Nested sequence of closed sets
$begingroup$
Is it true that every nested sequence of non-empty closed sets $(I_n)$ (one such that $I_{n+1} subset I_n$) has a non-empty intersection?
real-analysis general-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true that every nested sequence of non-empty closed sets $(I_n)$ (one such that $I_{n+1} subset I_n$) has a non-empty intersection?
real-analysis general-topology
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Closed sets where? In what topological space?
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Sep 10 '13 at 7:55
3
$begingroup$
I added 'non-empty' to the question, because otherwise there is the trivial counter-example where $I_n =emptyset$ for large enough $n$.
$endgroup$
– Rhys
Sep 10 '13 at 7:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true that every nested sequence of non-empty closed sets $(I_n)$ (one such that $I_{n+1} subset I_n$) has a non-empty intersection?
real-analysis general-topology
$endgroup$
Is it true that every nested sequence of non-empty closed sets $(I_n)$ (one such that $I_{n+1} subset I_n$) has a non-empty intersection?
real-analysis general-topology
real-analysis general-topology
edited Sep 10 '13 at 7:58
user94055
asked Sep 10 '13 at 7:51
user94055user94055
2313
2313
$begingroup$
Closed sets where? In what topological space?
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Sep 10 '13 at 7:55
3
$begingroup$
I added 'non-empty' to the question, because otherwise there is the trivial counter-example where $I_n =emptyset$ for large enough $n$.
$endgroup$
– Rhys
Sep 10 '13 at 7:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Closed sets where? In what topological space?
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Sep 10 '13 at 7:55
3
$begingroup$
I added 'non-empty' to the question, because otherwise there is the trivial counter-example where $I_n =emptyset$ for large enough $n$.
$endgroup$
– Rhys
Sep 10 '13 at 7:56
$begingroup$
Closed sets where? In what topological space?
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Sep 10 '13 at 7:55
$begingroup$
Closed sets where? In what topological space?
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Sep 10 '13 at 7:55
3
3
$begingroup$
I added 'non-empty' to the question, because otherwise there is the trivial counter-example where $I_n =emptyset$ for large enough $n$.
$endgroup$
– Rhys
Sep 10 '13 at 7:56
$begingroup$
I added 'non-empty' to the question, because otherwise there is the trivial counter-example where $I_n =emptyset$ for large enough $n$.
$endgroup$
– Rhys
Sep 10 '13 at 7:56
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $X$ is a compact space, this is true. $mathcal{F} = {I_alpha}_{alpha in I}$ is an arbitrary collection of nonempty closed sets such that any intersection of finitely many sets from $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty, then $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is nonempty.
To prove this, suppose $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is empty. Then ${X - I_alpha}$ is an open cover of $X$. Since $X$ is compact, there exists $alpha_1, ..., alpha_n$ such that $bigcup_{j = 1}^n (X - I_{alpha_j}) = X$. Then $bigcap_{j = 1}^n I_{alpha_j} = emptyset$. This contradicts the assumption that any finite intersection of elements of $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty.
For example (in your case) if $mathcal{F}$ consists of nonempty nested intervals, then $mathcal{F}$ has the finite intersection property and the above proof assured that the infinite intersection is nonempty.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No: take $I_n=[n,to)={xinBbb R:xge n}$. If, however, some $I_m$ is compact, then $I_n$ is compact for all $nge m$, and the intersection will be non-empty.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you use compactness to prove that?
$endgroup$
– user94055
Sep 10 '13 at 7:54
2
$begingroup$
@user94055: For $nge m$ let $U_n=Bbb Rsetminus I_n$. Show that if $bigcap_{nge m}I_n=varnothing$, then ${U_n:nge m}$ is an open cover of $I_m$ with no finite subcover. You may find this post from Dan Ma’s Topology Blog helpful.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 7:57
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: Can i ask you to help me about this two questions 1, 2, Thanks.
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:08
1
$begingroup$
@M.Sina: I did see your questions, but I’m probably going to need to refresh my memory a bit before answering. I’m about to head off to bed now, but I’ll take a look tomorrow.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 8:20
1
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: thanks. good night :).
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm studying intro to analysis and I got that a nested sequence of closed and nonempty subsets of $mathbb{R}$ do not necessarily have a nonempty infinite intersection:
$textbf{Claim 1}$: The set $A_{n} = (-infty, -n]$ is closed, $nin mathbb{N}$.
$textit{proof}$: Let $x$ be a limit point for $A_{n}Rightarrow$ if we had $x>-n,$ choose $epsilon = x+nRightarrow x-epsilon=-n<displaystyle x-frac{epsilon}{2}Rightarrow
V_{epsilon/2}(x)cap A_{n}=emptyset Rightarrow $ contradiction $Rightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 2}$: $A_{n+1}subseteq A_{n}forall n$.
$textit{Proof}$: $xin A_{n+1}Rightarrow xleq-n-1<-nRightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 3}$: The sequence $A_{n}supset A_{n+1}, A_{n}=(-infty,-n] forall n$ has
empty infinite intersection.
$textit{Proof}: bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}neq emptyset Rightarrow$ choose $xin
bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}Rightarrow xleq -nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow -xgeq nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow$ contradiction ($mathbb{N}$ is not bounded above)
$textbf{Conclusion}$: By claims 1,2, and 3, we have a nested sequence of closed sets with empty infinite intersection.
$underline{Legend}$:
- $V_{epsilon}(x)=(x-epsilon,x+epsilon)$
- Infinite intersection of $A_{n}=bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489242%2fnested-sequence-of-closed-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $X$ is a compact space, this is true. $mathcal{F} = {I_alpha}_{alpha in I}$ is an arbitrary collection of nonempty closed sets such that any intersection of finitely many sets from $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty, then $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is nonempty.
To prove this, suppose $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is empty. Then ${X - I_alpha}$ is an open cover of $X$. Since $X$ is compact, there exists $alpha_1, ..., alpha_n$ such that $bigcup_{j = 1}^n (X - I_{alpha_j}) = X$. Then $bigcap_{j = 1}^n I_{alpha_j} = emptyset$. This contradicts the assumption that any finite intersection of elements of $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty.
For example (in your case) if $mathcal{F}$ consists of nonempty nested intervals, then $mathcal{F}$ has the finite intersection property and the above proof assured that the infinite intersection is nonempty.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $X$ is a compact space, this is true. $mathcal{F} = {I_alpha}_{alpha in I}$ is an arbitrary collection of nonempty closed sets such that any intersection of finitely many sets from $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty, then $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is nonempty.
To prove this, suppose $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is empty. Then ${X - I_alpha}$ is an open cover of $X$. Since $X$ is compact, there exists $alpha_1, ..., alpha_n$ such that $bigcup_{j = 1}^n (X - I_{alpha_j}) = X$. Then $bigcap_{j = 1}^n I_{alpha_j} = emptyset$. This contradicts the assumption that any finite intersection of elements of $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty.
For example (in your case) if $mathcal{F}$ consists of nonempty nested intervals, then $mathcal{F}$ has the finite intersection property and the above proof assured that the infinite intersection is nonempty.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $X$ is a compact space, this is true. $mathcal{F} = {I_alpha}_{alpha in I}$ is an arbitrary collection of nonempty closed sets such that any intersection of finitely many sets from $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty, then $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is nonempty.
To prove this, suppose $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is empty. Then ${X - I_alpha}$ is an open cover of $X$. Since $X$ is compact, there exists $alpha_1, ..., alpha_n$ such that $bigcup_{j = 1}^n (X - I_{alpha_j}) = X$. Then $bigcap_{j = 1}^n I_{alpha_j} = emptyset$. This contradicts the assumption that any finite intersection of elements of $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty.
For example (in your case) if $mathcal{F}$ consists of nonempty nested intervals, then $mathcal{F}$ has the finite intersection property and the above proof assured that the infinite intersection is nonempty.
$endgroup$
If $X$ is a compact space, this is true. $mathcal{F} = {I_alpha}_{alpha in I}$ is an arbitrary collection of nonempty closed sets such that any intersection of finitely many sets from $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty, then $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is nonempty.
To prove this, suppose $bigcap_{alpha in I} I_alpha$ is empty. Then ${X - I_alpha}$ is an open cover of $X$. Since $X$ is compact, there exists $alpha_1, ..., alpha_n$ such that $bigcup_{j = 1}^n (X - I_{alpha_j}) = X$. Then $bigcap_{j = 1}^n I_{alpha_j} = emptyset$. This contradicts the assumption that any finite intersection of elements of $mathcal{F}$ is nonempty.
For example (in your case) if $mathcal{F}$ consists of nonempty nested intervals, then $mathcal{F}$ has the finite intersection property and the above proof assured that the infinite intersection is nonempty.
answered Sep 10 '13 at 8:10
WilliamWilliam
17.4k22256
17.4k22256
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No: take $I_n=[n,to)={xinBbb R:xge n}$. If, however, some $I_m$ is compact, then $I_n$ is compact for all $nge m$, and the intersection will be non-empty.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you use compactness to prove that?
$endgroup$
– user94055
Sep 10 '13 at 7:54
2
$begingroup$
@user94055: For $nge m$ let $U_n=Bbb Rsetminus I_n$. Show that if $bigcap_{nge m}I_n=varnothing$, then ${U_n:nge m}$ is an open cover of $I_m$ with no finite subcover. You may find this post from Dan Ma’s Topology Blog helpful.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 7:57
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: Can i ask you to help me about this two questions 1, 2, Thanks.
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:08
1
$begingroup$
@M.Sina: I did see your questions, but I’m probably going to need to refresh my memory a bit before answering. I’m about to head off to bed now, but I’ll take a look tomorrow.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 8:20
1
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: thanks. good night :).
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No: take $I_n=[n,to)={xinBbb R:xge n}$. If, however, some $I_m$ is compact, then $I_n$ is compact for all $nge m$, and the intersection will be non-empty.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you use compactness to prove that?
$endgroup$
– user94055
Sep 10 '13 at 7:54
2
$begingroup$
@user94055: For $nge m$ let $U_n=Bbb Rsetminus I_n$. Show that if $bigcap_{nge m}I_n=varnothing$, then ${U_n:nge m}$ is an open cover of $I_m$ with no finite subcover. You may find this post from Dan Ma’s Topology Blog helpful.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 7:57
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: Can i ask you to help me about this two questions 1, 2, Thanks.
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:08
1
$begingroup$
@M.Sina: I did see your questions, but I’m probably going to need to refresh my memory a bit before answering. I’m about to head off to bed now, but I’ll take a look tomorrow.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 8:20
1
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: thanks. good night :).
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No: take $I_n=[n,to)={xinBbb R:xge n}$. If, however, some $I_m$ is compact, then $I_n$ is compact for all $nge m$, and the intersection will be non-empty.
$endgroup$
No: take $I_n=[n,to)={xinBbb R:xge n}$. If, however, some $I_m$ is compact, then $I_n$ is compact for all $nge m$, and the intersection will be non-empty.
answered Sep 10 '13 at 7:52
Brian M. ScottBrian M. Scott
461k40518920
461k40518920
$begingroup$
How do you use compactness to prove that?
$endgroup$
– user94055
Sep 10 '13 at 7:54
2
$begingroup$
@user94055: For $nge m$ let $U_n=Bbb Rsetminus I_n$. Show that if $bigcap_{nge m}I_n=varnothing$, then ${U_n:nge m}$ is an open cover of $I_m$ with no finite subcover. You may find this post from Dan Ma’s Topology Blog helpful.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 7:57
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: Can i ask you to help me about this two questions 1, 2, Thanks.
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:08
1
$begingroup$
@M.Sina: I did see your questions, but I’m probably going to need to refresh my memory a bit before answering. I’m about to head off to bed now, but I’ll take a look tomorrow.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 8:20
1
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: thanks. good night :).
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How do you use compactness to prove that?
$endgroup$
– user94055
Sep 10 '13 at 7:54
2
$begingroup$
@user94055: For $nge m$ let $U_n=Bbb Rsetminus I_n$. Show that if $bigcap_{nge m}I_n=varnothing$, then ${U_n:nge m}$ is an open cover of $I_m$ with no finite subcover. You may find this post from Dan Ma’s Topology Blog helpful.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 7:57
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: Can i ask you to help me about this two questions 1, 2, Thanks.
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:08
1
$begingroup$
@M.Sina: I did see your questions, but I’m probably going to need to refresh my memory a bit before answering. I’m about to head off to bed now, but I’ll take a look tomorrow.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 8:20
1
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: thanks. good night :).
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:27
$begingroup$
How do you use compactness to prove that?
$endgroup$
– user94055
Sep 10 '13 at 7:54
$begingroup$
How do you use compactness to prove that?
$endgroup$
– user94055
Sep 10 '13 at 7:54
2
2
$begingroup$
@user94055: For $nge m$ let $U_n=Bbb Rsetminus I_n$. Show that if $bigcap_{nge m}I_n=varnothing$, then ${U_n:nge m}$ is an open cover of $I_m$ with no finite subcover. You may find this post from Dan Ma’s Topology Blog helpful.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 7:57
$begingroup$
@user94055: For $nge m$ let $U_n=Bbb Rsetminus I_n$. Show that if $bigcap_{nge m}I_n=varnothing$, then ${U_n:nge m}$ is an open cover of $I_m$ with no finite subcover. You may find this post from Dan Ma’s Topology Blog helpful.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 7:57
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: Can i ask you to help me about this two questions 1, 2, Thanks.
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:08
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: Can i ask you to help me about this two questions 1, 2, Thanks.
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:08
1
1
$begingroup$
@M.Sina: I did see your questions, but I’m probably going to need to refresh my memory a bit before answering. I’m about to head off to bed now, but I’ll take a look tomorrow.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 8:20
$begingroup$
@M.Sina: I did see your questions, but I’m probably going to need to refresh my memory a bit before answering. I’m about to head off to bed now, but I’ll take a look tomorrow.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Sep 10 '13 at 8:20
1
1
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: thanks. good night :).
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:27
$begingroup$
@BrianM.Scott: thanks. good night :).
$endgroup$
– M.Sina
Sep 10 '13 at 8:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm studying intro to analysis and I got that a nested sequence of closed and nonempty subsets of $mathbb{R}$ do not necessarily have a nonempty infinite intersection:
$textbf{Claim 1}$: The set $A_{n} = (-infty, -n]$ is closed, $nin mathbb{N}$.
$textit{proof}$: Let $x$ be a limit point for $A_{n}Rightarrow$ if we had $x>-n,$ choose $epsilon = x+nRightarrow x-epsilon=-n<displaystyle x-frac{epsilon}{2}Rightarrow
V_{epsilon/2}(x)cap A_{n}=emptyset Rightarrow $ contradiction $Rightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 2}$: $A_{n+1}subseteq A_{n}forall n$.
$textit{Proof}$: $xin A_{n+1}Rightarrow xleq-n-1<-nRightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 3}$: The sequence $A_{n}supset A_{n+1}, A_{n}=(-infty,-n] forall n$ has
empty infinite intersection.
$textit{Proof}: bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}neq emptyset Rightarrow$ choose $xin
bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}Rightarrow xleq -nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow -xgeq nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow$ contradiction ($mathbb{N}$ is not bounded above)
$textbf{Conclusion}$: By claims 1,2, and 3, we have a nested sequence of closed sets with empty infinite intersection.
$underline{Legend}$:
- $V_{epsilon}(x)=(x-epsilon,x+epsilon)$
- Infinite intersection of $A_{n}=bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm studying intro to analysis and I got that a nested sequence of closed and nonempty subsets of $mathbb{R}$ do not necessarily have a nonempty infinite intersection:
$textbf{Claim 1}$: The set $A_{n} = (-infty, -n]$ is closed, $nin mathbb{N}$.
$textit{proof}$: Let $x$ be a limit point for $A_{n}Rightarrow$ if we had $x>-n,$ choose $epsilon = x+nRightarrow x-epsilon=-n<displaystyle x-frac{epsilon}{2}Rightarrow
V_{epsilon/2}(x)cap A_{n}=emptyset Rightarrow $ contradiction $Rightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 2}$: $A_{n+1}subseteq A_{n}forall n$.
$textit{Proof}$: $xin A_{n+1}Rightarrow xleq-n-1<-nRightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 3}$: The sequence $A_{n}supset A_{n+1}, A_{n}=(-infty,-n] forall n$ has
empty infinite intersection.
$textit{Proof}: bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}neq emptyset Rightarrow$ choose $xin
bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}Rightarrow xleq -nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow -xgeq nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow$ contradiction ($mathbb{N}$ is not bounded above)
$textbf{Conclusion}$: By claims 1,2, and 3, we have a nested sequence of closed sets with empty infinite intersection.
$underline{Legend}$:
- $V_{epsilon}(x)=(x-epsilon,x+epsilon)$
- Infinite intersection of $A_{n}=bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm studying intro to analysis and I got that a nested sequence of closed and nonempty subsets of $mathbb{R}$ do not necessarily have a nonempty infinite intersection:
$textbf{Claim 1}$: The set $A_{n} = (-infty, -n]$ is closed, $nin mathbb{N}$.
$textit{proof}$: Let $x$ be a limit point for $A_{n}Rightarrow$ if we had $x>-n,$ choose $epsilon = x+nRightarrow x-epsilon=-n<displaystyle x-frac{epsilon}{2}Rightarrow
V_{epsilon/2}(x)cap A_{n}=emptyset Rightarrow $ contradiction $Rightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 2}$: $A_{n+1}subseteq A_{n}forall n$.
$textit{Proof}$: $xin A_{n+1}Rightarrow xleq-n-1<-nRightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 3}$: The sequence $A_{n}supset A_{n+1}, A_{n}=(-infty,-n] forall n$ has
empty infinite intersection.
$textit{Proof}: bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}neq emptyset Rightarrow$ choose $xin
bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}Rightarrow xleq -nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow -xgeq nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow$ contradiction ($mathbb{N}$ is not bounded above)
$textbf{Conclusion}$: By claims 1,2, and 3, we have a nested sequence of closed sets with empty infinite intersection.
$underline{Legend}$:
- $V_{epsilon}(x)=(x-epsilon,x+epsilon)$
- Infinite intersection of $A_{n}=bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}$
$endgroup$
I'm studying intro to analysis and I got that a nested sequence of closed and nonempty subsets of $mathbb{R}$ do not necessarily have a nonempty infinite intersection:
$textbf{Claim 1}$: The set $A_{n} = (-infty, -n]$ is closed, $nin mathbb{N}$.
$textit{proof}$: Let $x$ be a limit point for $A_{n}Rightarrow$ if we had $x>-n,$ choose $epsilon = x+nRightarrow x-epsilon=-n<displaystyle x-frac{epsilon}{2}Rightarrow
V_{epsilon/2}(x)cap A_{n}=emptyset Rightarrow $ contradiction $Rightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 2}$: $A_{n+1}subseteq A_{n}forall n$.
$textit{Proof}$: $xin A_{n+1}Rightarrow xleq-n-1<-nRightarrow xin A_{n}$.
$textbf{Claim 3}$: The sequence $A_{n}supset A_{n+1}, A_{n}=(-infty,-n] forall n$ has
empty infinite intersection.
$textit{Proof}: bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}neq emptyset Rightarrow$ choose $xin
bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}Rightarrow xleq -nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow -xgeq nhspace{.5pc}forall nRightarrow$ contradiction ($mathbb{N}$ is not bounded above)
$textbf{Conclusion}$: By claims 1,2, and 3, we have a nested sequence of closed sets with empty infinite intersection.
$underline{Legend}$:
- $V_{epsilon}(x)=(x-epsilon,x+epsilon)$
- Infinite intersection of $A_{n}=bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}A_{n}$
answered Oct 25 '18 at 19:15
JayJay
296
296
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489242%2fnested-sequence-of-closed-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Closed sets where? In what topological space?
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila♦
Sep 10 '13 at 7:55
3
$begingroup$
I added 'non-empty' to the question, because otherwise there is the trivial counter-example where $I_n =emptyset$ for large enough $n$.
$endgroup$
– Rhys
Sep 10 '13 at 7:56