If $degleft(fright) = minleft(left{d in mathbb{N}^times;; fvert X^{q^d} - Xright}right),$, then $f$ is...
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let for some prime power $q$ $mathbb{F}_q$ be a finite field and consider $f in mathbb{F}_qleft[Xright]$.
I want to show the implication mentioned in the title, i.e.
$$
degleft(,fright) =
minleft(left{d in mathbb{N}^times;; f,vert, X^{q^d} - Xright}right) implies f ;textit{is irreducible}
$$
I could really use some help proving this.
If you want to see my current approach (which I couldn't yet turn into a proof), read on.
I already know that for $d in mathbb{N}^times$, $P_d:=X^{q^d} - X$ is the squarefree product of all irreducible polynomials $r in mathbb{F}_q[X]$ such that $degleft(rright),mid,d$.
Another fact that might be useful is that if $r$ is an irreducible factor of $P_d$, then $degleft(rright) ,mid, d$.
My current proof idea is as follows:
Assume that $degleft(fright)$ has the minimality property mentioned above and that $f$ is not irreducible. We hence have, for $2 leq m in mathbb{N}^times$ and prime factors $f_i in mathbb{F}_qleft[Xright]$
$$
f = prod_{i=1}^m f_i
$$
I'm not sure if this helps, but on a side note, all the $f_i$ are coprime ($f$ is squarefree, since $P_d$ is).
Anyways, consider $mu:=text{lcm}left(left{degleft(f_iright);; 1 leq i leq mright}right)$.
Using one of the facts mentioned above, note that for all $i$, since $f_i$ is an irreducible factor of $f$ which divides $P_d$, we have $degleft(f_iright),mid,degleft(fright)$. By definition of $mu$, this implies $mu ,mid, degleft(fright)$.
It thus would suffice to show that $mu lt degleft(fright)$ to arrive at a contradiction to the minimality property of $degleft(fright)$.
Can somebody help me out here?
UPDATE: The answer here leads me to believe my approach might be wrong. Not sure though, just found this.
abstract-algebra polynomials finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let for some prime power $q$ $mathbb{F}_q$ be a finite field and consider $f in mathbb{F}_qleft[Xright]$.
I want to show the implication mentioned in the title, i.e.
$$
degleft(,fright) =
minleft(left{d in mathbb{N}^times;; f,vert, X^{q^d} - Xright}right) implies f ;textit{is irreducible}
$$
I could really use some help proving this.
If you want to see my current approach (which I couldn't yet turn into a proof), read on.
I already know that for $d in mathbb{N}^times$, $P_d:=X^{q^d} - X$ is the squarefree product of all irreducible polynomials $r in mathbb{F}_q[X]$ such that $degleft(rright),mid,d$.
Another fact that might be useful is that if $r$ is an irreducible factor of $P_d$, then $degleft(rright) ,mid, d$.
My current proof idea is as follows:
Assume that $degleft(fright)$ has the minimality property mentioned above and that $f$ is not irreducible. We hence have, for $2 leq m in mathbb{N}^times$ and prime factors $f_i in mathbb{F}_qleft[Xright]$
$$
f = prod_{i=1}^m f_i
$$
I'm not sure if this helps, but on a side note, all the $f_i$ are coprime ($f$ is squarefree, since $P_d$ is).
Anyways, consider $mu:=text{lcm}left(left{degleft(f_iright);; 1 leq i leq mright}right)$.
Using one of the facts mentioned above, note that for all $i$, since $f_i$ is an irreducible factor of $f$ which divides $P_d$, we have $degleft(f_iright),mid,degleft(fright)$. By definition of $mu$, this implies $mu ,mid, degleft(fright)$.
It thus would suffice to show that $mu lt degleft(fright)$ to arrive at a contradiction to the minimality property of $degleft(fright)$.
Can somebody help me out here?
UPDATE: The answer here leads me to believe my approach might be wrong. Not sure though, just found this.
abstract-algebra polynomials finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
1
The other question you linked to is different from yours because it has the extra assumption that $d$ is prime.
– Eric Wofsey
Nov 20 at 23:48
Oh, good point. Only quickly scanned the answer and thought this was something to be concluded.
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 15:02
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let for some prime power $q$ $mathbb{F}_q$ be a finite field and consider $f in mathbb{F}_qleft[Xright]$.
I want to show the implication mentioned in the title, i.e.
$$
degleft(,fright) =
minleft(left{d in mathbb{N}^times;; f,vert, X^{q^d} - Xright}right) implies f ;textit{is irreducible}
$$
I could really use some help proving this.
If you want to see my current approach (which I couldn't yet turn into a proof), read on.
I already know that for $d in mathbb{N}^times$, $P_d:=X^{q^d} - X$ is the squarefree product of all irreducible polynomials $r in mathbb{F}_q[X]$ such that $degleft(rright),mid,d$.
Another fact that might be useful is that if $r$ is an irreducible factor of $P_d$, then $degleft(rright) ,mid, d$.
My current proof idea is as follows:
Assume that $degleft(fright)$ has the minimality property mentioned above and that $f$ is not irreducible. We hence have, for $2 leq m in mathbb{N}^times$ and prime factors $f_i in mathbb{F}_qleft[Xright]$
$$
f = prod_{i=1}^m f_i
$$
I'm not sure if this helps, but on a side note, all the $f_i$ are coprime ($f$ is squarefree, since $P_d$ is).
Anyways, consider $mu:=text{lcm}left(left{degleft(f_iright);; 1 leq i leq mright}right)$.
Using one of the facts mentioned above, note that for all $i$, since $f_i$ is an irreducible factor of $f$ which divides $P_d$, we have $degleft(f_iright),mid,degleft(fright)$. By definition of $mu$, this implies $mu ,mid, degleft(fright)$.
It thus would suffice to show that $mu lt degleft(fright)$ to arrive at a contradiction to the minimality property of $degleft(fright)$.
Can somebody help me out here?
UPDATE: The answer here leads me to believe my approach might be wrong. Not sure though, just found this.
abstract-algebra polynomials finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
Let for some prime power $q$ $mathbb{F}_q$ be a finite field and consider $f in mathbb{F}_qleft[Xright]$.
I want to show the implication mentioned in the title, i.e.
$$
degleft(,fright) =
minleft(left{d in mathbb{N}^times;; f,vert, X^{q^d} - Xright}right) implies f ;textit{is irreducible}
$$
I could really use some help proving this.
If you want to see my current approach (which I couldn't yet turn into a proof), read on.
I already know that for $d in mathbb{N}^times$, $P_d:=X^{q^d} - X$ is the squarefree product of all irreducible polynomials $r in mathbb{F}_q[X]$ such that $degleft(rright),mid,d$.
Another fact that might be useful is that if $r$ is an irreducible factor of $P_d$, then $degleft(rright) ,mid, d$.
My current proof idea is as follows:
Assume that $degleft(fright)$ has the minimality property mentioned above and that $f$ is not irreducible. We hence have, for $2 leq m in mathbb{N}^times$ and prime factors $f_i in mathbb{F}_qleft[Xright]$
$$
f = prod_{i=1}^m f_i
$$
I'm not sure if this helps, but on a side note, all the $f_i$ are coprime ($f$ is squarefree, since $P_d$ is).
Anyways, consider $mu:=text{lcm}left(left{degleft(f_iright);; 1 leq i leq mright}right)$.
Using one of the facts mentioned above, note that for all $i$, since $f_i$ is an irreducible factor of $f$ which divides $P_d$, we have $degleft(f_iright),mid,degleft(fright)$. By definition of $mu$, this implies $mu ,mid, degleft(fright)$.
It thus would suffice to show that $mu lt degleft(fright)$ to arrive at a contradiction to the minimality property of $degleft(fright)$.
Can somebody help me out here?
UPDATE: The answer here leads me to believe my approach might be wrong. Not sure though, just found this.
abstract-algebra polynomials finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
abstract-algebra polynomials finite-fields irreducible-polynomials
edited Nov 21 at 1:29
Batominovski
32.1k23190
32.1k23190
asked Nov 20 at 17:28
polynomial_donut
592216
592216
1
The other question you linked to is different from yours because it has the extra assumption that $d$ is prime.
– Eric Wofsey
Nov 20 at 23:48
Oh, good point. Only quickly scanned the answer and thought this was something to be concluded.
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 15:02
add a comment |
1
The other question you linked to is different from yours because it has the extra assumption that $d$ is prime.
– Eric Wofsey
Nov 20 at 23:48
Oh, good point. Only quickly scanned the answer and thought this was something to be concluded.
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 15:02
1
1
The other question you linked to is different from yours because it has the extra assumption that $d$ is prime.
– Eric Wofsey
Nov 20 at 23:48
The other question you linked to is different from yours because it has the extra assumption that $d$ is prime.
– Eric Wofsey
Nov 20 at 23:48
Oh, good point. Only quickly scanned the answer and thought this was something to be concluded.
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 15:02
Oh, good point. Only quickly scanned the answer and thought this was something to be concluded.
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 15:02
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
This is false. For instance, if $q=2$ and $f(x)=x(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$ then $f$ is not irreducible but the smallest $d>0$ such that $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ is $6$, the degree of $f$. Indeed, the irreducible factors of $f$ have degree $1,2,$ and $3$, and so $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ iff $d$ is divisible by $1,2,$ and $3$. The least such $d$ is $6$.
In general, by the same reasoning, if $f$ is squarefree then the least such $d$ will be the least common multiple of the degrees of the irreducible factors of $f$.
Thank you. This now led me to another question, maybe you're interested...
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 14:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
This is false. For instance, if $q=2$ and $f(x)=x(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$ then $f$ is not irreducible but the smallest $d>0$ such that $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ is $6$, the degree of $f$. Indeed, the irreducible factors of $f$ have degree $1,2,$ and $3$, and so $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ iff $d$ is divisible by $1,2,$ and $3$. The least such $d$ is $6$.
In general, by the same reasoning, if $f$ is squarefree then the least such $d$ will be the least common multiple of the degrees of the irreducible factors of $f$.
Thank you. This now led me to another question, maybe you're interested...
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 14:48
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
This is false. For instance, if $q=2$ and $f(x)=x(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$ then $f$ is not irreducible but the smallest $d>0$ such that $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ is $6$, the degree of $f$. Indeed, the irreducible factors of $f$ have degree $1,2,$ and $3$, and so $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ iff $d$ is divisible by $1,2,$ and $3$. The least such $d$ is $6$.
In general, by the same reasoning, if $f$ is squarefree then the least such $d$ will be the least common multiple of the degrees of the irreducible factors of $f$.
Thank you. This now led me to another question, maybe you're interested...
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 14:48
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
This is false. For instance, if $q=2$ and $f(x)=x(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$ then $f$ is not irreducible but the smallest $d>0$ such that $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ is $6$, the degree of $f$. Indeed, the irreducible factors of $f$ have degree $1,2,$ and $3$, and so $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ iff $d$ is divisible by $1,2,$ and $3$. The least such $d$ is $6$.
In general, by the same reasoning, if $f$ is squarefree then the least such $d$ will be the least common multiple of the degrees of the irreducible factors of $f$.
This is false. For instance, if $q=2$ and $f(x)=x(x^2+x+1)(x^3+x+1)$ then $f$ is not irreducible but the smallest $d>0$ such that $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ is $6$, the degree of $f$. Indeed, the irreducible factors of $f$ have degree $1,2,$ and $3$, and so $f$ divides $x^{2^d}-x$ iff $d$ is divisible by $1,2,$ and $3$. The least such $d$ is $6$.
In general, by the same reasoning, if $f$ is squarefree then the least such $d$ will be the least common multiple of the degrees of the irreducible factors of $f$.
answered Nov 20 at 23:46
Eric Wofsey
176k12202327
176k12202327
Thank you. This now led me to another question, maybe you're interested...
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 14:48
add a comment |
Thank you. This now led me to another question, maybe you're interested...
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 14:48
Thank you. This now led me to another question, maybe you're interested...
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 14:48
Thank you. This now led me to another question, maybe you're interested...
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 14:48
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006621%2fif-deg-leftf-right-min-left-left-d-in-mathbbn-times-f-vert-xq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The other question you linked to is different from yours because it has the extra assumption that $d$ is prime.
– Eric Wofsey
Nov 20 at 23:48
Oh, good point. Only quickly scanned the answer and thought this was something to be concluded.
– polynomial_donut
Nov 21 at 15:02