Trying to Prove a generalization of Raabe's test












1












$begingroup$


I'm trying to prove (or disprove) a statement by Feld:



https://math.feld.cvut.cz/mt/txte/2/txe3ea2d.htm



It's a generalization of Raabe's test and it says that for a sequence $a_n$, for all n, if $a_n>0$ and $c_n$ is absolutely convergent and



$a_{n+1}/a_n = 1-A/n+c_n$



Then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges iff $A>1$



I rewrite:



$n(1-a_{n+1}/a_n)=A-n c_n$



and take the limit on both sides as $n to infty$ and its proven by Raabe's simple test, as long as $lim_{n to infty} n c_n=0$.



But it has been shown (Series converges implies $lim{n a_n} = 0$) that $lim_{n to infty} n c_n$ is not zero unless $c_n$ is non-increasing, so I'm stuck. Did Feld forget to add that $c_n$ is non-increasing, or is he right as it stands?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm trying to prove (or disprove) a statement by Feld:



    https://math.feld.cvut.cz/mt/txte/2/txe3ea2d.htm



    It's a generalization of Raabe's test and it says that for a sequence $a_n$, for all n, if $a_n>0$ and $c_n$ is absolutely convergent and



    $a_{n+1}/a_n = 1-A/n+c_n$



    Then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges iff $A>1$



    I rewrite:



    $n(1-a_{n+1}/a_n)=A-n c_n$



    and take the limit on both sides as $n to infty$ and its proven by Raabe's simple test, as long as $lim_{n to infty} n c_n=0$.



    But it has been shown (Series converges implies $lim{n a_n} = 0$) that $lim_{n to infty} n c_n$ is not zero unless $c_n$ is non-increasing, so I'm stuck. Did Feld forget to add that $c_n$ is non-increasing, or is he right as it stands?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm trying to prove (or disprove) a statement by Feld:



      https://math.feld.cvut.cz/mt/txte/2/txe3ea2d.htm



      It's a generalization of Raabe's test and it says that for a sequence $a_n$, for all n, if $a_n>0$ and $c_n$ is absolutely convergent and



      $a_{n+1}/a_n = 1-A/n+c_n$



      Then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges iff $A>1$



      I rewrite:



      $n(1-a_{n+1}/a_n)=A-n c_n$



      and take the limit on both sides as $n to infty$ and its proven by Raabe's simple test, as long as $lim_{n to infty} n c_n=0$.



      But it has been shown (Series converges implies $lim{n a_n} = 0$) that $lim_{n to infty} n c_n$ is not zero unless $c_n$ is non-increasing, so I'm stuck. Did Feld forget to add that $c_n$ is non-increasing, or is he right as it stands?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm trying to prove (or disprove) a statement by Feld:



      https://math.feld.cvut.cz/mt/txte/2/txe3ea2d.htm



      It's a generalization of Raabe's test and it says that for a sequence $a_n$, for all n, if $a_n>0$ and $c_n$ is absolutely convergent and



      $a_{n+1}/a_n = 1-A/n+c_n$



      Then $sum_{n=1}^infty a_n$ converges iff $A>1$



      I rewrite:



      $n(1-a_{n+1}/a_n)=A-n c_n$



      and take the limit on both sides as $n to infty$ and its proven by Raabe's simple test, as long as $lim_{n to infty} n c_n=0$.



      But it has been shown (Series converges implies $lim{n a_n} = 0$) that $lim_{n to infty} n c_n$ is not zero unless $c_n$ is non-increasing, so I'm stuck. Did Feld forget to add that $c_n$ is non-increasing, or is he right as it stands?







      real-analysis convergence






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 9 '18 at 21:22







      Paul R.

















      asked Dec 9 '18 at 19:29









      Paul R.Paul R.

      213




      213






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032841%2ftrying-to-prove-a-generalization-of-raabes-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032841%2ftrying-to-prove-a-generalization-of-raabes-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten