Find the function equation $f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y)$











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
6












find all functions $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ and such for any $x,yinBbb R$,and such
$$f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y)$$




I have proven that $$f(f(x))=x$$




proof:Let $y=0$,we have
$$f(x+f(0))=f(x)+xf(0)$$
let $x=0,yto x$,we have
$$f(f(x)+xf(0))=x+f(0)$$
so we have
$$f(f(x+f(0))=x+f(0)$$
then $$f(f(x))=x$$



and $f(x)=x$ is one solution but I can't argue this to be the only solution.
It doesn't seem easy.Thank for you help!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Are we at least assuming continuity/differentiability?
    – MisterRiemann
    Nov 21 at 12:13










  • no,This condtion,if have I can to solve
    – function sug
    Nov 21 at 12:24










  • Specializing the equation to the case $y = x$ gives $f(hat x) = hat x$, where $hat x = x + f(x) + x f(x)$, so we can immediately conclude that $fvert_A(x) = x$ on the image of $x mapsto x + f(x) + x f(x)$.
    – Travis
    Nov 21 at 12:34










  • The problem was given at IMO 1995, see for example here artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h506p1611 but with a much stronger constraint on its domain and monotonicity. Note that in that case the nontrivial $f(x) = -frac{x}{x+1}$ is also a solution(which obviously doesn't work here because $x=-1$ is in the domain. All in all, I expect a hard solution for this problem.
    – Sorin Tirc
    Nov 21 at 12:47












  • Note that $f(f(x))=x$ means that f is an involution. Other common involutions include $f:xrightarrow-x$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{1}{x}$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{-1}{x}$ even if these don't work here. or you can try this involution
    – TheD0ubleT
    Nov 22 at 9:02

















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
6












find all functions $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ and such for any $x,yinBbb R$,and such
$$f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y)$$




I have proven that $$f(f(x))=x$$




proof:Let $y=0$,we have
$$f(x+f(0))=f(x)+xf(0)$$
let $x=0,yto x$,we have
$$f(f(x)+xf(0))=x+f(0)$$
so we have
$$f(f(x+f(0))=x+f(0)$$
then $$f(f(x))=x$$



and $f(x)=x$ is one solution but I can't argue this to be the only solution.
It doesn't seem easy.Thank for you help!










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Are we at least assuming continuity/differentiability?
    – MisterRiemann
    Nov 21 at 12:13










  • no,This condtion,if have I can to solve
    – function sug
    Nov 21 at 12:24










  • Specializing the equation to the case $y = x$ gives $f(hat x) = hat x$, where $hat x = x + f(x) + x f(x)$, so we can immediately conclude that $fvert_A(x) = x$ on the image of $x mapsto x + f(x) + x f(x)$.
    – Travis
    Nov 21 at 12:34










  • The problem was given at IMO 1995, see for example here artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h506p1611 but with a much stronger constraint on its domain and monotonicity. Note that in that case the nontrivial $f(x) = -frac{x}{x+1}$ is also a solution(which obviously doesn't work here because $x=-1$ is in the domain. All in all, I expect a hard solution for this problem.
    – Sorin Tirc
    Nov 21 at 12:47












  • Note that $f(f(x))=x$ means that f is an involution. Other common involutions include $f:xrightarrow-x$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{1}{x}$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{-1}{x}$ even if these don't work here. or you can try this involution
    – TheD0ubleT
    Nov 22 at 9:02















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
6









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
6






6





find all functions $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ and such for any $x,yinBbb R$,and such
$$f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y)$$




I have proven that $$f(f(x))=x$$




proof:Let $y=0$,we have
$$f(x+f(0))=f(x)+xf(0)$$
let $x=0,yto x$,we have
$$f(f(x)+xf(0))=x+f(0)$$
so we have
$$f(f(x+f(0))=x+f(0)$$
then $$f(f(x))=x$$



and $f(x)=x$ is one solution but I can't argue this to be the only solution.
It doesn't seem easy.Thank for you help!










share|cite|improve this question















find all functions $f:Bbb Rto Bbb R$ and such for any $x,yinBbb R$,and such
$$f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y)$$




I have proven that $$f(f(x))=x$$




proof:Let $y=0$,we have
$$f(x+f(0))=f(x)+xf(0)$$
let $x=0,yto x$,we have
$$f(f(x)+xf(0))=x+f(0)$$
so we have
$$f(f(x+f(0))=x+f(0)$$
then $$f(f(x))=x$$



and $f(x)=x$ is one solution but I can't argue this to be the only solution.
It doesn't seem easy.Thank for you help!







functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 at 17:11









Mostafa Ayaz

13.3k3836




13.3k3836










asked Nov 21 at 12:08









function sug

3051438




3051438








  • 1




    Are we at least assuming continuity/differentiability?
    – MisterRiemann
    Nov 21 at 12:13










  • no,This condtion,if have I can to solve
    – function sug
    Nov 21 at 12:24










  • Specializing the equation to the case $y = x$ gives $f(hat x) = hat x$, where $hat x = x + f(x) + x f(x)$, so we can immediately conclude that $fvert_A(x) = x$ on the image of $x mapsto x + f(x) + x f(x)$.
    – Travis
    Nov 21 at 12:34










  • The problem was given at IMO 1995, see for example here artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h506p1611 but with a much stronger constraint on its domain and monotonicity. Note that in that case the nontrivial $f(x) = -frac{x}{x+1}$ is also a solution(which obviously doesn't work here because $x=-1$ is in the domain. All in all, I expect a hard solution for this problem.
    – Sorin Tirc
    Nov 21 at 12:47












  • Note that $f(f(x))=x$ means that f is an involution. Other common involutions include $f:xrightarrow-x$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{1}{x}$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{-1}{x}$ even if these don't work here. or you can try this involution
    – TheD0ubleT
    Nov 22 at 9:02
















  • 1




    Are we at least assuming continuity/differentiability?
    – MisterRiemann
    Nov 21 at 12:13










  • no,This condtion,if have I can to solve
    – function sug
    Nov 21 at 12:24










  • Specializing the equation to the case $y = x$ gives $f(hat x) = hat x$, where $hat x = x + f(x) + x f(x)$, so we can immediately conclude that $fvert_A(x) = x$ on the image of $x mapsto x + f(x) + x f(x)$.
    – Travis
    Nov 21 at 12:34










  • The problem was given at IMO 1995, see for example here artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h506p1611 but with a much stronger constraint on its domain and monotonicity. Note that in that case the nontrivial $f(x) = -frac{x}{x+1}$ is also a solution(which obviously doesn't work here because $x=-1$ is in the domain. All in all, I expect a hard solution for this problem.
    – Sorin Tirc
    Nov 21 at 12:47












  • Note that $f(f(x))=x$ means that f is an involution. Other common involutions include $f:xrightarrow-x$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{1}{x}$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{-1}{x}$ even if these don't work here. or you can try this involution
    – TheD0ubleT
    Nov 22 at 9:02










1




1




Are we at least assuming continuity/differentiability?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 21 at 12:13




Are we at least assuming continuity/differentiability?
– MisterRiemann
Nov 21 at 12:13












no,This condtion,if have I can to solve
– function sug
Nov 21 at 12:24




no,This condtion,if have I can to solve
– function sug
Nov 21 at 12:24












Specializing the equation to the case $y = x$ gives $f(hat x) = hat x$, where $hat x = x + f(x) + x f(x)$, so we can immediately conclude that $fvert_A(x) = x$ on the image of $x mapsto x + f(x) + x f(x)$.
– Travis
Nov 21 at 12:34




Specializing the equation to the case $y = x$ gives $f(hat x) = hat x$, where $hat x = x + f(x) + x f(x)$, so we can immediately conclude that $fvert_A(x) = x$ on the image of $x mapsto x + f(x) + x f(x)$.
– Travis
Nov 21 at 12:34












The problem was given at IMO 1995, see for example here artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h506p1611 but with a much stronger constraint on its domain and monotonicity. Note that in that case the nontrivial $f(x) = -frac{x}{x+1}$ is also a solution(which obviously doesn't work here because $x=-1$ is in the domain. All in all, I expect a hard solution for this problem.
– Sorin Tirc
Nov 21 at 12:47






The problem was given at IMO 1995, see for example here artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h506p1611 but with a much stronger constraint on its domain and monotonicity. Note that in that case the nontrivial $f(x) = -frac{x}{x+1}$ is also a solution(which obviously doesn't work here because $x=-1$ is in the domain. All in all, I expect a hard solution for this problem.
– Sorin Tirc
Nov 21 at 12:47














Note that $f(f(x))=x$ means that f is an involution. Other common involutions include $f:xrightarrow-x$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{1}{x}$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{-1}{x}$ even if these don't work here. or you can try this involution
– TheD0ubleT
Nov 22 at 9:02






Note that $f(f(x))=x$ means that f is an involution. Other common involutions include $f:xrightarrow-x$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{1}{x}$ and $f:xrightarrow frac{-1}{x}$ even if these don't work here. or you can try this involution
– TheD0ubleT
Nov 22 at 9:02












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













This is only a partial result (EDIT: full result is given below), but I'll post it anyway. Let us write $(x,y)$ if $y = f(x)$ holds. Since $f(f(x)) = x$, $(x,y)$ is equivalent to $(y,x)$ and $(x,y)wedge (x,y')$ implies $y= y'$. What we can directly observe is that $0= f(f(0)) = f(0)$ by letting $x=y=0$. What is less trivial is $f(1) = 1$. Let $gamma =f(1)$. Then by letting $y = 1$ and $y= gamma$, we get
$$
(x+ gamma + f(x),1+ f(x) +gamma x)wedge ;(x + 1+gamma f(x), gamma + f(x) +x).$$

Hence, $1+ f(x) +gamma x = x + 1+gamma f(x)$ for all $x$, and if $gamma neq 1$, then $f(x) = x$, leading to contradiction.

We next show that $$(-frac{f(x) - f(x')}{x-x'}, -frac{x-x'}{f(x) - f(x')}),quad forall xneq x';cdots(*).$$ Assume $(a,b)wedge (x,y)wedge (x',y').$ Then, by the FE,
$$
(a+x+by, b+y +ax)wedge (a+x'+by', b+y' +ax').
$$
We can equate $b+y +ax$ and $ b+y' +ax'$ by letting $a= -frac{y-y'}{x-x'}$. Then $b$ should satisfy $a+x+by = a+x'+by'$, that is, $ b= -frac{x-x'}{y-y'}.$ Because $y = f(x), y' = f(x')$, this proves the claim.

From the previous claim, we know that $(-1,-1)$, i.e. $f(-1) = -1$. By letting $x' = 0, - 1$, we also know that $(x,y)$ implies
$$(-frac{y}{x}, -frac{x}{y})wedge (-frac{y+ 1}{x + 1}, -frac{x+ 1}{y + 1}).
$$
If we write $-frac{y-y'}{x-x'}= k$, then $(-frac{1/k+ 1}{k + 1}, -frac{k+ 1}{1/k + 1}) = (-frac{1}{k}, -k)$ also shows that $(frac{y-y'}{x-x'}, frac{x-x'}{y-y'})$ whenever $xneq x'$. Next, by putting $y=-1$ in the original functional equation, we also have $(x,y)$ implies
$$(x-y-1, y-x-1).$$ Iterating this $n$ times we also have
$$(2^n(x-y)-1, 2^n(y-x)-1) ;cdots (**).
$$


Our next claim is that if $(x,x) vee (x, x+2^{1-N})$, then $(x+ 2^{-N}, x+2^{-N})$ ($Ngeq 0$.) To show this, let us write $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ and derive an equation about $alpha$. If $(x,x)$, $(*)$ implies $( 2^N(x-alpha ), frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )})$. By applying $(**)$ to $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ we also have $(2^N(x-alpha), 2^N(alpha-x)-2)$. Hence, $2^N(alpha-x)-2 = frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )}$ and this implies $2^N(x-alpha )=-1$ as desired. In case $(x, x+2^{1-N})$ can be dealt with similarly by noting that $(-2^N(x-alpha )-2, - frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )+2})$.

A very similar argument can also prove that
$$(x,x) vee (x, x-2^{1-N})Rightarrow (x-2^{-N}, x-2^{-N}).$$
So far, all the tedious arguments show that $f(x) = x$ holds for every dyadic rationals $x=frac{j}{2^n}$, that is, the set $F$ of fixed points of $f$ contains every dyadic rational. The following are some other facts about $F$:
(i) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y+xy$ and $x+y+1$ belongs to $F$.

(ii) If $x,y in F$, then $x+y+xy in F$.

(iii) If $x in F$, then $xpm frac{j}{2^n}in F$. (Above claim)

And for some $(x,f(x))$ such that $xnotin F$, this generates so many non-fixed pairs
$$(pm left[frac{f(x) - q}{x-q}right]^r,pm left[frac{x- q}{f(x)-q}right]^r), quad (x+q+qf(x),f(x)+q+qx)_{q neq 1},$$ for all dyadic rational $q$ and $rin mathbf{N}$.
I tried but failed to get further ideas about how $F$ and $mathbf{R}setminus F$ looks like. But I wish this helps somehow.



(Note: Actually in the above proposition, $(x, xpm 2^{1-N})$ cannot occur since their difference cannot be in $F$.)





Following yesterday's post, I've completed proof: $f = id$ is the only solution of the equation.



I'll briefly review some facts already proved.

(i) $F + mathbf{Q}_{dyad} = F.$

(ii) If $x,y in F$, then $xy in F$, or equivalently, $Fcdot F = F$. (Since $x-1, y-1 in F$ implies $xy -1in F$ and thus $xy in F$.)

(iii) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y, ;xy + x+ y in F$.



Our claim starts with: If $0neq x in F$, then $frac{1}{x} in F$. Proof is simple. Let $(frac{1}{x},gamma).$ Then $gamma +frac{1}{x}in F$. Since $xin F$, $gamma x + 1 in F$, and $gamma x in F$. Note that $(gamma x, frac{1}{gamma x}).$(slope of $(frac{1}{x},gamma),(0,0).$) This shows $gamma = pm frac{1}{x}.$ If it were that $(frac{1}{x},-frac{1}{x})$, then $frac{1}{x^2} in F$. This implies that $xcdotfrac{1}{x^2}=frac{1}{x} in F$, as desired.



Our next claim is that $(x,y)$ implies $xy in F$. We start from $x+y, ;x+y+xy in F$. If $x+y =0$, it's already done. Otherwise, $frac{x+y+xy}{x+y} = 1+ frac{xy}{x+y} in F$, hence $frac{xy}{x+y}in F$. Then this implies $$(x+y)cdot frac{xy}{x+y} = xy in F.$$



Our almost final claim is that $0< y in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Suppose $(sqrt[4]{y}, gamma)$. Then $gamma^2 sqrt{y} in F$. Since $frac{1}{y} in F$, we have $frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}} in F.$ Notice that $(frac{gamma}{sqrt[4]{y}}, frac{sqrt[4]{y}}{gamma})$ and hence $(frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}}, frac{sqrt{y}}{gamma^2})$ Thus we have $gamma^4 = y$, $gamma = pm sqrt[4]{y}$. Suppose $gamma = sqrt[4]{y}$. Then, $sqrt[4]{y} in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Otherwise, $(sqrt[4]{y}, -sqrt[4]{y})$ implies $-sqrt{y} in F$. Thus $sqrt{y} in F.$



Finally we are ready to prove that $(x,y)$ implies $ x-y=d =0$. Assume to the contrary that $d>0$. Then, as I showed in yesterday's post, $(d-1, -d-1).$ But this implies $(-1+d)cdot(-1-d) = 1-d^2 in F$, and thus $d^2 in F.$ So $d$ must be in $F$ and $d-1$ also. This leads to $d-1 = -d-1$, contradicting $d>0$. So, the only solution of the functional equation is $f(x) = x$!






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    2
    down vote



    +25










    There is a proof given by Professor Wu Wei-chao in 2001, you may download the paper here.



    Here is the overview of the proof:




    • $f$ is one-to-one, and $$f(0)=0,tag{2}$$


    • $forall yinBbb Rsetminus {0}$, $$fleft(-frac y{f(y)}right)=-frac{f(y)}y,qquad fleft(-frac{f(y)}yright)=-frac y{f(y)},tag{8,9}$$


    • $$f(pm1)=pm1,tag{11,12}$$


    • $forall xinBbb R$,
      $$f(x+f(x)+1)=f(x)+x+1,qquad f(x-f(x)-1)=-x+f(x)-1tag{13,14}$$


    • $$f(pm2)=pm2,tag{23,29}$$


    • $$(f(pmsqrt2))^2=2,qquad(f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2}))^2=frac12,tag{42,46}$$


    • $forall xinBbb R$,
      $$f(3x-4)=-3f(-x)-4.tag{47}$$



    • Introduce 5 lemmas,




      Lemma 4. $forall ain Bbb R$, if $$tag{58}f(-x-a)=-f(x)-a,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$ and $$tag{59}f(x-f(x)-dfrac {a^2}4)=f(x)-x-dfrac {a^2}4,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$
      then
      $$f(x)=xqquad (forall xinBbb R).$$




    • Saparate into 3 cases and finish the proof.




    Case 1: $f(pmsqrt 2)=pmsqrt 2implies f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$).



    Case 2: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=pmfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to injectivitiy of $f$.



    Case 3: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=mpfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to $f(sqrt 2)=-sqrt 2$.






    Wu also generalized the result.




    Generalization: Suppose $F$ is a field or a ring, $Bbb Zsubseteq Fsubseteq Bbb C$, and $f:Fto F$ satisifies
    $$f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y),$$




    • if $F=Bbb R$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$);


    • if $F=Bbb C$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb C$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xinBbb C$);


    • if $F=Bbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Q$);


    • if $F=Bbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Z$);


    • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Q}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$;


    • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Z}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$.








    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007645%2ffind-the-function-equation-fxfyyfx-yfxxfy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote













      This is only a partial result (EDIT: full result is given below), but I'll post it anyway. Let us write $(x,y)$ if $y = f(x)$ holds. Since $f(f(x)) = x$, $(x,y)$ is equivalent to $(y,x)$ and $(x,y)wedge (x,y')$ implies $y= y'$. What we can directly observe is that $0= f(f(0)) = f(0)$ by letting $x=y=0$. What is less trivial is $f(1) = 1$. Let $gamma =f(1)$. Then by letting $y = 1$ and $y= gamma$, we get
      $$
      (x+ gamma + f(x),1+ f(x) +gamma x)wedge ;(x + 1+gamma f(x), gamma + f(x) +x).$$

      Hence, $1+ f(x) +gamma x = x + 1+gamma f(x)$ for all $x$, and if $gamma neq 1$, then $f(x) = x$, leading to contradiction.

      We next show that $$(-frac{f(x) - f(x')}{x-x'}, -frac{x-x'}{f(x) - f(x')}),quad forall xneq x';cdots(*).$$ Assume $(a,b)wedge (x,y)wedge (x',y').$ Then, by the FE,
      $$
      (a+x+by, b+y +ax)wedge (a+x'+by', b+y' +ax').
      $$
      We can equate $b+y +ax$ and $ b+y' +ax'$ by letting $a= -frac{y-y'}{x-x'}$. Then $b$ should satisfy $a+x+by = a+x'+by'$, that is, $ b= -frac{x-x'}{y-y'}.$ Because $y = f(x), y' = f(x')$, this proves the claim.

      From the previous claim, we know that $(-1,-1)$, i.e. $f(-1) = -1$. By letting $x' = 0, - 1$, we also know that $(x,y)$ implies
      $$(-frac{y}{x}, -frac{x}{y})wedge (-frac{y+ 1}{x + 1}, -frac{x+ 1}{y + 1}).
      $$
      If we write $-frac{y-y'}{x-x'}= k$, then $(-frac{1/k+ 1}{k + 1}, -frac{k+ 1}{1/k + 1}) = (-frac{1}{k}, -k)$ also shows that $(frac{y-y'}{x-x'}, frac{x-x'}{y-y'})$ whenever $xneq x'$. Next, by putting $y=-1$ in the original functional equation, we also have $(x,y)$ implies
      $$(x-y-1, y-x-1).$$ Iterating this $n$ times we also have
      $$(2^n(x-y)-1, 2^n(y-x)-1) ;cdots (**).
      $$


      Our next claim is that if $(x,x) vee (x, x+2^{1-N})$, then $(x+ 2^{-N}, x+2^{-N})$ ($Ngeq 0$.) To show this, let us write $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ and derive an equation about $alpha$. If $(x,x)$, $(*)$ implies $( 2^N(x-alpha ), frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )})$. By applying $(**)$ to $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ we also have $(2^N(x-alpha), 2^N(alpha-x)-2)$. Hence, $2^N(alpha-x)-2 = frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )}$ and this implies $2^N(x-alpha )=-1$ as desired. In case $(x, x+2^{1-N})$ can be dealt with similarly by noting that $(-2^N(x-alpha )-2, - frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )+2})$.

      A very similar argument can also prove that
      $$(x,x) vee (x, x-2^{1-N})Rightarrow (x-2^{-N}, x-2^{-N}).$$
      So far, all the tedious arguments show that $f(x) = x$ holds for every dyadic rationals $x=frac{j}{2^n}$, that is, the set $F$ of fixed points of $f$ contains every dyadic rational. The following are some other facts about $F$:
      (i) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y+xy$ and $x+y+1$ belongs to $F$.

      (ii) If $x,y in F$, then $x+y+xy in F$.

      (iii) If $x in F$, then $xpm frac{j}{2^n}in F$. (Above claim)

      And for some $(x,f(x))$ such that $xnotin F$, this generates so many non-fixed pairs
      $$(pm left[frac{f(x) - q}{x-q}right]^r,pm left[frac{x- q}{f(x)-q}right]^r), quad (x+q+qf(x),f(x)+q+qx)_{q neq 1},$$ for all dyadic rational $q$ and $rin mathbf{N}$.
      I tried but failed to get further ideas about how $F$ and $mathbf{R}setminus F$ looks like. But I wish this helps somehow.



      (Note: Actually in the above proposition, $(x, xpm 2^{1-N})$ cannot occur since their difference cannot be in $F$.)





      Following yesterday's post, I've completed proof: $f = id$ is the only solution of the equation.



      I'll briefly review some facts already proved.

      (i) $F + mathbf{Q}_{dyad} = F.$

      (ii) If $x,y in F$, then $xy in F$, or equivalently, $Fcdot F = F$. (Since $x-1, y-1 in F$ implies $xy -1in F$ and thus $xy in F$.)

      (iii) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y, ;xy + x+ y in F$.



      Our claim starts with: If $0neq x in F$, then $frac{1}{x} in F$. Proof is simple. Let $(frac{1}{x},gamma).$ Then $gamma +frac{1}{x}in F$. Since $xin F$, $gamma x + 1 in F$, and $gamma x in F$. Note that $(gamma x, frac{1}{gamma x}).$(slope of $(frac{1}{x},gamma),(0,0).$) This shows $gamma = pm frac{1}{x}.$ If it were that $(frac{1}{x},-frac{1}{x})$, then $frac{1}{x^2} in F$. This implies that $xcdotfrac{1}{x^2}=frac{1}{x} in F$, as desired.



      Our next claim is that $(x,y)$ implies $xy in F$. We start from $x+y, ;x+y+xy in F$. If $x+y =0$, it's already done. Otherwise, $frac{x+y+xy}{x+y} = 1+ frac{xy}{x+y} in F$, hence $frac{xy}{x+y}in F$. Then this implies $$(x+y)cdot frac{xy}{x+y} = xy in F.$$



      Our almost final claim is that $0< y in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Suppose $(sqrt[4]{y}, gamma)$. Then $gamma^2 sqrt{y} in F$. Since $frac{1}{y} in F$, we have $frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}} in F.$ Notice that $(frac{gamma}{sqrt[4]{y}}, frac{sqrt[4]{y}}{gamma})$ and hence $(frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}}, frac{sqrt{y}}{gamma^2})$ Thus we have $gamma^4 = y$, $gamma = pm sqrt[4]{y}$. Suppose $gamma = sqrt[4]{y}$. Then, $sqrt[4]{y} in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Otherwise, $(sqrt[4]{y}, -sqrt[4]{y})$ implies $-sqrt{y} in F$. Thus $sqrt{y} in F.$



      Finally we are ready to prove that $(x,y)$ implies $ x-y=d =0$. Assume to the contrary that $d>0$. Then, as I showed in yesterday's post, $(d-1, -d-1).$ But this implies $(-1+d)cdot(-1-d) = 1-d^2 in F$, and thus $d^2 in F.$ So $d$ must be in $F$ and $d-1$ also. This leads to $d-1 = -d-1$, contradicting $d>0$. So, the only solution of the functional equation is $f(x) = x$!






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        up vote
        4
        down vote













        This is only a partial result (EDIT: full result is given below), but I'll post it anyway. Let us write $(x,y)$ if $y = f(x)$ holds. Since $f(f(x)) = x$, $(x,y)$ is equivalent to $(y,x)$ and $(x,y)wedge (x,y')$ implies $y= y'$. What we can directly observe is that $0= f(f(0)) = f(0)$ by letting $x=y=0$. What is less trivial is $f(1) = 1$. Let $gamma =f(1)$. Then by letting $y = 1$ and $y= gamma$, we get
        $$
        (x+ gamma + f(x),1+ f(x) +gamma x)wedge ;(x + 1+gamma f(x), gamma + f(x) +x).$$

        Hence, $1+ f(x) +gamma x = x + 1+gamma f(x)$ for all $x$, and if $gamma neq 1$, then $f(x) = x$, leading to contradiction.

        We next show that $$(-frac{f(x) - f(x')}{x-x'}, -frac{x-x'}{f(x) - f(x')}),quad forall xneq x';cdots(*).$$ Assume $(a,b)wedge (x,y)wedge (x',y').$ Then, by the FE,
        $$
        (a+x+by, b+y +ax)wedge (a+x'+by', b+y' +ax').
        $$
        We can equate $b+y +ax$ and $ b+y' +ax'$ by letting $a= -frac{y-y'}{x-x'}$. Then $b$ should satisfy $a+x+by = a+x'+by'$, that is, $ b= -frac{x-x'}{y-y'}.$ Because $y = f(x), y' = f(x')$, this proves the claim.

        From the previous claim, we know that $(-1,-1)$, i.e. $f(-1) = -1$. By letting $x' = 0, - 1$, we also know that $(x,y)$ implies
        $$(-frac{y}{x}, -frac{x}{y})wedge (-frac{y+ 1}{x + 1}, -frac{x+ 1}{y + 1}).
        $$
        If we write $-frac{y-y'}{x-x'}= k$, then $(-frac{1/k+ 1}{k + 1}, -frac{k+ 1}{1/k + 1}) = (-frac{1}{k}, -k)$ also shows that $(frac{y-y'}{x-x'}, frac{x-x'}{y-y'})$ whenever $xneq x'$. Next, by putting $y=-1$ in the original functional equation, we also have $(x,y)$ implies
        $$(x-y-1, y-x-1).$$ Iterating this $n$ times we also have
        $$(2^n(x-y)-1, 2^n(y-x)-1) ;cdots (**).
        $$


        Our next claim is that if $(x,x) vee (x, x+2^{1-N})$, then $(x+ 2^{-N}, x+2^{-N})$ ($Ngeq 0$.) To show this, let us write $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ and derive an equation about $alpha$. If $(x,x)$, $(*)$ implies $( 2^N(x-alpha ), frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )})$. By applying $(**)$ to $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ we also have $(2^N(x-alpha), 2^N(alpha-x)-2)$. Hence, $2^N(alpha-x)-2 = frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )}$ and this implies $2^N(x-alpha )=-1$ as desired. In case $(x, x+2^{1-N})$ can be dealt with similarly by noting that $(-2^N(x-alpha )-2, - frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )+2})$.

        A very similar argument can also prove that
        $$(x,x) vee (x, x-2^{1-N})Rightarrow (x-2^{-N}, x-2^{-N}).$$
        So far, all the tedious arguments show that $f(x) = x$ holds for every dyadic rationals $x=frac{j}{2^n}$, that is, the set $F$ of fixed points of $f$ contains every dyadic rational. The following are some other facts about $F$:
        (i) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y+xy$ and $x+y+1$ belongs to $F$.

        (ii) If $x,y in F$, then $x+y+xy in F$.

        (iii) If $x in F$, then $xpm frac{j}{2^n}in F$. (Above claim)

        And for some $(x,f(x))$ such that $xnotin F$, this generates so many non-fixed pairs
        $$(pm left[frac{f(x) - q}{x-q}right]^r,pm left[frac{x- q}{f(x)-q}right]^r), quad (x+q+qf(x),f(x)+q+qx)_{q neq 1},$$ for all dyadic rational $q$ and $rin mathbf{N}$.
        I tried but failed to get further ideas about how $F$ and $mathbf{R}setminus F$ looks like. But I wish this helps somehow.



        (Note: Actually in the above proposition, $(x, xpm 2^{1-N})$ cannot occur since their difference cannot be in $F$.)





        Following yesterday's post, I've completed proof: $f = id$ is the only solution of the equation.



        I'll briefly review some facts already proved.

        (i) $F + mathbf{Q}_{dyad} = F.$

        (ii) If $x,y in F$, then $xy in F$, or equivalently, $Fcdot F = F$. (Since $x-1, y-1 in F$ implies $xy -1in F$ and thus $xy in F$.)

        (iii) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y, ;xy + x+ y in F$.



        Our claim starts with: If $0neq x in F$, then $frac{1}{x} in F$. Proof is simple. Let $(frac{1}{x},gamma).$ Then $gamma +frac{1}{x}in F$. Since $xin F$, $gamma x + 1 in F$, and $gamma x in F$. Note that $(gamma x, frac{1}{gamma x}).$(slope of $(frac{1}{x},gamma),(0,0).$) This shows $gamma = pm frac{1}{x}.$ If it were that $(frac{1}{x},-frac{1}{x})$, then $frac{1}{x^2} in F$. This implies that $xcdotfrac{1}{x^2}=frac{1}{x} in F$, as desired.



        Our next claim is that $(x,y)$ implies $xy in F$. We start from $x+y, ;x+y+xy in F$. If $x+y =0$, it's already done. Otherwise, $frac{x+y+xy}{x+y} = 1+ frac{xy}{x+y} in F$, hence $frac{xy}{x+y}in F$. Then this implies $$(x+y)cdot frac{xy}{x+y} = xy in F.$$



        Our almost final claim is that $0< y in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Suppose $(sqrt[4]{y}, gamma)$. Then $gamma^2 sqrt{y} in F$. Since $frac{1}{y} in F$, we have $frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}} in F.$ Notice that $(frac{gamma}{sqrt[4]{y}}, frac{sqrt[4]{y}}{gamma})$ and hence $(frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}}, frac{sqrt{y}}{gamma^2})$ Thus we have $gamma^4 = y$, $gamma = pm sqrt[4]{y}$. Suppose $gamma = sqrt[4]{y}$. Then, $sqrt[4]{y} in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Otherwise, $(sqrt[4]{y}, -sqrt[4]{y})$ implies $-sqrt{y} in F$. Thus $sqrt{y} in F.$



        Finally we are ready to prove that $(x,y)$ implies $ x-y=d =0$. Assume to the contrary that $d>0$. Then, as I showed in yesterday's post, $(d-1, -d-1).$ But this implies $(-1+d)cdot(-1-d) = 1-d^2 in F$, and thus $d^2 in F.$ So $d$ must be in $F$ and $d-1$ also. This leads to $d-1 = -d-1$, contradicting $d>0$. So, the only solution of the functional equation is $f(x) = x$!






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          This is only a partial result (EDIT: full result is given below), but I'll post it anyway. Let us write $(x,y)$ if $y = f(x)$ holds. Since $f(f(x)) = x$, $(x,y)$ is equivalent to $(y,x)$ and $(x,y)wedge (x,y')$ implies $y= y'$. What we can directly observe is that $0= f(f(0)) = f(0)$ by letting $x=y=0$. What is less trivial is $f(1) = 1$. Let $gamma =f(1)$. Then by letting $y = 1$ and $y= gamma$, we get
          $$
          (x+ gamma + f(x),1+ f(x) +gamma x)wedge ;(x + 1+gamma f(x), gamma + f(x) +x).$$

          Hence, $1+ f(x) +gamma x = x + 1+gamma f(x)$ for all $x$, and if $gamma neq 1$, then $f(x) = x$, leading to contradiction.

          We next show that $$(-frac{f(x) - f(x')}{x-x'}, -frac{x-x'}{f(x) - f(x')}),quad forall xneq x';cdots(*).$$ Assume $(a,b)wedge (x,y)wedge (x',y').$ Then, by the FE,
          $$
          (a+x+by, b+y +ax)wedge (a+x'+by', b+y' +ax').
          $$
          We can equate $b+y +ax$ and $ b+y' +ax'$ by letting $a= -frac{y-y'}{x-x'}$. Then $b$ should satisfy $a+x+by = a+x'+by'$, that is, $ b= -frac{x-x'}{y-y'}.$ Because $y = f(x), y' = f(x')$, this proves the claim.

          From the previous claim, we know that $(-1,-1)$, i.e. $f(-1) = -1$. By letting $x' = 0, - 1$, we also know that $(x,y)$ implies
          $$(-frac{y}{x}, -frac{x}{y})wedge (-frac{y+ 1}{x + 1}, -frac{x+ 1}{y + 1}).
          $$
          If we write $-frac{y-y'}{x-x'}= k$, then $(-frac{1/k+ 1}{k + 1}, -frac{k+ 1}{1/k + 1}) = (-frac{1}{k}, -k)$ also shows that $(frac{y-y'}{x-x'}, frac{x-x'}{y-y'})$ whenever $xneq x'$. Next, by putting $y=-1$ in the original functional equation, we also have $(x,y)$ implies
          $$(x-y-1, y-x-1).$$ Iterating this $n$ times we also have
          $$(2^n(x-y)-1, 2^n(y-x)-1) ;cdots (**).
          $$


          Our next claim is that if $(x,x) vee (x, x+2^{1-N})$, then $(x+ 2^{-N}, x+2^{-N})$ ($Ngeq 0$.) To show this, let us write $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ and derive an equation about $alpha$. If $(x,x)$, $(*)$ implies $( 2^N(x-alpha ), frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )})$. By applying $(**)$ to $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ we also have $(2^N(x-alpha), 2^N(alpha-x)-2)$. Hence, $2^N(alpha-x)-2 = frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )}$ and this implies $2^N(x-alpha )=-1$ as desired. In case $(x, x+2^{1-N})$ can be dealt with similarly by noting that $(-2^N(x-alpha )-2, - frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )+2})$.

          A very similar argument can also prove that
          $$(x,x) vee (x, x-2^{1-N})Rightarrow (x-2^{-N}, x-2^{-N}).$$
          So far, all the tedious arguments show that $f(x) = x$ holds for every dyadic rationals $x=frac{j}{2^n}$, that is, the set $F$ of fixed points of $f$ contains every dyadic rational. The following are some other facts about $F$:
          (i) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y+xy$ and $x+y+1$ belongs to $F$.

          (ii) If $x,y in F$, then $x+y+xy in F$.

          (iii) If $x in F$, then $xpm frac{j}{2^n}in F$. (Above claim)

          And for some $(x,f(x))$ such that $xnotin F$, this generates so many non-fixed pairs
          $$(pm left[frac{f(x) - q}{x-q}right]^r,pm left[frac{x- q}{f(x)-q}right]^r), quad (x+q+qf(x),f(x)+q+qx)_{q neq 1},$$ for all dyadic rational $q$ and $rin mathbf{N}$.
          I tried but failed to get further ideas about how $F$ and $mathbf{R}setminus F$ looks like. But I wish this helps somehow.



          (Note: Actually in the above proposition, $(x, xpm 2^{1-N})$ cannot occur since their difference cannot be in $F$.)





          Following yesterday's post, I've completed proof: $f = id$ is the only solution of the equation.



          I'll briefly review some facts already proved.

          (i) $F + mathbf{Q}_{dyad} = F.$

          (ii) If $x,y in F$, then $xy in F$, or equivalently, $Fcdot F = F$. (Since $x-1, y-1 in F$ implies $xy -1in F$ and thus $xy in F$.)

          (iii) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y, ;xy + x+ y in F$.



          Our claim starts with: If $0neq x in F$, then $frac{1}{x} in F$. Proof is simple. Let $(frac{1}{x},gamma).$ Then $gamma +frac{1}{x}in F$. Since $xin F$, $gamma x + 1 in F$, and $gamma x in F$. Note that $(gamma x, frac{1}{gamma x}).$(slope of $(frac{1}{x},gamma),(0,0).$) This shows $gamma = pm frac{1}{x}.$ If it were that $(frac{1}{x},-frac{1}{x})$, then $frac{1}{x^2} in F$. This implies that $xcdotfrac{1}{x^2}=frac{1}{x} in F$, as desired.



          Our next claim is that $(x,y)$ implies $xy in F$. We start from $x+y, ;x+y+xy in F$. If $x+y =0$, it's already done. Otherwise, $frac{x+y+xy}{x+y} = 1+ frac{xy}{x+y} in F$, hence $frac{xy}{x+y}in F$. Then this implies $$(x+y)cdot frac{xy}{x+y} = xy in F.$$



          Our almost final claim is that $0< y in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Suppose $(sqrt[4]{y}, gamma)$. Then $gamma^2 sqrt{y} in F$. Since $frac{1}{y} in F$, we have $frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}} in F.$ Notice that $(frac{gamma}{sqrt[4]{y}}, frac{sqrt[4]{y}}{gamma})$ and hence $(frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}}, frac{sqrt{y}}{gamma^2})$ Thus we have $gamma^4 = y$, $gamma = pm sqrt[4]{y}$. Suppose $gamma = sqrt[4]{y}$. Then, $sqrt[4]{y} in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Otherwise, $(sqrt[4]{y}, -sqrt[4]{y})$ implies $-sqrt{y} in F$. Thus $sqrt{y} in F.$



          Finally we are ready to prove that $(x,y)$ implies $ x-y=d =0$. Assume to the contrary that $d>0$. Then, as I showed in yesterday's post, $(d-1, -d-1).$ But this implies $(-1+d)cdot(-1-d) = 1-d^2 in F$, and thus $d^2 in F.$ So $d$ must be in $F$ and $d-1$ also. This leads to $d-1 = -d-1$, contradicting $d>0$. So, the only solution of the functional equation is $f(x) = x$!






          share|cite|improve this answer














          This is only a partial result (EDIT: full result is given below), but I'll post it anyway. Let us write $(x,y)$ if $y = f(x)$ holds. Since $f(f(x)) = x$, $(x,y)$ is equivalent to $(y,x)$ and $(x,y)wedge (x,y')$ implies $y= y'$. What we can directly observe is that $0= f(f(0)) = f(0)$ by letting $x=y=0$. What is less trivial is $f(1) = 1$. Let $gamma =f(1)$. Then by letting $y = 1$ and $y= gamma$, we get
          $$
          (x+ gamma + f(x),1+ f(x) +gamma x)wedge ;(x + 1+gamma f(x), gamma + f(x) +x).$$

          Hence, $1+ f(x) +gamma x = x + 1+gamma f(x)$ for all $x$, and if $gamma neq 1$, then $f(x) = x$, leading to contradiction.

          We next show that $$(-frac{f(x) - f(x')}{x-x'}, -frac{x-x'}{f(x) - f(x')}),quad forall xneq x';cdots(*).$$ Assume $(a,b)wedge (x,y)wedge (x',y').$ Then, by the FE,
          $$
          (a+x+by, b+y +ax)wedge (a+x'+by', b+y' +ax').
          $$
          We can equate $b+y +ax$ and $ b+y' +ax'$ by letting $a= -frac{y-y'}{x-x'}$. Then $b$ should satisfy $a+x+by = a+x'+by'$, that is, $ b= -frac{x-x'}{y-y'}.$ Because $y = f(x), y' = f(x')$, this proves the claim.

          From the previous claim, we know that $(-1,-1)$, i.e. $f(-1) = -1$. By letting $x' = 0, - 1$, we also know that $(x,y)$ implies
          $$(-frac{y}{x}, -frac{x}{y})wedge (-frac{y+ 1}{x + 1}, -frac{x+ 1}{y + 1}).
          $$
          If we write $-frac{y-y'}{x-x'}= k$, then $(-frac{1/k+ 1}{k + 1}, -frac{k+ 1}{1/k + 1}) = (-frac{1}{k}, -k)$ also shows that $(frac{y-y'}{x-x'}, frac{x-x'}{y-y'})$ whenever $xneq x'$. Next, by putting $y=-1$ in the original functional equation, we also have $(x,y)$ implies
          $$(x-y-1, y-x-1).$$ Iterating this $n$ times we also have
          $$(2^n(x-y)-1, 2^n(y-x)-1) ;cdots (**).
          $$


          Our next claim is that if $(x,x) vee (x, x+2^{1-N})$, then $(x+ 2^{-N}, x+2^{-N})$ ($Ngeq 0$.) To show this, let us write $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ and derive an equation about $alpha$. If $(x,x)$, $(*)$ implies $( 2^N(x-alpha ), frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )})$. By applying $(**)$ to $(x+ 2^{-N}, alpha)$ we also have $(2^N(x-alpha), 2^N(alpha-x)-2)$. Hence, $2^N(alpha-x)-2 = frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )}$ and this implies $2^N(x-alpha )=-1$ as desired. In case $(x, x+2^{1-N})$ can be dealt with similarly by noting that $(-2^N(x-alpha )-2, - frac{1}{2^N(x-alpha )+2})$.

          A very similar argument can also prove that
          $$(x,x) vee (x, x-2^{1-N})Rightarrow (x-2^{-N}, x-2^{-N}).$$
          So far, all the tedious arguments show that $f(x) = x$ holds for every dyadic rationals $x=frac{j}{2^n}$, that is, the set $F$ of fixed points of $f$ contains every dyadic rational. The following are some other facts about $F$:
          (i) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y+xy$ and $x+y+1$ belongs to $F$.

          (ii) If $x,y in F$, then $x+y+xy in F$.

          (iii) If $x in F$, then $xpm frac{j}{2^n}in F$. (Above claim)

          And for some $(x,f(x))$ such that $xnotin F$, this generates so many non-fixed pairs
          $$(pm left[frac{f(x) - q}{x-q}right]^r,pm left[frac{x- q}{f(x)-q}right]^r), quad (x+q+qf(x),f(x)+q+qx)_{q neq 1},$$ for all dyadic rational $q$ and $rin mathbf{N}$.
          I tried but failed to get further ideas about how $F$ and $mathbf{R}setminus F$ looks like. But I wish this helps somehow.



          (Note: Actually in the above proposition, $(x, xpm 2^{1-N})$ cannot occur since their difference cannot be in $F$.)





          Following yesterday's post, I've completed proof: $f = id$ is the only solution of the equation.



          I'll briefly review some facts already proved.

          (i) $F + mathbf{Q}_{dyad} = F.$

          (ii) If $x,y in F$, then $xy in F$, or equivalently, $Fcdot F = F$. (Since $x-1, y-1 in F$ implies $xy -1in F$ and thus $xy in F$.)

          (iii) If $(x,y)$, then $x+y, ;xy + x+ y in F$.



          Our claim starts with: If $0neq x in F$, then $frac{1}{x} in F$. Proof is simple. Let $(frac{1}{x},gamma).$ Then $gamma +frac{1}{x}in F$. Since $xin F$, $gamma x + 1 in F$, and $gamma x in F$. Note that $(gamma x, frac{1}{gamma x}).$(slope of $(frac{1}{x},gamma),(0,0).$) This shows $gamma = pm frac{1}{x}.$ If it were that $(frac{1}{x},-frac{1}{x})$, then $frac{1}{x^2} in F$. This implies that $xcdotfrac{1}{x^2}=frac{1}{x} in F$, as desired.



          Our next claim is that $(x,y)$ implies $xy in F$. We start from $x+y, ;x+y+xy in F$. If $x+y =0$, it's already done. Otherwise, $frac{x+y+xy}{x+y} = 1+ frac{xy}{x+y} in F$, hence $frac{xy}{x+y}in F$. Then this implies $$(x+y)cdot frac{xy}{x+y} = xy in F.$$



          Our almost final claim is that $0< y in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Suppose $(sqrt[4]{y}, gamma)$. Then $gamma^2 sqrt{y} in F$. Since $frac{1}{y} in F$, we have $frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}} in F.$ Notice that $(frac{gamma}{sqrt[4]{y}}, frac{sqrt[4]{y}}{gamma})$ and hence $(frac{gamma^2}{sqrt{y}}, frac{sqrt{y}}{gamma^2})$ Thus we have $gamma^4 = y$, $gamma = pm sqrt[4]{y}$. Suppose $gamma = sqrt[4]{y}$. Then, $sqrt[4]{y} in F$ implies $sqrt{y} in F$. Otherwise, $(sqrt[4]{y}, -sqrt[4]{y})$ implies $-sqrt{y} in F$. Thus $sqrt{y} in F.$



          Finally we are ready to prove that $(x,y)$ implies $ x-y=d =0$. Assume to the contrary that $d>0$. Then, as I showed in yesterday's post, $(d-1, -d-1).$ But this implies $(-1+d)cdot(-1-d) = 1-d^2 in F$, and thus $d^2 in F.$ So $d$ must be in $F$ and $d-1$ also. This leads to $d-1 = -d-1$, contradicting $d>0$. So, the only solution of the functional equation is $f(x) = x$!







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 25 at 2:17

























          answered Nov 24 at 7:04









          Song

          1,45512




          1,45512






















              up vote
              2
              down vote



              +25










              There is a proof given by Professor Wu Wei-chao in 2001, you may download the paper here.



              Here is the overview of the proof:




              • $f$ is one-to-one, and $$f(0)=0,tag{2}$$


              • $forall yinBbb Rsetminus {0}$, $$fleft(-frac y{f(y)}right)=-frac{f(y)}y,qquad fleft(-frac{f(y)}yright)=-frac y{f(y)},tag{8,9}$$


              • $$f(pm1)=pm1,tag{11,12}$$


              • $forall xinBbb R$,
                $$f(x+f(x)+1)=f(x)+x+1,qquad f(x-f(x)-1)=-x+f(x)-1tag{13,14}$$


              • $$f(pm2)=pm2,tag{23,29}$$


              • $$(f(pmsqrt2))^2=2,qquad(f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2}))^2=frac12,tag{42,46}$$


              • $forall xinBbb R$,
                $$f(3x-4)=-3f(-x)-4.tag{47}$$



              • Introduce 5 lemmas,




                Lemma 4. $forall ain Bbb R$, if $$tag{58}f(-x-a)=-f(x)-a,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$ and $$tag{59}f(x-f(x)-dfrac {a^2}4)=f(x)-x-dfrac {a^2}4,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$
                then
                $$f(x)=xqquad (forall xinBbb R).$$




              • Saparate into 3 cases and finish the proof.




              Case 1: $f(pmsqrt 2)=pmsqrt 2implies f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$).



              Case 2: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=pmfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to injectivitiy of $f$.



              Case 3: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=mpfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to $f(sqrt 2)=-sqrt 2$.






              Wu also generalized the result.




              Generalization: Suppose $F$ is a field or a ring, $Bbb Zsubseteq Fsubseteq Bbb C$, and $f:Fto F$ satisifies
              $$f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y),$$




              • if $F=Bbb R$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$);


              • if $F=Bbb C$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb C$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xinBbb C$);


              • if $F=Bbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Q$);


              • if $F=Bbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Z$);


              • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Q}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$;


              • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Z}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$.








              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                +25










                There is a proof given by Professor Wu Wei-chao in 2001, you may download the paper here.



                Here is the overview of the proof:




                • $f$ is one-to-one, and $$f(0)=0,tag{2}$$


                • $forall yinBbb Rsetminus {0}$, $$fleft(-frac y{f(y)}right)=-frac{f(y)}y,qquad fleft(-frac{f(y)}yright)=-frac y{f(y)},tag{8,9}$$


                • $$f(pm1)=pm1,tag{11,12}$$


                • $forall xinBbb R$,
                  $$f(x+f(x)+1)=f(x)+x+1,qquad f(x-f(x)-1)=-x+f(x)-1tag{13,14}$$


                • $$f(pm2)=pm2,tag{23,29}$$


                • $$(f(pmsqrt2))^2=2,qquad(f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2}))^2=frac12,tag{42,46}$$


                • $forall xinBbb R$,
                  $$f(3x-4)=-3f(-x)-4.tag{47}$$



                • Introduce 5 lemmas,




                  Lemma 4. $forall ain Bbb R$, if $$tag{58}f(-x-a)=-f(x)-a,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$ and $$tag{59}f(x-f(x)-dfrac {a^2}4)=f(x)-x-dfrac {a^2}4,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$
                  then
                  $$f(x)=xqquad (forall xinBbb R).$$




                • Saparate into 3 cases and finish the proof.




                Case 1: $f(pmsqrt 2)=pmsqrt 2implies f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$).



                Case 2: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=pmfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to injectivitiy of $f$.



                Case 3: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=mpfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to $f(sqrt 2)=-sqrt 2$.






                Wu also generalized the result.




                Generalization: Suppose $F$ is a field or a ring, $Bbb Zsubseteq Fsubseteq Bbb C$, and $f:Fto F$ satisifies
                $$f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y),$$




                • if $F=Bbb R$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$);


                • if $F=Bbb C$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb C$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xinBbb C$);


                • if $F=Bbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Q$);


                • if $F=Bbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Z$);


                • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Q}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$;


                • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Z}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$.








                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  +25







                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  +25




                  +25




                  There is a proof given by Professor Wu Wei-chao in 2001, you may download the paper here.



                  Here is the overview of the proof:




                  • $f$ is one-to-one, and $$f(0)=0,tag{2}$$


                  • $forall yinBbb Rsetminus {0}$, $$fleft(-frac y{f(y)}right)=-frac{f(y)}y,qquad fleft(-frac{f(y)}yright)=-frac y{f(y)},tag{8,9}$$


                  • $$f(pm1)=pm1,tag{11,12}$$


                  • $forall xinBbb R$,
                    $$f(x+f(x)+1)=f(x)+x+1,qquad f(x-f(x)-1)=-x+f(x)-1tag{13,14}$$


                  • $$f(pm2)=pm2,tag{23,29}$$


                  • $$(f(pmsqrt2))^2=2,qquad(f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2}))^2=frac12,tag{42,46}$$


                  • $forall xinBbb R$,
                    $$f(3x-4)=-3f(-x)-4.tag{47}$$



                  • Introduce 5 lemmas,




                    Lemma 4. $forall ain Bbb R$, if $$tag{58}f(-x-a)=-f(x)-a,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$ and $$tag{59}f(x-f(x)-dfrac {a^2}4)=f(x)-x-dfrac {a^2}4,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$
                    then
                    $$f(x)=xqquad (forall xinBbb R).$$




                  • Saparate into 3 cases and finish the proof.




                  Case 1: $f(pmsqrt 2)=pmsqrt 2implies f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$).



                  Case 2: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=pmfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to injectivitiy of $f$.



                  Case 3: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=mpfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to $f(sqrt 2)=-sqrt 2$.






                  Wu also generalized the result.




                  Generalization: Suppose $F$ is a field or a ring, $Bbb Zsubseteq Fsubseteq Bbb C$, and $f:Fto F$ satisifies
                  $$f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y),$$




                  • if $F=Bbb R$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$);


                  • if $F=Bbb C$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb C$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xinBbb C$);


                  • if $F=Bbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Q$);


                  • if $F=Bbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Z$);


                  • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Q}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$;


                  • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Z}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$.








                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  There is a proof given by Professor Wu Wei-chao in 2001, you may download the paper here.



                  Here is the overview of the proof:




                  • $f$ is one-to-one, and $$f(0)=0,tag{2}$$


                  • $forall yinBbb Rsetminus {0}$, $$fleft(-frac y{f(y)}right)=-frac{f(y)}y,qquad fleft(-frac{f(y)}yright)=-frac y{f(y)},tag{8,9}$$


                  • $$f(pm1)=pm1,tag{11,12}$$


                  • $forall xinBbb R$,
                    $$f(x+f(x)+1)=f(x)+x+1,qquad f(x-f(x)-1)=-x+f(x)-1tag{13,14}$$


                  • $$f(pm2)=pm2,tag{23,29}$$


                  • $$(f(pmsqrt2))^2=2,qquad(f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2}))^2=frac12,tag{42,46}$$


                  • $forall xinBbb R$,
                    $$f(3x-4)=-3f(-x)-4.tag{47}$$



                  • Introduce 5 lemmas,




                    Lemma 4. $forall ain Bbb R$, if $$tag{58}f(-x-a)=-f(x)-a,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$ and $$tag{59}f(x-f(x)-dfrac {a^2}4)=f(x)-x-dfrac {a^2}4,qquad (forall xinBbb R)$$
                    then
                    $$f(x)=xqquad (forall xinBbb R).$$




                  • Saparate into 3 cases and finish the proof.




                  Case 1: $f(pmsqrt 2)=pmsqrt 2implies f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$).



                  Case 2: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=pmfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to injectivitiy of $f$.



                  Case 3: $f(pmsqrt 2)=mpsqrt 2, f(pmfrac 1{sqrt2})=mpfrac 1{sqrt2}implies$ contradition to $f(sqrt 2)=-sqrt 2$.






                  Wu also generalized the result.




                  Generalization: Suppose $F$ is a field or a ring, $Bbb Zsubseteq Fsubseteq Bbb C$, and $f:Fto F$ satisifies
                  $$f(x+f(y)+yf(x))=y+f(x)+xf(y),$$




                  • if $F=Bbb R$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb R$);


                  • if $F=Bbb C$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb C$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xinBbb C$);


                  • if $F=Bbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Q$);


                  • if $F=Bbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xinBbb Z$);


                  • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Q}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Q$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$;


                  • if $F={a+brmid forall a,binBbb Z}$, where $r$ is fixed irrational and $r^2inBbb Z$, then $f(x)=x$ ($forall xin F$) or $f(x)=overline x$ ($forall xin F$), here we define $overline{a+br}=a-br$.









                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 27 at 16:35

























                  answered Nov 27 at 15:54









                  Tianlalu

                  2,9801936




                  2,9801936






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007645%2ffind-the-function-equation-fxfyyfx-yfxxfy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bundesstraße 106

                      Verónica Boquete

                      Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten