Do linear functions, in addition to power law functions, have the property of scale invariance?












0














I recently came across the concept of scale invariance in the context of power laws.



According to wiki:




Given a relation $f(x)=ax^{-k}$, scaling the argument $x$ by a constant factor $c$ causes only a proportionate scaling of the function itself.




Suppose we have a simple linear equation $f(x) = 3x$



If we scale the argument, $x$, by a constant $c$, we have $f(cx)$ = $3cx$.



In this case, the value of the function is scaled by the same factor, $c$, as the argument was scaled by. Does this mean that $f(x) = 3x$ exhibits scale invariance?



Is the idea that it's more interesting that a power law is scale invariant since it is scale invariant despite it dealing with exponents that are not equal to 1?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • The linear case is just $k = -1$.
    – angryavian
    Nov 27 at 5:21










  • Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
    – spacediver
    Nov 27 at 5:29
















0














I recently came across the concept of scale invariance in the context of power laws.



According to wiki:




Given a relation $f(x)=ax^{-k}$, scaling the argument $x$ by a constant factor $c$ causes only a proportionate scaling of the function itself.




Suppose we have a simple linear equation $f(x) = 3x$



If we scale the argument, $x$, by a constant $c$, we have $f(cx)$ = $3cx$.



In this case, the value of the function is scaled by the same factor, $c$, as the argument was scaled by. Does this mean that $f(x) = 3x$ exhibits scale invariance?



Is the idea that it's more interesting that a power law is scale invariant since it is scale invariant despite it dealing with exponents that are not equal to 1?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • The linear case is just $k = -1$.
    – angryavian
    Nov 27 at 5:21










  • Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
    – spacediver
    Nov 27 at 5:29














0












0








0







I recently came across the concept of scale invariance in the context of power laws.



According to wiki:




Given a relation $f(x)=ax^{-k}$, scaling the argument $x$ by a constant factor $c$ causes only a proportionate scaling of the function itself.




Suppose we have a simple linear equation $f(x) = 3x$



If we scale the argument, $x$, by a constant $c$, we have $f(cx)$ = $3cx$.



In this case, the value of the function is scaled by the same factor, $c$, as the argument was scaled by. Does this mean that $f(x) = 3x$ exhibits scale invariance?



Is the idea that it's more interesting that a power law is scale invariant since it is scale invariant despite it dealing with exponents that are not equal to 1?










share|cite|improve this question













I recently came across the concept of scale invariance in the context of power laws.



According to wiki:




Given a relation $f(x)=ax^{-k}$, scaling the argument $x$ by a constant factor $c$ causes only a proportionate scaling of the function itself.




Suppose we have a simple linear equation $f(x) = 3x$



If we scale the argument, $x$, by a constant $c$, we have $f(cx)$ = $3cx$.



In this case, the value of the function is scaled by the same factor, $c$, as the argument was scaled by. Does this mean that $f(x) = 3x$ exhibits scale invariance?



Is the idea that it's more interesting that a power law is scale invariant since it is scale invariant despite it dealing with exponents that are not equal to 1?







probability statistics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 27 at 5:17









spacediver

33




33












  • The linear case is just $k = -1$.
    – angryavian
    Nov 27 at 5:21










  • Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
    – spacediver
    Nov 27 at 5:29


















  • The linear case is just $k = -1$.
    – angryavian
    Nov 27 at 5:21










  • Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
    – spacediver
    Nov 27 at 5:29
















The linear case is just $k = -1$.
– angryavian
Nov 27 at 5:21




The linear case is just $k = -1$.
– angryavian
Nov 27 at 5:21












Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
– spacediver
Nov 27 at 5:29




Thanks, that's what I suspected, but wasn't sure if I was missing something. It just seems odd that a central definition of a power law is scale invariance. I suppose perhaps it's to help provide contrast to exponential functions, which don't exhibit scale invariance?
– spacediver
Nov 27 at 5:29















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015362%2fdo-linear-functions-in-addition-to-power-law-functions-have-the-property-of-sc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015362%2fdo-linear-functions-in-addition-to-power-law-functions-have-the-property-of-sc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten