$|Z(G) cap G'|$ is not divisible by p if $G$ has abelian p-Sylow subgroups












2












$begingroup$


In Exercise §11.12 of “Methods of Representation Theory” by Curtis and Reiner, the reader is asked to prove the statement given in the title. In other words: If $P$ is an abelian $p$-Sylow subgroup of a finite group $G$, and if $x in P cap Z(G)$ is any non-trivial element (of order $p$, say), we have to show there is a homomorphism $varphi colon G to A$ into some abelian group $A$ such that $varphi(x) neq 1$.



If the transfer homomorphism is known, this is an easy task. Indeed, the transfer homomorphism $varphi colon G to P$ satisfies $varphi(x) = x^{|G:P|} neq 1$. But this morphism is only introduced later in the book. I suspect the authors want the reader to construct a linear representation $varphi colon G to mathbb{C}^times$ instead.



Maybe a desired proof would start like this: Since $P$ is abelian, there is a linear character $lambda$ of $P$ such that $lambda(x) neq 1$. Then $chi = lambda^G$ is a character of $G$ of degree $chi(1) = |G : P|$ with $x notin operatorname{Ker}(chi)$. More precisely, we have $chi_{|langle x rangle} = |G:P| cdot lambda_{|langle x rangle}$ (since $x in Z(G)$). In particular, we have $x notin operatorname{Ker}(psi)$ for all irreducible constituents $psi$ of $chi$. So it suffices to show that $chi$ has at least one linear constituent.



Any ideas how to continue from here? Note that I have not used that $P$ is a Sylow group so far.





Added later: As Dietrich Burde's comment shows, I was actually quite close: Instead of looking for a constituent of $chi$, one only needs to consider the determinant $varphi = det chi$. This is a homomorphism $G to mathbb{C}^times$ satisfying $varphi(x) = lambda(x)^{|G:P|} neq 1$.



By essentially the same argument, we can also prove the more general statement: $P cap Z(G) cap G' leq P'$ for all (not necessarily abelian) Sylow subgroups $P leq G$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The references here also give an argument for one (not all) $p$-Sylow group being abelian; see also Geoff Robinson's answer (can be proved also without using transfer).
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 13 '18 at 19:48












  • $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde: This is perfect, thank you very much! Isaacs' answer shows that I actually was on the right track. I will also think about a transfer-free proof of Geoff Robinson's suggestion (the focal subgroup theorem uses transfer if I am not mistaken?).
    $endgroup$
    – Dune
    Dec 13 '18 at 19:58
















2












$begingroup$


In Exercise §11.12 of “Methods of Representation Theory” by Curtis and Reiner, the reader is asked to prove the statement given in the title. In other words: If $P$ is an abelian $p$-Sylow subgroup of a finite group $G$, and if $x in P cap Z(G)$ is any non-trivial element (of order $p$, say), we have to show there is a homomorphism $varphi colon G to A$ into some abelian group $A$ such that $varphi(x) neq 1$.



If the transfer homomorphism is known, this is an easy task. Indeed, the transfer homomorphism $varphi colon G to P$ satisfies $varphi(x) = x^{|G:P|} neq 1$. But this morphism is only introduced later in the book. I suspect the authors want the reader to construct a linear representation $varphi colon G to mathbb{C}^times$ instead.



Maybe a desired proof would start like this: Since $P$ is abelian, there is a linear character $lambda$ of $P$ such that $lambda(x) neq 1$. Then $chi = lambda^G$ is a character of $G$ of degree $chi(1) = |G : P|$ with $x notin operatorname{Ker}(chi)$. More precisely, we have $chi_{|langle x rangle} = |G:P| cdot lambda_{|langle x rangle}$ (since $x in Z(G)$). In particular, we have $x notin operatorname{Ker}(psi)$ for all irreducible constituents $psi$ of $chi$. So it suffices to show that $chi$ has at least one linear constituent.



Any ideas how to continue from here? Note that I have not used that $P$ is a Sylow group so far.





Added later: As Dietrich Burde's comment shows, I was actually quite close: Instead of looking for a constituent of $chi$, one only needs to consider the determinant $varphi = det chi$. This is a homomorphism $G to mathbb{C}^times$ satisfying $varphi(x) = lambda(x)^{|G:P|} neq 1$.



By essentially the same argument, we can also prove the more general statement: $P cap Z(G) cap G' leq P'$ for all (not necessarily abelian) Sylow subgroups $P leq G$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The references here also give an argument for one (not all) $p$-Sylow group being abelian; see also Geoff Robinson's answer (can be proved also without using transfer).
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 13 '18 at 19:48












  • $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde: This is perfect, thank you very much! Isaacs' answer shows that I actually was on the right track. I will also think about a transfer-free proof of Geoff Robinson's suggestion (the focal subgroup theorem uses transfer if I am not mistaken?).
    $endgroup$
    – Dune
    Dec 13 '18 at 19:58














2












2








2





$begingroup$


In Exercise §11.12 of “Methods of Representation Theory” by Curtis and Reiner, the reader is asked to prove the statement given in the title. In other words: If $P$ is an abelian $p$-Sylow subgroup of a finite group $G$, and if $x in P cap Z(G)$ is any non-trivial element (of order $p$, say), we have to show there is a homomorphism $varphi colon G to A$ into some abelian group $A$ such that $varphi(x) neq 1$.



If the transfer homomorphism is known, this is an easy task. Indeed, the transfer homomorphism $varphi colon G to P$ satisfies $varphi(x) = x^{|G:P|} neq 1$. But this morphism is only introduced later in the book. I suspect the authors want the reader to construct a linear representation $varphi colon G to mathbb{C}^times$ instead.



Maybe a desired proof would start like this: Since $P$ is abelian, there is a linear character $lambda$ of $P$ such that $lambda(x) neq 1$. Then $chi = lambda^G$ is a character of $G$ of degree $chi(1) = |G : P|$ with $x notin operatorname{Ker}(chi)$. More precisely, we have $chi_{|langle x rangle} = |G:P| cdot lambda_{|langle x rangle}$ (since $x in Z(G)$). In particular, we have $x notin operatorname{Ker}(psi)$ for all irreducible constituents $psi$ of $chi$. So it suffices to show that $chi$ has at least one linear constituent.



Any ideas how to continue from here? Note that I have not used that $P$ is a Sylow group so far.





Added later: As Dietrich Burde's comment shows, I was actually quite close: Instead of looking for a constituent of $chi$, one only needs to consider the determinant $varphi = det chi$. This is a homomorphism $G to mathbb{C}^times$ satisfying $varphi(x) = lambda(x)^{|G:P|} neq 1$.



By essentially the same argument, we can also prove the more general statement: $P cap Z(G) cap G' leq P'$ for all (not necessarily abelian) Sylow subgroups $P leq G$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In Exercise §11.12 of “Methods of Representation Theory” by Curtis and Reiner, the reader is asked to prove the statement given in the title. In other words: If $P$ is an abelian $p$-Sylow subgroup of a finite group $G$, and if $x in P cap Z(G)$ is any non-trivial element (of order $p$, say), we have to show there is a homomorphism $varphi colon G to A$ into some abelian group $A$ such that $varphi(x) neq 1$.



If the transfer homomorphism is known, this is an easy task. Indeed, the transfer homomorphism $varphi colon G to P$ satisfies $varphi(x) = x^{|G:P|} neq 1$. But this morphism is only introduced later in the book. I suspect the authors want the reader to construct a linear representation $varphi colon G to mathbb{C}^times$ instead.



Maybe a desired proof would start like this: Since $P$ is abelian, there is a linear character $lambda$ of $P$ such that $lambda(x) neq 1$. Then $chi = lambda^G$ is a character of $G$ of degree $chi(1) = |G : P|$ with $x notin operatorname{Ker}(chi)$. More precisely, we have $chi_{|langle x rangle} = |G:P| cdot lambda_{|langle x rangle}$ (since $x in Z(G)$). In particular, we have $x notin operatorname{Ker}(psi)$ for all irreducible constituents $psi$ of $chi$. So it suffices to show that $chi$ has at least one linear constituent.



Any ideas how to continue from here? Note that I have not used that $P$ is a Sylow group so far.





Added later: As Dietrich Burde's comment shows, I was actually quite close: Instead of looking for a constituent of $chi$, one only needs to consider the determinant $varphi = det chi$. This is a homomorphism $G to mathbb{C}^times$ satisfying $varphi(x) = lambda(x)^{|G:P|} neq 1$.



By essentially the same argument, we can also prove the more general statement: $P cap Z(G) cap G' leq P'$ for all (not necessarily abelian) Sylow subgroups $P leq G$.







abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups representation-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 13 '18 at 21:00







Dune

















asked Dec 13 '18 at 19:18









DuneDune

4,46211231




4,46211231












  • $begingroup$
    The references here also give an argument for one (not all) $p$-Sylow group being abelian; see also Geoff Robinson's answer (can be proved also without using transfer).
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 13 '18 at 19:48












  • $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde: This is perfect, thank you very much! Isaacs' answer shows that I actually was on the right track. I will also think about a transfer-free proof of Geoff Robinson's suggestion (the focal subgroup theorem uses transfer if I am not mistaken?).
    $endgroup$
    – Dune
    Dec 13 '18 at 19:58


















  • $begingroup$
    The references here also give an argument for one (not all) $p$-Sylow group being abelian; see also Geoff Robinson's answer (can be proved also without using transfer).
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Dec 13 '18 at 19:48












  • $begingroup$
    @DietrichBurde: This is perfect, thank you very much! Isaacs' answer shows that I actually was on the right track. I will also think about a transfer-free proof of Geoff Robinson's suggestion (the focal subgroup theorem uses transfer if I am not mistaken?).
    $endgroup$
    – Dune
    Dec 13 '18 at 19:58
















$begingroup$
The references here also give an argument for one (not all) $p$-Sylow group being abelian; see also Geoff Robinson's answer (can be proved also without using transfer).
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 13 '18 at 19:48






$begingroup$
The references here also give an argument for one (not all) $p$-Sylow group being abelian; see also Geoff Robinson's answer (can be proved also without using transfer).
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Dec 13 '18 at 19:48














$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde: This is perfect, thank you very much! Isaacs' answer shows that I actually was on the right track. I will also think about a transfer-free proof of Geoff Robinson's suggestion (the focal subgroup theorem uses transfer if I am not mistaken?).
$endgroup$
– Dune
Dec 13 '18 at 19:58




$begingroup$
@DietrichBurde: This is perfect, thank you very much! Isaacs' answer shows that I actually was on the right track. I will also think about a transfer-free proof of Geoff Robinson's suggestion (the focal subgroup theorem uses transfer if I am not mistaken?).
$endgroup$
– Dune
Dec 13 '18 at 19:58










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Here is the total proof.



Theorem Let $P in Syl_p(G)$, then $G' cap Z(G) cap P subseteq P'$.



Proof Choose a linear character $lambda in Irr(P)$ and $g in G' cap Z(G) cap P$. We are going to show that $lambda(g)=1$. Since $P'=bigcap {ker(lambda) : lambda in Irr(P), lambda(1)=1}$, this will guarantee the result.
Now, $lambda^G=sum a_{chi}chi$, for certain $chi in Irr(G)$ and $a_{chi}$ positive integers. Since $lambda^G(1)=|G:P|=sum a_{chi}chi(1)$ is a not divisible by $p$, there must be a constituent $chi$ of $lambda^G$ with $p nmid chi(1)$. Let $mathfrak{X}$ be a representation affording this character $chi$.
Since $g in Z(G)$, $mathfrak{X}(g)=omega I$ for certain $omega in mathbb{C}^*$. Note that the order of $omega$ (in $mathbb{C}^*$) is a divisor of the order of $g$, which is a power of $p$, since $g in P$. But $g in G'$, so $det(mathfrak{X}(g))=det(omega I)=omega^{chi(1)}=1$. So the order of $omega$ divides also $chi(1)$. We conclude that $omega=1$, and hence $g in ker(mathfrak{X})=ker(chi)$. By Frobenius Reciprocity, $chi_P=a_{chi}lambda + cdots$, whence $ker(chi_P)=P cap ker(chi) subseteq ker(lambda)$. So $g in ker(lambda)$ and we are done.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038466%2fzg-cap-g-is-not-divisible-by-p-if-g-has-abelian-p-sylow-subgroups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Here is the total proof.



    Theorem Let $P in Syl_p(G)$, then $G' cap Z(G) cap P subseteq P'$.



    Proof Choose a linear character $lambda in Irr(P)$ and $g in G' cap Z(G) cap P$. We are going to show that $lambda(g)=1$. Since $P'=bigcap {ker(lambda) : lambda in Irr(P), lambda(1)=1}$, this will guarantee the result.
    Now, $lambda^G=sum a_{chi}chi$, for certain $chi in Irr(G)$ and $a_{chi}$ positive integers. Since $lambda^G(1)=|G:P|=sum a_{chi}chi(1)$ is a not divisible by $p$, there must be a constituent $chi$ of $lambda^G$ with $p nmid chi(1)$. Let $mathfrak{X}$ be a representation affording this character $chi$.
    Since $g in Z(G)$, $mathfrak{X}(g)=omega I$ for certain $omega in mathbb{C}^*$. Note that the order of $omega$ (in $mathbb{C}^*$) is a divisor of the order of $g$, which is a power of $p$, since $g in P$. But $g in G'$, so $det(mathfrak{X}(g))=det(omega I)=omega^{chi(1)}=1$. So the order of $omega$ divides also $chi(1)$. We conclude that $omega=1$, and hence $g in ker(mathfrak{X})=ker(chi)$. By Frobenius Reciprocity, $chi_P=a_{chi}lambda + cdots$, whence $ker(chi_P)=P cap ker(chi) subseteq ker(lambda)$. So $g in ker(lambda)$ and we are done.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Here is the total proof.



      Theorem Let $P in Syl_p(G)$, then $G' cap Z(G) cap P subseteq P'$.



      Proof Choose a linear character $lambda in Irr(P)$ and $g in G' cap Z(G) cap P$. We are going to show that $lambda(g)=1$. Since $P'=bigcap {ker(lambda) : lambda in Irr(P), lambda(1)=1}$, this will guarantee the result.
      Now, $lambda^G=sum a_{chi}chi$, for certain $chi in Irr(G)$ and $a_{chi}$ positive integers. Since $lambda^G(1)=|G:P|=sum a_{chi}chi(1)$ is a not divisible by $p$, there must be a constituent $chi$ of $lambda^G$ with $p nmid chi(1)$. Let $mathfrak{X}$ be a representation affording this character $chi$.
      Since $g in Z(G)$, $mathfrak{X}(g)=omega I$ for certain $omega in mathbb{C}^*$. Note that the order of $omega$ (in $mathbb{C}^*$) is a divisor of the order of $g$, which is a power of $p$, since $g in P$. But $g in G'$, so $det(mathfrak{X}(g))=det(omega I)=omega^{chi(1)}=1$. So the order of $omega$ divides also $chi(1)$. We conclude that $omega=1$, and hence $g in ker(mathfrak{X})=ker(chi)$. By Frobenius Reciprocity, $chi_P=a_{chi}lambda + cdots$, whence $ker(chi_P)=P cap ker(chi) subseteq ker(lambda)$. So $g in ker(lambda)$ and we are done.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Here is the total proof.



        Theorem Let $P in Syl_p(G)$, then $G' cap Z(G) cap P subseteq P'$.



        Proof Choose a linear character $lambda in Irr(P)$ and $g in G' cap Z(G) cap P$. We are going to show that $lambda(g)=1$. Since $P'=bigcap {ker(lambda) : lambda in Irr(P), lambda(1)=1}$, this will guarantee the result.
        Now, $lambda^G=sum a_{chi}chi$, for certain $chi in Irr(G)$ and $a_{chi}$ positive integers. Since $lambda^G(1)=|G:P|=sum a_{chi}chi(1)$ is a not divisible by $p$, there must be a constituent $chi$ of $lambda^G$ with $p nmid chi(1)$. Let $mathfrak{X}$ be a representation affording this character $chi$.
        Since $g in Z(G)$, $mathfrak{X}(g)=omega I$ for certain $omega in mathbb{C}^*$. Note that the order of $omega$ (in $mathbb{C}^*$) is a divisor of the order of $g$, which is a power of $p$, since $g in P$. But $g in G'$, so $det(mathfrak{X}(g))=det(omega I)=omega^{chi(1)}=1$. So the order of $omega$ divides also $chi(1)$. We conclude that $omega=1$, and hence $g in ker(mathfrak{X})=ker(chi)$. By Frobenius Reciprocity, $chi_P=a_{chi}lambda + cdots$, whence $ker(chi_P)=P cap ker(chi) subseteq ker(lambda)$. So $g in ker(lambda)$ and we are done.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Here is the total proof.



        Theorem Let $P in Syl_p(G)$, then $G' cap Z(G) cap P subseteq P'$.



        Proof Choose a linear character $lambda in Irr(P)$ and $g in G' cap Z(G) cap P$. We are going to show that $lambda(g)=1$. Since $P'=bigcap {ker(lambda) : lambda in Irr(P), lambda(1)=1}$, this will guarantee the result.
        Now, $lambda^G=sum a_{chi}chi$, for certain $chi in Irr(G)$ and $a_{chi}$ positive integers. Since $lambda^G(1)=|G:P|=sum a_{chi}chi(1)$ is a not divisible by $p$, there must be a constituent $chi$ of $lambda^G$ with $p nmid chi(1)$. Let $mathfrak{X}$ be a representation affording this character $chi$.
        Since $g in Z(G)$, $mathfrak{X}(g)=omega I$ for certain $omega in mathbb{C}^*$. Note that the order of $omega$ (in $mathbb{C}^*$) is a divisor of the order of $g$, which is a power of $p$, since $g in P$. But $g in G'$, so $det(mathfrak{X}(g))=det(omega I)=omega^{chi(1)}=1$. So the order of $omega$ divides also $chi(1)$. We conclude that $omega=1$, and hence $g in ker(mathfrak{X})=ker(chi)$. By Frobenius Reciprocity, $chi_P=a_{chi}lambda + cdots$, whence $ker(chi_P)=P cap ker(chi) subseteq ker(lambda)$. So $g in ker(lambda)$ and we are done.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 31 '18 at 13:25









        Nicky HeksterNicky Hekster

        28.8k63456




        28.8k63456






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038466%2fzg-cap-g-is-not-divisible-by-p-if-g-has-abelian-p-sylow-subgroups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Le Mesnil-Réaume

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten