      The block containing $0$ is equal to the set ${dots,-36,-24,-12,0,12,24,36,dots }$; we denote this set by $12mathbb Z$ and the quotient set by



      $tag 1 mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



      General theory tells us that we have a projection (or quotient) mapping



      $tag 2 phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



      The projection is by definition a surjective mapping.



      Notice that $0$ gets mapped to $12mathbb Z in mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$, and of course $phi(x) = 12mathbb Z$ just means that $x in 12mathbb Z $.



      So this takes care of the questions on the image and the kernel without having to know any group theory.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        It is unclear what you asking since you've not explained 'where we are at'.
        So the answer here will be general, forgetting all group theory and only assuming an understanding of equivalence relations.



        Fact 1: The relation $x equiv y text{ (mod 12) }$ is an equivalence relation, which by definition means that $x - y$ is divisible by $12$.



        The block containing $0$ is equal to the set ${dots,-36,-24,-12,0,12,24,36,dots }$; we denote this set by $12mathbb Z$ and the quotient set by



        $tag 1 mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



        General theory tells us that we have a projection (or quotient) mapping



        $tag 2 phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



        The projection is by definition a surjective mapping.



        Notice that $0$ gets mapped to $12mathbb Z in mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$, and of course $phi(x) = 12mathbb Z$ just means that $x in 12mathbb Z $.



        So this takes care of the questions on the image and the kernel without having to know any group theory.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is unclear what you asking since you've not explained 'where we are at'.
        So the answer here will be general, forgetting all group theory and only assuming an understanding of equivalence relations.



        Fact 1: The relation $x equiv y text{ (mod 12) }$ is an equivalence relation, which by definition means that $x - y$ is divisible by $12$.



        The block containing $0$ is equal to the set ${dots,-36,-24,-12,0,12,24,36,dots }$; we denote this set by $12mathbb Z$ and the quotient set by



        $tag 1 mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



        General theory tells us that we have a projection (or quotient) mapping



        $tag 2 phi: mathbb Z to mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$



        The projection is by definition a surjective mapping.



        Notice that $0$ gets mapped to $12mathbb Z in mathbb Z text{/} 12mathbb Z$, and of course $phi(x) = 12mathbb Z$ just means that $x in 12mathbb Z $.



        So this takes care of the questions on the image and the kernel without having to know any group theory.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 6 '18 at 4:14









        CopyPasteItCopyPasteIt

        4,1481628




        4,1481628






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027985%2fshowing-phi-mathbb-z-to-mathbb-z-12-is-a-homomorphism-and-determining-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Le Mesnil-Réaume

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten