How to calculate $lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}$












0












$begingroup$


$$lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}$$



What I tried to do was to divide every term my $x^2$:



$$frac{frac{1}{x} + frac{2}{x^2}}{sqrt{9+frac{1}{x^2}}}$$



Then I calculated the limits of the numerator and denominator separately, which gave:



$$frac{0}{3}$$



For some reason though, it appears that the right answer is $frac{1}{3}$? Can someone explain me what's wrong with my solution?






limits







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You divided the numerator by $x^2$, but you really divided the denominator by $x^4$. Do you see why?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:00










  • $begingroup$
    @T.Bongers not really, care to explain?
    $endgroup$
    – Trey
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:01










  • $begingroup$
    What is $sqrt{x^2}$?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:03










  • $begingroup$
    (1) It is positive for lage $x$. (2) The limit of the square is easy to compute.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:11
















0












$begingroup$


$$lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}$$



What I tried to do was to divide every term my $x^2$:



$$frac{frac{1}{x} + frac{2}{x^2}}{sqrt{9+frac{1}{x^2}}}$$



Then I calculated the limits of the numerator and denominator separately, which gave:



$$frac{0}{3}$$



For some reason though, it appears that the right answer is $frac{1}{3}$? Can someone explain me what's wrong with my solution?






limits







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You divided the numerator by $x^2$, but you really divided the denominator by $x^4$. Do you see why?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:00










  • $begingroup$
    @T.Bongers not really, care to explain?
    $endgroup$
    – Trey
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:01










  • $begingroup$
    What is $sqrt{x^2}$?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:03










  • $begingroup$
    (1) It is positive for lage $x$. (2) The limit of the square is easy to compute.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:11














0












0








0





$begingroup$


$$lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}$$



What I tried to do was to divide every term my $x^2$:



$$frac{frac{1}{x} + frac{2}{x^2}}{sqrt{9+frac{1}{x^2}}}$$



Then I calculated the limits of the numerator and denominator separately, which gave:



$$frac{0}{3}$$



For some reason though, it appears that the right answer is $frac{1}{3}$? Can someone explain me what's wrong with my solution?






limits







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




$$lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}$$



What I tried to do was to divide every term my $x^2$:



$$frac{frac{1}{x} + frac{2}{x^2}}{sqrt{9+frac{1}{x^2}}}$$



Then I calculated the limits of the numerator and denominator separately, which gave:



$$frac{0}{3}$$



For some reason though, it appears that the right answer is $frac{1}{3}$? Can someone explain me what's wrong with my solution?






limits




limits






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 2 '18 at 23:59









TreyTrey

309113




309113












  • $begingroup$
    You divided the numerator by $x^2$, but you really divided the denominator by $x^4$. Do you see why?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:00










  • $begingroup$
    @T.Bongers not really, care to explain?
    $endgroup$
    – Trey
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:01










  • $begingroup$
    What is $sqrt{x^2}$?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:03










  • $begingroup$
    (1) It is positive for lage $x$. (2) The limit of the square is easy to compute.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:11


















  • $begingroup$
    You divided the numerator by $x^2$, but you really divided the denominator by $x^4$. Do you see why?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:00










  • $begingroup$
    @T.Bongers not really, care to explain?
    $endgroup$
    – Trey
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:01










  • $begingroup$
    What is $sqrt{x^2}$?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:03










  • $begingroup$
    (1) It is positive for lage $x$. (2) The limit of the square is easy to compute.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:11
















$begingroup$
You divided the numerator by $x^2$, but you really divided the denominator by $x^4$. Do you see why?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 0:00




$begingroup$
You divided the numerator by $x^2$, but you really divided the denominator by $x^4$. Do you see why?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 0:00












$begingroup$
@T.Bongers not really, care to explain?
$endgroup$
– Trey
Dec 3 '18 at 0:01




$begingroup$
@T.Bongers not really, care to explain?
$endgroup$
– Trey
Dec 3 '18 at 0:01












$begingroup$
What is $sqrt{x^2}$?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 0:03




$begingroup$
What is $sqrt{x^2}$?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Dec 3 '18 at 0:03












$begingroup$
(1) It is positive for lage $x$. (2) The limit of the square is easy to compute.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 3 '18 at 0:11




$begingroup$
(1) It is positive for lage $x$. (2) The limit of the square is easy to compute.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 3 '18 at 0:11










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Your mistake is that when $1/x^2$ passes through a square root it becomes $sqrt{1/x^4}$. You should instead have hit numerator and denominator with $1/x$, not $1/x^2$.



However, only leading terms matter. As a shortcut, it is perfectly fine (and much quicker) to reason as follows:



$$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}=frac{1}{3}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Although you're right in principle, I think it's worth noting that many of the people who are grading student work at this level would disagree that this is "perfectly fine" without more justification.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:08










  • $begingroup$
    That's a nice suggestion even if not completely rigorous, in that case I would prefer use the following notation $$frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}} sim frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}to frac{1}{3}$$
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:09












  • $begingroup$
    That notation is fine and I use it myself sometimes. However, I do not believe my suggestion is any less rigorous than any other. It simply presses into service different theorems than that $lim1/x^n=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:11












  • $begingroup$
    I suppose you are appling that as equivalents but sometimes equivalents can induce to some mistakes. We need to be careful with that. Of course one expert user csn handle that without problem but a newbie must pat great attention with that.
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:27










  • $begingroup$
    What I was applying was this fact: Let's say that a function $f(x)$ is polynomial-like if it has the form $f(x)=sum_{i=0}^na_i^{(f)}x^{b_i^{(f)}}$ for real coefficients $a_i^{(f)}$ and an increasing sequence $(b_i^{(f)})_{i=0}^n$ of nonnegative real numbers. Let $r$ and $s$ be positive real numbers, and let $g$ be another polynomial-like function. Then $lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[f(x)]^r}{[g(x)]^s}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[a_n^{(f)}x^{b_n^{(f)}]^r}{[a_n^{(g)}x^{b_n^{(g)}]^s}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:34





















1












$begingroup$

HINT



We have



$$lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xto infty} frac x{sqrt{x^2}}frac{1+2/x}{sqrt{9+1/x^2}}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023403%2fhow-to-calculate-lim-x-to-infty-fracx2-sqrt9x21%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Your mistake is that when $1/x^2$ passes through a square root it becomes $sqrt{1/x^4}$. You should instead have hit numerator and denominator with $1/x$, not $1/x^2$.



    However, only leading terms matter. As a shortcut, it is perfectly fine (and much quicker) to reason as follows:



    $$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}=frac{1}{3}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Although you're right in principle, I think it's worth noting that many of the people who are grading student work at this level would disagree that this is "perfectly fine" without more justification.
      $endgroup$
      – T. Bongers
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:08










    • $begingroup$
      That's a nice suggestion even if not completely rigorous, in that case I would prefer use the following notation $$frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}} sim frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}to frac{1}{3}$$
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:09












    • $begingroup$
      That notation is fine and I use it myself sometimes. However, I do not believe my suggestion is any less rigorous than any other. It simply presses into service different theorems than that $lim1/x^n=0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben W
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:11












    • $begingroup$
      I suppose you are appling that as equivalents but sometimes equivalents can induce to some mistakes. We need to be careful with that. Of course one expert user csn handle that without problem but a newbie must pat great attention with that.
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:27










    • $begingroup$
      What I was applying was this fact: Let's say that a function $f(x)$ is polynomial-like if it has the form $f(x)=sum_{i=0}^na_i^{(f)}x^{b_i^{(f)}}$ for real coefficients $a_i^{(f)}$ and an increasing sequence $(b_i^{(f)})_{i=0}^n$ of nonnegative real numbers. Let $r$ and $s$ be positive real numbers, and let $g$ be another polynomial-like function. Then $lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[f(x)]^r}{[g(x)]^s}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[a_n^{(f)}x^{b_n^{(f)}]^r}{[a_n^{(g)}x^{b_n^{(g)}]^s}$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben W
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:34


















    3












    $begingroup$

    Your mistake is that when $1/x^2$ passes through a square root it becomes $sqrt{1/x^4}$. You should instead have hit numerator and denominator with $1/x$, not $1/x^2$.



    However, only leading terms matter. As a shortcut, it is perfectly fine (and much quicker) to reason as follows:



    $$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}=frac{1}{3}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Although you're right in principle, I think it's worth noting that many of the people who are grading student work at this level would disagree that this is "perfectly fine" without more justification.
      $endgroup$
      – T. Bongers
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:08










    • $begingroup$
      That's a nice suggestion even if not completely rigorous, in that case I would prefer use the following notation $$frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}} sim frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}to frac{1}{3}$$
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:09












    • $begingroup$
      That notation is fine and I use it myself sometimes. However, I do not believe my suggestion is any less rigorous than any other. It simply presses into service different theorems than that $lim1/x^n=0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben W
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:11












    • $begingroup$
      I suppose you are appling that as equivalents but sometimes equivalents can induce to some mistakes. We need to be careful with that. Of course one expert user csn handle that without problem but a newbie must pat great attention with that.
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:27










    • $begingroup$
      What I was applying was this fact: Let's say that a function $f(x)$ is polynomial-like if it has the form $f(x)=sum_{i=0}^na_i^{(f)}x^{b_i^{(f)}}$ for real coefficients $a_i^{(f)}$ and an increasing sequence $(b_i^{(f)})_{i=0}^n$ of nonnegative real numbers. Let $r$ and $s$ be positive real numbers, and let $g$ be another polynomial-like function. Then $lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[f(x)]^r}{[g(x)]^s}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[a_n^{(f)}x^{b_n^{(f)}]^r}{[a_n^{(g)}x^{b_n^{(g)}]^s}$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben W
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:34
















    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Your mistake is that when $1/x^2$ passes through a square root it becomes $sqrt{1/x^4}$. You should instead have hit numerator and denominator with $1/x$, not $1/x^2$.



    However, only leading terms matter. As a shortcut, it is perfectly fine (and much quicker) to reason as follows:



    $$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}=frac{1}{3}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Your mistake is that when $1/x^2$ passes through a square root it becomes $sqrt{1/x^4}$. You should instead have hit numerator and denominator with $1/x$, not $1/x^2$.



    However, only leading terms matter. As a shortcut, it is perfectly fine (and much quicker) to reason as follows:



    $$lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}=frac{1}{3}$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 3 '18 at 0:14

























    answered Dec 3 '18 at 0:07









    Ben WBen W

    2,189615




    2,189615












    • $begingroup$
      Although you're right in principle, I think it's worth noting that many of the people who are grading student work at this level would disagree that this is "perfectly fine" without more justification.
      $endgroup$
      – T. Bongers
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:08










    • $begingroup$
      That's a nice suggestion even if not completely rigorous, in that case I would prefer use the following notation $$frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}} sim frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}to frac{1}{3}$$
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:09












    • $begingroup$
      That notation is fine and I use it myself sometimes. However, I do not believe my suggestion is any less rigorous than any other. It simply presses into service different theorems than that $lim1/x^n=0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben W
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:11












    • $begingroup$
      I suppose you are appling that as equivalents but sometimes equivalents can induce to some mistakes. We need to be careful with that. Of course one expert user csn handle that without problem but a newbie must pat great attention with that.
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:27










    • $begingroup$
      What I was applying was this fact: Let's say that a function $f(x)$ is polynomial-like if it has the form $f(x)=sum_{i=0}^na_i^{(f)}x^{b_i^{(f)}}$ for real coefficients $a_i^{(f)}$ and an increasing sequence $(b_i^{(f)})_{i=0}^n$ of nonnegative real numbers. Let $r$ and $s$ be positive real numbers, and let $g$ be another polynomial-like function. Then $lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[f(x)]^r}{[g(x)]^s}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[a_n^{(f)}x^{b_n^{(f)}]^r}{[a_n^{(g)}x^{b_n^{(g)}]^s}$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben W
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:34




















    • $begingroup$
      Although you're right in principle, I think it's worth noting that many of the people who are grading student work at this level would disagree that this is "perfectly fine" without more justification.
      $endgroup$
      – T. Bongers
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:08










    • $begingroup$
      That's a nice suggestion even if not completely rigorous, in that case I would prefer use the following notation $$frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}} sim frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}to frac{1}{3}$$
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:09












    • $begingroup$
      That notation is fine and I use it myself sometimes. However, I do not believe my suggestion is any less rigorous than any other. It simply presses into service different theorems than that $lim1/x^n=0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben W
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:11












    • $begingroup$
      I suppose you are appling that as equivalents but sometimes equivalents can induce to some mistakes. We need to be careful with that. Of course one expert user csn handle that without problem but a newbie must pat great attention with that.
      $endgroup$
      – gimusi
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:27










    • $begingroup$
      What I was applying was this fact: Let's say that a function $f(x)$ is polynomial-like if it has the form $f(x)=sum_{i=0}^na_i^{(f)}x^{b_i^{(f)}}$ for real coefficients $a_i^{(f)}$ and an increasing sequence $(b_i^{(f)})_{i=0}^n$ of nonnegative real numbers. Let $r$ and $s$ be positive real numbers, and let $g$ be another polynomial-like function. Then $lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[f(x)]^r}{[g(x)]^s}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[a_n^{(f)}x^{b_n^{(f)}]^r}{[a_n^{(g)}x^{b_n^{(g)}]^s}$.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben W
      Dec 3 '18 at 0:34


















    $begingroup$
    Although you're right in principle, I think it's worth noting that many of the people who are grading student work at this level would disagree that this is "perfectly fine" without more justification.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:08




    $begingroup$
    Although you're right in principle, I think it's worth noting that many of the people who are grading student work at this level would disagree that this is "perfectly fine" without more justification.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:08












    $begingroup$
    That's a nice suggestion even if not completely rigorous, in that case I would prefer use the following notation $$frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}} sim frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}to frac{1}{3}$$
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:09






    $begingroup$
    That's a nice suggestion even if not completely rigorous, in that case I would prefer use the following notation $$frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}} sim frac{x}{sqrt{9x^2}}to frac{1}{3}$$
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:09














    $begingroup$
    That notation is fine and I use it myself sometimes. However, I do not believe my suggestion is any less rigorous than any other. It simply presses into service different theorems than that $lim1/x^n=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:11






    $begingroup$
    That notation is fine and I use it myself sometimes. However, I do not believe my suggestion is any less rigorous than any other. It simply presses into service different theorems than that $lim1/x^n=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:11














    $begingroup$
    I suppose you are appling that as equivalents but sometimes equivalents can induce to some mistakes. We need to be careful with that. Of course one expert user csn handle that without problem but a newbie must pat great attention with that.
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:27




    $begingroup$
    I suppose you are appling that as equivalents but sometimes equivalents can induce to some mistakes. We need to be careful with that. Of course one expert user csn handle that without problem but a newbie must pat great attention with that.
    $endgroup$
    – gimusi
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:27












    $begingroup$
    What I was applying was this fact: Let's say that a function $f(x)$ is polynomial-like if it has the form $f(x)=sum_{i=0}^na_i^{(f)}x^{b_i^{(f)}}$ for real coefficients $a_i^{(f)}$ and an increasing sequence $(b_i^{(f)})_{i=0}^n$ of nonnegative real numbers. Let $r$ and $s$ be positive real numbers, and let $g$ be another polynomial-like function. Then $lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[f(x)]^r}{[g(x)]^s}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[a_n^{(f)}x^{b_n^{(f)}]^r}{[a_n^{(g)}x^{b_n^{(g)}]^s}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:34






    $begingroup$
    What I was applying was this fact: Let's say that a function $f(x)$ is polynomial-like if it has the form $f(x)=sum_{i=0}^na_i^{(f)}x^{b_i^{(f)}}$ for real coefficients $a_i^{(f)}$ and an increasing sequence $(b_i^{(f)})_{i=0}^n$ of nonnegative real numbers. Let $r$ and $s$ be positive real numbers, and let $g$ be another polynomial-like function. Then $lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[f(x)]^r}{[g(x)]^s}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{[a_n^{(f)}x^{b_n^{(f)}]^r}{[a_n^{(g)}x^{b_n^{(g)}]^s}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben W
    Dec 3 '18 at 0:34













    1












    $begingroup$

    HINT



    We have



    $$lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xto infty} frac x{sqrt{x^2}}frac{1+2/x}{sqrt{9+1/x^2}}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      HINT



      We have



      $$lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xto infty} frac x{sqrt{x^2}}frac{1+2/x}{sqrt{9+1/x^2}}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        HINT



        We have



        $$lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xto infty} frac x{sqrt{x^2}}frac{1+2/x}{sqrt{9+1/x^2}}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        HINT



        We have



        $$lim_{xto infty} frac{x+2}{sqrt{9x^2+1}}=lim_{xto infty} frac x{sqrt{x^2}}frac{1+2/x}{sqrt{9+1/x^2}}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 3 '18 at 0:06









        gimusigimusi

        92.9k94494




        92.9k94494






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023403%2fhow-to-calculate-lim-x-to-infty-fracx2-sqrt9x21%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Image
            Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
            Read more

            Verónica Boquete

            Image
            Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
            Read more

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

            Image
            Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
            Read more