Why is restriction $varphi_R$ a homeomorphism in showing cross is not locally Euclidean in Tu Manifolds?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Tu Manifolds Section 5.1



Definition of locally Euclidean of dimension n.



enter image description here



Example



enter image description here





To show $varphi_R: U setminus p to B setminus 0$ is also a homeomorphism, I think:





  1. $varphi_R = r circ varphi circ j$ where $j: U setminus p to U$ is inclusion and $r$ is some function $r: B(0,varepsilon) to B(0,varepsilon) setminus 0$, $varphi_R$ is bijective because $varphi(p)=0$ and $varphi$ is bijective and $varphi_R$ is continuous if we can find a continuous $r$ because $j$ and $varphi$ are continuous. Then $varphi_R$ is a homeomorphism if we can find an $r$ and show either that $varphi_R$ is an open or closed map or that $varphi_R^{-1}$ is continuous.


Is that correct?





  1. What $r$ can we select?




    • Must $r$ be a retraction? That is, is it insufficient to find a continuous $r$ that isn't a retraction, if it's possible?


    • Is it possible? (to find a continuous $r$ that isn't a retraction)





  2. Why is $varphi_R^{-1}$ continuous?




    • What is $varphi_R^{-1}$ anyway? I don't think $j^{-1}$ or $r^{-1}$ exist.



  3. What properties of open or closed maps are there to say $varphi_R$ is an open or closed map because $varphi$ is an open or closed map and some other facts?



We have $varphi(x)=varphi_R(x)$ for all $x in U setminus p$, so I think $varphi_R(x)$ is an open map too. This might be relevant:



Theorem 22.1 in Munkres:



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Tu Manifolds Section 5.1



    Definition of locally Euclidean of dimension n.



    enter image description here



    Example



    enter image description here





    To show $varphi_R: U setminus p to B setminus 0$ is also a homeomorphism, I think:





    1. $varphi_R = r circ varphi circ j$ where $j: U setminus p to U$ is inclusion and $r$ is some function $r: B(0,varepsilon) to B(0,varepsilon) setminus 0$, $varphi_R$ is bijective because $varphi(p)=0$ and $varphi$ is bijective and $varphi_R$ is continuous if we can find a continuous $r$ because $j$ and $varphi$ are continuous. Then $varphi_R$ is a homeomorphism if we can find an $r$ and show either that $varphi_R$ is an open or closed map or that $varphi_R^{-1}$ is continuous.


    Is that correct?





    1. What $r$ can we select?




      • Must $r$ be a retraction? That is, is it insufficient to find a continuous $r$ that isn't a retraction, if it's possible?


      • Is it possible? (to find a continuous $r$ that isn't a retraction)





    2. Why is $varphi_R^{-1}$ continuous?




      • What is $varphi_R^{-1}$ anyway? I don't think $j^{-1}$ or $r^{-1}$ exist.



    3. What properties of open or closed maps are there to say $varphi_R$ is an open or closed map because $varphi$ is an open or closed map and some other facts?



    We have $varphi(x)=varphi_R(x)$ for all $x in U setminus p$, so I think $varphi_R(x)$ is an open map too. This might be relevant:



    Theorem 22.1 in Munkres:



    enter image description here










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Tu Manifolds Section 5.1



      Definition of locally Euclidean of dimension n.



      enter image description here



      Example



      enter image description here





      To show $varphi_R: U setminus p to B setminus 0$ is also a homeomorphism, I think:





      1. $varphi_R = r circ varphi circ j$ where $j: U setminus p to U$ is inclusion and $r$ is some function $r: B(0,varepsilon) to B(0,varepsilon) setminus 0$, $varphi_R$ is bijective because $varphi(p)=0$ and $varphi$ is bijective and $varphi_R$ is continuous if we can find a continuous $r$ because $j$ and $varphi$ are continuous. Then $varphi_R$ is a homeomorphism if we can find an $r$ and show either that $varphi_R$ is an open or closed map or that $varphi_R^{-1}$ is continuous.


      Is that correct?





      1. What $r$ can we select?




        • Must $r$ be a retraction? That is, is it insufficient to find a continuous $r$ that isn't a retraction, if it's possible?


        • Is it possible? (to find a continuous $r$ that isn't a retraction)





      2. Why is $varphi_R^{-1}$ continuous?




        • What is $varphi_R^{-1}$ anyway? I don't think $j^{-1}$ or $r^{-1}$ exist.



      3. What properties of open or closed maps are there to say $varphi_R$ is an open or closed map because $varphi$ is an open or closed map and some other facts?



      We have $varphi(x)=varphi_R(x)$ for all $x in U setminus p$, so I think $varphi_R(x)$ is an open map too. This might be relevant:



      Theorem 22.1 in Munkres:



      enter image description here










      share|cite|improve this question













      Tu Manifolds Section 5.1



      Definition of locally Euclidean of dimension n.



      enter image description here



      Example



      enter image description here





      To show $varphi_R: U setminus p to B setminus 0$ is also a homeomorphism, I think:





      1. $varphi_R = r circ varphi circ j$ where $j: U setminus p to U$ is inclusion and $r$ is some function $r: B(0,varepsilon) to B(0,varepsilon) setminus 0$, $varphi_R$ is bijective because $varphi(p)=0$ and $varphi$ is bijective and $varphi_R$ is continuous if we can find a continuous $r$ because $j$ and $varphi$ are continuous. Then $varphi_R$ is a homeomorphism if we can find an $r$ and show either that $varphi_R$ is an open or closed map or that $varphi_R^{-1}$ is continuous.


      Is that correct?





      1. What $r$ can we select?




        • Must $r$ be a retraction? That is, is it insufficient to find a continuous $r$ that isn't a retraction, if it's possible?


        • Is it possible? (to find a continuous $r$ that isn't a retraction)





      2. Why is $varphi_R^{-1}$ continuous?




        • What is $varphi_R^{-1}$ anyway? I don't think $j^{-1}$ or $r^{-1}$ exist.



      3. What properties of open or closed maps are there to say $varphi_R$ is an open or closed map because $varphi$ is an open or closed map and some other facts?



      We have $varphi(x)=varphi_R(x)$ for all $x in U setminus p$, so I think $varphi_R(x)$ is an open map too. This might be relevant:



      Theorem 22.1 in Munkres:



      enter image description here







      general-topology differential-geometry algebraic-topology manifolds quotient-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 22 at 3:49









      Jack Bauer

      1,2531631




      1,2531631



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008721%2fwhy-is-restriction-varphi-r-a-homeomorphism-in-showing-cross-is-not-locally-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008721%2fwhy-is-restriction-varphi-r-a-homeomorphism-in-showing-cross-is-not-locally-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bundesstraße 106

          Verónica Boquete

          Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten