Equivalence relations on natural numbers
$begingroup$
How many equivalence relations are there on $mathbb{N}$, where $mathbb{N}$ is the set of natural numbers? How can one compute it?
equivalence-relations set-partition
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How many equivalence relations are there on $mathbb{N}$, where $mathbb{N}$ is the set of natural numbers? How can one compute it?
equivalence-relations set-partition
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Uncountably infinitely many, obviously. Is this the answer you are after?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 6 '13 at 14:15
$begingroup$
The answer is a particular case of my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Jan 6 '13 at 14:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How many equivalence relations are there on $mathbb{N}$, where $mathbb{N}$ is the set of natural numbers? How can one compute it?
equivalence-relations set-partition
$endgroup$
How many equivalence relations are there on $mathbb{N}$, where $mathbb{N}$ is the set of natural numbers? How can one compute it?
equivalence-relations set-partition
equivalence-relations set-partition
edited Oct 26 '17 at 15:58
Peter Taylor
8,79312341
8,79312341
asked Jan 6 '13 at 14:04
BilboBilbo
270623
270623
$begingroup$
Uncountably infinitely many, obviously. Is this the answer you are after?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 6 '13 at 14:15
$begingroup$
The answer is a particular case of my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Jan 6 '13 at 14:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Uncountably infinitely many, obviously. Is this the answer you are after?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 6 '13 at 14:15
$begingroup$
The answer is a particular case of my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Jan 6 '13 at 14:25
$begingroup$
Uncountably infinitely many, obviously. Is this the answer you are after?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 6 '13 at 14:15
$begingroup$
Uncountably infinitely many, obviously. Is this the answer you are after?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 6 '13 at 14:15
$begingroup$
The answer is a particular case of my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Jan 6 '13 at 14:25
$begingroup$
The answer is a particular case of my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Jan 6 '13 at 14:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are $2^{aleph_0}$ many. As mentioned above, equivalence relation corresponds to partition of $mathbb{N}$. For each $f in 2^{mathbb{N}}$, i.e. a function $f : mathbb{N} rightarrow {0,1}$. Define a partition, $P_f$, such that, $P_f$ has a subset of size $n$ if and only if $f(n) = 1$. Then if $f neq g$, then $P_f neq P_g$. Hence the number of equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$ is at least as many as $2^{aleph_0}$. It can not be bigger because the power set $mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$.
Explicitly, you can have construct $P_f$ as follows: If $f(i) = 1$, then put into $P_f$, the subset $(sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1, sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1 + i)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An equivalence relation on any set partitions that set.
So we can approach your question by asking, equivalently: How many ways are there to partition $mathbb{N}$?
A partition of $X$ with is a set P of nonempty subsets of X, such that every element of X is an element of a single element of P. Each element of P is a cell of the partition. Moreover, the elements of P are pairwise disjoint and their union is X.
$|mathbb{N}| = aleph_0$. There are uncountably many possible distinct partitions of $mathbb{N}: 2^{aleph_0}$ distinct partitions.
(See this post for a nicely detailed proof of this - not just a sketch of a proof.)Since there is a natural bijection from the set of all possible equivalence
relations on a set $mathbb{N}$ and the set of all partitions of $mathbb{N}$, there are $2^{aleph_0}$ equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$.
For counting the number of partitions on a finite sets, see Counting Partitions.
For an elaboration on the relationship between an equivalence relation on a set and the partition of the set induced by that relation, vice versa, see this previous post
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f271540%2fequivalence-relations-on-natural-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are $2^{aleph_0}$ many. As mentioned above, equivalence relation corresponds to partition of $mathbb{N}$. For each $f in 2^{mathbb{N}}$, i.e. a function $f : mathbb{N} rightarrow {0,1}$. Define a partition, $P_f$, such that, $P_f$ has a subset of size $n$ if and only if $f(n) = 1$. Then if $f neq g$, then $P_f neq P_g$. Hence the number of equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$ is at least as many as $2^{aleph_0}$. It can not be bigger because the power set $mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$.
Explicitly, you can have construct $P_f$ as follows: If $f(i) = 1$, then put into $P_f$, the subset $(sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1, sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1 + i)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are $2^{aleph_0}$ many. As mentioned above, equivalence relation corresponds to partition of $mathbb{N}$. For each $f in 2^{mathbb{N}}$, i.e. a function $f : mathbb{N} rightarrow {0,1}$. Define a partition, $P_f$, such that, $P_f$ has a subset of size $n$ if and only if $f(n) = 1$. Then if $f neq g$, then $P_f neq P_g$. Hence the number of equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$ is at least as many as $2^{aleph_0}$. It can not be bigger because the power set $mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$.
Explicitly, you can have construct $P_f$ as follows: If $f(i) = 1$, then put into $P_f$, the subset $(sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1, sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1 + i)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are $2^{aleph_0}$ many. As mentioned above, equivalence relation corresponds to partition of $mathbb{N}$. For each $f in 2^{mathbb{N}}$, i.e. a function $f : mathbb{N} rightarrow {0,1}$. Define a partition, $P_f$, such that, $P_f$ has a subset of size $n$ if and only if $f(n) = 1$. Then if $f neq g$, then $P_f neq P_g$. Hence the number of equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$ is at least as many as $2^{aleph_0}$. It can not be bigger because the power set $mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$.
Explicitly, you can have construct $P_f$ as follows: If $f(i) = 1$, then put into $P_f$, the subset $(sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1, sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1 + i)$.
$endgroup$
There are $2^{aleph_0}$ many. As mentioned above, equivalence relation corresponds to partition of $mathbb{N}$. For each $f in 2^{mathbb{N}}$, i.e. a function $f : mathbb{N} rightarrow {0,1}$. Define a partition, $P_f$, such that, $P_f$ has a subset of size $n$ if and only if $f(n) = 1$. Then if $f neq g$, then $P_f neq P_g$. Hence the number of equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$ is at least as many as $2^{aleph_0}$. It can not be bigger because the power set $mathcal{P}(mathbb{N})$ has cardinality $2^{aleph_0}$.
Explicitly, you can have construct $P_f$ as follows: If $f(i) = 1$, then put into $P_f$, the subset $(sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1, sum_{k < i st f(k) = 1} k + 1 + i)$.
edited Jan 6 '13 at 14:35
answered Jan 6 '13 at 14:28
WilliamWilliam
17.1k22156
17.1k22156
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An equivalence relation on any set partitions that set.
So we can approach your question by asking, equivalently: How many ways are there to partition $mathbb{N}$?
A partition of $X$ with is a set P of nonempty subsets of X, such that every element of X is an element of a single element of P. Each element of P is a cell of the partition. Moreover, the elements of P are pairwise disjoint and their union is X.
$|mathbb{N}| = aleph_0$. There are uncountably many possible distinct partitions of $mathbb{N}: 2^{aleph_0}$ distinct partitions.
(See this post for a nicely detailed proof of this - not just a sketch of a proof.)Since there is a natural bijection from the set of all possible equivalence
relations on a set $mathbb{N}$ and the set of all partitions of $mathbb{N}$, there are $2^{aleph_0}$ equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$.
For counting the number of partitions on a finite sets, see Counting Partitions.
For an elaboration on the relationship between an equivalence relation on a set and the partition of the set induced by that relation, vice versa, see this previous post
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An equivalence relation on any set partitions that set.
So we can approach your question by asking, equivalently: How many ways are there to partition $mathbb{N}$?
A partition of $X$ with is a set P of nonempty subsets of X, such that every element of X is an element of a single element of P. Each element of P is a cell of the partition. Moreover, the elements of P are pairwise disjoint and their union is X.
$|mathbb{N}| = aleph_0$. There are uncountably many possible distinct partitions of $mathbb{N}: 2^{aleph_0}$ distinct partitions.
(See this post for a nicely detailed proof of this - not just a sketch of a proof.)Since there is a natural bijection from the set of all possible equivalence
relations on a set $mathbb{N}$ and the set of all partitions of $mathbb{N}$, there are $2^{aleph_0}$ equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$.
For counting the number of partitions on a finite sets, see Counting Partitions.
For an elaboration on the relationship between an equivalence relation on a set and the partition of the set induced by that relation, vice versa, see this previous post
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An equivalence relation on any set partitions that set.
So we can approach your question by asking, equivalently: How many ways are there to partition $mathbb{N}$?
A partition of $X$ with is a set P of nonempty subsets of X, such that every element of X is an element of a single element of P. Each element of P is a cell of the partition. Moreover, the elements of P are pairwise disjoint and their union is X.
$|mathbb{N}| = aleph_0$. There are uncountably many possible distinct partitions of $mathbb{N}: 2^{aleph_0}$ distinct partitions.
(See this post for a nicely detailed proof of this - not just a sketch of a proof.)Since there is a natural bijection from the set of all possible equivalence
relations on a set $mathbb{N}$ and the set of all partitions of $mathbb{N}$, there are $2^{aleph_0}$ equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$.
For counting the number of partitions on a finite sets, see Counting Partitions.
For an elaboration on the relationship between an equivalence relation on a set and the partition of the set induced by that relation, vice versa, see this previous post
$endgroup$
An equivalence relation on any set partitions that set.
So we can approach your question by asking, equivalently: How many ways are there to partition $mathbb{N}$?
A partition of $X$ with is a set P of nonempty subsets of X, such that every element of X is an element of a single element of P. Each element of P is a cell of the partition. Moreover, the elements of P are pairwise disjoint and their union is X.
$|mathbb{N}| = aleph_0$. There are uncountably many possible distinct partitions of $mathbb{N}: 2^{aleph_0}$ distinct partitions.
(See this post for a nicely detailed proof of this - not just a sketch of a proof.)Since there is a natural bijection from the set of all possible equivalence
relations on a set $mathbb{N}$ and the set of all partitions of $mathbb{N}$, there are $2^{aleph_0}$ equivalence relations on $mathbb{N}$.
For counting the number of partitions on a finite sets, see Counting Partitions.
For an elaboration on the relationship between an equivalence relation on a set and the partition of the set induced by that relation, vice versa, see this previous post
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 6 '13 at 14:16
amWhyamWhy
192k28225439
192k28225439
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f271540%2fequivalence-relations-on-natural-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Uncountably infinitely many, obviously. Is this the answer you are after?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 6 '13 at 14:15
$begingroup$
The answer is a particular case of my answer here.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Jan 6 '13 at 14:25