Calculation of Christoffel symbol for unit sphere
$begingroup$
We use the following parameterisation for the unit sphere: $sigma(theta,phi)=(costhetacosphi,costhetasinphi,sintheta)$.
I have calculated the Christoffel symbols to be
$Gamma^1_{11}=Gamma^2_{11}=Gamma^1_{12}=0, Gamma^1_{22}=sinthetacostheta,Gamma^2_{22}=0$, which match the answers I am given in my notes. But when I calculate $Gamma^2_{12}$ I get $-sinthetacostheta$, which apparently is incorrect and should be $-tantheta$. My reasoning was that $Gamma^2_{12}=sigma_phi cdot sigma_{thetaphi}=(-costhetasinphi,costhetacosphi,0)cdot(sinthetasinphi,-sinthetacosphi,0)=-sinthetacostheta$. I am not sure what I am doing wrong - the same method worked for the other five symbols and I have no idea where a $tantheta$ term would come from. Any help would be appreciated.
differential-geometry parametrization
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We use the following parameterisation for the unit sphere: $sigma(theta,phi)=(costhetacosphi,costhetasinphi,sintheta)$.
I have calculated the Christoffel symbols to be
$Gamma^1_{11}=Gamma^2_{11}=Gamma^1_{12}=0, Gamma^1_{22}=sinthetacostheta,Gamma^2_{22}=0$, which match the answers I am given in my notes. But when I calculate $Gamma^2_{12}$ I get $-sinthetacostheta$, which apparently is incorrect and should be $-tantheta$. My reasoning was that $Gamma^2_{12}=sigma_phi cdot sigma_{thetaphi}=(-costhetasinphi,costhetacosphi,0)cdot(sinthetasinphi,-sinthetacosphi,0)=-sinthetacostheta$. I am not sure what I am doing wrong - the same method worked for the other five symbols and I have no idea where a $tantheta$ term would come from. Any help would be appreciated.
differential-geometry parametrization
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
Dec 31 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
@JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We use the following parameterisation for the unit sphere: $sigma(theta,phi)=(costhetacosphi,costhetasinphi,sintheta)$.
I have calculated the Christoffel symbols to be
$Gamma^1_{11}=Gamma^2_{11}=Gamma^1_{12}=0, Gamma^1_{22}=sinthetacostheta,Gamma^2_{22}=0$, which match the answers I am given in my notes. But when I calculate $Gamma^2_{12}$ I get $-sinthetacostheta$, which apparently is incorrect and should be $-tantheta$. My reasoning was that $Gamma^2_{12}=sigma_phi cdot sigma_{thetaphi}=(-costhetasinphi,costhetacosphi,0)cdot(sinthetasinphi,-sinthetacosphi,0)=-sinthetacostheta$. I am not sure what I am doing wrong - the same method worked for the other five symbols and I have no idea where a $tantheta$ term would come from. Any help would be appreciated.
differential-geometry parametrization
$endgroup$
We use the following parameterisation for the unit sphere: $sigma(theta,phi)=(costhetacosphi,costhetasinphi,sintheta)$.
I have calculated the Christoffel symbols to be
$Gamma^1_{11}=Gamma^2_{11}=Gamma^1_{12}=0, Gamma^1_{22}=sinthetacostheta,Gamma^2_{22}=0$, which match the answers I am given in my notes. But when I calculate $Gamma^2_{12}$ I get $-sinthetacostheta$, which apparently is incorrect and should be $-tantheta$. My reasoning was that $Gamma^2_{12}=sigma_phi cdot sigma_{thetaphi}=(-costhetasinphi,costhetacosphi,0)cdot(sinthetasinphi,-sinthetacosphi,0)=-sinthetacostheta$. I am not sure what I am doing wrong - the same method worked for the other five symbols and I have no idea where a $tantheta$ term would come from. Any help would be appreciated.
differential-geometry parametrization
differential-geometry parametrization
asked Dec 31 '18 at 11:44
AlephNullAlephNull
559110
559110
$begingroup$
Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
Dec 31 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
@JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
Dec 31 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
@JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:11
$begingroup$
Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
Dec 31 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
Dec 31 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
@JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
@JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:11
$begingroup$
Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:11
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$require{cancel}$
You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)
$$
(g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
(g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
$$
From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
$$
Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
&=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
end{eqnarray}
You can calculate the other components the same way
$$
Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
$$
and
$$
Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
$$
You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily
$$
theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
$$
With this we have
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
&=& - tantheta tag{3}
end{eqnarray}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057630%2fcalculation-of-christoffel-symbol-for-unit-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$require{cancel}$
You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)
$$
(g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
(g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
$$
From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
$$
Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
&=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
end{eqnarray}
You can calculate the other components the same way
$$
Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
$$
and
$$
Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$require{cancel}$
You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)
$$
(g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
(g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
$$
From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
$$
Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
&=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
end{eqnarray}
You can calculate the other components the same way
$$
Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
$$
and
$$
Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$require{cancel}$
You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)
$$
(g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
(g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
$$
From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
$$
Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
&=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
end{eqnarray}
You can calculate the other components the same way
$$
Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
$$
and
$$
Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
$$
$endgroup$
$require{cancel}$
You can directly calculate the metric coefficients for this parameterization as ($x^1 = costheta, x^2 = phi$)
$$
(g_{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & cos^2theta} ~~~mbox{and}~~
(g^{munu}) = pmatrix{1 & 0 \ 0 & 1/cos^2theta}
$$
From this is pretty straightforward to calculate $Gamma^{lambda}_{munu}$
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{1}{2}g^{lambdaalpha}left(frac{partial g_{mualpha}}{partial x^{nu}}+ frac{partial g_{alphanu}}{partial x^{mu}} - frac{partial g_{munu}}{partial x^{alpha}}right)
$$
Take $lambda = 2$, $mu = 1$ and $nu = 2$
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{1}{2}g^{2alpha}left(frac{partial g_{1alpha}}{partial x^{2}}+ frac{partial g_{alpha2}}{partial x^{1}} - frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{alpha}}right) = frac{1}{2}g^{22}left(cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}} + frac{partial g_{22}}{partial x^{1}} - cancelto{0}{frac{partial g_{12}}{partial x^{2}}}right) \
&=& frac{1}{2}left(frac{1}{cos^2theta}right) frac{partial cos^2theta}{partial theta} = -tantheta
end{eqnarray}
You can calculate the other components the same way
$$
Gamma_{11}^1 = Gamma_{11}^2 = Gamma_{12}^1 = Gamma_{22}^2 = 0
$$
and
$$
Gamma_{22}^1 = sinthetacostheta
$$
answered Dec 31 '18 at 14:31
caveraccaverac
14.9k31130
14.9k31130
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
$$
You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily
$$
theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
$$
With this we have
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
&=& - tantheta tag{3}
end{eqnarray}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
$$
You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily
$$
theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
$$
With this we have
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
&=& - tantheta tag{3}
end{eqnarray}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
$$
You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily
$$
theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
$$
With this we have
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
&=& - tantheta tag{3}
end{eqnarray}
$endgroup$
There's another way, and I think this is what you were going for in your post, but is is completely equivalent to my other answer, the idea is to calculate
$$
Gamma^{lambda}_{munu} = frac{partial x^lambda}{partial sigma^alpha}frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^mu partial x^nu} tag{1}
$$
You can obtain the inverse mapping fairly easily
$$
theta = arcsin sigma^2 equiv x^1 ~~~mbox{and}~~~ phi = arctan left(frac{sigma^2}{sigma^1}right) equiv x^2 tag{2}
$$
With this we have
begin{eqnarray}
Gamma^{2}_{12} &=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^alpha} frac{partial^2 sigma^alpha}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^1} frac{partial^2 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^2} frac{partial^2 sigma^2}{partial x^1 partial x^2} + frac{partial x^2}{partial sigma^3} frac{partial^3 sigma^1}{partial x^1 partial x^2} \
&=& -frac{sigma^2 sinthetasinphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2}-frac{sigma^1sinthetacosphi}{(sigma^1)^2 + (sigma^2)^2} \
&=& - tantheta tag{3}
end{eqnarray}
answered Dec 31 '18 at 15:34
caveraccaverac
14.9k31130
14.9k31130
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057630%2fcalculation-of-christoffel-symbol-for-unit-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Hi. Your calculation, as you've shown it, looks correct. When you use it to compute the curvature of the sphere, do you get $1$? What if you use the alternative ($-tan theta$)? Perhaps your answer is the correct one. Also: I didn't try to answer this question in part because I don't recognize the notation using $sigma$s (even though I've taught diff'l geom courses once or twice). Amplifying your question with details about the notation, and showing the earlier parts of the computation, might be helpful to others.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
Dec 31 '18 at 13:43
$begingroup$
@JohnHughes I was not aware that Christoffel symbols were so often defined with matrices, so yes I should make my definition clear. Here the Christoffel symbols are defined to be the respective coefficients of $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$ in $sigma_{uu},sigma_{uv},sigma_{vv}$ (where $N$ is the unit normal to the surface). So in particular, $Gamma^2_{12}$ is the coefficient of $sigma_v$ in $sigma_{uv}$ (expressed in terms of the basis $sigma_u,sigma_v,N$). Perhaps they made a mistake, but that would seem strange considering that I see $-tantheta$ elsewhere, including the answer given below.
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:01
$begingroup$
Aha, I've realised my mistake was that I implicitly assumed the basis was orthonormal in my calculation when it is obviously not in general. Very stupid mistake. So that is why the much more complicated method with matrices is used... (It is rather amusing though that in this case the basis happened to be orthogonal so my method actually works in this case if one remembers to 'normalise' at the end.)
$endgroup$
– AlephNull
Dec 31 '18 at 15:11