Calculation of Christoffel symbol for unit sphere












1












$begingroup$


We use the following parameterisation for the unit sphere: $sigma(theta,phi)=(costhetacosphi,costhetasinphi,sintheta)$.
I have calculated the Christoffel symbols to be
$Gamma^1_{11}=Gamma^2_{11}=Gamma^1_{12}=0, Gamma^1_{22}=sinthetacostheta,Gamma^2_{22}=0$, which match the answers I am given in my notes. But when I calculate $Gamma^2_{12}$ I get $-sinthetacostheta$, which apparently is incorrect and should be $-tantheta$. My reasoning was that $Gamma^2_{12}=sigma_phi cdot sigma_{thetaphi}=(-costhetasinphi,costhetacosphi,0)cdot(sinthetasinphi,-sinthetacosphi,0)=-sinthetacostheta$. I am not sure what I am doing wrong - the same method worked for the other five symbols and I have no idea where a $tantheta$ term would come from. Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
    $endgroup$
    – John Hughes
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:43










  • $begingroup$
    @JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
    $endgroup$
    – AlephNull
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:01












  • $begingroup$
    Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
    $endgroup$
    – AlephNull
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:11


















1












$begingroup$


We use the following parameterisation for the unit sphere: $sigma(theta,phi)=(costhetacosphi,costhetasinphi,sintheta)$.
I have calculated the Christoffel symbols to be
$Gamma^1_{11}=Gamma^2_{11}=Gamma^1_{12}=0, Gamma^1_{22}=sinthetacostheta,Gamma^2_{22}=0$, which match the answers I am given in my notes. But when I calculate $Gamma^2_{12}$ I get $-sinthetacostheta$, which apparently is incorrect and should be $-tantheta$. My reasoning was that $Gamma^2_{12}=sigma_phi cdot sigma_{thetaphi}=(-costhetasinphi,costhetacosphi,0)cdot(sinthetasinphi,-sinthetacosphi,0)=-sinthetacostheta$. I am not sure what I am doing wrong - the same method worked for the other five symbols and I have no idea where a $tantheta$ term would come from. Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
    $endgroup$
    – John Hughes
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:43










  • $begingroup$
    @JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
    $endgroup$
    – AlephNull
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:01












  • $begingroup$
    Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
    $endgroup$
    – AlephNull
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:11
















1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


We use the following parameterisation for the unit sphere: $sigma(theta,phi)=(costhetacosphi,costhetasinphi,sintheta)$.
I have calculated the Christoffel symbols to be
$Gamma^1_{11}=Gamma^2_{11}=Gamma^1_{12}=0, Gamma^1_{22}=sinthetacostheta,Gamma^2_{22}=0$, which match the answers I am given in my notes. But when I calculate $Gamma^2_{12}$ I get $-sinthetacostheta$, which apparently is incorrect and should be $-tantheta$. My reasoning was that $Gamma^2_{12}=sigma_phi cdot sigma_{thetaphi}=(-costhetasinphi,costhetacosphi,0)cdot(sinthetasinphi,-sinthetacosphi,0)=-sinthetacostheta$. I am not sure what I am doing wrong - the same method worked for the other five symbols and I have no idea where a $tantheta$ term would come from. Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




We use the following parameterisation for the unit sphere: $sigma(theta,phi)=(costhetacosphi,costhetasinphi,sintheta)$.
I have calculated the Christoffel symbols to be
$Gamma^1_{11}=Gamma^2_{11}=Gamma^1_{12}=0, Gamma^1_{22}=sinthetacostheta,Gamma^2_{22}=0$, which match the answers I am given in my notes. But when I calculate $Gamma^2_{12}$ I get $-sinthetacostheta$, which apparently is incorrect and should be $-tantheta$. My reasoning was that $Gamma^2_{12}=sigma_phi cdot sigma_{thetaphi}=(-costhetasinphi,costhetacosphi,0)cdot(sinthetasinphi,-sinthetacosphi,0)=-sinthetacostheta$. I am not sure what I am doing wrong - the same method worked for the other five symbols and I have no idea where a $tantheta$ term would come from. Any help would be appreciated.







differential-geometry parametrization






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 31 '18 at 11:44









AlephNullAlephNull

559110




559110












  • $begingroup$
    Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
    $endgroup$
    – John Hughes
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:43










  • $begingroup$
    @JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
    $endgroup$
    – AlephNull
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:01












  • $begingroup$
    Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
    $endgroup$
    – AlephNull
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:11




















  • $begingroup$
    Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
    $endgroup$
    – John Hughes
    Dec 31 '18 at 13:43










  • $begingroup$
    @JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
    $endgroup$
    – AlephNull
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:01












  • $begingroup$
    Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
    $endgroup$
    – AlephNull
    Dec 31 '18 at 15:11


















$begingroup$
Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
Dec 31 '18 at 13:43




$begingroup$
Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
Dec 31 '18 at 13:43












$begingroup$
@JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:01






$begingroup$
@JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:01














$begingroup$
Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:11






$begingroup$
Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:11












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

$require{cancel}$
You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)



$$
(g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
(g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
$$



From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$



$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
$$



Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$



begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
&=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
end{eqnarray}



You can calculate the other components the same way



$$
Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
$$



and



$$
Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate



    $$
    Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
    $$



    You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily



    $$
    theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
    $$



    With this we have



    begin{eqnarray}
    Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
    &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
    &=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
    &=& - tantheta tag{3}
    end{eqnarray}






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057630%2fcalculation-of-christoffel-symbol-for-unit-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      $require{cancel}$
      You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)



      $$
      (g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
      (g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
      $$



      From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$



      $$
      Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
      $$



      Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$



      begin{eqnarray}
      Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
      &=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
      end{eqnarray}



      You can calculate the other components the same way



      $$
      Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
      $$



      and



      $$
      Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        $require{cancel}$
        You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)



        $$
        (g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
        (g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
        $$



        From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$



        $$
        Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
        $$



        Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$



        begin{eqnarray}
        Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
        &=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
        end{eqnarray}



        You can calculate the other components the same way



        $$
        Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
        $$



        and



        $$
        Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          $require{cancel}$
          You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)



          $$
          (g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
          (g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
          $$



          From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$



          $$
          Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
          $$



          Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$



          begin{eqnarray}
          Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
          &=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
          end{eqnarray}



          You can calculate the other components the same way



          $$
          Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
          $$



          and



          $$
          Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          $require{cancel}$
          You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)



          $$
          (g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
          (g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
          $$



          From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$



          $$
          Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
          $$



          Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$



          begin{eqnarray}
          Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
          &=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
          end{eqnarray}



          You can calculate the other components the same way



          $$
          Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
          $$



          and



          $$
          Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
          $$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 31 '18 at 14:31









          caveraccaverac

          14.9k31130




          14.9k31130























              0












              $begingroup$

              There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate



              $$
              Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
              $$



              You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily



              $$
              theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
              $$



              With this we have



              begin{eqnarray}
              Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
              &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
              &=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
              &=& - tantheta tag{3}
              end{eqnarray}






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate



                $$
                Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
                $$



                You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily



                $$
                theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
                $$



                With this we have



                begin{eqnarray}
                Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
                &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
                &=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
                &=& - tantheta tag{3}
                end{eqnarray}






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate



                  $$
                  Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
                  $$



                  You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily



                  $$
                  theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
                  $$



                  With this we have



                  begin{eqnarray}
                  Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
                  &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
                  &=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
                  &=& - tantheta tag{3}
                  end{eqnarray}






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate



                  $$
                  Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
                  $$



                  You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily



                  $$
                  theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
                  $$



                  With this we have



                  begin{eqnarray}
                  Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
                  &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
                  &=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
                  &=& - tantheta tag{3}
                  end{eqnarray}







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 31 '18 at 15:34









                  caveraccaverac

                  14.9k31130




                  14.9k31130






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057630%2fcalculation-of-christoffel-symbol-for-unit-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Le Mesnil-Réaume

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten