Do linear functions, in addition to power law functions, have the property of scale invariance?
I recently came across the concept of scale invariance in the context of power laws.
According to wiki:
Given a relation $f(x)=ax^{-k}$, scaling the argument $x$ by a constant factor $c$ causes only a proportionate scaling of the function itself.
Suppose we have a simple linear equation $f(x) = 3x$
If we scale the argument, $x$, by a constant $c$, we have $f(cx)$ = $3cx$.
In this case, the value of the function is scaled by the same factor, $c$, as the argument was scaled by. Does this mean that $f(x) = 3x$ exhibits scale invariance?
Is the idea that it's more interesting that a power law is scale invariant since it is scale invariant despite it dealing with exponents that are not equal to 1?
probability statistics
add a comment |
I recently came across the concept of scale invariance in the context of power laws.
According to wiki:
Given a relation $f(x)=ax^{-k}$, scaling the argument $x$ by a constant factor $c$ causes only a proportionate scaling of the function itself.
Suppose we have a simple linear equation $f(x) = 3x$
If we scale the argument, $x$, by a constant $c$, we have $f(cx)$ = $3cx$.
In this case, the value of the function is scaled by the same factor, $c$, as the argument was scaled by. Does this mean that $f(x) = 3x$ exhibits scale invariance?
Is the idea that it's more interesting that a power law is scale invariant since it is scale invariant despite it dealing with exponents that are not equal to 1?
probability statistics
The linear case is just $k = -1$.
– angryavian
Nov 27 at 5:21
Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
– spacediver
Nov 27 at 5:29
add a comment |
I recently came across the concept of scale invariance in the context of power laws.
According to wiki:
Given a relation $f(x)=ax^{-k}$, scaling the argument $x$ by a constant factor $c$ causes only a proportionate scaling of the function itself.
Suppose we have a simple linear equation $f(x) = 3x$
If we scale the argument, $x$, by a constant $c$, we have $f(cx)$ = $3cx$.
In this case, the value of the function is scaled by the same factor, $c$, as the argument was scaled by. Does this mean that $f(x) = 3x$ exhibits scale invariance?
Is the idea that it's more interesting that a power law is scale invariant since it is scale invariant despite it dealing with exponents that are not equal to 1?
probability statistics
I recently came across the concept of scale invariance in the context of power laws.
According to wiki:
Given a relation $f(x)=ax^{-k}$, scaling the argument $x$ by a constant factor $c$ causes only a proportionate scaling of the function itself.
Suppose we have a simple linear equation $f(x) = 3x$
If we scale the argument, $x$, by a constant $c$, we have $f(cx)$ = $3cx$.
In this case, the value of the function is scaled by the same factor, $c$, as the argument was scaled by. Does this mean that $f(x) = 3x$ exhibits scale invariance?
Is the idea that it's more interesting that a power law is scale invariant since it is scale invariant despite it dealing with exponents that are not equal to 1?
probability statistics
probability statistics
asked Nov 27 at 5:17
spacediver
33
33
The linear case is just $k = -1$.
– angryavian
Nov 27 at 5:21
Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
– spacediver
Nov 27 at 5:29
add a comment |
The linear case is just $k = -1$.
– angryavian
Nov 27 at 5:21
Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
– spacediver
Nov 27 at 5:29
The linear case is just $k = -1$.
– angryavian
Nov 27 at 5:21
The linear case is just $k = -1$.
– angryavian
Nov 27 at 5:21
Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
– spacediver
Nov 27 at 5:29
Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
– spacediver
Nov 27 at 5:29
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015362%2fdo-linear-functions-in-addition-to-power-law-functions-have-the-property-of-sc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015362%2fdo-linear-functions-in-addition-to-power-law-functions-have-the-property-of-sc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The linear case is just $k = -1$.
– angryavian
Nov 27 at 5:21
Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
– spacediver
Nov 27 at 5:29