Inverse Laplace transform of Gamma with branch cut












0














In solving a particular physical problem I have had to perform inverse Laplace transforms of sum and products of Gamma functions. Since my actual problem is complicated, I will state a simple example. Suppose:
$$F(s)=Gamma(s+a)-Gamma(s,b)\
Gamma(z)equivint_0^infty dt~ t^{z-1}e^{-t}\
Gamma(z,b)equivint_b^infty dt~ t^{z-1}e^{-t}$$

where $a,b>0$ are real.



The inverse Laplace transform is then:
$$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_Cds~e^{st}F(s)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_Cds~e^{st}(Gamma(s+a)-Gamma(s,b))$$
where $C$ is a vertical line in the complex $s$-plane such that all the singularities of $F(s)$ lie on the left of it.



enter image description here



$Gamma(s+a)$ has simple poles at $-(a+n),~nin{0,1,2,ldots}$ but no branch points. $Gamma(s,b)$ has a branch point at $0$ but has no poles. So I take my branch cut to be the positive real axis including origin. The rationale for this choice of the branch cut is that I want to evaluate the integral by summing the residues inside the closed contour shown in the figure above in the limit $Rtoinfty$. Following the logic in this post sum of residues of the integrand is simply: $sum_{n=0}^infty e^{-(a+n)t}(-1)^n/n!$. Therefore:



$$int_C ds~e^{st}F(s)+lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{tilde{C}}ds~e^{st}F(s)=sum_{n=0}^infty e^{-(a+n)t}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}$$



Assuming that everything I have done so far is correct then: How do I evaluate the second term on the LHS? Is it simply zero (how do I justify that)? Does the conclusion change if $F(s)=Gamma(s+a)Gamma(s,b)$?



P.S. I have read post1, post2, post3, but I still can't figure the answer to my question.










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    In solving a particular physical problem I have had to perform inverse Laplace transforms of sum and products of Gamma functions. Since my actual problem is complicated, I will state a simple example. Suppose:
    $$F(s)=Gamma(s+a)-Gamma(s,b)\
    Gamma(z)equivint_0^infty dt~ t^{z-1}e^{-t}\
    Gamma(z,b)equivint_b^infty dt~ t^{z-1}e^{-t}$$

    where $a,b>0$ are real.



    The inverse Laplace transform is then:
    $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_Cds~e^{st}F(s)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_Cds~e^{st}(Gamma(s+a)-Gamma(s,b))$$
    where $C$ is a vertical line in the complex $s$-plane such that all the singularities of $F(s)$ lie on the left of it.



    enter image description here



    $Gamma(s+a)$ has simple poles at $-(a+n),~nin{0,1,2,ldots}$ but no branch points. $Gamma(s,b)$ has a branch point at $0$ but has no poles. So I take my branch cut to be the positive real axis including origin. The rationale for this choice of the branch cut is that I want to evaluate the integral by summing the residues inside the closed contour shown in the figure above in the limit $Rtoinfty$. Following the logic in this post sum of residues of the integrand is simply: $sum_{n=0}^infty e^{-(a+n)t}(-1)^n/n!$. Therefore:



    $$int_C ds~e^{st}F(s)+lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{tilde{C}}ds~e^{st}F(s)=sum_{n=0}^infty e^{-(a+n)t}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}$$



    Assuming that everything I have done so far is correct then: How do I evaluate the second term on the LHS? Is it simply zero (how do I justify that)? Does the conclusion change if $F(s)=Gamma(s+a)Gamma(s,b)$?



    P.S. I have read post1, post2, post3, but I still can't figure the answer to my question.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      In solving a particular physical problem I have had to perform inverse Laplace transforms of sum and products of Gamma functions. Since my actual problem is complicated, I will state a simple example. Suppose:
      $$F(s)=Gamma(s+a)-Gamma(s,b)\
      Gamma(z)equivint_0^infty dt~ t^{z-1}e^{-t}\
      Gamma(z,b)equivint_b^infty dt~ t^{z-1}e^{-t}$$

      where $a,b>0$ are real.



      The inverse Laplace transform is then:
      $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_Cds~e^{st}F(s)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_Cds~e^{st}(Gamma(s+a)-Gamma(s,b))$$
      where $C$ is a vertical line in the complex $s$-plane such that all the singularities of $F(s)$ lie on the left of it.



      enter image description here



      $Gamma(s+a)$ has simple poles at $-(a+n),~nin{0,1,2,ldots}$ but no branch points. $Gamma(s,b)$ has a branch point at $0$ but has no poles. So I take my branch cut to be the positive real axis including origin. The rationale for this choice of the branch cut is that I want to evaluate the integral by summing the residues inside the closed contour shown in the figure above in the limit $Rtoinfty$. Following the logic in this post sum of residues of the integrand is simply: $sum_{n=0}^infty e^{-(a+n)t}(-1)^n/n!$. Therefore:



      $$int_C ds~e^{st}F(s)+lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{tilde{C}}ds~e^{st}F(s)=sum_{n=0}^infty e^{-(a+n)t}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}$$



      Assuming that everything I have done so far is correct then: How do I evaluate the second term on the LHS? Is it simply zero (how do I justify that)? Does the conclusion change if $F(s)=Gamma(s+a)Gamma(s,b)$?



      P.S. I have read post1, post2, post3, but I still can't figure the answer to my question.










      share|cite|improve this question















      In solving a particular physical problem I have had to perform inverse Laplace transforms of sum and products of Gamma functions. Since my actual problem is complicated, I will state a simple example. Suppose:
      $$F(s)=Gamma(s+a)-Gamma(s,b)\
      Gamma(z)equivint_0^infty dt~ t^{z-1}e^{-t}\
      Gamma(z,b)equivint_b^infty dt~ t^{z-1}e^{-t}$$

      where $a,b>0$ are real.



      The inverse Laplace transform is then:
      $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_Cds~e^{st}F(s)=frac{1}{2pi i}int_Cds~e^{st}(Gamma(s+a)-Gamma(s,b))$$
      where $C$ is a vertical line in the complex $s$-plane such that all the singularities of $F(s)$ lie on the left of it.



      enter image description here



      $Gamma(s+a)$ has simple poles at $-(a+n),~nin{0,1,2,ldots}$ but no branch points. $Gamma(s,b)$ has a branch point at $0$ but has no poles. So I take my branch cut to be the positive real axis including origin. The rationale for this choice of the branch cut is that I want to evaluate the integral by summing the residues inside the closed contour shown in the figure above in the limit $Rtoinfty$. Following the logic in this post sum of residues of the integrand is simply: $sum_{n=0}^infty e^{-(a+n)t}(-1)^n/n!$. Therefore:



      $$int_C ds~e^{st}F(s)+lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{tilde{C}}ds~e^{st}F(s)=sum_{n=0}^infty e^{-(a+n)t}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}$$



      Assuming that everything I have done so far is correct then: How do I evaluate the second term on the LHS? Is it simply zero (how do I justify that)? Does the conclusion change if $F(s)=Gamma(s+a)Gamma(s,b)$?



      P.S. I have read post1, post2, post3, but I still can't figure the answer to my question.







      complex-integration branch-cuts inverselaplace






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 27 '18 at 18:08

























      asked Nov 27 '18 at 16:58









      Deep

      371211




      371211



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016012%2finverse-laplace-transform-of-gamma-with-branch-cut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016012%2finverse-laplace-transform-of-gamma-with-branch-cut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Le Mesnil-Réaume

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten