Holomorphic integrals
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am struggling to understand how the center and radius effect a certain circular contour.
e.g. $ int _{gamma} frac {z^{2}+1} {e^{z}(z-1)(z+1)^{2}} dz $
can anyone explain this?
integration complex-analysis complex-numbers cauchy-integral-formula
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am struggling to understand how the center and radius effect a certain circular contour.
e.g. $ int _{gamma} frac {z^{2}+1} {e^{z}(z-1)(z+1)^{2}} dz $
can anyone explain this?
integration complex-analysis complex-numbers cauchy-integral-formula
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am struggling to understand how the center and radius effect a certain circular contour.
e.g. $ int _{gamma} frac {z^{2}+1} {e^{z}(z-1)(z+1)^{2}} dz $
can anyone explain this?
integration complex-analysis complex-numbers cauchy-integral-formula
I am struggling to understand how the center and radius effect a certain circular contour.
e.g. $ int _{gamma} frac {z^{2}+1} {e^{z}(z-1)(z+1)^{2}} dz $
can anyone explain this?
integration complex-analysis complex-numbers cauchy-integral-formula
integration complex-analysis complex-numbers cauchy-integral-formula
asked Nov 21 at 12:04
frankfields
113
113
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
In general, if $gamma$ is a closed contour, then the Residue Theorem tells us that
$$int_gamma f(z),dz = 2pi isum_{z_i}text{Res}left(f(z),z_iright)$$
where $z_i$ are the poles of the meromorphic function $f(z)$ that are enclosed within the contour of integration $gamma$.
In particular, the value of the integral does not actually depend on, say, the radius of the circle or its center as long as the poles enclosed by the contour of integration do not change.
In your example, we have
$$f(z) = frac{z^2+1}{e^z(z-1)(z+1)^2}$$
which has a simple pole at $z_1 = 1$ and a pole of order $2$ at $z_2 = -1$.
If we choose a circular contour $gamma$ that enclosed both of these poles, like the circle with radius $2$ centered at the origin for example, then we obtain
begin{align}
int_gamma f(z),dz &= 2pi ileft[text{Res}left(f(z), 1right) + text{Res}left(f(z), -1right)right]\
&= 2pi ileft[limlimits_{zrightarrow 1} frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z+1)^2} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{d}{dz}frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z-1)}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{x(x^2-2x+3}{e^x(x-1)^2}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + frac{3e}{2}right]\
&=frac{pi i}{e}left(1+3e^2right)
end{align}
As specified earlier, any other circular, or indeed closed contour that contains both of the poles of $f(z)$ in its interior will yield the same result.
Thank you, what if only one of the poles of f(z) is within the interior?
– frankfields
Nov 23 at 9:57
In that case, you only consider the contribution of that pole. For example, if you were to consider a contour that only contains the pole at $z=1$ in your example, like a circle centred at $z = 1$ with radius $r = 1$, then the value of the integral is simply $frac{pi i}{e}$, because we only consider the first of the terms in the residue sum.
– Tom
Nov 23 at 12:27
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
In general, if $gamma$ is a closed contour, then the Residue Theorem tells us that
$$int_gamma f(z),dz = 2pi isum_{z_i}text{Res}left(f(z),z_iright)$$
where $z_i$ are the poles of the meromorphic function $f(z)$ that are enclosed within the contour of integration $gamma$.
In particular, the value of the integral does not actually depend on, say, the radius of the circle or its center as long as the poles enclosed by the contour of integration do not change.
In your example, we have
$$f(z) = frac{z^2+1}{e^z(z-1)(z+1)^2}$$
which has a simple pole at $z_1 = 1$ and a pole of order $2$ at $z_2 = -1$.
If we choose a circular contour $gamma$ that enclosed both of these poles, like the circle with radius $2$ centered at the origin for example, then we obtain
begin{align}
int_gamma f(z),dz &= 2pi ileft[text{Res}left(f(z), 1right) + text{Res}left(f(z), -1right)right]\
&= 2pi ileft[limlimits_{zrightarrow 1} frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z+1)^2} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{d}{dz}frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z-1)}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{x(x^2-2x+3}{e^x(x-1)^2}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + frac{3e}{2}right]\
&=frac{pi i}{e}left(1+3e^2right)
end{align}
As specified earlier, any other circular, or indeed closed contour that contains both of the poles of $f(z)$ in its interior will yield the same result.
Thank you, what if only one of the poles of f(z) is within the interior?
– frankfields
Nov 23 at 9:57
In that case, you only consider the contribution of that pole. For example, if you were to consider a contour that only contains the pole at $z=1$ in your example, like a circle centred at $z = 1$ with radius $r = 1$, then the value of the integral is simply $frac{pi i}{e}$, because we only consider the first of the terms in the residue sum.
– Tom
Nov 23 at 12:27
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In general, if $gamma$ is a closed contour, then the Residue Theorem tells us that
$$int_gamma f(z),dz = 2pi isum_{z_i}text{Res}left(f(z),z_iright)$$
where $z_i$ are the poles of the meromorphic function $f(z)$ that are enclosed within the contour of integration $gamma$.
In particular, the value of the integral does not actually depend on, say, the radius of the circle or its center as long as the poles enclosed by the contour of integration do not change.
In your example, we have
$$f(z) = frac{z^2+1}{e^z(z-1)(z+1)^2}$$
which has a simple pole at $z_1 = 1$ and a pole of order $2$ at $z_2 = -1$.
If we choose a circular contour $gamma$ that enclosed both of these poles, like the circle with radius $2$ centered at the origin for example, then we obtain
begin{align}
int_gamma f(z),dz &= 2pi ileft[text{Res}left(f(z), 1right) + text{Res}left(f(z), -1right)right]\
&= 2pi ileft[limlimits_{zrightarrow 1} frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z+1)^2} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{d}{dz}frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z-1)}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{x(x^2-2x+3}{e^x(x-1)^2}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + frac{3e}{2}right]\
&=frac{pi i}{e}left(1+3e^2right)
end{align}
As specified earlier, any other circular, or indeed closed contour that contains both of the poles of $f(z)$ in its interior will yield the same result.
Thank you, what if only one of the poles of f(z) is within the interior?
– frankfields
Nov 23 at 9:57
In that case, you only consider the contribution of that pole. For example, if you were to consider a contour that only contains the pole at $z=1$ in your example, like a circle centred at $z = 1$ with radius $r = 1$, then the value of the integral is simply $frac{pi i}{e}$, because we only consider the first of the terms in the residue sum.
– Tom
Nov 23 at 12:27
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
In general, if $gamma$ is a closed contour, then the Residue Theorem tells us that
$$int_gamma f(z),dz = 2pi isum_{z_i}text{Res}left(f(z),z_iright)$$
where $z_i$ are the poles of the meromorphic function $f(z)$ that are enclosed within the contour of integration $gamma$.
In particular, the value of the integral does not actually depend on, say, the radius of the circle or its center as long as the poles enclosed by the contour of integration do not change.
In your example, we have
$$f(z) = frac{z^2+1}{e^z(z-1)(z+1)^2}$$
which has a simple pole at $z_1 = 1$ and a pole of order $2$ at $z_2 = -1$.
If we choose a circular contour $gamma$ that enclosed both of these poles, like the circle with radius $2$ centered at the origin for example, then we obtain
begin{align}
int_gamma f(z),dz &= 2pi ileft[text{Res}left(f(z), 1right) + text{Res}left(f(z), -1right)right]\
&= 2pi ileft[limlimits_{zrightarrow 1} frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z+1)^2} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{d}{dz}frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z-1)}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{x(x^2-2x+3}{e^x(x-1)^2}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + frac{3e}{2}right]\
&=frac{pi i}{e}left(1+3e^2right)
end{align}
As specified earlier, any other circular, or indeed closed contour that contains both of the poles of $f(z)$ in its interior will yield the same result.
In general, if $gamma$ is a closed contour, then the Residue Theorem tells us that
$$int_gamma f(z),dz = 2pi isum_{z_i}text{Res}left(f(z),z_iright)$$
where $z_i$ are the poles of the meromorphic function $f(z)$ that are enclosed within the contour of integration $gamma$.
In particular, the value of the integral does not actually depend on, say, the radius of the circle or its center as long as the poles enclosed by the contour of integration do not change.
In your example, we have
$$f(z) = frac{z^2+1}{e^z(z-1)(z+1)^2}$$
which has a simple pole at $z_1 = 1$ and a pole of order $2$ at $z_2 = -1$.
If we choose a circular contour $gamma$ that enclosed both of these poles, like the circle with radius $2$ centered at the origin for example, then we obtain
begin{align}
int_gamma f(z),dz &= 2pi ileft[text{Res}left(f(z), 1right) + text{Res}left(f(z), -1right)right]\
&= 2pi ileft[limlimits_{zrightarrow 1} frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z+1)^2} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{d}{dz}frac{z^2+1}{e^{z}(z-1)}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + limlimits_{zto -1}frac{x(x^2-2x+3}{e^x(x-1)^2}right]\
&=2pi ileft[frac{1}{2e} + frac{3e}{2}right]\
&=frac{pi i}{e}left(1+3e^2right)
end{align}
As specified earlier, any other circular, or indeed closed contour that contains both of the poles of $f(z)$ in its interior will yield the same result.
answered Nov 21 at 13:45
Tom
2,716315
2,716315
Thank you, what if only one of the poles of f(z) is within the interior?
– frankfields
Nov 23 at 9:57
In that case, you only consider the contribution of that pole. For example, if you were to consider a contour that only contains the pole at $z=1$ in your example, like a circle centred at $z = 1$ with radius $r = 1$, then the value of the integral is simply $frac{pi i}{e}$, because we only consider the first of the terms in the residue sum.
– Tom
Nov 23 at 12:27
add a comment |
Thank you, what if only one of the poles of f(z) is within the interior?
– frankfields
Nov 23 at 9:57
In that case, you only consider the contribution of that pole. For example, if you were to consider a contour that only contains the pole at $z=1$ in your example, like a circle centred at $z = 1$ with radius $r = 1$, then the value of the integral is simply $frac{pi i}{e}$, because we only consider the first of the terms in the residue sum.
– Tom
Nov 23 at 12:27
Thank you, what if only one of the poles of f(z) is within the interior?
– frankfields
Nov 23 at 9:57
Thank you, what if only one of the poles of f(z) is within the interior?
– frankfields
Nov 23 at 9:57
In that case, you only consider the contribution of that pole. For example, if you were to consider a contour that only contains the pole at $z=1$ in your example, like a circle centred at $z = 1$ with radius $r = 1$, then the value of the integral is simply $frac{pi i}{e}$, because we only consider the first of the terms in the residue sum.
– Tom
Nov 23 at 12:27
In that case, you only consider the contribution of that pole. For example, if you were to consider a contour that only contains the pole at $z=1$ in your example, like a circle centred at $z = 1$ with radius $r = 1$, then the value of the integral is simply $frac{pi i}{e}$, because we only consider the first of the terms in the residue sum.
– Tom
Nov 23 at 12:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007635%2fholomorphic-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown