Probability of winning/losing a lonely card game when you shout an integer progressively each time you draw











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Take a standard face-down 52-deck of cards, including 13 ranks of four suits (for simplicity, assign value 1 to 13 from ace to King). Draw the cards one by one, shouting the integers from 1 to 13 (and then starting again) in the natural order (i.e. {1,2,3,4...}) at each draw. For example, you shout 'one' and draw a 7, then you shout 'two' and draw an ace, then you shout 'three' and draw a King, and so on and so forth. You lose instantly if the number you've shouted coincide with the rank of the card you've just drawn. What is the probability of winning/losing the game (whichever is easier to compute)?



**Additional information:
The problem is related to the first-encounter probability of two walks (one deterministic and one random): a deterministic walk jumping to the right by one lattice site at each time-step, and resetting after 13 steps, and another walk randomly jumping among the same thirteen sites (with the constraint that no site can be visited more than four times).










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite












    Take a standard face-down 52-deck of cards, including 13 ranks of four suits (for simplicity, assign value 1 to 13 from ace to King). Draw the cards one by one, shouting the integers from 1 to 13 (and then starting again) in the natural order (i.e. {1,2,3,4...}) at each draw. For example, you shout 'one' and draw a 7, then you shout 'two' and draw an ace, then you shout 'three' and draw a King, and so on and so forth. You lose instantly if the number you've shouted coincide with the rank of the card you've just drawn. What is the probability of winning/losing the game (whichever is easier to compute)?



    **Additional information:
    The problem is related to the first-encounter probability of two walks (one deterministic and one random): a deterministic walk jumping to the right by one lattice site at each time-step, and resetting after 13 steps, and another walk randomly jumping among the same thirteen sites (with the constraint that no site can be visited more than four times).










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite











      Take a standard face-down 52-deck of cards, including 13 ranks of four suits (for simplicity, assign value 1 to 13 from ace to King). Draw the cards one by one, shouting the integers from 1 to 13 (and then starting again) in the natural order (i.e. {1,2,3,4...}) at each draw. For example, you shout 'one' and draw a 7, then you shout 'two' and draw an ace, then you shout 'three' and draw a King, and so on and so forth. You lose instantly if the number you've shouted coincide with the rank of the card you've just drawn. What is the probability of winning/losing the game (whichever is easier to compute)?



      **Additional information:
      The problem is related to the first-encounter probability of two walks (one deterministic and one random): a deterministic walk jumping to the right by one lattice site at each time-step, and resetting after 13 steps, and another walk randomly jumping among the same thirteen sites (with the constraint that no site can be visited more than four times).










      share|cite|improve this question















      Take a standard face-down 52-deck of cards, including 13 ranks of four suits (for simplicity, assign value 1 to 13 from ace to King). Draw the cards one by one, shouting the integers from 1 to 13 (and then starting again) in the natural order (i.e. {1,2,3,4...}) at each draw. For example, you shout 'one' and draw a 7, then you shout 'two' and draw an ace, then you shout 'three' and draw a King, and so on and so forth. You lose instantly if the number you've shouted coincide with the rank of the card you've just drawn. What is the probability of winning/losing the game (whichever is easier to compute)?



      **Additional information:
      The problem is related to the first-encounter probability of two walks (one deterministic and one random): a deterministic walk jumping to the right by one lattice site at each time-step, and resetting after 13 steps, and another walk randomly jumping among the same thirteen sites (with the constraint that no site can be visited more than four times).







      combinatorics random-walk card-games






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 16:07

























      asked Nov 20 at 14:27









      Pierpaolo Vivo

      5,1832623




      5,1832623






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          This is the so-called "Frustration solitaire". This is a good reference: article by Doyle, Grinstead and Snell. The probability of winning is about $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ where $4$ is related to the number of suits. That is about $2$%, this game is really frustrating!!



          P.S. As pointed out by Michael Lugo below, at page 8 of the linked article we can find the exact winning probability for a 52-card deck which is about $0.0162$. Even for $n=13$, the asymptotic probability $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ gives a reasonable estimation of the exact probability.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Note that $n = 13$ isn't large enough for the asymptotics to kick in; for a 52-card deck with four suits the probability is $0.0162$ (page 8 of the linked article). I don't have a good explanation for why this probability should be less than the asymptotic probability, instead of greater.
            – Michael Lugo
            Nov 20 at 14:54


















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          An exact solution is possible with the method of rook polynomials and a computer algebra system. Rook Polynomial



          First, it helps to reformulate the problem a little to make the solution by rook polynomials easier to visualize. So let's suppose that before shuffling, the deck is in the order ace of diamonds, ace of clubs, ace of hearts, ace of spades, ace of diamonds, 2 of clubs, 2 of hearts, 2 of spades, 2 of diamonds, etc., and let's suppose that the instead of shouting out "one, two, three, ..." , the player shouts out "one, one, one, one, two, two, two, two, ...". Since the deck is shuffled randomly, this revision does not affect the probability of winning. With this formulation, the player wins if there is no ace in cards 1-4 in the shuffled deck and no 2 in cards 5-8 and no 3 in cards 9-12, etc. Since the shuffled deck may consist of any of the $52!$ possible permutations of the original order, all of which we assume are equally likely, we would like to count the permutations which result in a win.



          To use the method of rook polynomials, we view a permutation of the cards as equivalent to placing 52 non-attacking rooks on a 52 by 52 board, i.e. with exactly one rook in each row and column. The winning permutations correspond to a placement of the rooks on the board below avoiding the gray squares. For reasons of space we have shown only the first twelve rows and columns,but please imagine the pattern extending into a 52 by 52 board.



          Restricted Board
          ...plus 40 more rows and columns (unshown).



          The rook polynomial of the 4 by 4 grey square in the upper left hand corner is
          $$R_4(x) = 1+16x+72x^2+96x^3+26x^4$$
          (See the Wikipedia page linked above.) What this means is that there are $16$ ways to place one rook on the area, $72$ ways to place two non-attacking rooks, $96$ ways to place three non-attacking rooks, and $26$ ways to place four non-attacking rooks.



          The rook polynomial of the restricted area on the 52 by 52 board, consisting of 13 such 4 by 4 squares, is then
          $$R_{52}(x) = R_4(x)^{13} = r_0 + r_1x +r_2x^2 +r_3x^3+ dots + r_{52}x^{52}$$
          where the coefficients $r_0, r_1, r_2, r_3, dots , r_{52}$ are not listed but can be calculated explicitly by expanding $R_4(x)^{13}$. This would be very tedious to do by hand, but it's easy with a computer algebra system. (I used Mathematica.) By the principle of inclusion/exclusion, the number of ways to place 52 non-attacking rooks on the non-excluded area of the board is
          $$N = sum_{i=0}^{52} (-1)^i (52-i)! ;r_i$$
          The result, calculated by Mathematica, is
          $$N = 1309307359844999263426548962125482317263708526033413008220015566848$$
          so the probability of winning the game is
          $$frac{N}{52!} = 0.0162328$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006372%2fprobability-of-winning-losing-a-lonely-card-game-when-you-shout-an-integer-progr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            This is the so-called "Frustration solitaire". This is a good reference: article by Doyle, Grinstead and Snell. The probability of winning is about $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ where $4$ is related to the number of suits. That is about $2$%, this game is really frustrating!!



            P.S. As pointed out by Michael Lugo below, at page 8 of the linked article we can find the exact winning probability for a 52-card deck which is about $0.0162$. Even for $n=13$, the asymptotic probability $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ gives a reasonable estimation of the exact probability.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Note that $n = 13$ isn't large enough for the asymptotics to kick in; for a 52-card deck with four suits the probability is $0.0162$ (page 8 of the linked article). I don't have a good explanation for why this probability should be less than the asymptotic probability, instead of greater.
              – Michael Lugo
              Nov 20 at 14:54















            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            This is the so-called "Frustration solitaire". This is a good reference: article by Doyle, Grinstead and Snell. The probability of winning is about $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ where $4$ is related to the number of suits. That is about $2$%, this game is really frustrating!!



            P.S. As pointed out by Michael Lugo below, at page 8 of the linked article we can find the exact winning probability for a 52-card deck which is about $0.0162$. Even for $n=13$, the asymptotic probability $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ gives a reasonable estimation of the exact probability.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Note that $n = 13$ isn't large enough for the asymptotics to kick in; for a 52-card deck with four suits the probability is $0.0162$ (page 8 of the linked article). I don't have a good explanation for why this probability should be less than the asymptotic probability, instead of greater.
              – Michael Lugo
              Nov 20 at 14:54













            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted






            This is the so-called "Frustration solitaire". This is a good reference: article by Doyle, Grinstead and Snell. The probability of winning is about $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ where $4$ is related to the number of suits. That is about $2$%, this game is really frustrating!!



            P.S. As pointed out by Michael Lugo below, at page 8 of the linked article we can find the exact winning probability for a 52-card deck which is about $0.0162$. Even for $n=13$, the asymptotic probability $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ gives a reasonable estimation of the exact probability.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            This is the so-called "Frustration solitaire". This is a good reference: article by Doyle, Grinstead and Snell. The probability of winning is about $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ where $4$ is related to the number of suits. That is about $2$%, this game is really frustrating!!



            P.S. As pointed out by Michael Lugo below, at page 8 of the linked article we can find the exact winning probability for a 52-card deck which is about $0.0162$. Even for $n=13$, the asymptotic probability $1/e^4approx 0.0183$ gives a reasonable estimation of the exact probability.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 20 at 15:21

























            answered Nov 20 at 14:38









            Robert Z

            91.3k1058129




            91.3k1058129












            • Note that $n = 13$ isn't large enough for the asymptotics to kick in; for a 52-card deck with four suits the probability is $0.0162$ (page 8 of the linked article). I don't have a good explanation for why this probability should be less than the asymptotic probability, instead of greater.
              – Michael Lugo
              Nov 20 at 14:54


















            • Note that $n = 13$ isn't large enough for the asymptotics to kick in; for a 52-card deck with four suits the probability is $0.0162$ (page 8 of the linked article). I don't have a good explanation for why this probability should be less than the asymptotic probability, instead of greater.
              – Michael Lugo
              Nov 20 at 14:54
















            Note that $n = 13$ isn't large enough for the asymptotics to kick in; for a 52-card deck with four suits the probability is $0.0162$ (page 8 of the linked article). I don't have a good explanation for why this probability should be less than the asymptotic probability, instead of greater.
            – Michael Lugo
            Nov 20 at 14:54




            Note that $n = 13$ isn't large enough for the asymptotics to kick in; for a 52-card deck with four suits the probability is $0.0162$ (page 8 of the linked article). I don't have a good explanation for why this probability should be less than the asymptotic probability, instead of greater.
            – Michael Lugo
            Nov 20 at 14:54










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            An exact solution is possible with the method of rook polynomials and a computer algebra system. Rook Polynomial



            First, it helps to reformulate the problem a little to make the solution by rook polynomials easier to visualize. So let's suppose that before shuffling, the deck is in the order ace of diamonds, ace of clubs, ace of hearts, ace of spades, ace of diamonds, 2 of clubs, 2 of hearts, 2 of spades, 2 of diamonds, etc., and let's suppose that the instead of shouting out "one, two, three, ..." , the player shouts out "one, one, one, one, two, two, two, two, ...". Since the deck is shuffled randomly, this revision does not affect the probability of winning. With this formulation, the player wins if there is no ace in cards 1-4 in the shuffled deck and no 2 in cards 5-8 and no 3 in cards 9-12, etc. Since the shuffled deck may consist of any of the $52!$ possible permutations of the original order, all of which we assume are equally likely, we would like to count the permutations which result in a win.



            To use the method of rook polynomials, we view a permutation of the cards as equivalent to placing 52 non-attacking rooks on a 52 by 52 board, i.e. with exactly one rook in each row and column. The winning permutations correspond to a placement of the rooks on the board below avoiding the gray squares. For reasons of space we have shown only the first twelve rows and columns,but please imagine the pattern extending into a 52 by 52 board.



            Restricted Board
            ...plus 40 more rows and columns (unshown).



            The rook polynomial of the 4 by 4 grey square in the upper left hand corner is
            $$R_4(x) = 1+16x+72x^2+96x^3+26x^4$$
            (See the Wikipedia page linked above.) What this means is that there are $16$ ways to place one rook on the area, $72$ ways to place two non-attacking rooks, $96$ ways to place three non-attacking rooks, and $26$ ways to place four non-attacking rooks.



            The rook polynomial of the restricted area on the 52 by 52 board, consisting of 13 such 4 by 4 squares, is then
            $$R_{52}(x) = R_4(x)^{13} = r_0 + r_1x +r_2x^2 +r_3x^3+ dots + r_{52}x^{52}$$
            where the coefficients $r_0, r_1, r_2, r_3, dots , r_{52}$ are not listed but can be calculated explicitly by expanding $R_4(x)^{13}$. This would be very tedious to do by hand, but it's easy with a computer algebra system. (I used Mathematica.) By the principle of inclusion/exclusion, the number of ways to place 52 non-attacking rooks on the non-excluded area of the board is
            $$N = sum_{i=0}^{52} (-1)^i (52-i)! ;r_i$$
            The result, calculated by Mathematica, is
            $$N = 1309307359844999263426548962125482317263708526033413008220015566848$$
            so the probability of winning the game is
            $$frac{N}{52!} = 0.0162328$$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              An exact solution is possible with the method of rook polynomials and a computer algebra system. Rook Polynomial



              First, it helps to reformulate the problem a little to make the solution by rook polynomials easier to visualize. So let's suppose that before shuffling, the deck is in the order ace of diamonds, ace of clubs, ace of hearts, ace of spades, ace of diamonds, 2 of clubs, 2 of hearts, 2 of spades, 2 of diamonds, etc., and let's suppose that the instead of shouting out "one, two, three, ..." , the player shouts out "one, one, one, one, two, two, two, two, ...". Since the deck is shuffled randomly, this revision does not affect the probability of winning. With this formulation, the player wins if there is no ace in cards 1-4 in the shuffled deck and no 2 in cards 5-8 and no 3 in cards 9-12, etc. Since the shuffled deck may consist of any of the $52!$ possible permutations of the original order, all of which we assume are equally likely, we would like to count the permutations which result in a win.



              To use the method of rook polynomials, we view a permutation of the cards as equivalent to placing 52 non-attacking rooks on a 52 by 52 board, i.e. with exactly one rook in each row and column. The winning permutations correspond to a placement of the rooks on the board below avoiding the gray squares. For reasons of space we have shown only the first twelve rows and columns,but please imagine the pattern extending into a 52 by 52 board.



              Restricted Board
              ...plus 40 more rows and columns (unshown).



              The rook polynomial of the 4 by 4 grey square in the upper left hand corner is
              $$R_4(x) = 1+16x+72x^2+96x^3+26x^4$$
              (See the Wikipedia page linked above.) What this means is that there are $16$ ways to place one rook on the area, $72$ ways to place two non-attacking rooks, $96$ ways to place three non-attacking rooks, and $26$ ways to place four non-attacking rooks.



              The rook polynomial of the restricted area on the 52 by 52 board, consisting of 13 such 4 by 4 squares, is then
              $$R_{52}(x) = R_4(x)^{13} = r_0 + r_1x +r_2x^2 +r_3x^3+ dots + r_{52}x^{52}$$
              where the coefficients $r_0, r_1, r_2, r_3, dots , r_{52}$ are not listed but can be calculated explicitly by expanding $R_4(x)^{13}$. This would be very tedious to do by hand, but it's easy with a computer algebra system. (I used Mathematica.) By the principle of inclusion/exclusion, the number of ways to place 52 non-attacking rooks on the non-excluded area of the board is
              $$N = sum_{i=0}^{52} (-1)^i (52-i)! ;r_i$$
              The result, calculated by Mathematica, is
              $$N = 1309307359844999263426548962125482317263708526033413008220015566848$$
              so the probability of winning the game is
              $$frac{N}{52!} = 0.0162328$$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                An exact solution is possible with the method of rook polynomials and a computer algebra system. Rook Polynomial



                First, it helps to reformulate the problem a little to make the solution by rook polynomials easier to visualize. So let's suppose that before shuffling, the deck is in the order ace of diamonds, ace of clubs, ace of hearts, ace of spades, ace of diamonds, 2 of clubs, 2 of hearts, 2 of spades, 2 of diamonds, etc., and let's suppose that the instead of shouting out "one, two, three, ..." , the player shouts out "one, one, one, one, two, two, two, two, ...". Since the deck is shuffled randomly, this revision does not affect the probability of winning. With this formulation, the player wins if there is no ace in cards 1-4 in the shuffled deck and no 2 in cards 5-8 and no 3 in cards 9-12, etc. Since the shuffled deck may consist of any of the $52!$ possible permutations of the original order, all of which we assume are equally likely, we would like to count the permutations which result in a win.



                To use the method of rook polynomials, we view a permutation of the cards as equivalent to placing 52 non-attacking rooks on a 52 by 52 board, i.e. with exactly one rook in each row and column. The winning permutations correspond to a placement of the rooks on the board below avoiding the gray squares. For reasons of space we have shown only the first twelve rows and columns,but please imagine the pattern extending into a 52 by 52 board.



                Restricted Board
                ...plus 40 more rows and columns (unshown).



                The rook polynomial of the 4 by 4 grey square in the upper left hand corner is
                $$R_4(x) = 1+16x+72x^2+96x^3+26x^4$$
                (See the Wikipedia page linked above.) What this means is that there are $16$ ways to place one rook on the area, $72$ ways to place two non-attacking rooks, $96$ ways to place three non-attacking rooks, and $26$ ways to place four non-attacking rooks.



                The rook polynomial of the restricted area on the 52 by 52 board, consisting of 13 such 4 by 4 squares, is then
                $$R_{52}(x) = R_4(x)^{13} = r_0 + r_1x +r_2x^2 +r_3x^3+ dots + r_{52}x^{52}$$
                where the coefficients $r_0, r_1, r_2, r_3, dots , r_{52}$ are not listed but can be calculated explicitly by expanding $R_4(x)^{13}$. This would be very tedious to do by hand, but it's easy with a computer algebra system. (I used Mathematica.) By the principle of inclusion/exclusion, the number of ways to place 52 non-attacking rooks on the non-excluded area of the board is
                $$N = sum_{i=0}^{52} (-1)^i (52-i)! ;r_i$$
                The result, calculated by Mathematica, is
                $$N = 1309307359844999263426548962125482317263708526033413008220015566848$$
                so the probability of winning the game is
                $$frac{N}{52!} = 0.0162328$$






                share|cite|improve this answer












                An exact solution is possible with the method of rook polynomials and a computer algebra system. Rook Polynomial



                First, it helps to reformulate the problem a little to make the solution by rook polynomials easier to visualize. So let's suppose that before shuffling, the deck is in the order ace of diamonds, ace of clubs, ace of hearts, ace of spades, ace of diamonds, 2 of clubs, 2 of hearts, 2 of spades, 2 of diamonds, etc., and let's suppose that the instead of shouting out "one, two, three, ..." , the player shouts out "one, one, one, one, two, two, two, two, ...". Since the deck is shuffled randomly, this revision does not affect the probability of winning. With this formulation, the player wins if there is no ace in cards 1-4 in the shuffled deck and no 2 in cards 5-8 and no 3 in cards 9-12, etc. Since the shuffled deck may consist of any of the $52!$ possible permutations of the original order, all of which we assume are equally likely, we would like to count the permutations which result in a win.



                To use the method of rook polynomials, we view a permutation of the cards as equivalent to placing 52 non-attacking rooks on a 52 by 52 board, i.e. with exactly one rook in each row and column. The winning permutations correspond to a placement of the rooks on the board below avoiding the gray squares. For reasons of space we have shown only the first twelve rows and columns,but please imagine the pattern extending into a 52 by 52 board.



                Restricted Board
                ...plus 40 more rows and columns (unshown).



                The rook polynomial of the 4 by 4 grey square in the upper left hand corner is
                $$R_4(x) = 1+16x+72x^2+96x^3+26x^4$$
                (See the Wikipedia page linked above.) What this means is that there are $16$ ways to place one rook on the area, $72$ ways to place two non-attacking rooks, $96$ ways to place three non-attacking rooks, and $26$ ways to place four non-attacking rooks.



                The rook polynomial of the restricted area on the 52 by 52 board, consisting of 13 such 4 by 4 squares, is then
                $$R_{52}(x) = R_4(x)^{13} = r_0 + r_1x +r_2x^2 +r_3x^3+ dots + r_{52}x^{52}$$
                where the coefficients $r_0, r_1, r_2, r_3, dots , r_{52}$ are not listed but can be calculated explicitly by expanding $R_4(x)^{13}$. This would be very tedious to do by hand, but it's easy with a computer algebra system. (I used Mathematica.) By the principle of inclusion/exclusion, the number of ways to place 52 non-attacking rooks on the non-excluded area of the board is
                $$N = sum_{i=0}^{52} (-1)^i (52-i)! ;r_i$$
                The result, calculated by Mathematica, is
                $$N = 1309307359844999263426548962125482317263708526033413008220015566848$$
                so the probability of winning the game is
                $$frac{N}{52!} = 0.0162328$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 21 at 20:08









                awkward

                5,71111022




                5,71111022






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006372%2fprobability-of-winning-losing-a-lonely-card-game-when-you-shout-an-integer-progr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Le Mesnil-Réaume

                    Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

                    web3.py web3.isConnected() returns false always