Set of vectors spanning an n - dim vector space implies set is a basis











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Theorem:



If a set of n vectors spans an n-dimensional vector space, then the set is a basis for that vector space.




Attempt:



Let S be a set of n vectors spanning an n-dimensional vector space.
This implies that any vector in the vector space $left(V, R^{n}right)$ is a linear combination of vectors in the set S.



It suffice to show that S is linearly independent.



Suppose that S is linearly dependent.
Then for some vectors $vec{v}_{i}, exists i in mathbb{Z}_{1}^{n}$ in S that may be expressed as a linear combination of some vectors in S, the removal of $vec{v}_{i}$ does not affect the span of set S.



Any hints to bring me forward is highly appreciated.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    You're almost done - say $span(S) = span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace)$, then $n = dim(span(S)) = dim(span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace))$, but what is $|S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace|$?
    – Stockfish
    Nov 23 at 14:34










  • @Stockfish And so a contradiction exists for the order of the set S is n is n -1.
    – Mathematicing
    Nov 23 at 14:40















up vote
0
down vote

favorite













Theorem:



If a set of n vectors spans an n-dimensional vector space, then the set is a basis for that vector space.




Attempt:



Let S be a set of n vectors spanning an n-dimensional vector space.
This implies that any vector in the vector space $left(V, R^{n}right)$ is a linear combination of vectors in the set S.



It suffice to show that S is linearly independent.



Suppose that S is linearly dependent.
Then for some vectors $vec{v}_{i}, exists i in mathbb{Z}_{1}^{n}$ in S that may be expressed as a linear combination of some vectors in S, the removal of $vec{v}_{i}$ does not affect the span of set S.



Any hints to bring me forward is highly appreciated.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    You're almost done - say $span(S) = span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace)$, then $n = dim(span(S)) = dim(span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace))$, but what is $|S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace|$?
    – Stockfish
    Nov 23 at 14:34










  • @Stockfish And so a contradiction exists for the order of the set S is n is n -1.
    – Mathematicing
    Nov 23 at 14:40













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Theorem:



If a set of n vectors spans an n-dimensional vector space, then the set is a basis for that vector space.




Attempt:



Let S be a set of n vectors spanning an n-dimensional vector space.
This implies that any vector in the vector space $left(V, R^{n}right)$ is a linear combination of vectors in the set S.



It suffice to show that S is linearly independent.



Suppose that S is linearly dependent.
Then for some vectors $vec{v}_{i}, exists i in mathbb{Z}_{1}^{n}$ in S that may be expressed as a linear combination of some vectors in S, the removal of $vec{v}_{i}$ does not affect the span of set S.



Any hints to bring me forward is highly appreciated.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question














Theorem:



If a set of n vectors spans an n-dimensional vector space, then the set is a basis for that vector space.




Attempt:



Let S be a set of n vectors spanning an n-dimensional vector space.
This implies that any vector in the vector space $left(V, R^{n}right)$ is a linear combination of vectors in the set S.



It suffice to show that S is linearly independent.



Suppose that S is linearly dependent.
Then for some vectors $vec{v}_{i}, exists i in mathbb{Z}_{1}^{n}$ in S that may be expressed as a linear combination of some vectors in S, the removal of $vec{v}_{i}$ does not affect the span of set S.



Any hints to bring me forward is highly appreciated.



Thanks in advance.







linear-algebra proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 23 at 14:19









Mathematicing

2,43621851




2,43621851








  • 1




    You're almost done - say $span(S) = span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace)$, then $n = dim(span(S)) = dim(span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace))$, but what is $|S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace|$?
    – Stockfish
    Nov 23 at 14:34










  • @Stockfish And so a contradiction exists for the order of the set S is n is n -1.
    – Mathematicing
    Nov 23 at 14:40














  • 1




    You're almost done - say $span(S) = span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace)$, then $n = dim(span(S)) = dim(span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace))$, but what is $|S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace|$?
    – Stockfish
    Nov 23 at 14:34










  • @Stockfish And so a contradiction exists for the order of the set S is n is n -1.
    – Mathematicing
    Nov 23 at 14:40








1




1




You're almost done - say $span(S) = span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace)$, then $n = dim(span(S)) = dim(span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace))$, but what is $|S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace|$?
– Stockfish
Nov 23 at 14:34




You're almost done - say $span(S) = span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace)$, then $n = dim(span(S)) = dim(span(S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace))$, but what is $|S setminus lbrace v_1 rbrace|$?
– Stockfish
Nov 23 at 14:34












@Stockfish And so a contradiction exists for the order of the set S is n is n -1.
– Mathematicing
Nov 23 at 14:40




@Stockfish And so a contradiction exists for the order of the set S is n is n -1.
– Mathematicing
Nov 23 at 14:40










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Let $S={x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n}$ be a set spanning the vector space $V$ of dimension $n$. Suppose $S$ is not a basis of $V$. Then $S$ is linearly dependent. Thus there exists $x_iin S$ such that $x_i$ is a linear combination of remaining $n-1$ vectors as $Ssetminus {x_i}$ also spans $V$. Thus $n-1$ vectors can span $V$, which is a contradiction. Hence $S$ is a basis.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Which is a contradiction or not, depending on what previous results we're allowed to use...
    – David C. Ullrich
    Nov 23 at 14:39










  • Up for the effort
    – Mathematicing
    Nov 23 at 14:41


















up vote
1
down vote













It's impossible to say what's a correct solution without knowing what previously proved results you're allowed to use (for example, the other answer is fine if you're given that $n-1$ vectors cannot span $V$.)



Since the word "dimension" appears it seems reasonable to conjecture that you've already shown that any basis for $V$ must have exactly $n$ elements; this is required before the typical definition of "dimension" makes sense. Assuming that it's an easy exercise:



Show that $S$ contains a minimal spanning set: There exists $S_1subset S$ such that $S_1$ spans $V$ and if $S_2subset S_1$ and $S_2$ spans $V$ then $S_2=S_1$. Show that it follows that $S_1$ is independent.



So $S_1$ is a basis. Hence that previous result show that $S_1$ contains exactly $n$ elements; since $S_1subset S$ this shows that $S_1=S$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010417%2fset-of-vectors-spanning-an-n-dim-vector-space-implies-set-is-a-basis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    Let $S={x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n}$ be a set spanning the vector space $V$ of dimension $n$. Suppose $S$ is not a basis of $V$. Then $S$ is linearly dependent. Thus there exists $x_iin S$ such that $x_i$ is a linear combination of remaining $n-1$ vectors as $Ssetminus {x_i}$ also spans $V$. Thus $n-1$ vectors can span $V$, which is a contradiction. Hence $S$ is a basis.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Which is a contradiction or not, depending on what previous results we're allowed to use...
      – David C. Ullrich
      Nov 23 at 14:39










    • Up for the effort
      – Mathematicing
      Nov 23 at 14:41















    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    Let $S={x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n}$ be a set spanning the vector space $V$ of dimension $n$. Suppose $S$ is not a basis of $V$. Then $S$ is linearly dependent. Thus there exists $x_iin S$ such that $x_i$ is a linear combination of remaining $n-1$ vectors as $Ssetminus {x_i}$ also spans $V$. Thus $n-1$ vectors can span $V$, which is a contradiction. Hence $S$ is a basis.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Which is a contradiction or not, depending on what previous results we're allowed to use...
      – David C. Ullrich
      Nov 23 at 14:39










    • Up for the effort
      – Mathematicing
      Nov 23 at 14:41













    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted






    Let $S={x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n}$ be a set spanning the vector space $V$ of dimension $n$. Suppose $S$ is not a basis of $V$. Then $S$ is linearly dependent. Thus there exists $x_iin S$ such that $x_i$ is a linear combination of remaining $n-1$ vectors as $Ssetminus {x_i}$ also spans $V$. Thus $n-1$ vectors can span $V$, which is a contradiction. Hence $S$ is a basis.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    Let $S={x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n}$ be a set spanning the vector space $V$ of dimension $n$. Suppose $S$ is not a basis of $V$. Then $S$ is linearly dependent. Thus there exists $x_iin S$ such that $x_i$ is a linear combination of remaining $n-1$ vectors as $Ssetminus {x_i}$ also spans $V$. Thus $n-1$ vectors can span $V$, which is a contradiction. Hence $S$ is a basis.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 23 at 14:37









    Anupam

    2,3701823




    2,3701823








    • 1




      Which is a contradiction or not, depending on what previous results we're allowed to use...
      – David C. Ullrich
      Nov 23 at 14:39










    • Up for the effort
      – Mathematicing
      Nov 23 at 14:41














    • 1




      Which is a contradiction or not, depending on what previous results we're allowed to use...
      – David C. Ullrich
      Nov 23 at 14:39










    • Up for the effort
      – Mathematicing
      Nov 23 at 14:41








    1




    1




    Which is a contradiction or not, depending on what previous results we're allowed to use...
    – David C. Ullrich
    Nov 23 at 14:39




    Which is a contradiction or not, depending on what previous results we're allowed to use...
    – David C. Ullrich
    Nov 23 at 14:39












    Up for the effort
    – Mathematicing
    Nov 23 at 14:41




    Up for the effort
    – Mathematicing
    Nov 23 at 14:41










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    It's impossible to say what's a correct solution without knowing what previously proved results you're allowed to use (for example, the other answer is fine if you're given that $n-1$ vectors cannot span $V$.)



    Since the word "dimension" appears it seems reasonable to conjecture that you've already shown that any basis for $V$ must have exactly $n$ elements; this is required before the typical definition of "dimension" makes sense. Assuming that it's an easy exercise:



    Show that $S$ contains a minimal spanning set: There exists $S_1subset S$ such that $S_1$ spans $V$ and if $S_2subset S_1$ and $S_2$ spans $V$ then $S_2=S_1$. Show that it follows that $S_1$ is independent.



    So $S_1$ is a basis. Hence that previous result show that $S_1$ contains exactly $n$ elements; since $S_1subset S$ this shows that $S_1=S$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      It's impossible to say what's a correct solution without knowing what previously proved results you're allowed to use (for example, the other answer is fine if you're given that $n-1$ vectors cannot span $V$.)



      Since the word "dimension" appears it seems reasonable to conjecture that you've already shown that any basis for $V$ must have exactly $n$ elements; this is required before the typical definition of "dimension" makes sense. Assuming that it's an easy exercise:



      Show that $S$ contains a minimal spanning set: There exists $S_1subset S$ such that $S_1$ spans $V$ and if $S_2subset S_1$ and $S_2$ spans $V$ then $S_2=S_1$. Show that it follows that $S_1$ is independent.



      So $S_1$ is a basis. Hence that previous result show that $S_1$ contains exactly $n$ elements; since $S_1subset S$ this shows that $S_1=S$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        It's impossible to say what's a correct solution without knowing what previously proved results you're allowed to use (for example, the other answer is fine if you're given that $n-1$ vectors cannot span $V$.)



        Since the word "dimension" appears it seems reasonable to conjecture that you've already shown that any basis for $V$ must have exactly $n$ elements; this is required before the typical definition of "dimension" makes sense. Assuming that it's an easy exercise:



        Show that $S$ contains a minimal spanning set: There exists $S_1subset S$ such that $S_1$ spans $V$ and if $S_2subset S_1$ and $S_2$ spans $V$ then $S_2=S_1$. Show that it follows that $S_1$ is independent.



        So $S_1$ is a basis. Hence that previous result show that $S_1$ contains exactly $n$ elements; since $S_1subset S$ this shows that $S_1=S$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        It's impossible to say what's a correct solution without knowing what previously proved results you're allowed to use (for example, the other answer is fine if you're given that $n-1$ vectors cannot span $V$.)



        Since the word "dimension" appears it seems reasonable to conjecture that you've already shown that any basis for $V$ must have exactly $n$ elements; this is required before the typical definition of "dimension" makes sense. Assuming that it's an easy exercise:



        Show that $S$ contains a minimal spanning set: There exists $S_1subset S$ such that $S_1$ spans $V$ and if $S_2subset S_1$ and $S_2$ spans $V$ then $S_2=S_1$. Show that it follows that $S_1$ is independent.



        So $S_1$ is a basis. Hence that previous result show that $S_1$ contains exactly $n$ elements; since $S_1subset S$ this shows that $S_1=S$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 23 at 14:47









        David C. Ullrich

        57.6k43891




        57.6k43891






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010417%2fset-of-vectors-spanning-an-n-dim-vector-space-implies-set-is-a-basis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten