What would make radio transmission unfeasible on a planet?











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I am looking for a good reason to make radio communications on a planetary scale unfeasible or impossible. Short-range use is acceptable, but no transmissions should make it to orbit or over the horizon line. Hints on specific type and features of an atmospheres are welcome, as well as scenarios that involve no atmosphere.










share|improve this question







New contributor




flexneck is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Hi, flexneck, welcome to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange! Nice question. What technology level would your civilization have? Do they have the tech levels of today, say, or of 1900?
    – HDE 226868
    2 hours ago










  • good point - i am wondering about conditions that would make radio transmissions unfeasible or impossible for any civilization level, ie what would the planetary and possibly local star system conditions have to be like for this to occur (extreme solar radiation comes to mind, but how would that actually look like...)
    – flexneck
    1 hour ago










  • Hi, @flexneck. Per your previous comment to HDE, I've edited my answer to try to be as broad as possible. Can you provide any additional details on the technology being used?
    – Dan
    1 hour ago










  • Possible duplicate of Can any astronomical phenomenon block/scramble all radio signals from a planet, without making it completely uninhabitable?
    – Renan
    1 hour ago










  • The question posed as a duplicate is specific to human-inhabited planets. This question asks for something broader (different atmospheres or none at all, implying that it could be an alien planet or one with domes/research/mining/etc). So the other answers may not be sufficient to answer this question.
    – Cyn
    31 mins ago















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I am looking for a good reason to make radio communications on a planetary scale unfeasible or impossible. Short-range use is acceptable, but no transmissions should make it to orbit or over the horizon line. Hints on specific type and features of an atmospheres are welcome, as well as scenarios that involve no atmosphere.










share|improve this question







New contributor




flexneck is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Hi, flexneck, welcome to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange! Nice question. What technology level would your civilization have? Do they have the tech levels of today, say, or of 1900?
    – HDE 226868
    2 hours ago










  • good point - i am wondering about conditions that would make radio transmissions unfeasible or impossible for any civilization level, ie what would the planetary and possibly local star system conditions have to be like for this to occur (extreme solar radiation comes to mind, but how would that actually look like...)
    – flexneck
    1 hour ago










  • Hi, @flexneck. Per your previous comment to HDE, I've edited my answer to try to be as broad as possible. Can you provide any additional details on the technology being used?
    – Dan
    1 hour ago










  • Possible duplicate of Can any astronomical phenomenon block/scramble all radio signals from a planet, without making it completely uninhabitable?
    – Renan
    1 hour ago










  • The question posed as a duplicate is specific to human-inhabited planets. This question asks for something broader (different atmospheres or none at all, implying that it could be an alien planet or one with domes/research/mining/etc). So the other answers may not be sufficient to answer this question.
    – Cyn
    31 mins ago













up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











I am looking for a good reason to make radio communications on a planetary scale unfeasible or impossible. Short-range use is acceptable, but no transmissions should make it to orbit or over the horizon line. Hints on specific type and features of an atmospheres are welcome, as well as scenarios that involve no atmosphere.










share|improve this question







New contributor




flexneck is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am looking for a good reason to make radio communications on a planetary scale unfeasible or impossible. Short-range use is acceptable, but no transmissions should make it to orbit or over the horizon line. Hints on specific type and features of an atmospheres are welcome, as well as scenarios that involve no atmosphere.







atmosphere communication radio






share|improve this question







New contributor




flexneck is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




flexneck is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




flexneck is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









flexneck

214




214




New contributor




flexneck is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





flexneck is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






flexneck is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Hi, flexneck, welcome to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange! Nice question. What technology level would your civilization have? Do they have the tech levels of today, say, or of 1900?
    – HDE 226868
    2 hours ago










  • good point - i am wondering about conditions that would make radio transmissions unfeasible or impossible for any civilization level, ie what would the planetary and possibly local star system conditions have to be like for this to occur (extreme solar radiation comes to mind, but how would that actually look like...)
    – flexneck
    1 hour ago










  • Hi, @flexneck. Per your previous comment to HDE, I've edited my answer to try to be as broad as possible. Can you provide any additional details on the technology being used?
    – Dan
    1 hour ago










  • Possible duplicate of Can any astronomical phenomenon block/scramble all radio signals from a planet, without making it completely uninhabitable?
    – Renan
    1 hour ago










  • The question posed as a duplicate is specific to human-inhabited planets. This question asks for something broader (different atmospheres or none at all, implying that it could be an alien planet or one with domes/research/mining/etc). So the other answers may not be sufficient to answer this question.
    – Cyn
    31 mins ago


















  • Hi, flexneck, welcome to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange! Nice question. What technology level would your civilization have? Do they have the tech levels of today, say, or of 1900?
    – HDE 226868
    2 hours ago










  • good point - i am wondering about conditions that would make radio transmissions unfeasible or impossible for any civilization level, ie what would the planetary and possibly local star system conditions have to be like for this to occur (extreme solar radiation comes to mind, but how would that actually look like...)
    – flexneck
    1 hour ago










  • Hi, @flexneck. Per your previous comment to HDE, I've edited my answer to try to be as broad as possible. Can you provide any additional details on the technology being used?
    – Dan
    1 hour ago










  • Possible duplicate of Can any astronomical phenomenon block/scramble all radio signals from a planet, without making it completely uninhabitable?
    – Renan
    1 hour ago










  • The question posed as a duplicate is specific to human-inhabited planets. This question asks for something broader (different atmospheres or none at all, implying that it could be an alien planet or one with domes/research/mining/etc). So the other answers may not be sufficient to answer this question.
    – Cyn
    31 mins ago
















Hi, flexneck, welcome to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange! Nice question. What technology level would your civilization have? Do they have the tech levels of today, say, or of 1900?
– HDE 226868
2 hours ago




Hi, flexneck, welcome to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange! Nice question. What technology level would your civilization have? Do they have the tech levels of today, say, or of 1900?
– HDE 226868
2 hours ago












good point - i am wondering about conditions that would make radio transmissions unfeasible or impossible for any civilization level, ie what would the planetary and possibly local star system conditions have to be like for this to occur (extreme solar radiation comes to mind, but how would that actually look like...)
– flexneck
1 hour ago




good point - i am wondering about conditions that would make radio transmissions unfeasible or impossible for any civilization level, ie what would the planetary and possibly local star system conditions have to be like for this to occur (extreme solar radiation comes to mind, but how would that actually look like...)
– flexneck
1 hour ago












Hi, @flexneck. Per your previous comment to HDE, I've edited my answer to try to be as broad as possible. Can you provide any additional details on the technology being used?
– Dan
1 hour ago




Hi, @flexneck. Per your previous comment to HDE, I've edited my answer to try to be as broad as possible. Can you provide any additional details on the technology being used?
– Dan
1 hour ago












Possible duplicate of Can any astronomical phenomenon block/scramble all radio signals from a planet, without making it completely uninhabitable?
– Renan
1 hour ago




Possible duplicate of Can any astronomical phenomenon block/scramble all radio signals from a planet, without making it completely uninhabitable?
– Renan
1 hour ago












The question posed as a duplicate is specific to human-inhabited planets. This question asks for something broader (different atmospheres or none at all, implying that it could be an alien planet or one with domes/research/mining/etc). So the other answers may not be sufficient to answer this question.
– Cyn
31 mins ago




The question posed as a duplicate is specific to human-inhabited planets. This question asks for something broader (different atmospheres or none at all, implying that it could be an alien planet or one with domes/research/mining/etc). So the other answers may not be sufficient to answer this question.
– Cyn
31 mins ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













First, before people start yelling "solar storms!" just bear in mind that even the craziest geomagnetic phenomena might not be effective against lower frequencies traveling long distances.



How this question is best answered depends on the forms of communication we're talking about. If you limit your technology to specific forms of communication (i.e., what frequencies we're dealing with), the constraints are easier to define, and it's easier to give you more specifics. (Microwave frequencies behave differently than FM, etc.)




No transmissions should make it to orbit or over the horizon line.




As your question implies, you are already aware that some forms of radio waves will reach distances beyond the line-of-sight of the transmitter because of how they "bounce" off the ionosphere. But they can also travel long distances as ground waves. This Wikipedia article has some good info.



Generally speaking, in theory, I suppose if you had a ridiculously ionized layer of atmosphere, it could conceivably block most if not all signals from reaching orbit, so that solves half of your problem. (The science is a bit less simple than I'm making it sound, but that's the basic idea.)



As for the other half of your problem, I would consider using terrain as a way to limit your range. Bodies of water and rugged, mountainous landscapes absorb a lot of EM radiation.



Note also that some weather can actually work against you and improve the signal range.






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    A mars sized planet would be more difficult for radio because of the enhanced curvature of the surface. A planet with an atmosphere thick with metallic dust also bad.. especially if that meant frequent electrical storms. A planet with a weak magnetic field.. allowing solar particles to penetrate the atmosphere.. basically mars.. with a slightly thicker atmosphere.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Mars' features have certainly crossed my mind, and you make excellent points - but none of this makes the use of radio impossible, just less convenient. otherwise we wouldn't be looking at pics from the various rovers..-)
      – flexneck
      1 hour ago










    • @flexneck true.. I missed your point about signals leaving the planet. What about orbiting dust? A large planet with a thick dusty atmosphere surrounded by a thick cloud of orbiting dust.. so.. a newly formed planet say.
      – Richard
      1 hour ago










    • again, that would just mean tuning for ideal or even just minimal passage, and you could communicate with a satellite in a higher orbit than the dust
      – flexneck
      1 hour ago


















    up vote
    1
    down vote














    What would make radio transmission unfeasible on a planet?




    Fierce Geomagnetic Storms.



    A non lower-atmospheric solution is a very active sun that releases more or less continuous flares which beat on the upper atmosphere - as they do on Earth in an eleven year cycle - but if the ones squirting out from your star are more or less continuous, then they'd fit the bill.




    • There's the storm of March 9, 1989 which disrupted radio stations - some believed it had been done by the Russians and was the start of something more sinister (it was during the cold war).


    enter image description here



    Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License: Wikipedia 2018.




    • There's a nice chart on Wikipedia about their classifications and how big they get on Earth (a bit like earthquake classifications).


    • There's a brief bit about potential effects on animals when it gets realy bad which may be worth noting.







    share|improve this answer























    • this is a good start for hypothetical continueous solar flares, a valid solution - now, how to explain such a phenomenon?
      – flexneck
      20 mins ago




















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    To keep the signals from reaching space you would need a charged upper atmosphere that is strong enough to block most signals. This may result in some aurora borealis if my understanding is correct, but it's pretty set dressing at least.



    The problem is that radio waves can travel through the ground too, so if you want to limit your communications range you need to alter the planets surface composition. Ever hear of Aokigahara? It's the place where Logan Paul screwed over his whole career. Well that place blocks cell signals because of the hill's rich iron composition. Make your planet rich in iron and that will fix most of your problems.



    However, the signal might still bounce between the ground and atmosphere and the high charge might cause nothing but radio static everywhere, so some hand waving or contrivium may be in order.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Snydwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      flexneck is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134358%2fwhat-would-make-radio-transmission-unfeasible-on-a-planet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote













      First, before people start yelling "solar storms!" just bear in mind that even the craziest geomagnetic phenomena might not be effective against lower frequencies traveling long distances.



      How this question is best answered depends on the forms of communication we're talking about. If you limit your technology to specific forms of communication (i.e., what frequencies we're dealing with), the constraints are easier to define, and it's easier to give you more specifics. (Microwave frequencies behave differently than FM, etc.)




      No transmissions should make it to orbit or over the horizon line.




      As your question implies, you are already aware that some forms of radio waves will reach distances beyond the line-of-sight of the transmitter because of how they "bounce" off the ionosphere. But they can also travel long distances as ground waves. This Wikipedia article has some good info.



      Generally speaking, in theory, I suppose if you had a ridiculously ionized layer of atmosphere, it could conceivably block most if not all signals from reaching orbit, so that solves half of your problem. (The science is a bit less simple than I'm making it sound, but that's the basic idea.)



      As for the other half of your problem, I would consider using terrain as a way to limit your range. Bodies of water and rugged, mountainous landscapes absorb a lot of EM radiation.



      Note also that some weather can actually work against you and improve the signal range.






      share|improve this answer



























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        First, before people start yelling "solar storms!" just bear in mind that even the craziest geomagnetic phenomena might not be effective against lower frequencies traveling long distances.



        How this question is best answered depends on the forms of communication we're talking about. If you limit your technology to specific forms of communication (i.e., what frequencies we're dealing with), the constraints are easier to define, and it's easier to give you more specifics. (Microwave frequencies behave differently than FM, etc.)




        No transmissions should make it to orbit or over the horizon line.




        As your question implies, you are already aware that some forms of radio waves will reach distances beyond the line-of-sight of the transmitter because of how they "bounce" off the ionosphere. But they can also travel long distances as ground waves. This Wikipedia article has some good info.



        Generally speaking, in theory, I suppose if you had a ridiculously ionized layer of atmosphere, it could conceivably block most if not all signals from reaching orbit, so that solves half of your problem. (The science is a bit less simple than I'm making it sound, but that's the basic idea.)



        As for the other half of your problem, I would consider using terrain as a way to limit your range. Bodies of water and rugged, mountainous landscapes absorb a lot of EM radiation.



        Note also that some weather can actually work against you and improve the signal range.






        share|improve this answer

























          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          First, before people start yelling "solar storms!" just bear in mind that even the craziest geomagnetic phenomena might not be effective against lower frequencies traveling long distances.



          How this question is best answered depends on the forms of communication we're talking about. If you limit your technology to specific forms of communication (i.e., what frequencies we're dealing with), the constraints are easier to define, and it's easier to give you more specifics. (Microwave frequencies behave differently than FM, etc.)




          No transmissions should make it to orbit or over the horizon line.




          As your question implies, you are already aware that some forms of radio waves will reach distances beyond the line-of-sight of the transmitter because of how they "bounce" off the ionosphere. But they can also travel long distances as ground waves. This Wikipedia article has some good info.



          Generally speaking, in theory, I suppose if you had a ridiculously ionized layer of atmosphere, it could conceivably block most if not all signals from reaching orbit, so that solves half of your problem. (The science is a bit less simple than I'm making it sound, but that's the basic idea.)



          As for the other half of your problem, I would consider using terrain as a way to limit your range. Bodies of water and rugged, mountainous landscapes absorb a lot of EM radiation.



          Note also that some weather can actually work against you and improve the signal range.






          share|improve this answer














          First, before people start yelling "solar storms!" just bear in mind that even the craziest geomagnetic phenomena might not be effective against lower frequencies traveling long distances.



          How this question is best answered depends on the forms of communication we're talking about. If you limit your technology to specific forms of communication (i.e., what frequencies we're dealing with), the constraints are easier to define, and it's easier to give you more specifics. (Microwave frequencies behave differently than FM, etc.)




          No transmissions should make it to orbit or over the horizon line.




          As your question implies, you are already aware that some forms of radio waves will reach distances beyond the line-of-sight of the transmitter because of how they "bounce" off the ionosphere. But they can also travel long distances as ground waves. This Wikipedia article has some good info.



          Generally speaking, in theory, I suppose if you had a ridiculously ionized layer of atmosphere, it could conceivably block most if not all signals from reaching orbit, so that solves half of your problem. (The science is a bit less simple than I'm making it sound, but that's the basic idea.)



          As for the other half of your problem, I would consider using terrain as a way to limit your range. Bodies of water and rugged, mountainous landscapes absorb a lot of EM radiation.



          Note also that some weather can actually work against you and improve the signal range.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          Dan

          1,289512




          1,289512






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              A mars sized planet would be more difficult for radio because of the enhanced curvature of the surface. A planet with an atmosphere thick with metallic dust also bad.. especially if that meant frequent electrical storms. A planet with a weak magnetic field.. allowing solar particles to penetrate the atmosphere.. basically mars.. with a slightly thicker atmosphere.






              share|improve this answer





















              • Mars' features have certainly crossed my mind, and you make excellent points - but none of this makes the use of radio impossible, just less convenient. otherwise we wouldn't be looking at pics from the various rovers..-)
                – flexneck
                1 hour ago










              • @flexneck true.. I missed your point about signals leaving the planet. What about orbiting dust? A large planet with a thick dusty atmosphere surrounded by a thick cloud of orbiting dust.. so.. a newly formed planet say.
                – Richard
                1 hour ago










              • again, that would just mean tuning for ideal or even just minimal passage, and you could communicate with a satellite in a higher orbit than the dust
                – flexneck
                1 hour ago















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              A mars sized planet would be more difficult for radio because of the enhanced curvature of the surface. A planet with an atmosphere thick with metallic dust also bad.. especially if that meant frequent electrical storms. A planet with a weak magnetic field.. allowing solar particles to penetrate the atmosphere.. basically mars.. with a slightly thicker atmosphere.






              share|improve this answer





















              • Mars' features have certainly crossed my mind, and you make excellent points - but none of this makes the use of radio impossible, just less convenient. otherwise we wouldn't be looking at pics from the various rovers..-)
                – flexneck
                1 hour ago










              • @flexneck true.. I missed your point about signals leaving the planet. What about orbiting dust? A large planet with a thick dusty atmosphere surrounded by a thick cloud of orbiting dust.. so.. a newly formed planet say.
                – Richard
                1 hour ago










              • again, that would just mean tuning for ideal or even just minimal passage, and you could communicate with a satellite in a higher orbit than the dust
                – flexneck
                1 hour ago













              up vote
              1
              down vote










              up vote
              1
              down vote









              A mars sized planet would be more difficult for radio because of the enhanced curvature of the surface. A planet with an atmosphere thick with metallic dust also bad.. especially if that meant frequent electrical storms. A planet with a weak magnetic field.. allowing solar particles to penetrate the atmosphere.. basically mars.. with a slightly thicker atmosphere.






              share|improve this answer












              A mars sized planet would be more difficult for radio because of the enhanced curvature of the surface. A planet with an atmosphere thick with metallic dust also bad.. especially if that meant frequent electrical storms. A planet with a weak magnetic field.. allowing solar particles to penetrate the atmosphere.. basically mars.. with a slightly thicker atmosphere.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 1 hour ago









              Richard

              3266




              3266












              • Mars' features have certainly crossed my mind, and you make excellent points - but none of this makes the use of radio impossible, just less convenient. otherwise we wouldn't be looking at pics from the various rovers..-)
                – flexneck
                1 hour ago










              • @flexneck true.. I missed your point about signals leaving the planet. What about orbiting dust? A large planet with a thick dusty atmosphere surrounded by a thick cloud of orbiting dust.. so.. a newly formed planet say.
                – Richard
                1 hour ago










              • again, that would just mean tuning for ideal or even just minimal passage, and you could communicate with a satellite in a higher orbit than the dust
                – flexneck
                1 hour ago


















              • Mars' features have certainly crossed my mind, and you make excellent points - but none of this makes the use of radio impossible, just less convenient. otherwise we wouldn't be looking at pics from the various rovers..-)
                – flexneck
                1 hour ago










              • @flexneck true.. I missed your point about signals leaving the planet. What about orbiting dust? A large planet with a thick dusty atmosphere surrounded by a thick cloud of orbiting dust.. so.. a newly formed planet say.
                – Richard
                1 hour ago










              • again, that would just mean tuning for ideal or even just minimal passage, and you could communicate with a satellite in a higher orbit than the dust
                – flexneck
                1 hour ago
















              Mars' features have certainly crossed my mind, and you make excellent points - but none of this makes the use of radio impossible, just less convenient. otherwise we wouldn't be looking at pics from the various rovers..-)
              – flexneck
              1 hour ago




              Mars' features have certainly crossed my mind, and you make excellent points - but none of this makes the use of radio impossible, just less convenient. otherwise we wouldn't be looking at pics from the various rovers..-)
              – flexneck
              1 hour ago












              @flexneck true.. I missed your point about signals leaving the planet. What about orbiting dust? A large planet with a thick dusty atmosphere surrounded by a thick cloud of orbiting dust.. so.. a newly formed planet say.
              – Richard
              1 hour ago




              @flexneck true.. I missed your point about signals leaving the planet. What about orbiting dust? A large planet with a thick dusty atmosphere surrounded by a thick cloud of orbiting dust.. so.. a newly formed planet say.
              – Richard
              1 hour ago












              again, that would just mean tuning for ideal or even just minimal passage, and you could communicate with a satellite in a higher orbit than the dust
              – flexneck
              1 hour ago




              again, that would just mean tuning for ideal or even just minimal passage, and you could communicate with a satellite in a higher orbit than the dust
              – flexneck
              1 hour ago










              up vote
              1
              down vote














              What would make radio transmission unfeasible on a planet?




              Fierce Geomagnetic Storms.



              A non lower-atmospheric solution is a very active sun that releases more or less continuous flares which beat on the upper atmosphere - as they do on Earth in an eleven year cycle - but if the ones squirting out from your star are more or less continuous, then they'd fit the bill.




              • There's the storm of March 9, 1989 which disrupted radio stations - some believed it had been done by the Russians and was the start of something more sinister (it was during the cold war).


              enter image description here



              Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License: Wikipedia 2018.




              • There's a nice chart on Wikipedia about their classifications and how big they get on Earth (a bit like earthquake classifications).


              • There's a brief bit about potential effects on animals when it gets realy bad which may be worth noting.







              share|improve this answer























              • this is a good start for hypothetical continueous solar flares, a valid solution - now, how to explain such a phenomenon?
                – flexneck
                20 mins ago

















              up vote
              1
              down vote














              What would make radio transmission unfeasible on a planet?




              Fierce Geomagnetic Storms.



              A non lower-atmospheric solution is a very active sun that releases more or less continuous flares which beat on the upper atmosphere - as they do on Earth in an eleven year cycle - but if the ones squirting out from your star are more or less continuous, then they'd fit the bill.




              • There's the storm of March 9, 1989 which disrupted radio stations - some believed it had been done by the Russians and was the start of something more sinister (it was during the cold war).


              enter image description here



              Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License: Wikipedia 2018.




              • There's a nice chart on Wikipedia about their classifications and how big they get on Earth (a bit like earthquake classifications).


              • There's a brief bit about potential effects on animals when it gets realy bad which may be worth noting.







              share|improve this answer























              • this is a good start for hypothetical continueous solar flares, a valid solution - now, how to explain such a phenomenon?
                – flexneck
                20 mins ago















              up vote
              1
              down vote










              up vote
              1
              down vote










              What would make radio transmission unfeasible on a planet?




              Fierce Geomagnetic Storms.



              A non lower-atmospheric solution is a very active sun that releases more or less continuous flares which beat on the upper atmosphere - as they do on Earth in an eleven year cycle - but if the ones squirting out from your star are more or less continuous, then they'd fit the bill.




              • There's the storm of March 9, 1989 which disrupted radio stations - some believed it had been done by the Russians and was the start of something more sinister (it was during the cold war).


              enter image description here



              Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License: Wikipedia 2018.




              • There's a nice chart on Wikipedia about their classifications and how big they get on Earth (a bit like earthquake classifications).


              • There's a brief bit about potential effects on animals when it gets realy bad which may be worth noting.







              share|improve this answer















              What would make radio transmission unfeasible on a planet?




              Fierce Geomagnetic Storms.



              A non lower-atmospheric solution is a very active sun that releases more or less continuous flares which beat on the upper atmosphere - as they do on Earth in an eleven year cycle - but if the ones squirting out from your star are more or less continuous, then they'd fit the bill.




              • There's the storm of March 9, 1989 which disrupted radio stations - some believed it had been done by the Russians and was the start of something more sinister (it was during the cold war).


              enter image description here



              Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License: Wikipedia 2018.




              • There's a nice chart on Wikipedia about their classifications and how big they get on Earth (a bit like earthquake classifications).


              • There's a brief bit about potential effects on animals when it gets realy bad which may be worth noting.








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 1 hour ago

























              answered 1 hour ago









              Duckisaduckisaduck

              1,192112




              1,192112












              • this is a good start for hypothetical continueous solar flares, a valid solution - now, how to explain such a phenomenon?
                – flexneck
                20 mins ago




















              • this is a good start for hypothetical continueous solar flares, a valid solution - now, how to explain such a phenomenon?
                – flexneck
                20 mins ago


















              this is a good start for hypothetical continueous solar flares, a valid solution - now, how to explain such a phenomenon?
              – flexneck
              20 mins ago






              this is a good start for hypothetical continueous solar flares, a valid solution - now, how to explain such a phenomenon?
              – flexneck
              20 mins ago












              up vote
              0
              down vote













              To keep the signals from reaching space you would need a charged upper atmosphere that is strong enough to block most signals. This may result in some aurora borealis if my understanding is correct, but it's pretty set dressing at least.



              The problem is that radio waves can travel through the ground too, so if you want to limit your communications range you need to alter the planets surface composition. Ever hear of Aokigahara? It's the place where Logan Paul screwed over his whole career. Well that place blocks cell signals because of the hill's rich iron composition. Make your planet rich in iron and that will fix most of your problems.



              However, the signal might still bounce between the ground and atmosphere and the high charge might cause nothing but radio static everywhere, so some hand waving or contrivium may be in order.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Snydwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                up vote
                0
                down vote













                To keep the signals from reaching space you would need a charged upper atmosphere that is strong enough to block most signals. This may result in some aurora borealis if my understanding is correct, but it's pretty set dressing at least.



                The problem is that radio waves can travel through the ground too, so if you want to limit your communications range you need to alter the planets surface composition. Ever hear of Aokigahara? It's the place where Logan Paul screwed over his whole career. Well that place blocks cell signals because of the hill's rich iron composition. Make your planet rich in iron and that will fix most of your problems.



                However, the signal might still bounce between the ground and atmosphere and the high charge might cause nothing but radio static everywhere, so some hand waving or contrivium may be in order.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Snydwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  To keep the signals from reaching space you would need a charged upper atmosphere that is strong enough to block most signals. This may result in some aurora borealis if my understanding is correct, but it's pretty set dressing at least.



                  The problem is that radio waves can travel through the ground too, so if you want to limit your communications range you need to alter the planets surface composition. Ever hear of Aokigahara? It's the place where Logan Paul screwed over his whole career. Well that place blocks cell signals because of the hill's rich iron composition. Make your planet rich in iron and that will fix most of your problems.



                  However, the signal might still bounce between the ground and atmosphere and the high charge might cause nothing but radio static everywhere, so some hand waving or contrivium may be in order.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Snydwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  To keep the signals from reaching space you would need a charged upper atmosphere that is strong enough to block most signals. This may result in some aurora borealis if my understanding is correct, but it's pretty set dressing at least.



                  The problem is that radio waves can travel through the ground too, so if you want to limit your communications range you need to alter the planets surface composition. Ever hear of Aokigahara? It's the place where Logan Paul screwed over his whole career. Well that place blocks cell signals because of the hill's rich iron composition. Make your planet rich in iron and that will fix most of your problems.



                  However, the signal might still bounce between the ground and atmosphere and the high charge might cause nothing but radio static everywhere, so some hand waving or contrivium may be in order.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Snydwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Snydwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 22 mins ago









                  Snydwell

                  1557




                  1557




                  New contributor




                  Snydwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Snydwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Snydwell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                      flexneck is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      flexneck is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      flexneck is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      flexneck is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134358%2fwhat-would-make-radio-transmission-unfeasible-on-a-planet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten