Is the inverse Fourier transform of a radial function radial?












0














Let $f: Bbb{R}^d to Bbb{R}$ be a rapidly decreasing function in $Bbb{R}^d$. Concerning Fourier transforms in $Bbb{R}^d$, we define $hat{f}(xi) = int_{Bbb{R}^d} f(x) e^{-2 pi i xi cdot x}dx $, for $xi in Bbb{R}^d$. And the inverse of $g(xi)$ is $int_{Bbb{R}^d}g(xi)e^{2 pi i xi cdot x}dxi$. A function $f: Bbb{R}^d to Bbb{R}$ is said to be radial iff there is $F: Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$ such that $f(x) = F(|x|)$ for $x in Bbb{R}^d$. It is easy to prove that the transform of a radial function is radial. Does the same hold for inverse transforms?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    the inverse transform of a function $f$ is the fourier trnasform of $xmapsto f(-x)$
    – Surb
    Nov 28 '18 at 11:28










  • Yes, convert the cartesian n-dimensional Fourier Transform to n-spherical (?) coordinates and integrate over the angular variables. You will be left with a transform that is a single integral in terms of the radial variable. You can do the same for the inverse transform. For n = 1, you will get the Fourier cosine transform. For n = 2, you will get the zero order Hankel Transform. For higher n, see math.stackexchange.com/a/3007081/441161
    – Andy Walls
    Nov 28 '18 at 19:36
















0














Let $f: Bbb{R}^d to Bbb{R}$ be a rapidly decreasing function in $Bbb{R}^d$. Concerning Fourier transforms in $Bbb{R}^d$, we define $hat{f}(xi) = int_{Bbb{R}^d} f(x) e^{-2 pi i xi cdot x}dx $, for $xi in Bbb{R}^d$. And the inverse of $g(xi)$ is $int_{Bbb{R}^d}g(xi)e^{2 pi i xi cdot x}dxi$. A function $f: Bbb{R}^d to Bbb{R}$ is said to be radial iff there is $F: Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$ such that $f(x) = F(|x|)$ for $x in Bbb{R}^d$. It is easy to prove that the transform of a radial function is radial. Does the same hold for inverse transforms?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    the inverse transform of a function $f$ is the fourier trnasform of $xmapsto f(-x)$
    – Surb
    Nov 28 '18 at 11:28










  • Yes, convert the cartesian n-dimensional Fourier Transform to n-spherical (?) coordinates and integrate over the angular variables. You will be left with a transform that is a single integral in terms of the radial variable. You can do the same for the inverse transform. For n = 1, you will get the Fourier cosine transform. For n = 2, you will get the zero order Hankel Transform. For higher n, see math.stackexchange.com/a/3007081/441161
    – Andy Walls
    Nov 28 '18 at 19:36














0












0








0







Let $f: Bbb{R}^d to Bbb{R}$ be a rapidly decreasing function in $Bbb{R}^d$. Concerning Fourier transforms in $Bbb{R}^d$, we define $hat{f}(xi) = int_{Bbb{R}^d} f(x) e^{-2 pi i xi cdot x}dx $, for $xi in Bbb{R}^d$. And the inverse of $g(xi)$ is $int_{Bbb{R}^d}g(xi)e^{2 pi i xi cdot x}dxi$. A function $f: Bbb{R}^d to Bbb{R}$ is said to be radial iff there is $F: Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$ such that $f(x) = F(|x|)$ for $x in Bbb{R}^d$. It is easy to prove that the transform of a radial function is radial. Does the same hold for inverse transforms?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $f: Bbb{R}^d to Bbb{R}$ be a rapidly decreasing function in $Bbb{R}^d$. Concerning Fourier transforms in $Bbb{R}^d$, we define $hat{f}(xi) = int_{Bbb{R}^d} f(x) e^{-2 pi i xi cdot x}dx $, for $xi in Bbb{R}^d$. And the inverse of $g(xi)$ is $int_{Bbb{R}^d}g(xi)e^{2 pi i xi cdot x}dxi$. A function $f: Bbb{R}^d to Bbb{R}$ is said to be radial iff there is $F: Bbb{R} to Bbb{R}$ such that $f(x) = F(|x|)$ for $x in Bbb{R}^d$. It is easy to prove that the transform of a radial function is radial. Does the same hold for inverse transforms?







fourier-transform






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 28 '18 at 11:24









Nuntractatuses Amável

61812




61812








  • 2




    the inverse transform of a function $f$ is the fourier trnasform of $xmapsto f(-x)$
    – Surb
    Nov 28 '18 at 11:28










  • Yes, convert the cartesian n-dimensional Fourier Transform to n-spherical (?) coordinates and integrate over the angular variables. You will be left with a transform that is a single integral in terms of the radial variable. You can do the same for the inverse transform. For n = 1, you will get the Fourier cosine transform. For n = 2, you will get the zero order Hankel Transform. For higher n, see math.stackexchange.com/a/3007081/441161
    – Andy Walls
    Nov 28 '18 at 19:36














  • 2




    the inverse transform of a function $f$ is the fourier trnasform of $xmapsto f(-x)$
    – Surb
    Nov 28 '18 at 11:28










  • Yes, convert the cartesian n-dimensional Fourier Transform to n-spherical (?) coordinates and integrate over the angular variables. You will be left with a transform that is a single integral in terms of the radial variable. You can do the same for the inverse transform. For n = 1, you will get the Fourier cosine transform. For n = 2, you will get the zero order Hankel Transform. For higher n, see math.stackexchange.com/a/3007081/441161
    – Andy Walls
    Nov 28 '18 at 19:36








2




2




the inverse transform of a function $f$ is the fourier trnasform of $xmapsto f(-x)$
– Surb
Nov 28 '18 at 11:28




the inverse transform of a function $f$ is the fourier trnasform of $xmapsto f(-x)$
– Surb
Nov 28 '18 at 11:28












Yes, convert the cartesian n-dimensional Fourier Transform to n-spherical (?) coordinates and integrate over the angular variables. You will be left with a transform that is a single integral in terms of the radial variable. You can do the same for the inverse transform. For n = 1, you will get the Fourier cosine transform. For n = 2, you will get the zero order Hankel Transform. For higher n, see math.stackexchange.com/a/3007081/441161
– Andy Walls
Nov 28 '18 at 19:36




Yes, convert the cartesian n-dimensional Fourier Transform to n-spherical (?) coordinates and integrate over the angular variables. You will be left with a transform that is a single integral in terms of the radial variable. You can do the same for the inverse transform. For n = 1, you will get the Fourier cosine transform. For n = 2, you will get the zero order Hankel Transform. For higher n, see math.stackexchange.com/a/3007081/441161
– Andy Walls
Nov 28 '18 at 19:36










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017033%2fis-the-inverse-fourier-transform-of-a-radial-function-radial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017033%2fis-the-inverse-fourier-transform-of-a-radial-function-radial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten