Lower bound on the smallest singular value of a submatrix of this matrix?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Consider the following matrix $A$:
$A = begin{bmatrix}l_1F & cdots & l_mF\I_N & cdots & I_Nend{bmatrix}$.
Here, ${l_1, cdots, l_m}$ are distinct real numbers such that their sum is zero, $I_N$ is the identity matrix of dimension $Ntimes N$ and $F$ is a $rtimes N$ matrix given by:
$ F = begin{bmatrix}
frac{1}{N} & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_1}{N}} &cdots & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_1 (N-1)}{N}}\
vdots & vdots & vdots & vdots \
frac{1}{N} & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_r}{N}} &cdots & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_r (N-1)}{N}}
end{bmatrix},
$
where ${k_1, cdots, k_r}$ are distinct integers such that $1leq k_1, cdots, k_r leq N/100$ (ofcourse, assuming $N$ is much larger than 100.).
Question: What is a non-trivial lower bound (as a function of ${l_1, cdots, l_m}$, ${k_1, cdots, k_r}$, $N$ and $r$) for the smallest singular value of any submatrix made up of $N+r$ linearly independent columns of $A$?
It is also clear that as $N$ becomes larger and the other parameters remain constant, the smallest singular value will go to zero. It would be equally good if one can show that the rate of decrease is $Oleft(frac{1}{N^{1.5-delta}}right)$, $delta>0$.
An observation might be of some help - the rows of $A$ are orthogonal.
linear-algebra matrices
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Consider the following matrix $A$:
$A = begin{bmatrix}l_1F & cdots & l_mF\I_N & cdots & I_Nend{bmatrix}$.
Here, ${l_1, cdots, l_m}$ are distinct real numbers such that their sum is zero, $I_N$ is the identity matrix of dimension $Ntimes N$ and $F$ is a $rtimes N$ matrix given by:
$ F = begin{bmatrix}
frac{1}{N} & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_1}{N}} &cdots & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_1 (N-1)}{N}}\
vdots & vdots & vdots & vdots \
frac{1}{N} & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_r}{N}} &cdots & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_r (N-1)}{N}}
end{bmatrix},
$
where ${k_1, cdots, k_r}$ are distinct integers such that $1leq k_1, cdots, k_r leq N/100$ (ofcourse, assuming $N$ is much larger than 100.).
Question: What is a non-trivial lower bound (as a function of ${l_1, cdots, l_m}$, ${k_1, cdots, k_r}$, $N$ and $r$) for the smallest singular value of any submatrix made up of $N+r$ linearly independent columns of $A$?
It is also clear that as $N$ becomes larger and the other parameters remain constant, the smallest singular value will go to zero. It would be equally good if one can show that the rate of decrease is $Oleft(frac{1}{N^{1.5-delta}}right)$, $delta>0$.
An observation might be of some help - the rows of $A$ are orthogonal.
linear-algebra matrices
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Consider the following matrix $A$:
$A = begin{bmatrix}l_1F & cdots & l_mF\I_N & cdots & I_Nend{bmatrix}$.
Here, ${l_1, cdots, l_m}$ are distinct real numbers such that their sum is zero, $I_N$ is the identity matrix of dimension $Ntimes N$ and $F$ is a $rtimes N$ matrix given by:
$ F = begin{bmatrix}
frac{1}{N} & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_1}{N}} &cdots & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_1 (N-1)}{N}}\
vdots & vdots & vdots & vdots \
frac{1}{N} & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_r}{N}} &cdots & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_r (N-1)}{N}}
end{bmatrix},
$
where ${k_1, cdots, k_r}$ are distinct integers such that $1leq k_1, cdots, k_r leq N/100$ (ofcourse, assuming $N$ is much larger than 100.).
Question: What is a non-trivial lower bound (as a function of ${l_1, cdots, l_m}$, ${k_1, cdots, k_r}$, $N$ and $r$) for the smallest singular value of any submatrix made up of $N+r$ linearly independent columns of $A$?
It is also clear that as $N$ becomes larger and the other parameters remain constant, the smallest singular value will go to zero. It would be equally good if one can show that the rate of decrease is $Oleft(frac{1}{N^{1.5-delta}}right)$, $delta>0$.
An observation might be of some help - the rows of $A$ are orthogonal.
linear-algebra matrices
Consider the following matrix $A$:
$A = begin{bmatrix}l_1F & cdots & l_mF\I_N & cdots & I_Nend{bmatrix}$.
Here, ${l_1, cdots, l_m}$ are distinct real numbers such that their sum is zero, $I_N$ is the identity matrix of dimension $Ntimes N$ and $F$ is a $rtimes N$ matrix given by:
$ F = begin{bmatrix}
frac{1}{N} & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_1}{N}} &cdots & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_1 (N-1)}{N}}\
vdots & vdots & vdots & vdots \
frac{1}{N} & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_r}{N}} &cdots & frac{1}{N}e^{frac{2pi k_r (N-1)}{N}}
end{bmatrix},
$
where ${k_1, cdots, k_r}$ are distinct integers such that $1leq k_1, cdots, k_r leq N/100$ (ofcourse, assuming $N$ is much larger than 100.).
Question: What is a non-trivial lower bound (as a function of ${l_1, cdots, l_m}$, ${k_1, cdots, k_r}$, $N$ and $r$) for the smallest singular value of any submatrix made up of $N+r$ linearly independent columns of $A$?
It is also clear that as $N$ becomes larger and the other parameters remain constant, the smallest singular value will go to zero. It would be equally good if one can show that the rate of decrease is $Oleft(frac{1}{N^{1.5-delta}}right)$, $delta>0$.
An observation might be of some help - the rows of $A$ are orthogonal.
linear-algebra matrices
linear-algebra matrices
asked Nov 21 at 12:10
Shravan Mohan
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007648%2flower-bound-on-the-smallest-singular-value-of-a-submatrix-of-this-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown