Values in an inductively defined sequence of sets












6














Consider the following sequence of sets:



begin{align}
T_0 &= {(0,0)} \
T_{n+1} &= {(1+x_1+x_2,y_1+y_2):(x_1,y_1)in T_n, (x_2,y_2)in T_k text{ for some } kleq n} \
&quad cup {(x_1,1+y_1):(x_1,y_1)in T_n}.
end{align}



What values of $(a,b)$ are in $T_n$ for a given $n$?



For reference, here are the first couple values of $T_n$:



$T_1 = {(1,0),(0,1)}$



$T_2 = {(2,0),(3,0),(1,1),(2,1),(0,2)}$



$T_3$ is pretty big.



So far, I have that the first coordinate can take any value from $n$ to $2^n-1$, but I am having trouble finding a systematic way of describing corresponding possible values for the second coordinate.



If it helps, this question is derived from trying to determine the possible lengths of a propositional formula of height $n$.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    There is a minor typo, for $(x_1,y_1)=(x_2,y_2)=(0,1) in T_1$ the first rule gives $(1,2) in T_2$. As a side remark, it might be useful to state the full original problem that you actually want to solve, rather than the part where you get stuck in your chosen path towards a solution, because your approach need not be the easiest strategy for solving it.
    – Ronald Blaak
    Nov 27 at 10:28
















6














Consider the following sequence of sets:



begin{align}
T_0 &= {(0,0)} \
T_{n+1} &= {(1+x_1+x_2,y_1+y_2):(x_1,y_1)in T_n, (x_2,y_2)in T_k text{ for some } kleq n} \
&quad cup {(x_1,1+y_1):(x_1,y_1)in T_n}.
end{align}



What values of $(a,b)$ are in $T_n$ for a given $n$?



For reference, here are the first couple values of $T_n$:



$T_1 = {(1,0),(0,1)}$



$T_2 = {(2,0),(3,0),(1,1),(2,1),(0,2)}$



$T_3$ is pretty big.



So far, I have that the first coordinate can take any value from $n$ to $2^n-1$, but I am having trouble finding a systematic way of describing corresponding possible values for the second coordinate.



If it helps, this question is derived from trying to determine the possible lengths of a propositional formula of height $n$.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    There is a minor typo, for $(x_1,y_1)=(x_2,y_2)=(0,1) in T_1$ the first rule gives $(1,2) in T_2$. As a side remark, it might be useful to state the full original problem that you actually want to solve, rather than the part where you get stuck in your chosen path towards a solution, because your approach need not be the easiest strategy for solving it.
    – Ronald Blaak
    Nov 27 at 10:28














6












6








6


1





Consider the following sequence of sets:



begin{align}
T_0 &= {(0,0)} \
T_{n+1} &= {(1+x_1+x_2,y_1+y_2):(x_1,y_1)in T_n, (x_2,y_2)in T_k text{ for some } kleq n} \
&quad cup {(x_1,1+y_1):(x_1,y_1)in T_n}.
end{align}



What values of $(a,b)$ are in $T_n$ for a given $n$?



For reference, here are the first couple values of $T_n$:



$T_1 = {(1,0),(0,1)}$



$T_2 = {(2,0),(3,0),(1,1),(2,1),(0,2)}$



$T_3$ is pretty big.



So far, I have that the first coordinate can take any value from $n$ to $2^n-1$, but I am having trouble finding a systematic way of describing corresponding possible values for the second coordinate.



If it helps, this question is derived from trying to determine the possible lengths of a propositional formula of height $n$.










share|cite|improve this question















Consider the following sequence of sets:



begin{align}
T_0 &= {(0,0)} \
T_{n+1} &= {(1+x_1+x_2,y_1+y_2):(x_1,y_1)in T_n, (x_2,y_2)in T_k text{ for some } kleq n} \
&quad cup {(x_1,1+y_1):(x_1,y_1)in T_n}.
end{align}



What values of $(a,b)$ are in $T_n$ for a given $n$?



For reference, here are the first couple values of $T_n$:



$T_1 = {(1,0),(0,1)}$



$T_2 = {(2,0),(3,0),(1,1),(2,1),(0,2)}$



$T_3$ is pretty big.



So far, I have that the first coordinate can take any value from $n$ to $2^n-1$, but I am having trouble finding a systematic way of describing corresponding possible values for the second coordinate.



If it helps, this question is derived from trying to determine the possible lengths of a propositional formula of height $n$.







combinatorics logic propositional-calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 27 at 17:02









Taroccoesbrocco

5,02261839




5,02261839










asked Feb 7 at 22:02









Daniel Mourad

587




587








  • 1




    There is a minor typo, for $(x_1,y_1)=(x_2,y_2)=(0,1) in T_1$ the first rule gives $(1,2) in T_2$. As a side remark, it might be useful to state the full original problem that you actually want to solve, rather than the part where you get stuck in your chosen path towards a solution, because your approach need not be the easiest strategy for solving it.
    – Ronald Blaak
    Nov 27 at 10:28














  • 1




    There is a minor typo, for $(x_1,y_1)=(x_2,y_2)=(0,1) in T_1$ the first rule gives $(1,2) in T_2$. As a side remark, it might be useful to state the full original problem that you actually want to solve, rather than the part where you get stuck in your chosen path towards a solution, because your approach need not be the easiest strategy for solving it.
    – Ronald Blaak
    Nov 27 at 10:28








1




1




There is a minor typo, for $(x_1,y_1)=(x_2,y_2)=(0,1) in T_1$ the first rule gives $(1,2) in T_2$. As a side remark, it might be useful to state the full original problem that you actually want to solve, rather than the part where you get stuck in your chosen path towards a solution, because your approach need not be the easiest strategy for solving it.
– Ronald Blaak
Nov 27 at 10:28




There is a minor typo, for $(x_1,y_1)=(x_2,y_2)=(0,1) in T_1$ the first rule gives $(1,2) in T_2$. As a side remark, it might be useful to state the full original problem that you actually want to solve, rather than the part where you get stuck in your chosen path towards a solution, because your approach need not be the easiest strategy for solving it.
– Ronald Blaak
Nov 27 at 10:28










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1





+50









As mentioned in the comment, it is probably better to ask the actual problem you wanted to solve. The current question has a rather messy and lengthy solution and might not be too useful. For that reason I only give here the main results and the main steps required in a proof.



The set of points $T_n$ is a convex set of lattice points $(x,y)$ in the 2D plane. It is relatively easy to show that $0 leq x leq 2^n-1$ and $0 leq y leq 2^{n-1}$. For the actual boundaries of the set, you will find that the set is bounded from below by two lines $x+y geq n$ and $y geq 0$. The upper limit is more complicated and consists of inequalities, the number of which increases with the value of $n$. One can show that for given $n$ and $x in [0,2^n-1]$ that all points are found by
$$
max (n-x,0) leq y leq 2^{k+1} + (n-k-2)(x+1) qquad qquad qquad (*)
$$

where $k$ is an integer dependent on $x$ and given by
$$
2^k leq x + 1 < 2^{k+1}.
$$



enter image description here



For proving this result a number of steps are required.



1) The range of $x$ and $y$. From the transformation it is immediately clear that $x,y geq 0$. With the help of induction you can prove that the domain is restricted by $T_n subset [0,2^n-1] times [0,2^{n-1}]$ for $ngeq1$ using the maximum growth possible in either direction.



2) With induction you can also show that
$$
(x,0) in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad nleq xleq2^n-1
$$

$$
(x,n-x)in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad 0 leq x leq n
$$

You can also use this to show that $x+ygeq n$ which establishes the lower bounds in $(*)$



3) If you would represent the sets graphically and consider the transformation for low values of $n$, it will be clear that the set $T_n$ is convex and that the boundary is a polygon.



4) The vertices of the polygon-boundary of $T_n$ are given by $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k)$ for $0leq k leq n$. Note that each vertex under the first transformation rule maps on to the boundary of $T_{n+1}$, i.e., $(x,y) rightarrow (2x+1,2y)$ gives that $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k) rightarrow (2^{k+1}-1,[(n+1)-(k+1)]2^{k+1})$ complemented with applying the second transformation on $(0,n) rightarrow (0,n+1)$. The only other vertex to be added to make the boundary complete is the point $(n,0)$.



5) The rest of the boundary are straight lines connecting the vertices, giving rise to the upper limit in $(*)$.



A full prove along these lines is possible but quite a bit of writing.



The derivation can be simplified and made more intuitive, if we consider the sets $S_n=cup_{i=0}^n T_n$. With the innitial condition $T_0={(0,0)}$, we then find that
begin{eqnarray}
S_{n+1}
& = & left[ bigcup_{k=1}^{n+1} T_n right] cup T_0\
& = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in T_i text{ with } 0 leq i leq k} cup {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup T_0\
& = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in S_k} right] cup left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup S_0\
& = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {p+(0,1)|pin S_{n}} cup S_0
end{eqnarray}



Effectively, this means that $S_n$ is obtained by adding the grid-points $(x,y)$ in the triange $x,ygeq$ and $x+y<n$ to $T_n$.



By considering $q=(0,1)$ in the first set, it is obvious that almost all points generated by the second set in the prescription for $S_{n+1}$ are already included by the first set. The only exception are the points $(0,y)$ with $1 leq y leq n+1$. Including the point $(0,0)$, we can therefore summarize the sets $S_n$ by
begin{eqnarray}
S_0 & = & {(0,0)} \
S_{n+1} & = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {(0,k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
end{eqnarray}



enter image description here



We now apply a particular translation of the points in each set $S_n$, that will depend explicitly on $n$. This does of course not affect their number or the shape of the set in a graphical representation, and obtain the sets $R_n$
$$
R_n = {p-(2^{n-2}-1,0) | p in S_n}
$$

This results in $R_0={(frac{3}{4},0)}$ and $R_1={(frac{1}{2},0),(frac{1}{2},1),(frac{3}{2},0)}$, but for $n geq 2$ the set $R_n$ will only contain integer grid-points.



Applying this translation to the transformation for $T_n$, we find that this results in
begin{eqnarray}
R_0 & = & {(frac{3}{4},0)} \
R_{n+1} & = & {p+q|p,q in R_n} cup {(1-2^{n-1},k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
end{eqnarray}



enter image description here



This means that in each iteration the domain is mainly scaled by a factor 2 in both $x$ and $y$ direction with respect to the origin (this is the reason for the particular choice or translation) and a single vertical line of points is added on the extreme left side. With this in mind, it is then easy to check and prove by induction that for $n geq 2$, the set $R_n$ contains all integer grid-points that are bounded by the inequalities $y geq 0$, $x geq 1-2^{n-2}$, and $ y leq (k-1) (x+2^{n-2}) + 2^{k+1}$ for $0 leq k < n$, as well as that the corresponding vertices of the polygon are given by ${(2^{n-k}-2^{n-2}, k 2^{n-k})| 0 leq k leq n} cup {(1-2^{n-2},0)}$.



Transforming this result back to the set $S_n$ and $T_n$ gives the results as mentioned above.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2640868%2fvalues-in-an-inductively-defined-sequence-of-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1





    +50









    As mentioned in the comment, it is probably better to ask the actual problem you wanted to solve. The current question has a rather messy and lengthy solution and might not be too useful. For that reason I only give here the main results and the main steps required in a proof.



    The set of points $T_n$ is a convex set of lattice points $(x,y)$ in the 2D plane. It is relatively easy to show that $0 leq x leq 2^n-1$ and $0 leq y leq 2^{n-1}$. For the actual boundaries of the set, you will find that the set is bounded from below by two lines $x+y geq n$ and $y geq 0$. The upper limit is more complicated and consists of inequalities, the number of which increases with the value of $n$. One can show that for given $n$ and $x in [0,2^n-1]$ that all points are found by
    $$
    max (n-x,0) leq y leq 2^{k+1} + (n-k-2)(x+1) qquad qquad qquad (*)
    $$

    where $k$ is an integer dependent on $x$ and given by
    $$
    2^k leq x + 1 < 2^{k+1}.
    $$



    enter image description here



    For proving this result a number of steps are required.



    1) The range of $x$ and $y$. From the transformation it is immediately clear that $x,y geq 0$. With the help of induction you can prove that the domain is restricted by $T_n subset [0,2^n-1] times [0,2^{n-1}]$ for $ngeq1$ using the maximum growth possible in either direction.



    2) With induction you can also show that
    $$
    (x,0) in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad nleq xleq2^n-1
    $$

    $$
    (x,n-x)in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad 0 leq x leq n
    $$

    You can also use this to show that $x+ygeq n$ which establishes the lower bounds in $(*)$



    3) If you would represent the sets graphically and consider the transformation for low values of $n$, it will be clear that the set $T_n$ is convex and that the boundary is a polygon.



    4) The vertices of the polygon-boundary of $T_n$ are given by $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k)$ for $0leq k leq n$. Note that each vertex under the first transformation rule maps on to the boundary of $T_{n+1}$, i.e., $(x,y) rightarrow (2x+1,2y)$ gives that $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k) rightarrow (2^{k+1}-1,[(n+1)-(k+1)]2^{k+1})$ complemented with applying the second transformation on $(0,n) rightarrow (0,n+1)$. The only other vertex to be added to make the boundary complete is the point $(n,0)$.



    5) The rest of the boundary are straight lines connecting the vertices, giving rise to the upper limit in $(*)$.



    A full prove along these lines is possible but quite a bit of writing.



    The derivation can be simplified and made more intuitive, if we consider the sets $S_n=cup_{i=0}^n T_n$. With the innitial condition $T_0={(0,0)}$, we then find that
    begin{eqnarray}
    S_{n+1}
    & = & left[ bigcup_{k=1}^{n+1} T_n right] cup T_0\
    & = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in T_i text{ with } 0 leq i leq k} cup {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup T_0\
    & = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in S_k} right] cup left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup S_0\
    & = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {p+(0,1)|pin S_{n}} cup S_0
    end{eqnarray}



    Effectively, this means that $S_n$ is obtained by adding the grid-points $(x,y)$ in the triange $x,ygeq$ and $x+y<n$ to $T_n$.



    By considering $q=(0,1)$ in the first set, it is obvious that almost all points generated by the second set in the prescription for $S_{n+1}$ are already included by the first set. The only exception are the points $(0,y)$ with $1 leq y leq n+1$. Including the point $(0,0)$, we can therefore summarize the sets $S_n$ by
    begin{eqnarray}
    S_0 & = & {(0,0)} \
    S_{n+1} & = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {(0,k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
    end{eqnarray}



    enter image description here



    We now apply a particular translation of the points in each set $S_n$, that will depend explicitly on $n$. This does of course not affect their number or the shape of the set in a graphical representation, and obtain the sets $R_n$
    $$
    R_n = {p-(2^{n-2}-1,0) | p in S_n}
    $$

    This results in $R_0={(frac{3}{4},0)}$ and $R_1={(frac{1}{2},0),(frac{1}{2},1),(frac{3}{2},0)}$, but for $n geq 2$ the set $R_n$ will only contain integer grid-points.



    Applying this translation to the transformation for $T_n$, we find that this results in
    begin{eqnarray}
    R_0 & = & {(frac{3}{4},0)} \
    R_{n+1} & = & {p+q|p,q in R_n} cup {(1-2^{n-1},k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
    end{eqnarray}



    enter image description here



    This means that in each iteration the domain is mainly scaled by a factor 2 in both $x$ and $y$ direction with respect to the origin (this is the reason for the particular choice or translation) and a single vertical line of points is added on the extreme left side. With this in mind, it is then easy to check and prove by induction that for $n geq 2$, the set $R_n$ contains all integer grid-points that are bounded by the inequalities $y geq 0$, $x geq 1-2^{n-2}$, and $ y leq (k-1) (x+2^{n-2}) + 2^{k+1}$ for $0 leq k < n$, as well as that the corresponding vertices of the polygon are given by ${(2^{n-k}-2^{n-2}, k 2^{n-k})| 0 leq k leq n} cup {(1-2^{n-2},0)}$.



    Transforming this result back to the set $S_n$ and $T_n$ gives the results as mentioned above.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      1





      +50









      As mentioned in the comment, it is probably better to ask the actual problem you wanted to solve. The current question has a rather messy and lengthy solution and might not be too useful. For that reason I only give here the main results and the main steps required in a proof.



      The set of points $T_n$ is a convex set of lattice points $(x,y)$ in the 2D plane. It is relatively easy to show that $0 leq x leq 2^n-1$ and $0 leq y leq 2^{n-1}$. For the actual boundaries of the set, you will find that the set is bounded from below by two lines $x+y geq n$ and $y geq 0$. The upper limit is more complicated and consists of inequalities, the number of which increases with the value of $n$. One can show that for given $n$ and $x in [0,2^n-1]$ that all points are found by
      $$
      max (n-x,0) leq y leq 2^{k+1} + (n-k-2)(x+1) qquad qquad qquad (*)
      $$

      where $k$ is an integer dependent on $x$ and given by
      $$
      2^k leq x + 1 < 2^{k+1}.
      $$



      enter image description here



      For proving this result a number of steps are required.



      1) The range of $x$ and $y$. From the transformation it is immediately clear that $x,y geq 0$. With the help of induction you can prove that the domain is restricted by $T_n subset [0,2^n-1] times [0,2^{n-1}]$ for $ngeq1$ using the maximum growth possible in either direction.



      2) With induction you can also show that
      $$
      (x,0) in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad nleq xleq2^n-1
      $$

      $$
      (x,n-x)in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad 0 leq x leq n
      $$

      You can also use this to show that $x+ygeq n$ which establishes the lower bounds in $(*)$



      3) If you would represent the sets graphically and consider the transformation for low values of $n$, it will be clear that the set $T_n$ is convex and that the boundary is a polygon.



      4) The vertices of the polygon-boundary of $T_n$ are given by $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k)$ for $0leq k leq n$. Note that each vertex under the first transformation rule maps on to the boundary of $T_{n+1}$, i.e., $(x,y) rightarrow (2x+1,2y)$ gives that $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k) rightarrow (2^{k+1}-1,[(n+1)-(k+1)]2^{k+1})$ complemented with applying the second transformation on $(0,n) rightarrow (0,n+1)$. The only other vertex to be added to make the boundary complete is the point $(n,0)$.



      5) The rest of the boundary are straight lines connecting the vertices, giving rise to the upper limit in $(*)$.



      A full prove along these lines is possible but quite a bit of writing.



      The derivation can be simplified and made more intuitive, if we consider the sets $S_n=cup_{i=0}^n T_n$. With the innitial condition $T_0={(0,0)}$, we then find that
      begin{eqnarray}
      S_{n+1}
      & = & left[ bigcup_{k=1}^{n+1} T_n right] cup T_0\
      & = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in T_i text{ with } 0 leq i leq k} cup {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup T_0\
      & = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in S_k} right] cup left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup S_0\
      & = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {p+(0,1)|pin S_{n}} cup S_0
      end{eqnarray}



      Effectively, this means that $S_n$ is obtained by adding the grid-points $(x,y)$ in the triange $x,ygeq$ and $x+y<n$ to $T_n$.



      By considering $q=(0,1)$ in the first set, it is obvious that almost all points generated by the second set in the prescription for $S_{n+1}$ are already included by the first set. The only exception are the points $(0,y)$ with $1 leq y leq n+1$. Including the point $(0,0)$, we can therefore summarize the sets $S_n$ by
      begin{eqnarray}
      S_0 & = & {(0,0)} \
      S_{n+1} & = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {(0,k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
      end{eqnarray}



      enter image description here



      We now apply a particular translation of the points in each set $S_n$, that will depend explicitly on $n$. This does of course not affect their number or the shape of the set in a graphical representation, and obtain the sets $R_n$
      $$
      R_n = {p-(2^{n-2}-1,0) | p in S_n}
      $$

      This results in $R_0={(frac{3}{4},0)}$ and $R_1={(frac{1}{2},0),(frac{1}{2},1),(frac{3}{2},0)}$, but for $n geq 2$ the set $R_n$ will only contain integer grid-points.



      Applying this translation to the transformation for $T_n$, we find that this results in
      begin{eqnarray}
      R_0 & = & {(frac{3}{4},0)} \
      R_{n+1} & = & {p+q|p,q in R_n} cup {(1-2^{n-1},k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
      end{eqnarray}



      enter image description here



      This means that in each iteration the domain is mainly scaled by a factor 2 in both $x$ and $y$ direction with respect to the origin (this is the reason for the particular choice or translation) and a single vertical line of points is added on the extreme left side. With this in mind, it is then easy to check and prove by induction that for $n geq 2$, the set $R_n$ contains all integer grid-points that are bounded by the inequalities $y geq 0$, $x geq 1-2^{n-2}$, and $ y leq (k-1) (x+2^{n-2}) + 2^{k+1}$ for $0 leq k < n$, as well as that the corresponding vertices of the polygon are given by ${(2^{n-k}-2^{n-2}, k 2^{n-k})| 0 leq k leq n} cup {(1-2^{n-2},0)}$.



      Transforming this result back to the set $S_n$ and $T_n$ gives the results as mentioned above.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        1





        +50







        1





        +50



        1




        +50




        As mentioned in the comment, it is probably better to ask the actual problem you wanted to solve. The current question has a rather messy and lengthy solution and might not be too useful. For that reason I only give here the main results and the main steps required in a proof.



        The set of points $T_n$ is a convex set of lattice points $(x,y)$ in the 2D plane. It is relatively easy to show that $0 leq x leq 2^n-1$ and $0 leq y leq 2^{n-1}$. For the actual boundaries of the set, you will find that the set is bounded from below by two lines $x+y geq n$ and $y geq 0$. The upper limit is more complicated and consists of inequalities, the number of which increases with the value of $n$. One can show that for given $n$ and $x in [0,2^n-1]$ that all points are found by
        $$
        max (n-x,0) leq y leq 2^{k+1} + (n-k-2)(x+1) qquad qquad qquad (*)
        $$

        where $k$ is an integer dependent on $x$ and given by
        $$
        2^k leq x + 1 < 2^{k+1}.
        $$



        enter image description here



        For proving this result a number of steps are required.



        1) The range of $x$ and $y$. From the transformation it is immediately clear that $x,y geq 0$. With the help of induction you can prove that the domain is restricted by $T_n subset [0,2^n-1] times [0,2^{n-1}]$ for $ngeq1$ using the maximum growth possible in either direction.



        2) With induction you can also show that
        $$
        (x,0) in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad nleq xleq2^n-1
        $$

        $$
        (x,n-x)in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad 0 leq x leq n
        $$

        You can also use this to show that $x+ygeq n$ which establishes the lower bounds in $(*)$



        3) If you would represent the sets graphically and consider the transformation for low values of $n$, it will be clear that the set $T_n$ is convex and that the boundary is a polygon.



        4) The vertices of the polygon-boundary of $T_n$ are given by $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k)$ for $0leq k leq n$. Note that each vertex under the first transformation rule maps on to the boundary of $T_{n+1}$, i.e., $(x,y) rightarrow (2x+1,2y)$ gives that $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k) rightarrow (2^{k+1}-1,[(n+1)-(k+1)]2^{k+1})$ complemented with applying the second transformation on $(0,n) rightarrow (0,n+1)$. The only other vertex to be added to make the boundary complete is the point $(n,0)$.



        5) The rest of the boundary are straight lines connecting the vertices, giving rise to the upper limit in $(*)$.



        A full prove along these lines is possible but quite a bit of writing.



        The derivation can be simplified and made more intuitive, if we consider the sets $S_n=cup_{i=0}^n T_n$. With the innitial condition $T_0={(0,0)}$, we then find that
        begin{eqnarray}
        S_{n+1}
        & = & left[ bigcup_{k=1}^{n+1} T_n right] cup T_0\
        & = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in T_i text{ with } 0 leq i leq k} cup {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup T_0\
        & = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in S_k} right] cup left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup S_0\
        & = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {p+(0,1)|pin S_{n}} cup S_0
        end{eqnarray}



        Effectively, this means that $S_n$ is obtained by adding the grid-points $(x,y)$ in the triange $x,ygeq$ and $x+y<n$ to $T_n$.



        By considering $q=(0,1)$ in the first set, it is obvious that almost all points generated by the second set in the prescription for $S_{n+1}$ are already included by the first set. The only exception are the points $(0,y)$ with $1 leq y leq n+1$. Including the point $(0,0)$, we can therefore summarize the sets $S_n$ by
        begin{eqnarray}
        S_0 & = & {(0,0)} \
        S_{n+1} & = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {(0,k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
        end{eqnarray}



        enter image description here



        We now apply a particular translation of the points in each set $S_n$, that will depend explicitly on $n$. This does of course not affect their number or the shape of the set in a graphical representation, and obtain the sets $R_n$
        $$
        R_n = {p-(2^{n-2}-1,0) | p in S_n}
        $$

        This results in $R_0={(frac{3}{4},0)}$ and $R_1={(frac{1}{2},0),(frac{1}{2},1),(frac{3}{2},0)}$, but for $n geq 2$ the set $R_n$ will only contain integer grid-points.



        Applying this translation to the transformation for $T_n$, we find that this results in
        begin{eqnarray}
        R_0 & = & {(frac{3}{4},0)} \
        R_{n+1} & = & {p+q|p,q in R_n} cup {(1-2^{n-1},k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
        end{eqnarray}



        enter image description here



        This means that in each iteration the domain is mainly scaled by a factor 2 in both $x$ and $y$ direction with respect to the origin (this is the reason for the particular choice or translation) and a single vertical line of points is added on the extreme left side. With this in mind, it is then easy to check and prove by induction that for $n geq 2$, the set $R_n$ contains all integer grid-points that are bounded by the inequalities $y geq 0$, $x geq 1-2^{n-2}$, and $ y leq (k-1) (x+2^{n-2}) + 2^{k+1}$ for $0 leq k < n$, as well as that the corresponding vertices of the polygon are given by ${(2^{n-k}-2^{n-2}, k 2^{n-k})| 0 leq k leq n} cup {(1-2^{n-2},0)}$.



        Transforming this result back to the set $S_n$ and $T_n$ gives the results as mentioned above.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        As mentioned in the comment, it is probably better to ask the actual problem you wanted to solve. The current question has a rather messy and lengthy solution and might not be too useful. For that reason I only give here the main results and the main steps required in a proof.



        The set of points $T_n$ is a convex set of lattice points $(x,y)$ in the 2D plane. It is relatively easy to show that $0 leq x leq 2^n-1$ and $0 leq y leq 2^{n-1}$. For the actual boundaries of the set, you will find that the set is bounded from below by two lines $x+y geq n$ and $y geq 0$. The upper limit is more complicated and consists of inequalities, the number of which increases with the value of $n$. One can show that for given $n$ and $x in [0,2^n-1]$ that all points are found by
        $$
        max (n-x,0) leq y leq 2^{k+1} + (n-k-2)(x+1) qquad qquad qquad (*)
        $$

        where $k$ is an integer dependent on $x$ and given by
        $$
        2^k leq x + 1 < 2^{k+1}.
        $$



        enter image description here



        For proving this result a number of steps are required.



        1) The range of $x$ and $y$. From the transformation it is immediately clear that $x,y geq 0$. With the help of induction you can prove that the domain is restricted by $T_n subset [0,2^n-1] times [0,2^{n-1}]$ for $ngeq1$ using the maximum growth possible in either direction.



        2) With induction you can also show that
        $$
        (x,0) in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad nleq xleq2^n-1
        $$

        $$
        (x,n-x)in T_n qquadtext{for}qquad 0 leq x leq n
        $$

        You can also use this to show that $x+ygeq n$ which establishes the lower bounds in $(*)$



        3) If you would represent the sets graphically and consider the transformation for low values of $n$, it will be clear that the set $T_n$ is convex and that the boundary is a polygon.



        4) The vertices of the polygon-boundary of $T_n$ are given by $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k)$ for $0leq k leq n$. Note that each vertex under the first transformation rule maps on to the boundary of $T_{n+1}$, i.e., $(x,y) rightarrow (2x+1,2y)$ gives that $(2^k-1,[n-k]2^k) rightarrow (2^{k+1}-1,[(n+1)-(k+1)]2^{k+1})$ complemented with applying the second transformation on $(0,n) rightarrow (0,n+1)$. The only other vertex to be added to make the boundary complete is the point $(n,0)$.



        5) The rest of the boundary are straight lines connecting the vertices, giving rise to the upper limit in $(*)$.



        A full prove along these lines is possible but quite a bit of writing.



        The derivation can be simplified and made more intuitive, if we consider the sets $S_n=cup_{i=0}^n T_n$. With the innitial condition $T_0={(0,0)}$, we then find that
        begin{eqnarray}
        S_{n+1}
        & = & left[ bigcup_{k=1}^{n+1} T_n right] cup T_0\
        & = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in T_i text{ with } 0 leq i leq k} cup {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup T_0\
        & = & left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+q+(1,0)|p in T_{k}; q in S_k} right] cup left[ bigcup_{k=0}^{n} {p+(0,1)|pin T_{k}} right] cup S_0\
        & = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {p+(0,1)|pin S_{n}} cup S_0
        end{eqnarray}



        Effectively, this means that $S_n$ is obtained by adding the grid-points $(x,y)$ in the triange $x,ygeq$ and $x+y<n$ to $T_n$.



        By considering $q=(0,1)$ in the first set, it is obvious that almost all points generated by the second set in the prescription for $S_{n+1}$ are already included by the first set. The only exception are the points $(0,y)$ with $1 leq y leq n+1$. Including the point $(0,0)$, we can therefore summarize the sets $S_n$ by
        begin{eqnarray}
        S_0 & = & {(0,0)} \
        S_{n+1} & = & {p+q+(1,0)|p,q in S_n} cup {(0,k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
        end{eqnarray}



        enter image description here



        We now apply a particular translation of the points in each set $S_n$, that will depend explicitly on $n$. This does of course not affect their number or the shape of the set in a graphical representation, and obtain the sets $R_n$
        $$
        R_n = {p-(2^{n-2}-1,0) | p in S_n}
        $$

        This results in $R_0={(frac{3}{4},0)}$ and $R_1={(frac{1}{2},0),(frac{1}{2},1),(frac{3}{2},0)}$, but for $n geq 2$ the set $R_n$ will only contain integer grid-points.



        Applying this translation to the transformation for $T_n$, we find that this results in
        begin{eqnarray}
        R_0 & = & {(frac{3}{4},0)} \
        R_{n+1} & = & {p+q|p,q in R_n} cup {(1-2^{n-1},k) |0 leq k leq n+1 }
        end{eqnarray}



        enter image description here



        This means that in each iteration the domain is mainly scaled by a factor 2 in both $x$ and $y$ direction with respect to the origin (this is the reason for the particular choice or translation) and a single vertical line of points is added on the extreme left side. With this in mind, it is then easy to check and prove by induction that for $n geq 2$, the set $R_n$ contains all integer grid-points that are bounded by the inequalities $y geq 0$, $x geq 1-2^{n-2}$, and $ y leq (k-1) (x+2^{n-2}) + 2^{k+1}$ for $0 leq k < n$, as well as that the corresponding vertices of the polygon are given by ${(2^{n-k}-2^{n-2}, k 2^{n-k})| 0 leq k leq n} cup {(1-2^{n-2},0)}$.



        Transforming this result back to the set $S_n$ and $T_n$ gives the results as mentioned above.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 3 at 15:18

























        answered Nov 27 at 22:28









        Ronald Blaak

        2,394310




        2,394310






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2640868%2fvalues-in-an-inductively-defined-sequence-of-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bundesstraße 106

            Verónica Boquete

            Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten