How to prove that the center of the fundamental group of $T_g$ is trivial for $g geq 2$?
11
$begingroup$
Where $T_g$ is a closed orientable surface of genus g.
I want a proof using covering space theory. I know a proof that uses the notion of hyperbolic groups and Riemanian geometry using uniformization theorem. But I want to know is it possible to prove it just using covering space theory?
algebraic-topology manifolds homotopy-theory covering-spaces
asked Mar 3 '17 at 17:58
InfinityInfinity
389113
$endgroup$
add a comment |
11
$begingroup$
Where $T_g$ is a closed orientable surface of genus g.
I want a proof using covering space theory. I know a proof that uses the notion of hyperbolic groups and Riemanian geometry using uniformization theorem. But I want to know is it possible to prove it just using covering space theory?
algebraic-topology manifolds homotopy-theory covering-spaces
asked Mar 3 '17 at 17:58
InfinityInfinity
389113
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There are purely algebraic proofs of this fact, but you need some background in combinatorial group theory, e.g. in Lyndon-Schupp.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Mar 3 '17 at 18:06
$begingroup$
@daw edited....
$endgroup$
– Infinity
Dec 24 '18 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Why do you want that? Fundamental groups themselves are generally nontrivial to compute.
$endgroup$
– anomaly
Dec 24 '18 at 23:35
$begingroup$
@anomaly I don't care about proofs from covering space theory, but a non-hyperbolic proof as in Moishe's first comment would be nice.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 27 '18 at 15:17
add a comment |
11
11
11
3
$begingroup$
Where $T_g$ is a closed orientable surface of genus g.
I want a proof using covering space theory. I know a proof that uses the notion of hyperbolic groups and Riemanian geometry using uniformization theorem. But I want to know is it possible to prove it just using covering space theory?
algebraic-topology manifolds homotopy-theory covering-spaces
asked Mar 3 '17 at 17:58
InfinityInfinity
389113
$endgroup$
Where $T_g$ is a closed orientable surface of genus g.
I want a proof using covering space theory. I know a proof that uses the notion of hyperbolic groups and Riemanian geometry using uniformization theorem. But I want to know is it possible to prove it just using covering space theory?
algebraic-topology manifolds homotopy-theory covering-spaces
algebraic-topology manifolds homotopy-theory covering-spaces
asked Mar 3 '17 at 17:58
InfinityInfinity
389113
asked Mar 3 '17 at 17:58
InfinityInfinity
389113
edited Dec 24 '18 at 22:54
Infinity
asked Mar 3 '17 at 17:58
InfinityInfinity
389113
asked Mar 3 '17 at 17:58
InfinityInfinity
389113
asked Mar 3 '17 at 17:58
InfinityInfinity
389113
389113
$begingroup$
There are purely algebraic proofs of this fact, but you need some background in combinatorial group theory, e.g. in Lyndon-Schupp.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Mar 3 '17 at 18:06
$begingroup$
@daw edited....
$endgroup$
– Infinity
Dec 24 '18 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Why do you want that? Fundamental groups themselves are generally nontrivial to compute.
$endgroup$
– anomaly
Dec 24 '18 at 23:35
$begingroup$
@anomaly I don't care about proofs from covering space theory, but a non-hyperbolic proof as in Moishe's first comment would be nice.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 27 '18 at 15:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are purely algebraic proofs of this fact, but you need some background in combinatorial group theory, e.g. in Lyndon-Schupp.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Mar 3 '17 at 18:06
$begingroup$
@daw edited....
$endgroup$
– Infinity
Dec 24 '18 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Why do you want that? Fundamental groups themselves are generally nontrivial to compute.
$endgroup$
– anomaly
Dec 24 '18 at 23:35
$begingroup$
@anomaly I don't care about proofs from covering space theory, but a non-hyperbolic proof as in Moishe's first comment would be nice.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 27 '18 at 15:17
$begingroup$
There are purely algebraic proofs of this fact, but you need some background in combinatorial group theory, e.g. in Lyndon-Schupp.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Mar 3 '17 at 18:06
$begingroup$
There are purely algebraic proofs of this fact, but you need some background in combinatorial group theory, e.g. in Lyndon-Schupp.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Mar 3 '17 at 18:06
$begingroup$
@daw edited....
$endgroup$
– Infinity
Dec 24 '18 at 22:55
$begingroup$
@daw edited....
$endgroup$
– Infinity
Dec 24 '18 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Why do you want that? Fundamental groups themselves are generally nontrivial to compute.
$endgroup$
– anomaly
Dec 24 '18 at 23:35
$begingroup$
Why do you want that? Fundamental groups themselves are generally nontrivial to compute.
$endgroup$
– anomaly
Dec 24 '18 at 23:35
$begingroup$
@anomaly I don't care about proofs from covering space theory, but a non-hyperbolic proof as in Moishe's first comment would be nice.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 27 '18 at 15:17
$begingroup$
@anomaly I don't care about proofs from covering space theory, but a non-hyperbolic proof as in Moishe's first comment would be nice.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 27 '18 at 15:17
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2170520%2fhow-to-prove-that-the-center-of-the-fundamental-group-of-t-g-is-trivial-for-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2170520%2fhow-to-prove-that-the-center-of-the-fundamental-group-of-t-g-is-trivial-for-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
There are purely algebraic proofs of this fact, but you need some background in combinatorial group theory, e.g. in Lyndon-Schupp.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Mar 3 '17 at 18:06
$begingroup$
@daw edited....
$endgroup$
– Infinity
Dec 24 '18 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Why do you want that? Fundamental groups themselves are generally nontrivial to compute.
$endgroup$
– anomaly
Dec 24 '18 at 23:35
$begingroup$
@anomaly I don't care about proofs from covering space theory, but a non-hyperbolic proof as in Moishe's first comment would be nice.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 27 '18 at 15:17