Derivative of integral, which way?












1












$begingroup$


I know ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$



can be written as $sqrt{x} - x$



but what is the derivative of ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$?



is it 1 or derivative of $sqrt{x} - x$?






calculus integration







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user10998700 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I know ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$



    can be written as $sqrt{x} - x$



    but what is the derivative of ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$?



    is it 1 or derivative of $sqrt{x} - x$?






    calculus integration







    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    user10998700 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      I know ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$



      can be written as $sqrt{x} - x$



      but what is the derivative of ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$?



      is it 1 or derivative of $sqrt{x} - x$?






      calculus integration







      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      user10998700 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I know ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$



      can be written as $sqrt{x} - x$



      but what is the derivative of ${Largeint} _{x}^{sqrt x} dt$?



      is it 1 or derivative of $sqrt{x} - x$?






      calculus integration




      calculus integration






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      user10998700 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      user10998700 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      user10998700 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      user10998700user10998700

      284




      284




      New contributor




      user10998700 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user10998700 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user10998700 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:



            $$
            frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
            frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
            frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
            $$



            If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:



            $$
            frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
            frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
            0.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 2




              $begingroup$
              What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
              $endgroup$
              – John Omielan
              2 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
              $endgroup$
              – Mike R.
              1 hour ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
              $endgroup$
              – John Omielan
              1 hour ago












            • $begingroup$
              Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
              $endgroup$
              – Mike R.
              1 hour ago








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
              $endgroup$
              – John Omielan
              1 hour ago





















            2












            $begingroup$

            The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:



            ($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$



            (This is because of the derivative chain rule).
            It's pretty easy to go on from here.
            Good luck.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Jonathan Perales is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
              $endgroup$
              – John Omielan
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Perales
              1 hour ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3105789%2fderivative-of-integral-which-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Second answer: derivative of $sqrt{x}-x$ which is $-1+frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                HAMIDINE SOUMAREHAMIDINE SOUMARE

                35618




                35618























                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:



                    $$
                    frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
                    frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
                    frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
                    $$



                    If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:



                    $$
                    frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
                    frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
                    0.
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$









                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      2 hours ago








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mike R.
                      1 hour ago








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mike R.
                      1 hour ago








                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago


















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:



                    $$
                    frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
                    frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
                    frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
                    $$



                    If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:



                    $$
                    frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
                    frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
                    0.
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$









                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      2 hours ago








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mike R.
                      1 hour ago








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mike R.
                      1 hour ago








                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:



                    $$
                    frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
                    frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
                    frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
                    $$



                    If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:



                    $$
                    frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
                    frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
                    0.
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    It depends on with respect to which variable you're differentiating. If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $x$, then the answer is going to be $frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1$:



                    $$
                    frac{d}{dx}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
                    frac{d}{dx}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
                    frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}-1.
                    $$



                    If you're differentiating with respect to the variable $t$, then you would get $0$ because $sqrt{x}-x$ is a constant (it's like $sqrt{4}-4$ which is just a number) and the derivative of a constant, as you probably know, is $0$:



                    $$
                    frac{d}{dt}left(int_{x}^{sqrt x},dtright)=
                    frac{d}{dt}left(sqrt{x}-xright)=
                    0.
                    $$







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 2 hours ago

























                    answered 2 hours ago









                    Mike R.Mike R.

                    1,967314




                    1,967314








                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      2 hours ago








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mike R.
                      1 hour ago








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mike R.
                      1 hour ago








                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago
















                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      2 hours ago








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mike R.
                      1 hour ago








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago












                    • $begingroup$
                      Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mike R.
                      1 hour ago








                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago










                    2




                    2




                    $begingroup$
                    What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Omielan
                    2 hours ago






                    $begingroup$
                    What is your $t$ that you are taking a derivative of? Note the variable $t$ in the integral $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} dt$ is just a "dummy" variable as the indication of what is to be integrated, so it doesn't have any relevance outside of the integral, and with it not showing in the final result. As such, you will always get a result of $0$ for any such derivative, not just this particular example. If I'm missing something simple & obvious, I apologize and would appreciate it if you could explain. Thanks.
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Omielan
                    2 hours ago






                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Mike R.
                    1 hour ago






                    $begingroup$
                    It doesn't matter whether there is a $t$ in the expression or not. You still can differentiate with respect to anything you want. I hope I'm not doing anything wrong, am I?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Mike R.
                    1 hour ago






                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Omielan
                    1 hour ago






                    $begingroup$
                    In that case, why not also differentiate wrt $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$, ..., with all being as valid as using $t$? You are correct $t$ doesn't need to be in the expression, but the variable should have a particular meaning. In this case, as $t$ is not defined as being anything specific, then you need to define what you mean by $t$ to make differentiating wrt to it have any meaning.
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Omielan
                    1 hour ago














                    $begingroup$
                    Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Mike R.
                    1 hour ago






                    $begingroup$
                    Well, in the OP's example there are two variables $x$ and $t$. In my answer, I show that you get different answers depending on with respect to which of the two variables you're differentiating. That's really all there is to it. I don't know why it rubs you the wrong way.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Mike R.
                    1 hour ago






                    2




                    2




                    $begingroup$
                    This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Omielan
                    1 hour ago






                    $begingroup$
                    This will be my final comment, so anything we still don't agree on we'll just have to agree to disagree. Your last sentence says "If the expression under the integral sign had a $t$ in it, then there would probably be a $t$ in the answer". This is not correct. A simple example is that $int_{x}^{sqrt{x}} tdt = frac{x - x^2}{2}$. My point is that anything with $t$ would be integrated, so there will never be any $t$ in the final answer. Also, I will repeat again, what is $t$ supposed to be outside of the integral, as you can't reasonably differentiate wrt a variable if it has no meaning!
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Omielan
                    1 hour ago













                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:



                    ($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$



                    (This is because of the derivative chain rule).
                    It's pretty easy to go on from here.
                    Good luck.






                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Jonathan Perales is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jonathan Perales
                      1 hour ago
















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:



                    ($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$



                    (This is because of the derivative chain rule).
                    It's pretty easy to go on from here.
                    Good luck.






                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Jonathan Perales is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jonathan Perales
                      1 hour ago














                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:



                    ($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$



                    (This is because of the derivative chain rule).
                    It's pretty easy to go on from here.
                    Good luck.






                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Jonathan Perales is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$



                    The generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus says that:



                    ($int_{g(x)}^{h(x)} f(t) dt))'= f(h(x))*h'(x)-f(g(x))*g'(x)$



                    (This is because of the derivative chain rule).
                    It's pretty easy to go on from here.
                    Good luck.







                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Jonathan Perales is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago





















                    New contributor




                    Jonathan Perales is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered 1 hour ago









                    Jonathan PeralesJonathan Perales

                    385




                    385




                    New contributor




                    Jonathan Perales is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Jonathan Perales is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Jonathan Perales is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.












                    • $begingroup$
                      I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jonathan Perales
                      1 hour ago


















                    • $begingroup$
                      I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
                      $endgroup$
                      – John Omielan
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jonathan Perales
                      1 hour ago
















                    $begingroup$
                    I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Omielan
                    1 hour ago




                    $begingroup$
                    I believe you forgot to add an indication you are taking the derivative of the integral, not just evaluating the integral.
                    $endgroup$
                    – John Omielan
                    1 hour ago












                    $begingroup$
                    Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jonathan Perales
                    1 hour ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Thanks. You are right. Latex is a new thing to me, writing the integral itself was a tough job!
                    $endgroup$
                    – Jonathan Perales
                    1 hour ago










                    user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    user10998700 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3105789%2fderivative-of-integral-which-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Image
                    Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
                    Read more

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Image
                    Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
                    Read more

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                    Image
                    Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
                    Read more