Why do I get unnecessary column space when using `multicolumn` in type `X` columns?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked 2 days ago
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,390211
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked 2 days ago
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,390211
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basicccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}
– Mico
2 days ago
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, usemathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked 2 days ago
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,390211
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked 2 days ago
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,390211
asked 2 days ago
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,390211
asked 2 days ago
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,390211
asked 2 days ago
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,390211
asked 2 days ago
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,390211
1,390211
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basicccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}
– Mico
2 days ago
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, usemathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
add a comment |
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basicccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}
– Mico
2 days ago
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, usemathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basic
c column type: multicolumn{2}{c}{...}– Mico
2 days ago
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basic
c column type: multicolumn{2}{c}{...}– Mico
2 days ago
1
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, use
mathrm{eq} and mathrm{SDSCR}– David Carlisle
2 days ago
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, use
mathrm{eq} and mathrm{SDSCR}– David Carlisle
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered 2 days ago
Mico
269k30364749
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered 2 days ago
Mico
269k30364749
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered 2 days ago
Mico
269k30364749
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered 2 days ago
Mico
269k30364749
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered 2 days ago
Mico
269k30364749
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Mico
269k30364749
answered 2 days ago
Mico
269k30364749
answered 2 days ago
Mico
269k30364749
269k30364749
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
1
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460504%2fwhy-do-i-get-unnecessary-column-space-when-using-multicolumn-in-type-x-colu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basic
ccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}– Mico
2 days ago
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
2 days ago
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, use
mathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}– David Carlisle
2 days ago