Help to understand that $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right) dxi $ is well defined












1














Let $phi :Omega subset
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
rightarrow
%TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
%BeginExpansion
mathbb{C}
%EndExpansion
$
holomorphic function. Define $x:Omega subset
rightarrow
mathbb{C}
$
by $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right)
dxi $
.



The author states:
"It is not necessary that the domain $Omega$ is simply connected, but only that the periods (that is, that the integral along any closed curve) $phi_k$ are pure imaginary so that the functions $x_k$ are well defined."



Because for $x_k$ is well defined, just enough?
I can not understand. For me if the integral is pure imaginary, then the function $x_k$ will be identically zero.



Could someone help me to understand this better?










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    Let $phi :Omega subset
    %TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
    %BeginExpansion
    mathbb{C}
    %EndExpansion
    rightarrow
    %TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
    %BeginExpansion
    mathbb{C}
    %EndExpansion
    $
    holomorphic function. Define $x:Omega subset
    rightarrow
    mathbb{C}
    $
    by $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right)
    dxi $
    .



    The author states:
    "It is not necessary that the domain $Omega$ is simply connected, but only that the periods (that is, that the integral along any closed curve) $phi_k$ are pure imaginary so that the functions $x_k$ are well defined."



    Because for $x_k$ is well defined, just enough?
    I can not understand. For me if the integral is pure imaginary, then the function $x_k$ will be identically zero.



    Could someone help me to understand this better?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1


      1





      Let $phi :Omega subset
      %TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
      %BeginExpansion
      mathbb{C}
      %EndExpansion
      rightarrow
      %TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
      %BeginExpansion
      mathbb{C}
      %EndExpansion
      $
      holomorphic function. Define $x:Omega subset
      rightarrow
      mathbb{C}
      $
      by $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right)
      dxi $
      .



      The author states:
      "It is not necessary that the domain $Omega$ is simply connected, but only that the periods (that is, that the integral along any closed curve) $phi_k$ are pure imaginary so that the functions $x_k$ are well defined."



      Because for $x_k$ is well defined, just enough?
      I can not understand. For me if the integral is pure imaginary, then the function $x_k$ will be identically zero.



      Could someone help me to understand this better?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $phi :Omega subset
      %TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
      %BeginExpansion
      mathbb{C}
      %EndExpansion
      rightarrow
      %TCIMACRO{U{2102} }%
      %BeginExpansion
      mathbb{C}
      %EndExpansion
      $
      holomorphic function. Define $x:Omega subset
      rightarrow
      mathbb{C}
      $
      by $xleft( zright) ={Re}int_{z_{0}}^{z}phi left( xi right)
      dxi $
      .



      The author states:
      "It is not necessary that the domain $Omega$ is simply connected, but only that the periods (that is, that the integral along any closed curve) $phi_k$ are pure imaginary so that the functions $x_k$ are well defined."



      Because for $x_k$ is well defined, just enough?
      I can not understand. For me if the integral is pure imaginary, then the function $x_k$ will be identically zero.



      Could someone help me to understand this better?







      complex-analysis analysis differential-geometry riemannian-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 26 at 1:35









      Takashi

      1946




      1946






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.



          This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013687%2fhelp-to-understand-that-x-left-z-right-re-int-z-0z-phi-left-xi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.



            This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              2














              It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.



              This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                2












                2








                2






                It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.



                This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                It doesn't say that the integral from $z_0$ to $z$ is purely imaginary, but that the integral along a closed curve must be purely imaginary.



                This means that if you have two different curves that both go from $z_0$ to $z$, the difference of their integrals will equal the integral around a closed curve (namely, out from $z_0$ to $z$ along one curve and back again along the other) will be purely imaginary, and therefore the two integrals have the same real part.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 26 at 1:44









                Henning Makholm

                237k16301536




                237k16301536






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013687%2fhelp-to-understand-that-x-left-z-right-re-int-z-0z-phi-left-xi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten