Neumann problem for a circle.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












We consider the interior neumann problem : $$nabla^{2} u =0:::, ::r<R$$



$$ dfrac{partial u}{partial n}=dfrac{partial u}{partial r}=f(theta)::,::r=R::,:: 0<theta<2pi$$



We first establish the fact which as the solution says is the compatibility condition : $$int_B fds=0$$
which is established using Green's second formula. Now the solution proceeds as follows :



(1) The compatibility condition obtained above can be written as $$R int_0^{2pi} f(theta) dtheta=0$$



(2) In the case of the dirichlet problem of the circle , the solution of the laplace equation is given as : $$u(r,theta) = dfrac{a_0}{2} + sum_{k=1}^{infty}r^{k}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta)$$



(3) Differentiating with respect to r and applying the boundary conditions we obtain : $$dfrac{partial u}{partial r}(R,theta) = sum_{k=1}^{infty}kR^{k-1}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta) = f(theta)$$



(4) Now the expression of $f(theta)$ in a series of the form (3) is possible only by the virtue of the compatibility condition since : $$a_0 = dfrac{1}{pi} int_0^{2pi} f(tau) d tau = 0$$



The rest of the proof was okay , can anyone explain the points (1) and (4) ?



Like in (1) are we changing the variable into $theta$ ? If yes , then how is $R$ there ?



And I have no idea about (4). Kindly help !



Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    We consider the interior neumann problem : $$nabla^{2} u =0:::, ::r<R$$



    $$ dfrac{partial u}{partial n}=dfrac{partial u}{partial r}=f(theta)::,::r=R::,:: 0<theta<2pi$$



    We first establish the fact which as the solution says is the compatibility condition : $$int_B fds=0$$
    which is established using Green's second formula. Now the solution proceeds as follows :



    (1) The compatibility condition obtained above can be written as $$R int_0^{2pi} f(theta) dtheta=0$$



    (2) In the case of the dirichlet problem of the circle , the solution of the laplace equation is given as : $$u(r,theta) = dfrac{a_0}{2} + sum_{k=1}^{infty}r^{k}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta)$$



    (3) Differentiating with respect to r and applying the boundary conditions we obtain : $$dfrac{partial u}{partial r}(R,theta) = sum_{k=1}^{infty}kR^{k-1}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta) = f(theta)$$



    (4) Now the expression of $f(theta)$ in a series of the form (3) is possible only by the virtue of the compatibility condition since : $$a_0 = dfrac{1}{pi} int_0^{2pi} f(tau) d tau = 0$$



    The rest of the proof was okay , can anyone explain the points (1) and (4) ?



    Like in (1) are we changing the variable into $theta$ ? If yes , then how is $R$ there ?



    And I have no idea about (4). Kindly help !



    Thanks in advance !










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      We consider the interior neumann problem : $$nabla^{2} u =0:::, ::r<R$$



      $$ dfrac{partial u}{partial n}=dfrac{partial u}{partial r}=f(theta)::,::r=R::,:: 0<theta<2pi$$



      We first establish the fact which as the solution says is the compatibility condition : $$int_B fds=0$$
      which is established using Green's second formula. Now the solution proceeds as follows :



      (1) The compatibility condition obtained above can be written as $$R int_0^{2pi} f(theta) dtheta=0$$



      (2) In the case of the dirichlet problem of the circle , the solution of the laplace equation is given as : $$u(r,theta) = dfrac{a_0}{2} + sum_{k=1}^{infty}r^{k}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta)$$



      (3) Differentiating with respect to r and applying the boundary conditions we obtain : $$dfrac{partial u}{partial r}(R,theta) = sum_{k=1}^{infty}kR^{k-1}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta) = f(theta)$$



      (4) Now the expression of $f(theta)$ in a series of the form (3) is possible only by the virtue of the compatibility condition since : $$a_0 = dfrac{1}{pi} int_0^{2pi} f(tau) d tau = 0$$



      The rest of the proof was okay , can anyone explain the points (1) and (4) ?



      Like in (1) are we changing the variable into $theta$ ? If yes , then how is $R$ there ?



      And I have no idea about (4). Kindly help !



      Thanks in advance !










      share|cite|improve this question















      We consider the interior neumann problem : $$nabla^{2} u =0:::, ::r<R$$



      $$ dfrac{partial u}{partial n}=dfrac{partial u}{partial r}=f(theta)::,::r=R::,:: 0<theta<2pi$$



      We first establish the fact which as the solution says is the compatibility condition : $$int_B fds=0$$
      which is established using Green's second formula. Now the solution proceeds as follows :



      (1) The compatibility condition obtained above can be written as $$R int_0^{2pi} f(theta) dtheta=0$$



      (2) In the case of the dirichlet problem of the circle , the solution of the laplace equation is given as : $$u(r,theta) = dfrac{a_0}{2} + sum_{k=1}^{infty}r^{k}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta)$$



      (3) Differentiating with respect to r and applying the boundary conditions we obtain : $$dfrac{partial u}{partial r}(R,theta) = sum_{k=1}^{infty}kR^{k-1}(a_k cosktheta + b_k sinktheta) = f(theta)$$



      (4) Now the expression of $f(theta)$ in a series of the form (3) is possible only by the virtue of the compatibility condition since : $$a_0 = dfrac{1}{pi} int_0^{2pi} f(tau) d tau = 0$$



      The rest of the proof was okay , can anyone explain the points (1) and (4) ?



      Like in (1) are we changing the variable into $theta$ ? If yes , then how is $R$ there ?



      And I have no idea about (4). Kindly help !



      Thanks in advance !







      differential-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 8 '16 at 12:20

























      asked Mar 7 '16 at 19:33









      User9523

      9701822




      9701822






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.



          (4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1687412%2fneumann-problem-for-a-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.



            (4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.



              (4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.



                (4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                The integral in (1) is transformed into polar co-ordinates by considering the " arc-length " relation. $ds$ here is the arc length. $R$ is the radius of the region. So , using $ theta = dfrac{l}{r}$ , where $l$ is the arc length and $r$ is the radius . Thus we get $ theta = dfrac{ds}{R}$ . Substituting this gives the result.



                (4) actually tells the value of the constant $a_0$. That's all.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 12 '16 at 10:03









                User9523

                9701822




                9701822






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1687412%2fneumann-problem-for-a-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Willebadessen

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                    Residenzschloss Arolsen