Finding the intersections between $y = e^x$ and $y = x + 2$ algebraically?












5












$begingroup$


In trying to find the intersections between $y = e^x$ and $y = x + 2$ in terms of $x$, I came up with the equation,



$e^x = x + 2$



and subsequently,



$x = ln(x+2)$.



Beyond that point, I am stumped. I am able to solve the equation numerically using a calculator, Newton's method, etc., but need to solve it algebraically. I have done a good deal of research on how to solve this type of problem, but have been unable to find any problems similar enough to be of help.



Thanks to the StackExchange community for your help. I love your sites and have been happy to find answers to hundreds of my own questions on them.






logarithms exponential-function transcendental-equations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There is no closed form unless we use special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Could you elaborate a bit? I recall running into Lambert functions earlier. Do you mean that I must use functions such as those to solve for $x$, rather than simple algebraic rules?
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:28










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. See: wolframalpha.com/input/?i=e%5Ex+-+x+-+2+%3D+0
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:31










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Thank you for the help. I was hoping to be able to solve this algebraically, but it seems my calculus professor may have made a mistake by labeling this as a no-calculator problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:34










  • $begingroup$
    You could try to expand $e^x$ using Taylor Series for some terms. However, this will give you an approximate solution. A similar (unanswered so far question) is here:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1686045/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:49


















5












$begingroup$


In trying to find the intersections between $y = e^x$ and $y = x + 2$ in terms of $x$, I came up with the equation,



$e^x = x + 2$



and subsequently,



$x = ln(x+2)$.



Beyond that point, I am stumped. I am able to solve the equation numerically using a calculator, Newton's method, etc., but need to solve it algebraically. I have done a good deal of research on how to solve this type of problem, but have been unable to find any problems similar enough to be of help.



Thanks to the StackExchange community for your help. I love your sites and have been happy to find answers to hundreds of my own questions on them.






logarithms exponential-function transcendental-equations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There is no closed form unless we use special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Could you elaborate a bit? I recall running into Lambert functions earlier. Do you mean that I must use functions such as those to solve for $x$, rather than simple algebraic rules?
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:28










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. See: wolframalpha.com/input/?i=e%5Ex+-+x+-+2+%3D+0
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:31










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Thank you for the help. I was hoping to be able to solve this algebraically, but it seems my calculus professor may have made a mistake by labeling this as a no-calculator problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:34










  • $begingroup$
    You could try to expand $e^x$ using Taylor Series for some terms. However, this will give you an approximate solution. A similar (unanswered so far question) is here:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1686045/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:49
















5












5








5





$begingroup$


In trying to find the intersections between $y = e^x$ and $y = x + 2$ in terms of $x$, I came up with the equation,



$e^x = x + 2$



and subsequently,



$x = ln(x+2)$.



Beyond that point, I am stumped. I am able to solve the equation numerically using a calculator, Newton's method, etc., but need to solve it algebraically. I have done a good deal of research on how to solve this type of problem, but have been unable to find any problems similar enough to be of help.



Thanks to the StackExchange community for your help. I love your sites and have been happy to find answers to hundreds of my own questions on them.






logarithms exponential-function transcendental-equations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In trying to find the intersections between $y = e^x$ and $y = x + 2$ in terms of $x$, I came up with the equation,



$e^x = x + 2$



and subsequently,



$x = ln(x+2)$.



Beyond that point, I am stumped. I am able to solve the equation numerically using a calculator, Newton's method, etc., but need to solve it algebraically. I have done a good deal of research on how to solve this type of problem, but have been unable to find any problems similar enough to be of help.



Thanks to the StackExchange community for your help. I love your sites and have been happy to find answers to hundreds of my own questions on them.






logarithms exponential-function transcendental-equations




logarithms exponential-function transcendental-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '18 at 10:24









Martin Sleziak

45.2k11123278




45.2k11123278










asked Mar 8 '16 at 2:23









Dillon MorseDillon Morse

283




283












  • $begingroup$
    There is no closed form unless we use special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Could you elaborate a bit? I recall running into Lambert functions earlier. Do you mean that I must use functions such as those to solve for $x$, rather than simple algebraic rules?
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:28










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. See: wolframalpha.com/input/?i=e%5Ex+-+x+-+2+%3D+0
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:31










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Thank you for the help. I was hoping to be able to solve this algebraically, but it seems my calculus professor may have made a mistake by labeling this as a no-calculator problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:34










  • $begingroup$
    You could try to expand $e^x$ using Taylor Series for some terms. However, this will give you an approximate solution. A similar (unanswered so far question) is here:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1686045/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:49




















  • $begingroup$
    There is no closed form unless we use special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Could you elaborate a bit? I recall running into Lambert functions earlier. Do you mean that I must use functions such as those to solve for $x$, rather than simple algebraic rules?
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:28










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. See: wolframalpha.com/input/?i=e%5Ex+-+x+-+2+%3D+0
    $endgroup$
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:31










  • $begingroup$
    I see. Thank you for the help. I was hoping to be able to solve this algebraically, but it seems my calculus professor may have made a mistake by labeling this as a no-calculator problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:34










  • $begingroup$
    You could try to expand $e^x$ using Taylor Series for some terms. However, this will give you an approximate solution. A similar (unanswered so far question) is here:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1686045/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Mar 8 '16 at 2:49


















$begingroup$
There is no closed form unless we use special functions.
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Mar 8 '16 at 2:25




$begingroup$
There is no closed form unless we use special functions.
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Mar 8 '16 at 2:25












$begingroup$
Could you elaborate a bit? I recall running into Lambert functions earlier. Do you mean that I must use functions such as those to solve for $x$, rather than simple algebraic rules?
$endgroup$
– Dillon Morse
Mar 8 '16 at 2:28




$begingroup$
Could you elaborate a bit? I recall running into Lambert functions earlier. Do you mean that I must use functions such as those to solve for $x$, rather than simple algebraic rules?
$endgroup$
– Dillon Morse
Mar 8 '16 at 2:28












$begingroup$
Yes. See: wolframalpha.com/input/?i=e%5Ex+-+x+-+2+%3D+0
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Mar 8 '16 at 2:31




$begingroup$
Yes. See: wolframalpha.com/input/?i=e%5Ex+-+x+-+2+%3D+0
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Mar 8 '16 at 2:31












$begingroup$
I see. Thank you for the help. I was hoping to be able to solve this algebraically, but it seems my calculus professor may have made a mistake by labeling this as a no-calculator problem.
$endgroup$
– Dillon Morse
Mar 8 '16 at 2:34




$begingroup$
I see. Thank you for the help. I was hoping to be able to solve this algebraically, but it seems my calculus professor may have made a mistake by labeling this as a no-calculator problem.
$endgroup$
– Dillon Morse
Mar 8 '16 at 2:34












$begingroup$
You could try to expand $e^x$ using Taylor Series for some terms. However, this will give you an approximate solution. A similar (unanswered so far question) is here:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1686045/…
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Mar 8 '16 at 2:49






$begingroup$
You could try to expand $e^x$ using Taylor Series for some terms. However, this will give you an approximate solution. A similar (unanswered so far question) is here:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1686045/…
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Mar 8 '16 at 2:49












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Here again appears the beautiful Lambert function : rewrite $$e^x=x+2implies e^{x+2}=e^2(x+2)implies e^y=e^2 y$$ and the solutions are given by $$x_1=-Wleft(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ $$x_2=-W_{-1}left(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ In fact, keep in mind that any equation which can write $A+Bx+Clog(D+Ex)=0$ has solutions in terms of Lambert function.



The Wikipedia page gives series approximations.



There is no other closed form to this equation. If you cannot use it, just numerical methods will provide the solutions.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer. I've marked your answer as accepted. While it does not technically answer my question, it does provide the best possible answer to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 11:36












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1687866%2ffinding-the-intersections-between-y-ex-and-y-x-2-algebraically%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Here again appears the beautiful Lambert function : rewrite $$e^x=x+2implies e^{x+2}=e^2(x+2)implies e^y=e^2 y$$ and the solutions are given by $$x_1=-Wleft(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ $$x_2=-W_{-1}left(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ In fact, keep in mind that any equation which can write $A+Bx+Clog(D+Ex)=0$ has solutions in terms of Lambert function.



The Wikipedia page gives series approximations.



There is no other closed form to this equation. If you cannot use it, just numerical methods will provide the solutions.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer. I've marked your answer as accepted. While it does not technically answer my question, it does provide the best possible answer to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 11:36
















3












$begingroup$

Here again appears the beautiful Lambert function : rewrite $$e^x=x+2implies e^{x+2}=e^2(x+2)implies e^y=e^2 y$$ and the solutions are given by $$x_1=-Wleft(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ $$x_2=-W_{-1}left(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ In fact, keep in mind that any equation which can write $A+Bx+Clog(D+Ex)=0$ has solutions in terms of Lambert function.



The Wikipedia page gives series approximations.



There is no other closed form to this equation. If you cannot use it, just numerical methods will provide the solutions.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer. I've marked your answer as accepted. While it does not technically answer my question, it does provide the best possible answer to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 11:36














3












3








3





$begingroup$

Here again appears the beautiful Lambert function : rewrite $$e^x=x+2implies e^{x+2}=e^2(x+2)implies e^y=e^2 y$$ and the solutions are given by $$x_1=-Wleft(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ $$x_2=-W_{-1}left(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ In fact, keep in mind that any equation which can write $A+Bx+Clog(D+Ex)=0$ has solutions in terms of Lambert function.



The Wikipedia page gives series approximations.



There is no other closed form to this equation. If you cannot use it, just numerical methods will provide the solutions.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Here again appears the beautiful Lambert function : rewrite $$e^x=x+2implies e^{x+2}=e^2(x+2)implies e^y=e^2 y$$ and the solutions are given by $$x_1=-Wleft(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ $$x_2=-W_{-1}left(-frac{1}{e^2}right)-2$$ In fact, keep in mind that any equation which can write $A+Bx+Clog(D+Ex)=0$ has solutions in terms of Lambert function.



The Wikipedia page gives series approximations.



There is no other closed form to this equation. If you cannot use it, just numerical methods will provide the solutions.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 8 '16 at 6:49

























answered Mar 8 '16 at 6:41









Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

127k1158135




127k1158135












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer. I've marked your answer as accepted. While it does not technically answer my question, it does provide the best possible answer to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 11:36


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer. I've marked your answer as accepted. While it does not technically answer my question, it does provide the best possible answer to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dillon Morse
    Mar 8 '16 at 11:36
















$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer. I've marked your answer as accepted. While it does not technically answer my question, it does provide the best possible answer to it.
$endgroup$
– Dillon Morse
Mar 8 '16 at 11:36




$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer. I've marked your answer as accepted. While it does not technically answer my question, it does provide the best possible answer to it.
$endgroup$
– Dillon Morse
Mar 8 '16 at 11:36


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1687866%2ffinding-the-intersections-between-y-ex-and-y-x-2-algebraically%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bundesstraße 106

Image
Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland. Zur gleichnamigen Straße in Österreich siehe Mölltal Straße. Vorlage:Infobox hochrangige Straße/Wartung/DE-B Bundesstraße 106 in Deutschland Karte Basisdaten Betreiber: Deutschland  Bundesrepublik Deutschland Straßenbeginn: Wismar ( 53° 54′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.900536 11.396875 ) Straßenende: Schwerin ( 53° 36′  N , 11° 24′  O 53.592785 11.404892 ) Gesamtlänge: 40,7 km Bundesland: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Ausbauzustand: zweistreifig [1] Bundesstraße 106 in Schwerin (Umgehungsstraße) Straßenverlauf Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Landkreis Nordwestmecklenburg Ortsumgehung Wismar Wallensteingraben über   Dorf Mecklenburg Wallensteingraben Groß Stieten Bad Kleinen OT Niendorf Bahnstrecke Lübeck–Bad Kleinen Zickhusen Lübstorf Klein Trebbow OT Kirch Stück
Read more

Verónica Boquete

Image
Verónica Boquete im Trikot der Nationalmannschaft (2013) Personalia Name Verónica Boquete Giadans Geburtstag 9. April 1987 Geburtsort Santiago de Compostela, Spanien Größe 159 cm Position Mittelfeld / Sturm Juniorinnen Jahre Station 2001–2005 Xuventú Aguiño Frauen Jahre Station Spiele (Tore) 1 2005–2008 Prainsa Zaragoza 83 (40) 2008–2010 Espanyol Barcelona 53 (30) 2010 Buffalo Flash 9 0 (9) 2010 Chicago Red Stars 3 0 (1) 2010–2011 Espanyol Barcelona 26 (41) 2011 Philadelphia Independence 13 0 (5) 2011 Energija Woronesch 5 0 (1) 2012–2014 Tyresö FF 39 (14) 2014 Portland Thorns FC 15 0 (4) 2014–2015 1. FFC Frankfurt 23 0 (7) 2015–2016 FC Bayern München 9 0 (0) 2016–2018 Paris Saint-Germain 31 0 (8) 2018 Peking BG Phoenix 2019– Utah Royals FC 0 0 (0) Nationalmannschaft Jahre Auswahl
Read more

Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten

Image
Die Lage des Ida-Boy-Ed-Gartens, rot markiert Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten, Blick von der Wakenitzmauer durch das Tor in der Stadtmauer Der Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten ist eine Straße der Lübecker Altstadt. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Lage 2 Geschichte 3 Literatur 4 Weblinks Lage | Der etwa 90 Meter lange Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten befindet sich an der nördlichen Spitze der Altstadtinsel, vor dem Burgtor. Die in einem Bogen durch eine Grünanlage hangaufwärts führende Straße verbindet die Wakenitzmauer mit der Burgtorbrücke. Geschichte | Der heutige Ida-Boy-Ed-Garten wurde ursprünglich als Verlängerung der Wakenitzmauer angelegt. 1903 wurde in den erhaltenen Teil der mittelalterlichen Stadtmauer, an dem die Wakenitzmauer bei der Einmündung der Kaiserstraße begann, ein Tor mit einem großen Bogen für die Durchführung der Straße und zwei kleineren seitlichen Öffnungen für Fußgänger gebrochen, um für die neu errichteten Wohnhäuser in diesem Bereich
Read more