Issue in comparing token contract address and address(0) in Solidity 0.5.0












1














I am trying to compare the token contract address with the address(0). This was working fine in older version of truffle and solidity compiler (0.4.24). When I upgraded truffle and started using the latest truffle and compiler version (0.5.0) I am unable to compare the token contract address and address(0).



Could you please assist me to resolve this ?



enter image description here










share|improve this question





























    1














    I am trying to compare the token contract address with the address(0). This was working fine in older version of truffle and solidity compiler (0.4.24). When I upgraded truffle and started using the latest truffle and compiler version (0.5.0) I am unable to compare the token contract address and address(0).



    Could you please assist me to resolve this ?



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1







      I am trying to compare the token contract address with the address(0). This was working fine in older version of truffle and solidity compiler (0.4.24). When I upgraded truffle and started using the latest truffle and compiler version (0.5.0) I am unable to compare the token contract address and address(0).



      Could you please assist me to resolve this ?



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question















      I am trying to compare the token contract address with the address(0). This was working fine in older version of truffle and solidity compiler (0.4.24). When I upgraded truffle and started using the latest truffle and compiler version (0.5.0) I am unable to compare the token contract address and address(0).



      Could you please assist me to resolve this ?



      enter image description here







      solidity truffle remix open-zeppelin






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago

























      asked 2 hours ago









      iappmaker

      16211




      16211






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          As of Solidity 0.5.X, contract types do not include the address members. Per the documentation:




          Contract types do not include address members anymore in order to
          separate the namespaces. Therefore, it is now necessary to explicitly
          convert values of contract type to addresses before using an address
          member. Example: if c is a contract, change c.transfer(...) to
          address(c).transfer(...), and c.balance to address(c).balance.




          So you will need to update that particular line of code to be require(address(token) != address(0));, as shown in this mvce:



          pragma solidity ^0.5.2;

          contract ERC20Interface {
          function totalSupply() public view returns (uint);
          function balanceOf(address tokenOwner) public view returns (uint balance);
          function allowance(address tokenOwner, address spender) public view returns (uint remaining);
          function transfer(address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
          function approve(address spender, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
          function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);

          event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint tokens);
          event Approval(address indexed tokenOwner, address indexed spender, uint tokens);
          }

          contract init {
          ERC20Interface token;

          function test() public view {
          require(address(token) != address(0));
          }
          }





          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "642"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fethereum.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64590%2fissue-in-comparing-token-contract-address-and-address0-in-solidity-0-5-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            As of Solidity 0.5.X, contract types do not include the address members. Per the documentation:




            Contract types do not include address members anymore in order to
            separate the namespaces. Therefore, it is now necessary to explicitly
            convert values of contract type to addresses before using an address
            member. Example: if c is a contract, change c.transfer(...) to
            address(c).transfer(...), and c.balance to address(c).balance.




            So you will need to update that particular line of code to be require(address(token) != address(0));, as shown in this mvce:



            pragma solidity ^0.5.2;

            contract ERC20Interface {
            function totalSupply() public view returns (uint);
            function balanceOf(address tokenOwner) public view returns (uint balance);
            function allowance(address tokenOwner, address spender) public view returns (uint remaining);
            function transfer(address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
            function approve(address spender, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
            function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);

            event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint tokens);
            event Approval(address indexed tokenOwner, address indexed spender, uint tokens);
            }

            contract init {
            ERC20Interface token;

            function test() public view {
            require(address(token) != address(0));
            }
            }





            share|improve this answer


























              2














              As of Solidity 0.5.X, contract types do not include the address members. Per the documentation:




              Contract types do not include address members anymore in order to
              separate the namespaces. Therefore, it is now necessary to explicitly
              convert values of contract type to addresses before using an address
              member. Example: if c is a contract, change c.transfer(...) to
              address(c).transfer(...), and c.balance to address(c).balance.




              So you will need to update that particular line of code to be require(address(token) != address(0));, as shown in this mvce:



              pragma solidity ^0.5.2;

              contract ERC20Interface {
              function totalSupply() public view returns (uint);
              function balanceOf(address tokenOwner) public view returns (uint balance);
              function allowance(address tokenOwner, address spender) public view returns (uint remaining);
              function transfer(address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
              function approve(address spender, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
              function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);

              event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint tokens);
              event Approval(address indexed tokenOwner, address indexed spender, uint tokens);
              }

              contract init {
              ERC20Interface token;

              function test() public view {
              require(address(token) != address(0));
              }
              }





              share|improve this answer
























                2












                2








                2






                As of Solidity 0.5.X, contract types do not include the address members. Per the documentation:




                Contract types do not include address members anymore in order to
                separate the namespaces. Therefore, it is now necessary to explicitly
                convert values of contract type to addresses before using an address
                member. Example: if c is a contract, change c.transfer(...) to
                address(c).transfer(...), and c.balance to address(c).balance.




                So you will need to update that particular line of code to be require(address(token) != address(0));, as shown in this mvce:



                pragma solidity ^0.5.2;

                contract ERC20Interface {
                function totalSupply() public view returns (uint);
                function balanceOf(address tokenOwner) public view returns (uint balance);
                function allowance(address tokenOwner, address spender) public view returns (uint remaining);
                function transfer(address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
                function approve(address spender, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
                function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);

                event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint tokens);
                event Approval(address indexed tokenOwner, address indexed spender, uint tokens);
                }

                contract init {
                ERC20Interface token;

                function test() public view {
                require(address(token) != address(0));
                }
                }





                share|improve this answer












                As of Solidity 0.5.X, contract types do not include the address members. Per the documentation:




                Contract types do not include address members anymore in order to
                separate the namespaces. Therefore, it is now necessary to explicitly
                convert values of contract type to addresses before using an address
                member. Example: if c is a contract, change c.transfer(...) to
                address(c).transfer(...), and c.balance to address(c).balance.




                So you will need to update that particular line of code to be require(address(token) != address(0));, as shown in this mvce:



                pragma solidity ^0.5.2;

                contract ERC20Interface {
                function totalSupply() public view returns (uint);
                function balanceOf(address tokenOwner) public view returns (uint balance);
                function allowance(address tokenOwner, address spender) public view returns (uint remaining);
                function transfer(address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
                function approve(address spender, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);
                function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint tokens) public returns (bool success);

                event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint tokens);
                event Approval(address indexed tokenOwner, address indexed spender, uint tokens);
                }

                contract init {
                ERC20Interface token;

                function test() public view {
                require(address(token) != address(0));
                }
                }






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                Shawn Tabrizi

                4,7882522




                4,7882522






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Ethereum Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fethereum.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f64590%2fissue-in-comparing-token-contract-address-and-address0-in-solidity-0-5-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bundesstraße 106

                    Verónica Boquete

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten