Example of a nowhere-zero 4-flow












1














I'm trying to understand the concept of nowhere-zero-flows.



I have this example graph that's supposed to have a nowhere-zero-4-flow (since it has a Hamiltonian cycle).



So by one of the theorems by Tutte, it should also have a nowhere-zero $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow.



If I understood it correctly, the flows assigned to the edges need to have a value out of ${(0,1), (1,0), (1,1)}$ and have to sum up to an even number.



For some reason I don't manage to assign the flows correctly. Help would be appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Is the linked graph supposed to be directed?
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 8:46










  • i'm trying to find an orientation for the graph such that it has a nowhere-zero-4-flow
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 8:49
















1














I'm trying to understand the concept of nowhere-zero-flows.



I have this example graph that's supposed to have a nowhere-zero-4-flow (since it has a Hamiltonian cycle).



So by one of the theorems by Tutte, it should also have a nowhere-zero $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow.



If I understood it correctly, the flows assigned to the edges need to have a value out of ${(0,1), (1,0), (1,1)}$ and have to sum up to an even number.



For some reason I don't manage to assign the flows correctly. Help would be appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Is the linked graph supposed to be directed?
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 8:46










  • i'm trying to find an orientation for the graph such that it has a nowhere-zero-4-flow
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 8:49














1












1








1







I'm trying to understand the concept of nowhere-zero-flows.



I have this example graph that's supposed to have a nowhere-zero-4-flow (since it has a Hamiltonian cycle).



So by one of the theorems by Tutte, it should also have a nowhere-zero $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow.



If I understood it correctly, the flows assigned to the edges need to have a value out of ${(0,1), (1,0), (1,1)}$ and have to sum up to an even number.



For some reason I don't manage to assign the flows correctly. Help would be appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question













I'm trying to understand the concept of nowhere-zero-flows.



I have this example graph that's supposed to have a nowhere-zero-4-flow (since it has a Hamiltonian cycle).



So by one of the theorems by Tutte, it should also have a nowhere-zero $mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow.



If I understood it correctly, the flows assigned to the edges need to have a value out of ${(0,1), (1,0), (1,1)}$ and have to sum up to an even number.



For some reason I don't manage to assign the flows correctly. Help would be appreciated!







graph-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 26 at 8:42









Lydia

134




134












  • Is the linked graph supposed to be directed?
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 8:46










  • i'm trying to find an orientation for the graph such that it has a nowhere-zero-4-flow
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 8:49


















  • Is the linked graph supposed to be directed?
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 8:46










  • i'm trying to find an orientation for the graph such that it has a nowhere-zero-4-flow
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 8:49
















Is the linked graph supposed to be directed?
– Servaes
Nov 26 at 8:46




Is the linked graph supposed to be directed?
– Servaes
Nov 26 at 8:46












i'm trying to find an orientation for the graph such that it has a nowhere-zero-4-flow
– Lydia
Nov 26 at 8:49




i'm trying to find an orientation for the graph such that it has a nowhere-zero-4-flow
– Lydia
Nov 26 at 8:49










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Take an entirely clockwise orientation; label all edges outside the triangle $(1,1)$, and label the edges of the triangle $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ accordingly.



enter image description here



There are of course many variations on this solution.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • oh - i understand what i did wrong all the time now!!! thanks a lot!!
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 8:58










  • You're welcome, I've added a picture for clarity.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 9:02






  • 1




    the direction can also be removed because it is in $mathbb{Z}_2$ can't it?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:26












  • is there a way to use the Hamiltonian cycle to construct the nowherezero-$mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:27










  • Indeed the direction can be removed, because the group has exponent $2$, i.e. $2g=0$ for all $gin G$, or equivalently $g=-g$ for all $gin G$.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 11:24











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014052%2fexample-of-a-nowhere-zero-4-flow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Take an entirely clockwise orientation; label all edges outside the triangle $(1,1)$, and label the edges of the triangle $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ accordingly.



enter image description here



There are of course many variations on this solution.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • oh - i understand what i did wrong all the time now!!! thanks a lot!!
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 8:58










  • You're welcome, I've added a picture for clarity.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 9:02






  • 1




    the direction can also be removed because it is in $mathbb{Z}_2$ can't it?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:26












  • is there a way to use the Hamiltonian cycle to construct the nowherezero-$mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:27










  • Indeed the direction can be removed, because the group has exponent $2$, i.e. $2g=0$ for all $gin G$, or equivalently $g=-g$ for all $gin G$.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 11:24
















0














Take an entirely clockwise orientation; label all edges outside the triangle $(1,1)$, and label the edges of the triangle $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ accordingly.



enter image description here



There are of course many variations on this solution.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • oh - i understand what i did wrong all the time now!!! thanks a lot!!
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 8:58










  • You're welcome, I've added a picture for clarity.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 9:02






  • 1




    the direction can also be removed because it is in $mathbb{Z}_2$ can't it?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:26












  • is there a way to use the Hamiltonian cycle to construct the nowherezero-$mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:27










  • Indeed the direction can be removed, because the group has exponent $2$, i.e. $2g=0$ for all $gin G$, or equivalently $g=-g$ for all $gin G$.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 11:24














0












0








0






Take an entirely clockwise orientation; label all edges outside the triangle $(1,1)$, and label the edges of the triangle $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ accordingly.



enter image description here



There are of course many variations on this solution.






share|cite|improve this answer














Take an entirely clockwise orientation; label all edges outside the triangle $(1,1)$, and label the edges of the triangle $(0,1)$ and $(1,0)$ accordingly.



enter image description here



There are of course many variations on this solution.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 26 at 9:01

























answered Nov 26 at 8:55









Servaes

22.3k33793




22.3k33793












  • oh - i understand what i did wrong all the time now!!! thanks a lot!!
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 8:58










  • You're welcome, I've added a picture for clarity.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 9:02






  • 1




    the direction can also be removed because it is in $mathbb{Z}_2$ can't it?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:26












  • is there a way to use the Hamiltonian cycle to construct the nowherezero-$mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:27










  • Indeed the direction can be removed, because the group has exponent $2$, i.e. $2g=0$ for all $gin G$, or equivalently $g=-g$ for all $gin G$.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 11:24


















  • oh - i understand what i did wrong all the time now!!! thanks a lot!!
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 8:58










  • You're welcome, I've added a picture for clarity.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 9:02






  • 1




    the direction can also be removed because it is in $mathbb{Z}_2$ can't it?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:26












  • is there a way to use the Hamiltonian cycle to construct the nowherezero-$mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow?
    – Lydia
    Nov 26 at 10:27










  • Indeed the direction can be removed, because the group has exponent $2$, i.e. $2g=0$ for all $gin G$, or equivalently $g=-g$ for all $gin G$.
    – Servaes
    Nov 26 at 11:24
















oh - i understand what i did wrong all the time now!!! thanks a lot!!
– Lydia
Nov 26 at 8:58




oh - i understand what i did wrong all the time now!!! thanks a lot!!
– Lydia
Nov 26 at 8:58












You're welcome, I've added a picture for clarity.
– Servaes
Nov 26 at 9:02




You're welcome, I've added a picture for clarity.
– Servaes
Nov 26 at 9:02




1




1




the direction can also be removed because it is in $mathbb{Z}_2$ can't it?
– Lydia
Nov 26 at 10:26






the direction can also be removed because it is in $mathbb{Z}_2$ can't it?
– Lydia
Nov 26 at 10:26














is there a way to use the Hamiltonian cycle to construct the nowherezero-$mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow?
– Lydia
Nov 26 at 10:27




is there a way to use the Hamiltonian cycle to construct the nowherezero-$mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_2$-flow?
– Lydia
Nov 26 at 10:27












Indeed the direction can be removed, because the group has exponent $2$, i.e. $2g=0$ for all $gin G$, or equivalently $g=-g$ for all $gin G$.
– Servaes
Nov 26 at 11:24




Indeed the direction can be removed, because the group has exponent $2$, i.e. $2g=0$ for all $gin G$, or equivalently $g=-g$ for all $gin G$.
– Servaes
Nov 26 at 11:24


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014052%2fexample-of-a-nowhere-zero-4-flow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Le Mesnil-Réaume

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always