How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex fraction environment












3















How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?



enter image description here



My trial code does not compile,



documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}









share|improve this question

























  • please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...

    – Zarko
    Dec 16 '18 at 3:05


















3















How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?



enter image description here



My trial code does not compile,



documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}









share|improve this question

























  • please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...

    – Zarko
    Dec 16 '18 at 3:05
















3












3








3


1






How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?



enter image description here



My trial code does not compile,



documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}









share|improve this question
















How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?



enter image description here



My trial code does not compile,



documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}






tikz-pgf amsmath fractions alignment






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 16 '18 at 5:49







Kevin Powell

















asked Dec 16 '18 at 2:59









Kevin PowellKevin Powell

36016




36016













  • please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...

    – Zarko
    Dec 16 '18 at 3:05





















  • please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...

    – Zarko
    Dec 16 '18 at 3:05



















please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...

– Zarko
Dec 16 '18 at 3:05







please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...

– Zarko
Dec 16 '18 at 3:05












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:14











  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:42











  • That's quite neat! Why [baseline] option centers the figure in the numerator? It is black magic for me.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:42



















4














documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 3:38











  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:04






  • 2





    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:43











  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:10











  • @marmot, definition of M is left from some my experiments (now deleted). baseline is used slightly differently. also coordinates of elements are different. however you still can look on my answer as small variation of yours ... (but i wrote it without seeing yours).

    – Zarko
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:22











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466042%2fhow-to-properly-align-tikz-pictures-in-latex-fraction-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:14











  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:42











  • That's quite neat! Why [baseline] option centers the figure in the numerator? It is black magic for me.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:42
















3














Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:14











  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:42











  • That's quite neat! Why [baseline] option centers the figure in the numerator? It is black magic for me.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:42














3












3








3







Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline option.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here



I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.



Note that you can use a TikZ matrix:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}

begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline]
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm,ampersand replacement=&]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}

end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 16 '18 at 7:46

























answered Dec 16 '18 at 3:22









marmotmarmot

107k5129243




107k5129243













  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:14











  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:42











  • That's quite neat! Why [baseline] option centers the figure in the numerator? It is black magic for me.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:42



















  • Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:14











  • @KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:42











  • That's quite neat! Why [baseline] option centers the figure in the numerator? It is black magic for me.

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 17 '18 at 7:42

















Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.

– Kevin Powell
Dec 16 '18 at 6:14





Thanks! It seems that the more versatile matrix in tikzpicture does not work with frac. Although baseline is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.

– Kevin Powell
Dec 16 '18 at 6:14













@KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.

– marmot
Dec 16 '18 at 7:42





@KevinPowell You can definitely use a matrix, just add ampersand replacement=& and replace & by &.

– marmot
Dec 16 '18 at 7:42













That's quite neat! Why [baseline] option centers the figure in the numerator? It is black magic for me.

– Kevin Powell
Dec 17 '18 at 7:42





That's quite neat! Why [baseline] option centers the figure in the numerator? It is black magic for me.

– Kevin Powell
Dec 17 '18 at 7:42











4














documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 3:38











  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:04






  • 2





    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:43











  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:10











  • @marmot, definition of M is left from some my experiments (now deleted). baseline is used slightly differently. also coordinates of elements are different. however you still can look on my answer as small variation of yours ... (but i wrote it without seeing yours).

    – Zarko
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:22
















4














documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 3:38











  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:04






  • 2





    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:43











  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:10











  • @marmot, definition of M is left from some my experiments (now deleted). baseline is used slightly differently. also coordinates of elements are different. however you still can look on my answer as small variation of yours ... (but i wrote it without seeing yours).

    – Zarko
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:22














4












4








4







documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}

begin{document}
[
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 16 '18 at 7:16

























answered Dec 16 '18 at 3:32









ZarkoZarko

126k868165




126k868165













  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 3:38











  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:04






  • 2





    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:43











  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:10











  • @marmot, definition of M is left from some my experiments (now deleted). baseline is used slightly differently. also coordinates of elements are different. however you still can look on my answer as small variation of yours ... (but i wrote it without seeing yours).

    – Zarko
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:22



















  • How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.

    – marmot
    Dec 16 '18 at 3:38











  • @marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:04






  • 2





    I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).

    – CarLaTeX
    Dec 16 '18 at 4:43











  • @CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!

    – Kevin Powell
    Dec 16 '18 at 6:10











  • @marmot, definition of M is left from some my experiments (now deleted). baseline is used slightly differently. also coordinates of elements are different. however you still can look on my answer as small variation of yours ... (but i wrote it without seeing yours).

    – Zarko
    Dec 16 '18 at 7:22

















How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.

– marmot
Dec 16 '18 at 3:38





How is that different from my answer except that you define M but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline, which is precisely what I am using.

– marmot
Dec 16 '18 at 3:38













@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.

– CarLaTeX
Dec 16 '18 at 4:04





@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.

– CarLaTeX
Dec 16 '18 at 4:04




2




2





I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).

– CarLaTeX
Dec 16 '18 at 4:43





I would create a pic for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).

– CarLaTeX
Dec 16 '18 at 4:43













@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!

– Kevin Powell
Dec 16 '18 at 6:10





@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!

– Kevin Powell
Dec 16 '18 at 6:10













@marmot, definition of M is left from some my experiments (now deleted). baseline is used slightly differently. also coordinates of elements are different. however you still can look on my answer as small variation of yours ... (but i wrote it without seeing yours).

– Zarko
Dec 16 '18 at 7:22





@marmot, definition of M is left from some my experiments (now deleted). baseline is used slightly differently. also coordinates of elements are different. however you still can look on my answer as small variation of yours ... (but i wrote it without seeing yours).

– Zarko
Dec 16 '18 at 7:22


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466042%2fhow-to-properly-align-tikz-pictures-in-latex-fraction-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Verónica Boquete

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten